iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

General McChrystal's Rolling Stone Interview Showed 'Poor Judgment,' Obama Says

Mcchrystal Rolling Stone Gates

ANNE GEARAN and JENNIFER LOVEN   06/22/10 11:24 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama rebuked his Afghanistan war commander for "poor judgment" Tuesday and considered whether to fire him in the most extraordinary airing of military-civilian tensions since Harry Truman stripped Gen. Douglas MacArthur of his command a half-century ago.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal is prepared to submit his resignation at a meeting with Obama on Wednesday at the White House, two military officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

Obama summoned McChrystal to explain disparaging comments about his commander in chief and Obama's top aides. The meeting was a last-ditch moment for the general once considered the war's brightest hope.

If not insubordination, the remarks in a forthcoming Rolling Stone magazine article were at least an indirect challenge to civilian management of the war in Washington by its top military commander.

"I think it's clear that the article in which he and his team appeared showed a poor – showed poor judgment," the president said, surrounded by members of his Cabinet at the close of their meeting. "But I also want to make sure that I talk to him directly before I make any final decisions."

The eruption comes as the war and public support for it are at a tipping point, a perilous time to change military leadership. A majority of Americans now say the war is probably not worth fighting, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said that public dissatisfaction means the U.S.-led international coalition must show progress this year.

In the article, McChrystal did not criticize Obama directly but called the period last fall when Obama was deciding whether to approve more troops "painful" and said the president was handing him an "unsellable" position.

McChrystal also said he was "betrayed" by Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, the man the White House chose to be his diplomatic partner in Afghanistan. He accused Eikenberry of raising doubts about the reliability of Afghan President Hamid Karzai only to give himself cover in case the U.S. effort failed.

"Here's one that covers his flank for the history books," McChrystal told the magazine. "Now, if we fail, they can say 'I told you so.'"

And he was quoted joking that he doesn't recognize Vice President Joe Biden's name.

As support for the general drained in Washington, the showdown was set to take place in two parts – as part of Obama's regular monthly war meeting, in which McChrystal usually participates by videoconference, and a separate discussion with Obama in the Oval Office.

Several names circulated among Pentagon and Capitol Hill aides as potential successors. Military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity ahead of the White House meeting, said the administration has not reached out to possible successors, but might do so on Wednesday.

"We all serve at the pleasure of the president," said Gen. James Mattis, one of those mentioned. "I have a pretty full plate here," in his current job as Joint Forces Command chief, Mattis told AP.

Other names include Lt. Gen. John Allen, the No. 2 at U.S. Central Command; Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez, McChrystal's No. 2 in Afghanistan; Gen. Martin Dempsey, commander of the Army Training and Doctrine Command; and Adm. James Stavridis, the top NATO commander in Europe.

A senior U.S. military official in Afghanistan told The Associated Press the general has been given no indication that he'll be fired – but no assurance he won't be. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal discussions between Washington and the general's office in Kabul.

A crucial military push to pacify the Taliban heartland in southern Afghanistan is going more slowly that McChrystal had planned, and showing fewer solid results. Marines in Helmand Province are in near-daily firefights, months after a push there was supposed to clear out the bulk of Taliban fighters.

McChrystal has spent the past several weeks arguing that the U.S.-led military effort is gaining momentum against the Taliban, while Gates argued for time to show that McChrystal's many changes in strategy and tactics can succeed.

Wisconsin Democrat Rep. David Obey, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, called for McChrystal to resign. Sen. John McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee that approved McChrystal for the job, was among three prominent Republican senators to criticize the general and say a decision about his future should rest with Obama.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said: "I couldn't believe Gen. McChrystal, being the good soldier I think he is, at least in this article not being a very good soldier."

McChrystal publicly apologized Tuesday for using "poor judgment" in the magazine interviews, words echoed later by Obama. He then left Afghanistan for the meeting in Washington.

There has been no similar public contretemps between a president and a top wartime commander since Truman relieved MacArthur of his Far East command in 1951. MacArthur bid farewell in an address to Congress in which he quoted a line from a ballad: "Old soldiers never die; they just fade away."

MacArthur had openly flouted the Truman administration's policy of limited war during the Korean conflict, arguing that the "police action" against North Korea's invasion of South Korea should not be contained to the Korean peninsula but expanded to China and Asian communism in general. Braced for the political fallout to follow, the unpopular Truman fired his popular general rather than allow MacArthur to resign.

McChrystal will also meet separately with Gates, who issued a stern scolding to McChrystal on Tuesday that contains no endorsement for him to remain in his job. Gates hand-picked McChrystal to take over the war last year, calling him a driven visionary with the guts and smarts to turn the war around. Obama fired the previous commander at Gates' recommendation.

