Unemployment: Outlook Grim For Jobs Bill Ahead Of Vote

First Posted: 06-23-10 11:58 PM   |   Updated: 06-24-10 10:22 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Jobs Bill

Democratic leaders in the Senate have apparently failed to win enough support to overcome a Republican filibuster of a bill to help the poor, the old and the jobless, despite making a series of cuts to the measure over the past several weeks to appease deficit hawks.

"It looks like we're going to come up short," said a senior Democratic aide on Wednesday evening. "It looks like Republicans are prepared to kill aid to states, an extension of unemployment benefits, and ironically, the Republicans are prepared to kill efforts to close loopholes that allow companies to export jobs overseas."

The legislation, known as the "tax extenders" bill, would reauthorize extended unemployment benefits for people out of work for six months or longer, would protect doctors from a 21 percent pay cut for seeing Medicare patients, and would provide billions in aid to state Medicaid programs.

Come Friday, 1.2 million people will lose access to the extended unemployment benefits, a number that will grow by several hundred thousand every week after that. Fifty million Medicare claims from June are currently in process at the reduced rate, which the AARP says has already caused some of its members to have trouble finding a doctor. And the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that dropping the $24 billion in aid to states will lead to cuts in services and thousands of layoffs, and that spending cuts to close states' aggregate budget shortfall absent new federal funds in 2011 would lead to 900,000 public- and private-sector layoffs.

Both chambers of Congress had already passed the measure, deficit spending and all, but when it came time to combine the bills in May, conservative Democrats and moderate Republicans lost their previous will to help the economy and forced party leaders to begin the nickel-and-dime process of trimming the bill.

"I've never been involved in anything that's been revised so often and in so many different ways," said Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who worked with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to try to win support for the bill.

The House shortened the Medicare physicians' fix, dropped the Medicaid money, and also $7 billion in subsidies for laid off workers to buy health insurance. The Senate cut $25 per week from every unemployment check and shortened the so-called "Doc Fix" even further, to six months, and on Wednesday Dem leaders trimmed another $8 billion by reducing the Medicaid assistance. The bill has shrunk over the past few weeks from $190 billion, to $80 billion, to $55 billion, to just over $30 billion in the current Senate version.

Story continues below
Advertisement

"Sen. Baucus and Sen. Reid did everything they can to try to pick up the handful of votes needed to overcome the Republican filibuster" said the Dem aide. Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson has said repeatedly he would not vote for the measure unless its cost was completely offset, so Reid and Baucus focused on moderate Maine Republicans Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, who demanded more cuts to the bill, apparently, than the Dem leaders were willing to make.

"Remember, Republicans voted for legislation that both extended unemployment insurance and reduced the deficit," said Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). "Democrats, on the other hand, introduced and voted for legislation that increased the deficit. There was bipartisan support for ours, bipartisan opposition for theirs."

The Republican alternative to the tax extenders bill, which Ben Nelson supported, would have extended unemployment benefits and offset the cost with budget cuts so steep it "would essentially shut down much of the federal government for the last two and a half months of this fiscal year," according to the CBPP.

Democrats also softened a provision that would raise taxes on investment fund managers by closing a loophole that allows some of the richest people in the world to pay a lower tax rate than their secretaries. The debate has largely focused on the deficit, however.

The process has been infuriating to employment and labor activists.

"Let Senator McConnell, let Senator Senator Collins, let Senator Brown and every other Republican explain why one of their own constituents doesn't deserve to keep their job, shouldn't be able to send their kid to college, can't put food on their table without maxing out their credit cards," said Lori Lodes of the SEIU. "Rooting against America, Republicans are taking pride in keeping families out of work as their only strategy for winning elections."

The Senate will vote on Thursday afternoon.

