More

Stanley McChrystal Relieved Of Command: Obama Ousts General

JENNIFER LOVEN and ANNE GEARAN   06/24/10 12:35 AM ET   AP

Mcchrystal White House

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama sacked his loose-lipped Afghanistan commander Wednesday, a seismic shift for the military order in wartime, and chose the familiar, admired – and tightly disciplined – Gen. David Petraeus to replace him. Petraeus, architect of the Iraq war turnaround, was once again to take hands-on leadership of a troubled war effort.

Obama said bluntly that Gen. Stanley McChrystal's scornful remarks about administration officials in interviews for a magazine article represent conduct that "undermines the civilian control of the military that is at the core of our democratic system."

He fired the commander after summoning him from Afghanistan for a face to face meeting in the Oval Office and named Petraeus, the Central Command chief who was McChrystal's direct boss, to step in.

By pairing those announcements, Obama sought to move on from the firestorm that was renewing debate over his revamped Afghanistan policy. It was meant to assure Afghans, U.S. allies and a restive American electorate that a firm hand is running the war.

Expressing praise for McChrystal yet certainty he had to go, Obama said he did not make the decision over any disagreement in policy or "out of any sense of personal insult." Flanked by Vice President Joe Biden, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in the Rose Garden, he said: "War is bigger than any one man or woman, whether a private, a general, or a president."

He urged the Senate to confirm Petraeus swiftly and emphasized the Afghanistan strategy he announced in December was not shifting with McChrystal's departure.

"This is a change in personnel but it is not a change in policy," Obama said. The president delivered the same message in a phone call to Afghan President Hamid Karzai, the White House said, and Karzai told Obama he would work toward a smooth transition.

As Obama was speaking in the Rose Garden, McChrystal released a statement saying that he resigned out of "a desire to see the mission succeed" and expressing support for the war strategy.

With lawmakers of both parties praising the choice of Petraeus, the White House is confident he will be confirmed before Congress adjourns at the end of next week.

Obama hit several grace notes about McChrystal and his service after their meeting, saying he made the decision to sack him "with considerable regret." And yet, he said the job in Afghanistan cannot be done now under McChrystal's leadership, asserting that the critical remarks from the general and his inner circle in Rolling Stone displayed conduct that doesn't live up to the standards for a command-level officer.

"I welcome debate among my team, but I won't tolerate division," Obama said. He had delivered that same message – that there must be no more backbiting – to his full war cabinet in a Situation Room session, said a senior administration official.

The announcement came as June became the deadliest month for the U.S.-dominated international coalition in Afghanistan. NATO announced eight more international troop deaths Wednesday for a total of 76 this month, one more than in the deadliest month previously, in July 2009. Forty-six of those killed this month were Americans. The U.S. has 90,800 troops in Afghanistan.

Obama seemed to suggest that McChrystal's military career is over, saying the nation should be grateful "for his remarkable career in uniform" as if that has drawn to a close. McChrystal left the White House after the meeting and returned to his military quarters at Washington's Fort McNair.

Petraeus, who attended a formal Afghanistan war meeting at the White House on Wednesday, has had overarching responsibility for the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq as head of Central Command. He was to vacate the Central Command post after his expected confirmation, giving Obama another key opening to fill. The Afghanistan job is actually a step down from his current post but one that filled Obama's pre-eminent need.

Petraeus is the nation's best-known military man, having risen to prominence as the commander who turned around the Iraq war in 2007, applying a counterinsurgency strategy that has been adapted for Afghanistan.

He has a reputation for rigorous discipline. He keeps a punishing pace – spending more than 300 days on the road last year. He briefly collapsed during Senate testimony last week, apparently from dehydration. It was a rare glimpse of weakness for a man known as among the military's most driven.

In the hearing last week, Petraeus told Congress he would recommend delaying Obama's prescribed pullout of U.S. forces from Afghanistan beginning in July 2011. He said security and political conditions in Afghanistan must be ready to handle a U.S. drawdown.

Waheed Omar, spokesman for Karzai, said Petraeus "will also be a trusted partner." Karzai had been a lonely voice in speaking out in support of McChrystal. But Omar said of Petraeus: "He is the most informed person and the most obvious choice for this job" now that McChrystal is out.

The day unfolded with a secretive series of meetings.

McChrystal arrived in Washington off the long flight from Kabul in the early morning and went first to the Pentagon to see top brass. Then came his half-hour alone with the president. Obama huddled afterward with Biden, Gates, Mullen and just a few others to plot the next step, and the group settled on Petraeus because he represents the "greatest continuity in operational understanding" and knows Afghanistan, said the senior administration official.

Obama then sat down with Petraeus to offer him the job.

Gates' advice on the matter wasn't disclosed. Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said that Gates had talked extensively with Obama, including a 30-minute one-on-one meeting late Tuesday. But Morrell declined to say whether Gates suggested McChrystal should be fired.

