More

Congress Sends Obama New Sanctions Against Iran

JIM ABRAMS   06/24/10 08:24 PM ET   AP

Congress Iran Sanctions

WASHINGTON — Congress on Thursday overwhelmingly passed tough new sanctions against Iran, sending a message to the Tehran government that notions of becoming a nuclear power could be accompanied by a steep economic price.

The Senate and House in quick succession approved the penalties that focus on Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard and the country's imports of gas and other refined energy products.

The measure now goes to the White House for President Barack Obama's signature.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said the legislation, coming after a year in which the Obama administration's direct diplomacy efforts were largely rebuffed by Iran, represented "the most powerful sanctions ever imposed by the Congress on the government of Iran."

Foreign companies will be given a choice, McCain said. "Do you want to do business with Iran, or do you want to do business with the United States?"

One provision added in final House-Senate negotiations specifies that foreign banks interacting with the Revolutionary Guard or certain Iranian banks will be shut out of the U.S. financial system. That measure alone has "the potential to be a game changer" in Iran's defiance of international criticism of its nuclear program, said House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman, D-Calif.

The Senate vote was 99-0. The House vote was 408-8.

The House passed its original version last December, and the Senate in March. But at the urging of the White House, Democratic leaders put off a final vote as they waited for diplomatic talks to play out.

Those talks culminated two weeks ago with the U.N. Security Council approving a fourth round of sanctions against Iran. The European Union is considering its own package of penalties and last week the Treasury Department added three dozen more companies and individuals to those blacklisted because they contribute to Iran's nuclear program or help Iran evade existing sanctions.

The Tehran government has shrugged off the latest U.N. penalties and says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

The congressional legislation would:

_Expand the scope of the 1996 Iran Sanctions Act by penalizing foreign companies that assist Iran's energy sector. While Iran is a major exporter of oil, it relies heavily on imports for its refined products such as gasoline.

_Ban U.S. banks from dealing with foreign banks doing business with the Revolutionary Guard or aiding Iran's nuclear program.

_Ban foreign companies from U.S. government procurement contracts if they provide Iran with technology used to restrict the free flow of information. Iranians involved in human rights abuses would be barred from obtaining visas and be subject to having their assets in the United States seized.

_Provide a legal framework for U.S. states, local governments and other investors to divest their portfolios of foreign companies involved in Iran's energy sector.

Lawmakers from both parties stressed that the bill will be ineffective if the Obama administration, like past administrations, chooses not to punish violators in order to avoid confrontations with other countries.

"We have been profoundly unhappy over the years that successive administrations failed to implement the 1996 Iran Sanctions Act," Berman said.

The legislation represents "one of our last best hopes to force Iran to end its nuclear weapons program," said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, top Republican on the Foreign Affairs Committee. If it is ignored as in the past, she said, "then we will have failed the American people."

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., the top Senate negotiator on the bill, acknowledged the weak response of past presidents, but he said the new bill, while still containing waiver provisions, states "in no uncertain terms" that the president must investigate if there is credible evidence of a violation and ultimately impose sanctions.

There were other misgivings. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., who voted against it, said sanctions don't always have the desired effect. "Not one member of the Iranian elite will lack for gasoline while ordinary Iranians will go without," he said.

Fariborz Ghadar, a scholar and Iran expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said he didn't think the new penalties would have a substantial economic impact. He said Iran's oil industry has already been hit by restrictions on direct investment and that Iran, in anticipation of sanctions on gas sales, has taken steps to reduce domestic consumption and cut dependence on gas imports from 40 percent of total use to less than 30 percent.

___

Online:

Information on the bill, H.R. 2194, can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Congress on Thursday overwhelmingly passed tough new sanctions against Iran, sending a message to the Tehran government that notions of becoming a nuclear power could be accompanied...
WASHINGTON — Congress on Thursday overwhelmingly passed tough new sanctions against Iran, sending a message to the Tehran government that notions of becoming a nuclear power could be accompanied...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 265
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
spytheweb 11:50 PM on 06/24/2010
“Here's another reason to attack Iran, they don't have a central banking system.

"Islamic scholars have been seeking to devise a global banking system that would serve as an alternative to the usury-based scheme now in control internationally, and Iran has led the way in devising that model. Iran is characterized as a democratic Islamic republic, which enforces Islamic principles not only  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koroush1336
An human rights activist and totally anti-mullahs,
03:19 PM on 07/05/2010
The Mullahs are beginnig to feel the pressure from the SACTIONS. This is the best way to confront with this BEAST! The first PHASE has done it to the GAS prices. The Mullahs are raising the Gas PRICES. That would mean a great deal of pressure on the people in Iran. But whatever the PRESSURE(S) on the people would be, it is NOT greater than the MULLAHS' PRESSURE ON THE PEOPLE IN IRAN!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bonaboman
01:59 PM on 06/27/2010
Sanctions do not work. We have had sanctions in the past; Marc Rich and Pincus Green violated them; then, Willie Clinton pardoned them. Rich and Green have hundreds of millions as a result of their illegal trading with Iran.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
koroush1336
An human rights activist and totally anti-mullahs,
10:05 AM on 06/26/2010
TO those who are opposing the Sanctions! What are you suggesting instead? Do you want the MILITARY to get involved? Do you want another "BURNNING POINT" in ME? Don't we have enough of BLOODSHEDS? Leave alone the fact that only one smallest Military Attack will help the Mullahs to remain in power for a longer time. The Mullahs would LOVE to see the people of Iran getting KILLED and just like the DEAD KHOMEINI HISELF, CONFASCATE ALL THE PROBLEMS INSIDE IRAN TO THIS "GREAT BLESSING!" AND CRASH THE DEMOCRATIC FORCES IN IRAN. That was the "POLICY" during the Iran-Iraq war. Khomeini called the WAR " A BLESSING SENT FROM god HIMSELF"! These are the kind of "CREATURES" who are in power in Iran. The best SOLUTIONS for this problem are more broader and effectiver SANCTIONS. STOP BUYING THE OIL FROM THE MULLAHS. STOP SELLING GAS TO MULLAHS. AND MAKE THIS AS A GENERAL SANCTIONS WHICH RUSSIA AND CHINA WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW TOO!
04:33 PM on 06/26/2010
Leave Iran alone!