Get HuffPost Politics On Twitter, Facebook, and Google Buzz! Subscribe to the new HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Democratic leaders in the Senate have apparently failed to win enough support to overcome a Republican filibuster of a bill to help the poor, the old and the jobless, despite making a series of cuts t...
Democratic leaders in the Senate have apparently failed to win enough support to overcome a Republican filibuster of a bill to help the poor, the old and the jobless, despite making a series of cuts t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
1,626
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (23 total)
  1 of 6  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
chuck prebys   12:26 AM on 6/24/2010
I look around and what do I see?

Millions of oblivious sheople being paid lots and lots of $$ for doing who-knows-what (usually shifting $$ from one place to another).......
Millions more stressed out, overworked, hat!ng their lives and wanting off the treadmill.....
And millions more who got nothing to do, can't get a look, and have all but been written off from society because  Read More...
situpnow   11:26 PM on 6/25/2010
Are not there plenty of jobs at the flag lapel factory? It seems our politicians cannot get enough of them.
LBA7895   06:48 PM on 6/25/2010
Let's see, if we got out of Afghanistan and Iraq, we'd have plenty of money to help our unemployed people.

Bin Laden bragged he'd bankrupt the US in Afghanistan, just like he bankrupted the Russians. Looks like Bin Laden is in schedule!
colonelgirdle   09:57 PM on 6/25/2010
NO, the Afghanistan war is saved! Haven't you heard? The Pentagon is going to spend almost $600 million to built a fleet of blimps to fight in Afghanistan (no joke). Now America will be sure to win.
photo
aweissnet   08:12 PM on 6/24/2010
I heard McCain commented today that they have to begin addressing the deficit, on the matter of this issue.

I believe he said "let them eat cake."
mandinka   07:42 PM on 6/24/2010
Libe generated over $1.5 Trillion of new debt last year and now another $1.6 Trillion. How about returning to the budget for 2008 and have congress justify any penny over and above that
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
moose and squirrel   08:59 PM on 6/24/2010
that is still a budget that ran a deficit of over $400 billion
LBA7895   06:50 PM on 6/25/2010
Better idea: let's return to the budget of 2000, before George Bush took the US to the brink of bankruptcy with his relentless tax cuts combined with runaway spending and borrowing $1 billion per month for 6 years to fund the Iraq invasion and occupation. Do the math, stupid!
bizrlee   06:52 PM on 7/01/2010
You can always tell a Democrat by the name calling.
Why do you do that?
Aren't you supposed to be the smarter, more sophisticated group?
colonelgirdle   10:01 PM on 6/25/2010
Better yet, let's give a pay cut to those bloated Senate salaries (over $170,000). If we cut them back by $100,000 each that would save $10,000,000. Gotta start somewhere and we can see how concerned the Senators are with saving money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
formerroadie   07:09 PM on 6/24/2010
My middle finger goes up in the general direction of conservative Senators.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH   12:05 PM on 6/25/2010
That seems to be going around....
photo
hardlyhikin   07:01 PM on 6/24/2010
Explain to me again why Democrats chances in November are shrinking every day?
jdevans   04:35 PM on 6/25/2010
Because Republicans fantasize that unemployed Republicans will still be voting with them after this incident.
LBA7895   06:51 PM on 6/25/2010
Unemployed Republicans will vote against their own economic interests in order to vote for God, guns and against gays. Geniuses!
colonelgirdle   10:02 PM on 6/25/2010
Because as awful as Republicans are, the Democrats are cowards who should be fighting for the average American but don't.
photo
Downrivers   06:05 PM on 6/24/2010
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
renegade28   05:49 PM on 6/24/2010
Just in, GOP squashes Unemployment Benefits extension. Democrats to pull the bill and move on. So looks like that will be the final end of debate on unemployment extensions.
photo
Downrivers   05:53 PM on 6/24/2010
This is one to remember come November.
photo
hardlyhikin   07:02 PM on 6/24/2010
Explain to me again why Democrats chances in November are shrinking every day?
LBA7895   06:53 PM on 6/25/2010
If Harry Reid had laid the foundation for using Reconciliation to defeat Republican obstruction, we wouldn't have this problem. I have said from day #1 that Reid was Obama's stumbling block. He's an idiot!
trev ali   05:40 PM on 6/24/2010
new unemployment support site and forum ------uiunite.createforum.net
missingwmd   04:03 PM on 6/24/2010
Hardly any MSM coverage on this issue. Huff Po is the only one giving regular updates. No one cares. But they will care soon as people have to turn off cell phones, internet access, tv services those industries will start laying off also.
colonelgirdle   10:09 PM on 6/25/2010
Amen! Once a few million of us unemployed stop paying our bills and the economy spirals down even more and more businesses crash & more job cuts, then the msm pundits & politicians will ask "Wha' happened?"