In the magazine article, McChrystal called the period last fall when the president was deciding whether to approve more troops "painful" and said the president appeared ready to hand him an "unsellable" position. McChrystal also said he was "betrayed" by Ambassador Karl Eikenberry, the man the White House chose to be his diplomatic partner in Afghanistan.

He accused Eikenberry of raising doubts about Karzai only to give himself cover in case the U.S. effort failed. And he was quoted mocking Biden.

If not insubordination, the remarks – as well as even sharper commentary about Obama and his White House from several in McChrystal's inner circle – were at the least an extraordinary challenge from a military leader.

Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he expected to hold a hearing by Tuesday on Petraeus' confirmation.

___

Associated Press writers Julie Pace, Pauline Jelinek, Kimberly Dozier and Anne Flaherty in Washington and Deb Riechmann in Kabul, Afghanistan, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama sacked his loose-lipped Afghanistan commander Wednesday, a seismic shift for the military order in wartime, and chose the familiar, admired – and tightl...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama sacked his loose-lipped Afghanistan commander Wednesday, a seismic shift for the military order in wartime, and chose the familiar, admired – and tightl...
Filed by Michael Falcone  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,303
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
supergenius02 06:26 PM on 06/23/2010
The way Obama is firing generals there won't be any to lead the war. Maybe he can find some Ivy League pacifists who have never served in combat to lead the wars.

Interesting that Obama does not seem to be firing all the failures in his cabinet who have failed to bring down this incredible unemployment rate, historic foreclosures, historic homelessness and historic personal bankruptcies.  Read More...
12:15 PM on 06/26/2010
Tell you what _moderators, why don't you go _____ yourself!

I have a nifty idea for a bot, that when ever a _moderator posts anything it will create a dozen normal posts, so when ever they post in whatever story their comments will be buried by boring posts. Smart use of a proxy server and random timings will make it impossible to defeat, especially as it only posts boring comments which will be undetectable from normal posts.

Then we will see how keen people are to become _moderators.

Anyone else have any ideas about weaknesses in the _HuffPo _censor Bot, let's hear them and put an end to the madness.
10:59 AM on 06/25/2010
This little general is a member of the g.o.p. that's why he spoke against President Obama to make all Democrats look weak in defending American. Democrats defend America just the same as republicans we just care about American lives more than republicans do. There are people making money on these wars at the expense of American lives being sacrificed. There must not be a delay in pulling out of the middle east bring these Americans home to safety now, it's long over due.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
01:55 PM on 06/24/2010
Officers, not held to the highest of standards, surely will not disapoint, when Failing.
01:11 PM on 06/24/2010
So Obama has replaced McCrystal with Bush's General General Petraeus. The same General Petraeus that was brought before Congress and told his surge was a failure in Iraq and he was a liar. And the same media that raked him over the coals and the move on . org add General please don't Betrayus are now singing the praises of Obamas brilliant decision to appoint Petraeus as the next Commander of Afganastan. HYPOCRITS!!!
01:20 PM on 06/24/2010
You do understand that General Petraeus works for the USA--not Democrats or Republicans.
When will people STOP with the pepetural DIVISION!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rplite
12:54 PM on 06/24/2010
I haven't read the article yet. I'll reserve my opinion until then. As long as he is not lying about anything. I thought we had a right to our own opinion. I heard he revealed our troops were growing Opium Poppies. That's just the rumor mill.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:36 PM on 06/24/2010
Stan " Gonna get my picture, on the cover of rolling stone, gonna buy five copies for mother". LOL! LOL! LOL!
11:43 AM on 06/24/2010
Folks thinking a 4Star General leading troops in combat doing a Hit Piece in Rolling Stone and later fired, is some sort of Noble Act of Defiance has been watching waaaayyyy too many Dirty Harry Movies.

That man spent his entire adult life (effectively) serving this nation, leading young men and women, combat, Handpicked in spearheading a campaign to attempt to thwart the latest threat in our lifetime,...

And he throws it away resembling a drunken private Conversation in a basement with friends.

Yeah he was planning on doing that while he was at the Military Academy, constructing war plans, consulting combat leaders,..."I'll do a Rolling Stone Interview" and then go out and make a lot of money.

He was fired in the middle of a War he was leading.

Not very HIGH on the Valiant or Nobility Scale. At least not one minus Conservative Rose Colored Glasses.

Oh, perhaps this act will have it's proper Conservative Spin on it in Texas History Books, once that Committee rewrites history:).

Thought for Food, when you're leader, you have to be MORE than right, you have to convince others, finish the job, implement effective plans, train others, plan B-G if it ain't working, mentor, rise above, and if you can't,... YOU BOW OUT GRACEFULLY, anything less than that,... You're not leading. See McArthur for reference, especially compared to Ike.

