More

South Carolina Republican Primaries: Whiff Of Change Or Just Good Timing?

SEANNA ADCOX and BRUCE SMITH   06/23/10 06:32 PM ET   AP

South Carolina Primaries

CHARLESTON, S.C. – South Carolina voters have nominated an Indian-American woman for governor and a black state lawmaker for Congress – developments which, on their face, suggest landmark racial progress in a state that still flies the Confederate flag near its statehouse.

Still, some are asking whether the victories by state representatives Nikki Haley and Tim Scott are a sign of real change or just an aberration of conservative politics.

Haley, the child of Sikh immigrants from India, took 65 percent of the vote in Tuesday's GOP primary runoff, after trouncing three white male opponents two weeks earlier. And Scott, the lone black Republican state legislator, had an even wider victory margin in a 72-percent white coastal congressional district over the son of the late political icon and one-time segregationist Sen. Strom Thurmond.

In a state where voting has previously run along racial fault lines the results do mark a change, said political scientist Merle Black of Emory University in Atlanta.

"It's an interesting shift because it goes against the stereotypes," he said. "It helps the Republican Party become more racially and ethnically diverse."

The elections come in a state where the first shots of the Civil War sounded, and where Jim Crow-era policies and the lawsuit that led to the 1954 landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision outlawing segregation originated.

Fast forward to the past year, and it's where officials have apologized after likening an escaped gorilla to an ancestor of first lady Michelle Obama and referring to President Barack Obama and Haley as ragheads.

But Haley and Scott stressed their message, not their ethnicity or gender.

"They had the right message, and they had the leadership skills to get it done," said state House Majority Leader Kenny Bingham.

Melissa Ervin, a white voter from Mount Pleasant, said race had nothing to do with her vote for Scott.

"It kept coming across that he was very conservative and had traditional values," the 45-year-old interior designer said. "I thought he was the better person for the job."

Ervin, who voted for Barrett in the gubernatorial primary, said she was more surprised that Haley was nominated in a state that consistently ranks last nationwide in the percentage of female legislators.

Endorsed by Sarah Palin and tea party groups, Haley and Scott are social and fiscal conservatives. Although they have served in the state Legislature, they cast themselves as political outsiders, ready to shake things up.

"I'm tired of the good ol' boy system," said Greenville voter Carol Gregory, a 62-year-old dental hygienist. "I think across the board, we're just ready for a change."

Good timing was on their side in other ways too, said state Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, D-Orangeburg. She noted the scandal surrounding Gov. Mark Sanford's secretive trip to visit his mistress in Argentina and the uproar over U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson's "You lie!" heckling of President Obama.

And then there's Alvin Greene, an unemployed military veteran recently nominated by the Democrats to run for U.S. Senate, despite a pending felony obscenity charge.

After more than a year of being "America's whoopee cushion," as comedian Jon Stewart recently put it, South Carolina voters wanted to change outsiders' perception of the state, Cobb-Hunter said.

"Politics is about timing, and their timing has been perfect to seize the moment and capitalize on a real desire to be perceived in a positive light nationally," said Cobb-Hunter, who is black.

Attorney General Henry McMaster, who endorsed Haley after losing to her two weeks ago, said the nominations of Haley and Scott mark a "new day for South Carolina, and it's all positive."

"I think we get a lot of publicity we see on late night talk shows, and all that does not accurately reflect the people of South Carolina or their spirit," he said.

But it remains to be seen whether this road to diversity is real, said Cobb-Hunter: "If, on one hand, Republicans are saying, 'Oh, wow, look at us and how diverse we are,'" she said, the question becomes, "Are they replaced by people of color?"

State Democratic Party Chairwoman Carol Fowler notes Haley and Scott are the only minority Republicans in the state Legislature. Their departure leaves the Legislature, which lacks even a single female senator, even less diverse.

"In South Carolina, any racial progress is better than where we have been," Fowler said. "I think whether the Republican Party is making progress to being a more diverse party is another question."

In Washington, members of the Congressional Black Caucus said Wednesday they don't see Haley and Scott victories as a sign of Republican diversity.

"You know, it takes more than just having a token one African American ... in Congress to say that you have diversity," said Rep. Laura Richardson, D-Calif.

Diversity goes beyond skin color and gender to include opinion, and Scott lacks a different point of view, said Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo.

"This gentleman is to the right of many of the members in the Republican Caucus, so he will blend in quite well with them in terms of ideology," Cleaver said. "So I don't know where the diversity is in adding someone who thinks like everyone else."

Glenn McCall of South Carolina, one of just two black members of the Republican National Committee, says he believes more people of diverse ethnic backgrounds will step forward. He cites his own election two years ago as an example of the party's inclusiveness.

"It's not that we have arrived as it relates to ethnic involvement and running for public office," he said. "We're just getting started. And I'm excited about the future."

But David Bositis, a senior political analyst at the Washington-based Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, doesn't see a fundamental change in the racial politics of South Carolina.

