iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

McChrystal Survived Tillman Cover-Up And Detainee Abuse, But Not Rolling Stone's Profile

First Posted: 06/23/10 04:25 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:50 PM ET

Mcchrystal

Stanley McChrystal, the general and chief architect of the counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan, was relieved of his command on Wednesday, following a series of disparaging quotes that he and his aides made about the president and civilian leadership.

It was a remarkable conclusion to a frantic two-day period of frenzied coverage, climaxing with a Rose Garden appearance in which the president explained his rationale. In the end, it will remain a confounding episode for both historians and politicos alike. It was not McChrystal's connections to a scarring episode of detainee abuse and the cover-up of a revered soldier's death or his disparagement of the vice president's proposal for Afghanistan that did the general in. It was a series of interviews with Rolling Stone magazine, of all things.

"The conduct represented in the recently published article," said President Obama, "does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general."

Indeed, as Obama spoke in front of a throng of reporters at the Rose Garden, it seemed nearly surreal to imagine that a freelance reporter -- fortuitously embedded with McChrystal during an alcohol-filled bus trip from Paris to Berlin (the flight had been canceled due to volcanic activity in Iceland) -- had put the wheels in motion. McChrystal, after all, had made gaffes before, including publicly mocking Joe Biden's preference for a limited troop presence in Afghanistan ("Chaos-stan" he chided). More than that, he had been either intimately connected or directly tied to two very controversial episodes in recent military history. And no one seemed to notice.

McChrystal was the head of Special Operations command in Afghanistan when Army Ranger and former football star Pat Tillman was killed by friendly fire. He approved the paperwork awarding Tillman a Silver Star for dying in the line "of enemy fire" -- and he was "accountable for the inaccurate and misleading assertions" contained therein, according to an investigation -- despite knowing (or at least suspecting) that Tillman had died in an episode of fratricide. That episode barely registered with the public or, for that matter, Congress, when McChrystal went before the Senate Armed Services Committee waiting to take over control in Afghanistan. The one person who questioned whether more answers were needed was journalist Jon Krakauer who had just penned a book on Tillman's death and thought the general's explanations were "preposterous" and "unbelievable."

The second episode was even less well-known. Years after the Tillman death, McChrystal was mentioned several times in a report by Human Rights Watch which documented the abuse and torture of detained prisoners at Camp Nama in Iraq. A soldier, quoted anonymously in the findings, recalled seeing McChrystal at the facility "a couple of times." It was also reported that the general himself said there was no way that the Red Cross would ever be allowed through the door at Nama -- where treatment of detainees was so bad, it earned the nickname Nasty Ass Military Area.

"It is not easy to say what his role was accurately because the entire program of detention and interrogation going on there remains highly classified," said John Siston, an author of the Human Rights Watch report. "But HRW was able to learn enough to say that he was in the chain of command that oversaw the operations of that special task force and the interrogation unit that took care of the detainees that that special task force detained."

Nama, like Tillman, never played a role in McChrystal's quick ascendancy through the military ranks. Indeed, one of the most ignored nuggets in the Rolling Stone piece involved the general and his staff prepping for tough questioning on both of these topics, only to discover that Congress didn't care.

In May 2009, as McChrystal prepared for his confirmation hearings, his staff prepared him for hard questions about Camp Nama and the Tillman cover-up. But the scandals barely made a ripple in Congress, and McChrystal was soon on his way back to Kabul to run the war in Afghanistan.

Congress it seemed was more invested in moving forward than looking back. And so it was that McChrystal became embroiled in a career-threatening controversy only after the Rolling Stone piece raised questions as to whether his shaky relationship with civilian leadership would compromise the Afghan mission.

It wasn't an unworthy basis for the general's dismissal though it may have fallen a bit short of the official definition of insubordination (but not by much). But it was telling for some that after dodging several other bullets, it was an article in a music magazine (and not even a cover article at that) that did the trick.

"Given that there are a lot of unanswered questions about McChrystal's role in detainee abuse in Iraq," Stacy Sullivan, a spokesperson for Human Rights Watch said hours before his resignation, "it would be ironic if a few careless comments to Rolling Stone magazine were to bring about his undoing."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Stanley McChrystal, the general and chief architect of the counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan, was relieved of his command on Wednesday, following a series of disparaging quotes that he and h...
Stanley McChrystal, the general and chief architect of the counterinsurgency operations in Afghanistan, was relieved of his command on Wednesday, following a series of disparaging quotes that he and h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 387
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
panamarine
My opinion is only an opinion
01:50 PM on 06/25/2010
So the General and his little cadre where upset at the administration's policy of conducting the war in Afghanistan, eh? Dissing the President and cabinet members along the way. What's next a coup-de' etat? A dissatisfied general has no place conducting Government war policy. He should try his professional best to make lemonade with a lemon, plan and demonstrate that inspite of the orders and the way the government's plans are formulated---go do the job, make them and us happy at the unintended outcome as it were. Don't bitch and gripe like some disgruntled corporal. Come on... The General apparently wanted to go rogue. Apparently he ignored the: Article 88, USMJ: "Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct." So there it is. He should have known better.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:16 PM on 06/24/2010
And down goes another Bushie.

heh
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:14 PM on 06/24/2010
Here's an interesting piece regarding the interviews that appeared in the Rolling Stone.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/24/michael-hastings-general-mcchrystal-article

Unexpected.