Military leaders rarely challenge their commander in chief publicly and when they do, consequences tend to be more severe than a scolding.

McChrystal has a history of drawing criticism, despite his military achievements.

Obama called him on the carpet last fall for speaking too bluntly about his desire for more troops.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Pace, Pauline Jelinek, Kimberly Dozier, Laurie Kellman, Matthew Lee and Anne Flaherty contributed to this story from Washington. Deb Riechmann contributed from Kabul.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama rebuked his Afghanistan war commander for "poor judgment" Tuesday and considered whether to fire him in the most extraordinary airing of military-civilian ten...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama rebuked his Afghanistan war commander for "poor judgment" Tuesday and considered whether to fire him in the most extraordinary airing of military-civilian ten...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,157
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (117 total)
photo
panamarine
My opinion is only an opinion
03:37 PM on 06/24/2010
Re: McChrystal's role in the trash talk and the "Hook" taking him outta the game: That is why this type of verbal disrespect among military personnel toward the leaders in the upper chain of command or Superior officers cannot be tolerated. It leads to a breakdown in discipline and the command and control. Imagine if a Liutenant decided to tell his platoon to: "Don't give a F what our Company commander has to say, he's a jerk, we will not follow his stupid orders, etc., etc." Then what kind of Military would we have? That's why The General should have known better, he had to go. One bad apple CAN spoil the whole barrel. Right? Insurrection in the military should only happen in third world countries---Not here in the U.S.A. Just my thought.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lilipilicious
06:25 PM on 06/23/2010
Why should he be fired? I dont get it. For not liking Obama? For expressing his opinion? I mean who ISNT unhappy with the current administration - for whatever reason - be it their cowardice, be it Obama's cowardice and inability to stand up for oil spill victims and pull through serious sanctions and indictments against BP excs and his sickly compromise of a health care reform - you name it. People are unhappy with it and no one should be sanctioned from saying so. I dont like the DoD and whatever it stands for - but somehow, I still cannot grasp why this man is being asked to resign for essentially - not liking Obama. This is just bizarre.
11:13 PM on 06/23/2010
If that's the case. Should El Rushbo be worried? Nah.
01:22 PM on 06/23/2010
Obama wants to run the war by a committee and McChristal got tired of it and let off steam.
11:40 AM on 06/23/2010
We were in South East Asia and 90% of the worlds Heroin production came from there during that time. Now were in Afghanistan and 90% of the worlds heroin production comes from where we are fighting. The Afgan President’s brother is “THE” cartel master mind for the world heroin supply, and the enemy uses “ALL” the money to buy weapons.
We just watched in astonishment as the “ENTIRE” Country harvested a crop that destroys lives around the world and funds the killing of our own military and you think this small fact went unnoticed by Gen. Stanley McChrystal? We had the planes, the resources, the chemicals and the power to reduce that opium crop in Afghanistan to mush, and kill a bunch of farmers who have a choice to participate in this crap or not. No heroin in the world for a “YEAR” or a severe shortage in the very least. No money for the “enemy” or a severe shortage.
It’s all hypocrisy folks and its all “rotten,” and I’m sure Gen. Stanley McChrystal has had enough of it and wants no more blood on his hands in support of it. The current Administration who swore they were so different then the last is not. Protected by a Government media, who couldn’t show 1/10th of the blood and death on National TV without creating a national revolt against both these Wars, insults the intelligence of a retarded idiot and that is unfair to them. They are smarter than that.
photo
christopherflynn
The wreligious wright is always rong...
01:15 PM on 06/23/2010
US...buy the opium from the poor farmer...use it for medicine for those in "chronic pain", like cancer folk, etc. Your "war on drugs" is not feasible...nor is it wise... jafo2me...You've been watching too many movies,...
08:32 AM on 06/23/2010
In looking for people to chide and mock and BLAME, McChrystal shows that even he believes this war can't be "won." Time to bring the troops home, Mr. President.
04:17 AM on 06/23/2010
There is something more to this McChrystal story. No one believes that McChrystal could be so ignorant as to let this interview get so far out of hand to the point of threatening his career. The old story; follow the money. Last week the military announced the discovery of a trillion dollar mineral find. I wonder if that is somehow connected to the bizzare behavior of General McChrystal.
01:23 PM on 06/23/2010
Obama wants to run the war by a committee and McChristal got tired of it and let off steam.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:21 AM on 06/23/2010
Mr. McChrystal, before you walk away free... which in itself is a shameful thing... I would like you to go on national television and explain to America what REALLY happened to Pat Tillman. America deserves it, after the way in which you patently l1ed about it and stirred up America in favor of the war through your very propeganda. Most of all, Mr. Tillman's family would like to know what REALLY happened.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
02:12 AM on 06/23/2010
Minister of Propaganda Robert Gibbs has his shorts in a knot because Gen. McChrystal and his staff used some frank language and a few words that are familiar to any elementary school student to describe the administrations ineptness in international relations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sofrito
04:38 AM on 06/23/2010
Article 88, USMJ: "Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct."