Scott won the nomination in the coastal 1st Congressional District where thousands of newcomers from other states have flocked in the past decade. Haley also ran stronger in several coastal counties than she did in her home Lexington County.

By Bositis' estimate, South Carolina remains a state divided politically along racial lines.

"Most African-Americans most certainly will not be voting for Tim Scott," he said.

___

Adcox reported from Columbia, S.C., and Smith from Charleston. Associated Press writers Jim Davenport in Columbia and Ileana Morales in Washington contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
CHARLESTON, S.C. – South Carolina voters have nominated an Indian-American woman for governor and a black state lawmaker for Congress – developments which, on their face, suggest landmark ...
CHARLESTON, S.C. – South Carolina voters have nominated an Indian-American woman for governor and a black state lawmaker for Congress – developments which, on their face, suggest landmark ...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 277
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
billhodges 01:25 AM on 06/24/2010
By PETER WALLSTEN And ELIZA GRAY

Americans are more pessimistic about the state of the country and less confident in President Barack Obama's leadership than at any point since Mr. Obama entered the White House, according to a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.

The survey also shows grave and growing concerns about the Gulf oil spill, with overwhelming majorities of adults  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ichigo Kurosaki
Why do Republicans hate America so much?
07:55 AM on 06/28/2010
Haley may well give SC it's first Dem governor in 32 years.
09:35 AM on 06/25/2010
Everyone is making a big deal about Haley winning the Republican nomination. I live in South Carolina. She won't win. One reason she don't promote a good platform for South Carolina. People need jobs, and all she can shout is "We are going to take our Government back." She has no substance. Another thing the Democrat running have a plan for turning around jobs, education and the state deficit. He is underestimated right now while everyone is focused on Haley. If the media look at the voting numbers Sheheen the Dem, had more votes and had Democratic and Republican support.

The good ole boys, down here will not vote for her, because of her race and because she is a woman, they would rather vote for the Dem or just stay home. So no one should be sure that she is going to win South Carolina. I'm looking forward to the upset, unless Sheheen do something or say something stupid, he got this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whitney Kyle
11:41 PM on 06/24/2010
Both are going to promote the agenda of those rich white folks who have ruled South Carolina for generations. They are not going to promote social welfare or democracy, take care of the unemployed, create jobs for South Carolinians, or repair their infrastructure. Corporations and wealth are all both care about. They both represent the class that is profiting off the recession and will fight to maintain the status quo. What a huge mistake the conservative working people of South Carolina may make come November. Changing the package an agenda is delivered in does not change the same old failed policies.
12:14 AM on 06/25/2010
Everything you say is gospel except Haley and the "rich white folks who have ruled SC for generations" are NOT on the same team. Any agenda directives would come from the likes of Howard Rich (NY real estate developer who is obscenely wealthy, very Libertarian, and would love to see public education fail) along with Jenny & Mark Sanfraud.
08:14 PM on 06/24/2010
BTW, if 95% of the blacks in Tim Scott's district vote for the Deomcratic candidate, who is also black, will they be considered racist:?
photo
NJProgressiveIndie
Never Surrender...
04:41 AM on 06/25/2010
No. Just guilty of not having poor judgement and being smart enough not to vote against their own best interests...
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
1088
05:40 PM on 06/24/2010
Slap a woman with the same ideology and rap it in in bow, you still have the same stinking racist party.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ComeOnAlready
09:34 PM on 06/24/2010
THANK YOU! I got grilled earlier this week for claiming the news report was flawed. Haley's primary election is NOT a symbol of progress. All they did was put on a different cover. It is Southern defiance in its greatest, most secretive form. South Carolinians nor the Republican leadership regard Haley as someone other than them, like they do Clyburn and Obama. What Haley represents is a strong anti-Obama voice who, because she legally can't claim she's caucasian, is a minority and therefore would be a victim if she were called a racist. But she promotes that same anti-Obama rhetoric that Fox News and the deep South have been spewing for years. She's not interested in what's best for the people. She's interested in what's best for businesses and corporations, even if it means the middle class suffers. South Carolinians don't think their national leadership has bucked Obama enough, so they're trying to put someone in place who can spit venom better than Beck.
photo
Catch22isms
Schizo-political
05:30 PM on 06/24/2010
It's really very difficult for some people to discern the difference between being conservative and just being racist. There are liberals and conservatives alike who perpetuate the stereotype that if you are conservative, you are prejudiced or racist as well. That's simply not true. As we are witnessing, slowly yet surely, a more diverse selection of conservative candidates it merely proves that some people, no matter their race, color or sex, share similar values which are known to be 'conservative'. And we are beginning to see those people voted in to positions of authority.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ComeOnAlready
09:38 PM on 06/24/2010
Totally agree. Conservatism as well as all ideologies, should be as diverse as the nation itself. That's how we come to conclusions that are best for everyone. And I truly hope to see more diversity in conservatism efforts in the future. BUT ... the primary election of Nikki Haley is not an examle of diverse conservatism. Most voters did not know she was not white until long after they decided to support her. She was a female victim of wrath wrought by a male agenda, and the public got tired of that. Race had nothing to do with this.
01:06 AM on 06/25/2010
I knew she her ethnicity the first time I saw her because she was wearing ethnic clothing. I listened to her and liked what she said. She was the only candidate who got out and campaigned. Face it. You are racist. You don't like her because she's Indian. And I don't know why you keep saying she's not "white." That's just another racist word for a group you don't like. If someone asks me of Nikki, "Is she black or white?" I would say, "She's American, and her parents are Indian." Why are you so hung up on race? Libs claim to be reality-based and science-based. There is no scientific base to call people black, white, brown, yellow, or red. There is one race and we have different ethnic backgrounds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Albertmum
Did IQ's just drop dramatically?
05:29 PM on 06/24/2010
The Economist has a good article this week 'What's wrong with America's right'. They hit the nail on the head multiple times.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thor Larson
05:08 PM on 06/24/2010
Real Change!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
04:54 PM on 06/24/2010
Now if only she stays away from the camping trail and Argentina?
04:34 PM on 06/24/2010
Imagine Kennedy had to give up his Catholic faith and convert to Prostant faith, do you think other Catholics would have respected him?