Damn that Bud Light Lime.
12:07 PM on 06/24/2010
The plan of action/mission becomes irrelevant if those charged with executing it can't get along. Sounds like McChrystal's & staff didn't like anybody. Negativity at the top tends to spread through the ranks. No wonder things were going badly. Bad attitude = bad execution = mission failure.
11:42 AM on 06/24/2010
Why does this country continue to start wars all over the world? Why is this country still in Iraq and the rest of the countries they inivaded? Why is a gullible patriotic public still accepting a war 'on terrorism' when the terrorist is a country that invades another country? How do you define winning a war with tanks, planes, etc., against a country that does not posses these same weapons and call it 'a war' without all sides being equal? What is a hero? Someone who kills for no reason other than the love for killilng? Why is this country still fighting wars and losing it's young people who believe they are 'fighting for their country' when there is no threat to their country? This country has coined a new phase 'terrorism' which it uses to justify just about anything it does to justify killing innocent people to include women and children. For love of money and for love of killing? For love of taking over another country goverrnment and calling it 'justilfiable intrusion.' Coward is the word that should be used instead of hero. When a country has to fight with anything it can get its hands on because if posses no tanks, planes, drones, satelites, etc they are deemed cowards. So, what do you call a country that posses these weapons: bullies. The public needs to wake up and realize they are being had by the greedy who suck the life out of the needy.
08:34 AM on 06/24/2010
I guess he will be canceling his subscription to Rolling Stone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly8
♥ > $
09:53 AM on 06/24/2010
And who knew that the "Fog of War" was really the effect of beer goggles, nightclub smoke machines and disco balls????
10:07 AM on 06/24/2010
Smoke on the Water.........Fire in the Sky.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:09 AM on 06/24/2010
I can't believe that I forgot he was behind the Tillman cover-up! Never liked this guy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly8
♥ > $
07:57 AM on 06/24/2010
Whelp, you know that Mainstream "lib-rul" media - always burying stories that would do harm to Republicans (wait). Plus we had so many other diversions: Teabaggers, DarthCheney, HockeyMOM and Joe the unlicensed Plummer....
06:58 AM on 06/24/2010
Let's see if I remember this. Pull back slide, insert loaded magazine, release slide allowing a round to be chambered, take aim at foot and fire. Is that the drill for shooting yourself in the foot? Should he really have survived this long without serious career damage? Four stars? Please.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brautigan
06:49 AM on 06/24/2010
Oh come on. Practically spitting on the grave of an American soldier who sacrificed his own personal future to fight under your command for altruistic reasons is one thing, but did you really think you would get away with disrespecting our President? Sir, you hath follied!
05:15 AM on 06/24/2010
I have had the experience of working for a retired General. I came away with the feeling he used military style dishonest tactics when dealing with employees at this civilian company. They were harsh and far from honest, totalitarian and oppressive. I could see that this was the way he was used to dealing with things. I think the entire military is rotten to the core. They feel above the law the rest of us must follow. Take for example the reports made with wounded men, the military trying to blame pre-existing conditions, to cheat them out of benefits. Young men go in there and come out psychopaths. The entire system needs to be reviewed and reformed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly8
♥ > $
09:55 AM on 06/24/2010
Exactly - fav & fan
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:20 AM on 06/24/2010
GOOD RIDDANCE !
04:05 AM on 06/24/2010
Disrespecting or disregarding the chain of command is the fatal error of any officer, general, or not. I know this stuff. You speak when you are spoken to, show proper respect at all times. If you have objections you bring them up formally. Don't like someone or some idea, too bad. Can it. The military is not a democracy where everyone talks about their feelings and opinions. Without the proper chain of command, the whole military structure breaks down.
03:55 AM on 06/24/2010
This general represents a lack of discipline and a breakdown of command. If he is capable and so unconcerned about speaking on-the-record, what makes anyone think he won't also be as sloppy in speaking about other things which might give away their tactics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IssuesInFocus
05:01 AM on 06/24/2010
Right on!
For someone at his level to have made such a gaffe-- speaking out of turn, is unbelievable. McChrystal has become apparently, a victim of his ego. I am just totally shocked. Such an interview shouldn't have been given to any magazine- Rolling Stone, Salon, Vanity Fair.. you name it. It was just the wrong thing to do. What did he miss during all those years in the army? http://myown.oprah.com/audition/index.html?request=video_details&response_id=3822&promo_id=1
03:49 AM on 06/24/2010
He actually wrote himself as a character in a novel which attempts to take down the POTUS which is almost treason.
03:38 AM on 06/24/2010
Allowing torture? That's cool.

Lying to the public about military casualties? No biggie.

Doing something politically embarrassing for Obama? Game over.
04:55 AM on 06/24/2010
Hey, when allowing "torture and lying about casualties: "happened" they happened under GW Bush!

Obama had no place nor business in those affairs.
05:05 AM on 06/24/2010
Oh yeah, the magnanimous amnesty for all Bush-era crimes. Has to do with Looking Forward Not Backward, Pragmatism, Post-Partisanship, Centrism, and other such Obama neologisms, huh?

Guess that's why he's doing his damnedest to prosecute Bush-era whistleblowers, right?

Oops.

One day, just one day, the mainstream of the Democratic party will have to hold Obama accountable and stop blaming Bush for everything.
craig asia
Not part of upper-most 2%...yet!
05:58 AM on 06/24/2010
That's because torture only taints the effectiveness of the military, it doesn't destroy it completely. After all, these guys are out there to kill as many of the enemy as possible, and torture is really a much less severe action than killing.

To be a good military, you must be able to complete your assigned tasks as ordered. The very nature of McChrystal's comments would have severely damaged the chain of command structure, thus limiting, damaging or destroying the effectiveness of the entire military.

As for lying to the public, your joking right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly8
♥ > $
10:05 AM on 06/24/2010
OMG -there is so much wrong with this statement - I don't know where to start.