Guess you have to be a "Real" American to see this differently than that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffrey A Beard
CCHS, WKU, Bonanza Steak House, Iowa, Old Creamery
11:34 AM on 06/24/2010
"Well, I keep gettin' richer, but I can't get my pi'tcher on the cover of the . . ."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosieee
11:04 AM on 06/24/2010
McChrystal's firing mightf not hurt him in money but it sure took any respect we had for him away. This was a man in charge of our safety and the lives of many Americans fighting for this country.It is hard to think a man in the top position is so dumb he shuts off his mouth as he did. If he had a problem he could of called the president. I would hate to see what secrets he would give up if captured and waterboarded. His staff and him can not even shut up to a magazine. DUMB, DUMB! He is one arrrogant dude with a big ego.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
11:03 AM on 06/24/2010
A jail cell in Stan's future?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
09:57 AM on 06/24/2010
The peaple of Afganastan dont want the return of the taliban, the taliban Hate women! solution Draft every woman in afganastan @ 12 -16 years of age, train them to read,to think,to write,to Hate the burka! Self defence,to keep them from being beaten by men!Change the women,change the men, Change the men, change the country, and we go home in 10 years!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timm0
It's impossible to have too many malasadas.
10:06 AM on 06/24/2010
I'm afraid there will be some areas where that will work and some where it will backfire.

There's just no "good" solution.

However, I love the logic path you've taken on this.... much better idea than what we've stuck our forces with today.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
10:40 AM on 06/24/2010
what , no fav/? I hate,to beg but I will.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:37 AM on 06/24/2010
McChrystal has lost nothing. This was an engineered stunt to get out of the command. He is still an active duty General, he retains his Rank and all the pay. If he retired tomorrow he will more than double his pay which is about 16K a month. He has no respect for the President which has been more then evident, so the So the Commander in Chief accepting his resignation was something he counted on. McChrystal was prepared for all this, it was the President who had to figure out what to do with this mess. The wild card is GEN Petreaus, Who do you think his top advisor is going to be? It will never be made public but McChrystal is still in this.
10:01 AM on 06/24/2010
You mean he lost NOTHING outside of his Job, command, respect MANY (on all sides) folks have for military leaders being apolitcal.

A general or other military folks leaving to make more $$$ is nothing new, neither is a General being fired in the middle of a conflict.

It happens in other fields, when Mark Furhman ruined the OJ case, with his smooth-cool lies, I'm certain he made more $$$ when he left LAPD.

But those Smooth-cool lies followed him.

Same for Oliver North, G-Gordon Liddy, Marion Barry,...

Who knows, Jack Abramoff may become a Pizza King when he's finished kneading that dough$$$$$?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timm0
It's impossible to have too many malasadas.
10:47 AM on 06/24/2010
He didn't want his command anymore. He still has a paycheck, a job, and his full pension (usually over $100K per year for his rank). He clearly doesn't need or want the respect of anyone else, otherwise he wouldn't have ridiculed his superiors the way he did. Since he still has his rank, anyone who disrespects him from within, can still be disciplined or courtmartialed.

He's lost absolutely nothing at all - and he almost certainly has made some gains at the same time.

His gain is probably that the enormity of the clowning he perpetrated will make him a bona fide hero to the raging right. He is guaranteed a job at faux news and can probably name his price in any of the arch-conservative forum. He has absolutely expanded ALL his horizons with this well-orchestrated move against the President.

If you think he's sobbing in a corner somewhere, regretting his actions and stinging from his "punishment" like some 8 year-old, you're sadly mistaken.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
10:48 AM on 06/24/2010
Furman didn't ruin the case ,against Oj. if O.j. was only charged with the death of Ron Goldman the casewould have lasted 2 hours, but Marsha Clark decided she would make an example of OJ,and spouse abuse! Marsha clark dismissed a witness who saw OJ 1 block from N.browns house,After he ran a stop sign and just missed her VW bug bumper!She wa dismissed because she did an interveiw after she gave her grand jury testimony, Mark Furman didn't screw up the case Marsha, did, and judge Ito allowing evidence that would prejudice,a jury! Hanus!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timm0
It's impossible to have too many malasadas.
10:07 AM on 06/24/2010
Dead on.
09:14 AM on 06/24/2010
Will four stars flatten a presidential administration buses tires?
09:08 AM on 06/24/2010
Good riddence. My problem with this process is that Obama is handing Afghanistan over to Petraeus who just approved of the Army's decision not to court martial or at least reprimand the commanding officers in charge of the debacle on the border where nine (09) Army soldiers were killed by the Taliban. Isn't ironic that a few years back everyone yelled and screamed when MoveOn called him General BetrayUs. He just betrayed the families of the fallen soldiers. Now he is in command of the rest. Well, if the shoe fits wear it General Betray-Us and shame on you Mr. President for continuing the Bush legacy of Yes Men commanding generals. There are plenty of general officers....pick somone else.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
01:52 PM on 06/24/2010
officers, not held to the highest of standards, surely will not disapoint, when Failing!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
springsm
09:06 AM on 06/24/2010
I expect that Petreous will do fine. He is the most ambitious general to come along for years...ambitious and a opportunist, fortunately he seems to be a good leader. You watch tho, he has kept his nose where it gets him ahead and with no problems, he will run for president in 8 years.
09:28 AM on 06/24/2010
That is a scary proposition.