I guess the only way to get attention is for the economy to completely crash to Great Depression levels. Then maybe citizens will wake up, quit listening to the "prosperity is just around the corner" crowd, and get some people in the government that will care about the citizens.

The next Constitution should have representatives chosen by random lottery to serve a limited term and the death penalty for anyone found to be on the take.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Chris Campbell   03:36 PM on 6/24/2010
The democratic party is so inept. With the presidency and huge advantages in both houses, they lead like complete cowards. If this were Bush (obviously on a different policy matter, one that likely helped no one), he would've plowed it through without a thought.

Just like those crazy Tea Baggers, we need a determined and aggressive progressive party.

I find it astonishing that this legislation is barely even making the news.
photo
Downrivers   03:39 PM on 6/24/2010
the current administration seems hell bent on pursuing the failed neocon policy of global manifest destiny
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
moose and squirrel   09:01 PM on 6/24/2010
what in the world are you talking about? just because you hear the big words on tv doesnt mean you understand them
photo
Slow Turning   03:59 PM on 6/24/2010
I find it astonishing HP will run ads in the right margin of the site for articles that detail 24 year old actresses retiring for over four days, while articles like this see the light of day barely 12 hours before people have to DIG to find them.

HP, C'mon. I mean thanks for publishing it by all means, but, you published this puppy last night AFTER the east coast went to bed, and you have BURIED it before they have gotten home from work the next day.

Please give this issue more of a chance. People need to know about this in a bigger way that they have been getting.

Please let it have a full 24 hour cycle at least before you bury it.
photo
rascalov   04:00 PM on 6/24/2010
Their advantages are in label only. With blue dogs, DINOs, etc., their majority is actually ephemeral.
photo
ewilder   08:13 PM on 6/24/2010
The Beltway-insider 'conventional wisdom' is that the Republicans form the majority party, the Dems only govern by some default.
Until this nonsense is busted, there's little hope for change in our government.
LBA7895   06:54 PM on 6/25/2010
Obama was too timid in providing policy leadership in his first year in office. Can't understand why. He channeled Jimmy Carter, not FDR. Big mistake!
photo
Downrivers   03:25 PM on 6/24/2010
If nothing else this shows the country that the unemployed make soft targets for congress.

There are literally millions of people over the age of 55 who have lost their jobs. The hope for re-employment for them is very bleak.