Which part of this are you having trouble understanding?
11:04 PM on 06/23/2010
I'm really not trying to change the subject, yet. Are you in accord with the Federal Government suing one of it's own states for implementing a law that the Federal Government itself refuses to enforce?
photo
panamarine
My opinion is only an opinion
05:42 PM on 06/24/2010
sofrito: That's the article (Article 88) that should be shown to all the McChrystal supporters. They dismiss the badmouthing by a General as just harmless rant, but fail to see the implications. That is the reason for Article 88. The Yahoos don't get it. Military discipline is requisite in order to maintain command and control---and if a General doesn't know that or practice this, then he should find work someplace else. But then again, where? If I or you or anybody bad mouths their boss--gets FIRED, now write ups or warnings...you are shown the door the next day. You think Hannity can bad mouth Roger Ailes? He. l. l NO. I wish he would so they can fire HIS A$$. But he knows better. LOL.
12:42 AM on 06/23/2010
Until the First Afghan War the Sirkar (the Indian colloquial name for the East India Company) had an overwhelming reputation for efficiency and good luck. The British were considered to be unconquerable and omnipotent. The Afghan War severely undermined this view. The retreat from Kabul in January 1842 and the annihilation of Elphinstone’s Kabul garrison dealt a mortal blow to British prestige in the East only rivaled by the fall of Singapore 100 years later.

The causes of the disaster are easily stated: the difficulties of campaigning in Afghanistan’s inhospitable mountainous terrain with its extremes of weather, the turbulent politics of the country and its armed and refractory population and finally the failure of the British authorities to appoint senior officers capable of conducting the campaign competently and decisively. source British Battles.com...............(thanks to the lady who led me to this site)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phillip finley
stay strong!....Dems!
12:38 AM on 06/23/2010
Alright HP now what wrong with the site!.................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phillip finley
stay strong!....Dems!
12:34 AM on 06/23/2010
Beg for troops then Quit!...........you a fail General!...........
03:58 AM on 06/23/2010
Shades of Sarah Palin. If it is too difficult just quit.
11:59 PM on 06/22/2010
I read the Rolling Stone article. I couldn't find anything attributable to the General that disparaged Obama. I smell a witch hunt. Does Obama want the General's whole staff and everyone in the Army who is disappointed with Obama to resign?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
greeneyes51654m
Retired, finally...
01:24 AM on 06/23/2010
You would be correct.
11:48 PM on 06/22/2010
Time to clean house of any and all left over elephant dung appointees.
11:10 PM on 06/23/2010
Who appointed McChrystal again? And who appointed Petraeus?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hoodoo X
tanstaafl
09:33 PM on 06/22/2010
The funny thing is, our president chose this guy to run Afghanistan. Of course, our community organizer in chief (no military service) can fire him, or the 5 deferment Vice President, that "discovered" teenage asthma when his school deferment ran out, can fire him.
Fire the guy. These inept, hopelessly out of their league dimwits in the White House can do as they please. They follow on the previous dimwit. Can't we find some politicians that actually aren't half-wits?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
H321
10:29 PM on 06/22/2010
How about some perspective. The last President to serve was George H.W. Bush and he flubbed the Gulf War. War is hard, and having military experience means squat when you have an endless supply of four-star generals who don't know what they are doing.
marilyn 63
LEVEL ONE NETWORKER
10:57 PM on 06/22/2010
AND W WENT AWOL!! SO AND THEY LOVE TO ROPE OBAMA INTO THEIR GUYS CRAP BUT NO ONE IS THIS BAD!!!
11:13 PM on 06/22/2010
Appears not.
09:22 PM on 06/22/2010
If ya'll want to know the real truth behind all of this, read Jon Alter, the radical left wing d00sh bag of news week who wrote obama's biography. It is all in there how this pres and admin has been criticizing and poking a stick at Stan, Mullen and others. If you are as smart as me, which I doubt, connect the dots and that explains why we are where we are today. Stan was not insubordinate at all. Your reading liberal lies/propaganda as usual. You watch, in due time I will be proven right. Until then, read halter " the hack's " book and you will see. This was all planned by the 1960's radical leftist obama and crooks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carhac66
01:20 AM on 06/23/2010
so obama planned this before he was 5 years old. LOL
04:04 AM on 06/23/2010
I guess you would rather see the military running the government, right?