NO!

The same way, Jindal and this woman gets low respect from Indians.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jagrmeister721
04:54 PM on 06/24/2010
Most Indian-Americans I know in the US don't put a huge premium on religion. Generally, the hyperbolic ones tend to be ridiculously partisan- tend to have achieved less in life and seem to be filled with bitterness over not blending into society or getting ahead and succeeding. So they are bitter at a triviality like a change in religion. They should thrill to success stories in their community , and put aside petty partisan differences, but to each their own.
01:08 AM on 06/25/2010
You are racist. She didn't give up her faith. She attends the Sikh temple down the road from my house and my church. She is well-loved and respected by the Indian community.
04:32 PM on 06/24/2010
Korean Christian says 'Destroy All Buddhist temple!'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VHF-feF2PA&playnext_from=TL&videos=2cEmH_OK72w

Korean Christian Burn Doseon Buddhist temple

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wh30ZQxYUQ&feature=related
01:09 AM on 06/25/2010
You are a racist. You have posted multiple times attacking Haley on her ethnicity. You are nothing but a hater.
04:30 AM on 06/25/2010
"Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness?" 2 Corinthians 6:14

Haley was right for dumping her tredition!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nana-anne
just trying to make sense of the senseless
01:08 PM on 06/24/2010
Does Ms Haley popularity mean that the voters of South Carolina have embraced the Republican's ability to run that state? Aside from the character, or lack thereof, of the present Gov., take a look at some of the statistics of S. C.

Ranked 4th most dangerous state to live in
Ranked 46 in health care.
Ranked 46 in SAT scores
Ranked 39 in economy

So tell me what, exactly has a Republican state administration done for S.C. and why continue such inept leadership.
02:46 PM on 06/24/2010
Links, please. SC has a large number of Dem voters. Those areas where Dems are concentrated has a higher rate of crime and lack of education. Alvin Greene comes to mind.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nana-anne
just trying to make sense of the senseless
03:48 PM on 06/24/2010
Facts gathered from Google ranking of states in each area. So according to your comment only the "good" parts of the state should get help and the poorer areas with high crime and failing schools and poor health facilities should be ignored and hope they disappear? You snobs deserve the the humiliating reputation your state has.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ComeOnAlready
09:43 PM on 06/24/2010
Itsy, you give us links. The dem areas are not where the crimes are ... crimes are all over the state. Nana-anne is correct. Republican administrations have done nothing to help the common South Carolinian, Republican or Democrat. What SC has is a defiant population that considers politics a game of us vs. them. Republicans first, always, and that was strengthened by Obama's election. They've been taught that a vote for Democrats means they'll lose whatever little bit they have to a bunch of dem areas that have a high rate of crime and lack education. Which for Pete's sake is not true.
03:35 PM on 06/24/2010
That's what you get with a Senator like Clyburn on the loose, looking around for elephant dung.LOL
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
04:56 PM on 06/24/2010
Good thing to because the Republican Party has been peddling that for years now!
01:07 PM on 06/24/2010
She believe in exactly what Sanfraud did. If SC vote this woman in she will not change anything that Sanfraud implemented
02:48 PM on 06/24/2010
Good example of a Democrat espousing political beliefs. This is why Dems don't win in SC. They cannot write a sentence where verb and subject agree.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ComeOnAlready
09:56 PM on 06/24/2010
Wow. OK. Steve Benjamin is mayor of Columbia, the state's capital city. If Dems don't win, who is he?
photo
Skyhawk
When I write one it'll appear here.
11:31 AM on 06/24/2010
A whiff of something that toilet paper maybe needed for.