iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

McChrystal Relieved Of Command, Petraeus Tapped To Lead Afghan War

Mcchrystal Rolling Stone

First Posted: 06/23/10 09:25 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:50 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A senior administration official tells The Associated Press that President Barack Obama has accepted Gen. Stanley McChrystal's resignation as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan and is replacing him with Gen. David Petraeus, head of U.S. Central Command.

McChrystal was pushed out over his blistering remarks about administration officials quoted in a magazine interview.

After an Oval Office meeting with McChrystal in the morning, Obama huddled with his war advisers and planned to announce his decision on the general's fate to the nation at 1:30 p.m. EDT in the Rose Garden.

The official spoke only on condition of anonymity, because the president's announcement was not yet public. Petraeus now oversees the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

WASHINGTON (AP) - A source tells The Associated Press that President Barack Obama will name Gen. David Petraeus to succeed Gen. Stanley McChrystal as top war commander in Afghanistan.

* * * *

WASHINGTON -- His job in grave jeopardy, Afghanistan war commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal made his case to President Barack Obama on Wednesday, contrite over his blistering remarks about administration officials.

Obama huddled with his war advisers before telling the nation of the embattled general's fate. He planned a 1:30 p.m. EDT statement in the Rose Garden about the controversy.

With Washington abuzz, there was an almost complete White House lockdown on information about the day's developments and the president's thinking. It wasn't even known where McChrystal went after leaving the West Wing from his nearly half-hour showdown with Obama.

Summoned to Washington to explain himself, McChrystal had arrived from Kabul in the early morning and met first at the Pentagon with Defense Secretary Robert Gates. After his next face-to-face, with Obama, the general was not seen returning to the White House for a bigger, hourlong Afghanistan strategy session, as he has been expected.

Before the White House meeting, two military officials said McChrystal went in prepared to submit his resignation. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

"I think it's clear that the article in which he and his team appeared ... showed poor judgment," Obama said Tuesday at the close of an unrelated Cabinet meeting. "But I also want to make sure that I talk to him directly before I make any final decisions."

Obama summoned McChrystal to Washington from Afghanistan after learning of scathing, mocking comments from the general and his inner circle about administration officials, including the president. The White House rebuke of McChrystal on Tuesday suggested that it would be hard for him to give an explanation that would be enough to save his job.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai expressed his confidence in McChrystal during a video conference Tuesday night with Obama, Karzai spokesman Waheed Omar said Wednesday in Kabul. "We hope there is not a change of leadership of the international forces here in Afghanistan," Omar told reporters.

In the article in Rolling Stone magazine, McChrystal didn't criticize Obama himself but called the period last fall when the president was deciding whether to approve more troops "painful" and said Obama appeared ready to hand him an "unsellable" position.

McChrystal also said he was "betrayed" by Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, the man the White House chose to be his diplomatic partner in Afghanistan. He accused Eikenberry of raising doubts about Karzai only to give himself cover in case the U.S. effort failed. "Now, if we fail, they can say 'I told you so,'" McChrystal told the magazine. And he was quoted mocking Vice President Joe Biden.

If not insubordination, the remarks – as well as even sharper commentary about Obama and his White House from several in McChrystal's inner circle – were at least an indirect and extraordinary challenge. The capital hasn't seen a similar public contretemps between a president and a top wartime commander since Harry Truman stripped Gen. Douglas MacArthur of his command more than a half-century ago after disagreements over Korean War strategy.

Notably, neither McChrystal nor his team questioned the accuracy of the story or the quotes in it. McChrystal issued an apology.

Military leaders rarely challenge their commanders in chief publicly. When they do, consequences tend to be more severe than a scolding.

Indeed, the presidential spokesman's prepared reaction to the article was remarkably revealing, even for the normally coded language of Washington. Press secretary Robert Gibbs repeatedly declined to say McChrystal's job was safe, and questioned whether McChrystal is "capable and mature enough" to lead the war.

Gates, one of McChrystal's biggest backers, said in a statement that McChrystal had made "a significant mistake."

A senior U.S. military official in Afghanistan told The Associated Press that McChrystal – who had not spoken with Obama on the matter before Wednesday – has been given no indication that he'll be fired but no assurance he won't be. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal discussions between Washington and the general's office in Kabul.

Obama raised the issue of McChrystal's future in a phone call with British Prime Minister David Cameron on Tuesday night, Cameron's office said Wednesday without disclosing what was said. Britain has about 10,000 troops in Afghanistan, the largest international force after the United States.