The unemployment benefits roles fell because congress did not extend EUC. Millions will lose their benefits AND insurance. Thousands will file bankruptcy for medical expenses, there will be yet another wave of foreclosures. Consumer spending is going to tank, and with it, there goes the house of cards congress calls the "recovery"”
photo
John Hodges   03:31 PM on 6/24/2010
lose insurance? I lost my insurance when I lost my job. I can't afford it on my own. I have a bad knee that requires somewhat regular cortizone shots, and I've already had to skip 3. I'm about to lose the ability to drive my car because the UC that was paying my insurance has stopped because of these damned politicians playing games with my life. How is it going to help me get a job with a knee that barely lets me walk and a car I cant use to GET to work even if I find any?
photo
Downrivers   03:36 PM on 6/24/2010
you are screwed my friend. also all those boomer 401k's went bye bye along with their jobs and home equity.
photo
rascalov   04:02 PM on 6/24/2010
And because of the piecemeal way EUC was adopted and renewed, some people will run out of benefits after 26 weeks of checks, while others will with 39, 46, 53, 79, 93 and 99 weeks. It is wholly unfair.
beebster   01:23 PM on 6/25/2010
And the repugnants wil jump for joy!
jdevans   04:38 PM on 6/25/2010
I've been to a dozen job fairs in the Chicago area in the last couple years. Its rare to see someone at a job fair who's under the age of 40.
LBA7895   06:55 PM on 6/25/2010
Wait until the suicide and murder suicide rate starts skyrocketing. People with no more hope jump out of windows and shoot themselves, and often their families, too. The worst is yet to come.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
procrustes13   02:38 PM on 6/24/2010
Change this stupid filibuster rule once and for all. It's insanity that a majority favours this law and yet it is blocked. This is profoundly anti-democratic. Funny how the GOP has been hiding behind idiotic supermajority rules as they openly declare their contempt for democracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janine547   09:08 PM on 6/24/2010
Just because the filibuster don't meet your agenda, now you want to dispose of it.
LBA7895   06:56 PM on 6/25/2010
The majority should rule, not the tyrannical minority.
photo
midbikecrisis   02:33 PM on 6/24/2010
Republicans have always been the party of the rich and well connected, never caring about the average American. It has been Democrats who have put through legislation such as the first time home buyer tax credit that just expired (and should be extended in my view), not Republicans. Republicans would never be caught dead doing anything to help the average American unless it somehow feathered the nest of the rich in the process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janine547   09:11 PM on 6/24/2010
That tax credit did, SQUAT to address the real concerns of housing sales. The only thing it accomplished was to prolong the real issues.
Those that went and bought homes will soon realize that their purchase was overpriced to begin with.
beebster   01:25 PM on 6/25/2010
Are you kidding? Now is the best time to buy a home because prices are lower.
LBA7895   06:57 PM on 6/25/2010
You are IGNORANT, Maam! Every expert in Real Estate said the tax credit stimulated sales. And when it expired, sales collapsed the very next month. Wake Up!
Jazzcomedian   02:12 PM on 6/24/2010
The constituency of the Republican Party has always been the affluent, and large corporations. That's who they truly represent and fight for. The working and middle class are not on their radar, and have never been. This is merely an observation by an independent who's been watching politics since 1960. Time and time again, they've demonstrated that capital gains and corporate tax cuts, excessive defense spending, and profit without regulation are their only true interests, and they're perfectly fine with their deficit spending--but not the Dems.

They fought for health insurance companies against the people, even though their profit motivated practices were unconscionable. During the healthcare reform debate the GOP never once mentioned letters from any of their constituents who were being bankrupted, or left to die. They're slowing up regulatory reform for Wall Street, even though an unregulated Wall Street has brought the US to it's financial needs. They've fought loosening the liability of BP in this historic destiny changing catastrophe, and they've very reluctantly extended unemployment benefits to millions of former hardworking Americans caught in this calamity.

Three GOP votes for the stimulus, and not one GOP vote for the healthcare reform---let the sick and uninsured fend for themselves. They despise the policies/programs of FDR which put desperate Americans to work, and restored their dignity.

Social security, medicare, child labor laws, unions to give workers a fair shake and livable wages--all fought against by the GOP, yet they still get working class votes. Amazing.
beebster   01:27 PM on 6/25/2010
You forgot the evengilicals. Ohh and war, they reallly love war!
LBA7895   06:59 PM on 6/25/2010
"Gay marriage" referandums: the gift that keeps on giving!"
Karl Rove

These people vote against their own economic interests to vote for God, guns and (against) gays.
Total idiots!
colonelgirdle   10:18 PM on 6/25/2010
25 years ago, my now late brother-in-law asked my entirely Republican working-class family: "Why would any working person vote Republican?" When we tried to explain it became obvious that we were fools. We have all since deserted the monstrous Republican party. Just goes to show that sometimes one person can make a difference.

Twitter Edition