McChrystal was viewed as a visionary with the guts and smarts to turn around the beleaguered, 8-year-old Afghanistan war when he was chosen to take over last year.

But despite his military achievements, he has a history of making waves. This is not his first brush with Obama's anger. Last fall, the president scolded McChrystal for speaking too bluntly about his desire for more troops.

Wisconsin Democratic Rep. David Obey, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, called for McChrystal to resign. Sen. John McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, was among three prominent Republican senators to criticize the general and say a decision about his future should rest with Obama.

Several names circulated among Pentagon and Capitol Hill aides as potential successors, including Gen. James Mattis, Joint Forces Command chief; Lt. Gen. John Allen, the No. 2 at U.S. Central Command; Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez, McChrystal's No. 2 in Afghanistan; Gen. Martin Dempsey, commander of the Army Training and Doctrine Command; and Adm. James Stavridis, the top NATO commander in Europe.

Military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity ahead of the White House meeting, said the administration had not reached out to possible successors but might do so Wednesday.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Pace, Pauline Jelinek, Kimberly Dozier, Laurie Kellman, Matthew Lee and Anne Flaherty in Washington and Deb Riechmann in Kabul, Afghanistan, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A senior administration official tells The Associated Press that President Barack Obama has accepted Gen. Stanley McChrystal's resignation as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan a...
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A senior administration official tells The Associated Press that President Barack Obama has accepted Gen. Stanley McChrystal's resignation as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan a...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,921
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (126 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Graves
03:14 PM on 06/24/2010
The pres should have appointed the great war hero Mark Kirk to finish the fight in Afghanistan.....oh wait.....NVM
12:29 PM on 06/24/2010
Did anyone consider that the General may be sacrificing himself in order to shine a light on the Afghan situation. Kind of farfetched, but...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim Graves
03:10 PM on 06/24/2010
or sacrificed himself cause he couldn't make it happen? No wonder becasue those who can't follow can't lead.....first thing they teach you in Military Leadership Training.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
11:59 AM on 06/24/2010
Gotta get to work around here. I am addicted to HP.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
09:53 AM on 06/24/2010
PEOPLE, whether friendly or unfriendly to this present administration, REMEMBER WHO began this war then left it to begin another war. Now we're dealing with leftovers from Cheney's lust for war for oil in Iraq to get us through Cheney's unfinished war in Afghanistan. I think the biggest mistake made at the beginning of President Obama's Presidency was having too much trust in Cheney's leftovers. These wars ARE political and I believe these people who were kept on from Cheney & Bush are unable to be loyal and respectful no matter what the circumstances. I haven't forgotten how the Democratic party wanted to end the war while Republicans, very much so McCain, wanted to keep it going practically forever. President Obama needs to listen to us and STOP trusting the Rethugs who want to continue drawing their pay for "NO" and doing nothing more than negative talk about EVERYTHING being done now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:24 AM on 06/24/2010
To think how much blood and treasure we've wasted on this war based on lies.

Our brave young troops are being sacrificed to fight a major drug cartel and tribal
war lords who are sitting on top of TRILLIONS in natural resources.

Their mission is to subdue the local tribes enough to secure safe passage and a critical
trade route and then to exploit the wealth of the region.

Everything else you hear as the "official story" is just propaganda.

If it costs us another few thousand troops and many more billions, they do not care
because they are considered acceptable losses in the quest for Afghanistan's
mother load of resources.

Wake up and smell the stash.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
12:23 AM on 06/24/2010
Patton got the AXE as Germany's Military Governor for being quoted saying "being a NAZI was just like being a Democrat or Republican in the United States when he was asked why he was leaving a lot of people in their jobs after we won WW2 in Germany". Here was a man who was being pragmatic in leaving people who would not need training in jobs they already had. And he was being truthful as NAZI's were running things prior to their surrender, however President Truman was OFFENDED by Patton's candor.

Gen Stanley McChrystal was caught doing the exact same thing. After being stuck in an unwinable position for such a long time he was caught griping about it. Obama, being a prick, got offended by a subordinate expressing what was on their mind.

General David Petraeus, McChrystal's former boss is now in charge of Both of these stupid wars and I predict he will find that Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai to be almost as large of a jerk/butt head as Obama is. He will find his job just got ten times worse as Afghan's can't get along with each other, let alone outsiders and especially non-Muslim people they consider to be infidels.

I voted for Obama and I just wish he would do what he said he was going to do before he got elected and did the exact opposite. I can't stand his bungling in the Gulf of Mexico and his piss-poor war performance.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
11:00 PM on 06/23/2010
I notice that the general's salute looks more like an Air Force salute than an Army salute.
07:58 PM on 06/23/2010
Whats the surprise, McChrystal wanted out, he was tired of fighting a war that can't be won.
He knew what he was doing, the RS article was a deliberate attempt by the General to leave the Afghanistan as opposed to being credited with the loss of the war there. He knows he could win that war, but not under the plan established by our politicians. Most intelligent people knew from the start that we would never win in Afghanistan, and Iraq as well. We were spending huge amounts of capital and manpower to support a very corrupt government. Until the people of each country fight for freedom themselves, and pay with their own blood and money, nothing will change there.
Afghanistan is a narco state where the present government is concerned with establishing dynasties through war dollars. When the time comes Karzai and his brother and most of the government will retire to Virginia, establish businesses with the hundreds of millions of dollars they stashed away, and let true patriots fight for the soul of Afghanistan.
Don't be surprised when you drive up to a chain of gas stations owned by the Karzai brothers.
07:31 PM on 06/23/2010
Sargeant McNugget did such a good job at covering up the Tillman killing and detainee abuse he should have received the Nobel War Price.
Sargeant McNugget is a great conservatwit republiKlan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
10:51 PM on 06/23/2010
I would agree. I think he has been listening too long to the the likes of Rush, Palin, Hannity. He forgot that he had sworn to uphold article 88.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
11:03 PM on 06/23/2010
Please don't sink to the general's level by not showing the man any respect. He did do most of his job in an acceptable manner, only screwed up a few times.
07:14 PM on 06/23/2010
Thread flying by. No time to jump in. Check comment history for some of my best except what the censormodnits deleted for no good reason.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItzGid
06:51 PM on 06/23/2010
"...there was an almost complete White House lockdown on information about the day's developments and the president's thinking." This seems to sum up Shrub's 3rd term policies; the question is not whether McChrystal should be in Afghanistan, but whether we should. More educated minds than mine seem to agree that we should not; and the fact that Karzai was hoping McChrystal would remain disturbed me still further.

Regardles of the changing of the guard, we should not expect this war to end any time soon, because it and the US Military as a whole are corporate money makers (we just paid Xe/Blackwater/Halliburton/Cheney another $100M despite their criminal record). If the US government were interested in acting responsibly to its people, it would not have begun this war, let alone drag it out this long. It would not have wasted a chance for a Public Health Care Option, and Wall Street reform would be an established fact. It would not have fostered a petrocataclysm, and accountability would be more than a buzzword.
07:06 PM on 06/23/2010
1,000% Agreed!
01:42 AM on 06/24/2010
I agree, but I blame our pay-per media for everything. At a time when we should be considering closing half the military bases we have all over the world they are romanticizing this so-called war in Afghanistan.
We can't afford this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
babybuda
Tolling for the outcast....
06:46 PM on 06/23/2010
He will be working for blackwater tomorrow !
09:03 PM on 06/23/2010
I would bet against that.
01:44 AM on 06/24/2010
Bajed,

I'm interested in your take regarding this switch in command. I was very sad to see McChrystal go, but the choice of Petraeus has given me a reason for optimism. For full disclosure, I am a full-fledged Petraeus fan and have had the opportunity to meet him on a couple of occasions (the initial encounter is worthy of a Rolling Stone article!).

Thanks.

xoxo
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KO4Pres
I have never faked a sarcasm...
01:01 AM on 06/24/2010
Perhaps Fox....
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
criticallydampedroots
06:19 PM on 06/23/2010
"General Betray us" the liar is now the Obama number one man in Afghanistan???? I love to point this out ALL the Democrats flat out declared he is a liar and was lying in his senate testimony. Now he's the man. ROFL.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrJM
https://twitter.com/misterjayem
05:53 PM on 06/23/2010
RT @kirk4senate: Today the president named Mark Kirk as the top US commander in Afghanistan

-- MrJM
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini2
05:52 PM on 06/23/2010
The General had seen enough of war and casualties. He wanted out. Others weren't so lucky.
01:34 AM on 06/24/2010
That's true but others will still be there.