Fix these problems in US instead:

high rate jobless Americans, the real number is 30-35% amound active male job seekers and not 12% official statistics,

expensive and inadequate heath care in US,

expensive and inadequate education,

influence of MIC and Zionists over politicians,

corrupt impartial media,

make people really own their home and not being milkcows for banks
etc etc!

We cannot solve our own problems, why we should care about other nation's problems!
05:01 PM on 06/26/2010
How about leaving Iran's problem to Iranians and take care of our own problems?

Do you have any problem with it?

People get what they deserve.

We deserve Bush and Obama, Fox News, New York Times etc and all the lies which have been sold to us!

People of Iran deserve their government, good or bad might be subject of discussion, but US interference in internal affairs of another country should not be the subject of any discussions if Americans were more politically educated.

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will be!
05:36 AM on 06/26/2010
Afghanistan Irag Vietnam- Will pale into insignificance if America intends to go to war with these guys.
09:20 PM on 06/25/2010
I'm still waiting for internet grassroots movement that requires all member of congress to sign a binding document before elections to forgo any lobbies groups support and automatic kicking out of office if they break their promise in a next election, much like a massive internet grassroots movement which elected Obama against well established old guards in D.C., that's a one way to separate corruption from politics!
02:41 AM on 06/26/2010
The system is fraudulent! Obama was a sleeper cell and was implanted to fool us all!

The only way forward is to chose educated people from grass movement itself, and not trust the media or democratic party to chose it for us.

The litmus test should be that these grassroot candidates be anti Zionits and anti AIPAC!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
08:12 PM on 06/25/2010
AP- Noting the success of Iran in removing fraudulent American bankers and financiers from its financial system, the country of Lichtenstein has vowed to start its own nuclear enrichment program, saying quote " if investing 30% of our GDP in nuclear power, energy and nuclear weapons helps reduce banking fraud and scams, the benefits certainly outweigh the costs.

Seeking to benefit from the removal of fraudulent American bakers from their economy and adding to the drama the country of Brazil further threatened we have lots and lots and lots of yellow cake. We don't know what to do with it but it looks menacing and we can make more of it. The minister of Iceland added we have lots of aluminum tubes. Lot and lots of them. They're an alloy of tin and aluminum but since they're more than 51% aluminum they qualify.

Not to be outdone by the drama, Alaska's Inuit leading spokesperson chimed in, "we are going to build an Igloo the size of the New Orleans super dome". When asked that they were going to put in the giant igloo the Inuits said, "we don't know but we are in negotiations with Lichtenstein, Brazil and Iceland".
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hodz
05:51 PM on 06/25/2010
Actually, the sanctions hurts the US more than Iran because other countries have replaced the US. Also, Iranians have been importing goods from other countries. Further, some of the US products found in Iran are manufactured by the US companies overseas and imported from the manufacturing country. This is one of the reasons why outsourcing of our manufacturing goods helps Iran beat the sanctions.

Therefore, the latest bill is to divert attention from the actual problems at home, Middle East, and Afghanistan.
06:14 PM on 06/25/2010
What diverting attention?

Look at the number of posts here in HP on these issue!

Iran is a major issue for US since US policies in ME is based on the geopolitical goal to make Israel the only regional power in ME.

If this is a diversion, then it was executed very lousy!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hodz
06:32 PM on 06/25/2010
Yes, even the Shah knew that and that's why he was removed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKYlvyZwHHU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCMftp2bdJA&feature=related
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:08 PM on 06/25/2010
"The legislation represents "one of our last best hopes to force Iran to end its nuclear weapons program," said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, top Republican on the Foreign Affairs Committee" What nuclear weapons program?! When a member of Foreign Affairs Committee is so misinformed or uninformed, what can be expected from other members or the public?!!
04:32 PM on 06/25/2010
This is an order from above, since there is not a single credible evidence that Iran has or intends to build a nuclear bomb in future.

This is ME geopolitics in display to make Israel the regional power in ME, by physically eliminating her competitors in ME.

The war cycle to make Israel the regional power in ME will result in future wars between US and Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Egypt if the current democratic revolution in Egypt succeeds.

American people should know the facts, back on white, about the final goals and decide if the price to be paid for Israel is too high or not.

If the price is too high which it is, the question is what forces are at work to put interests of Israel ahead of US interests?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:50 PM on 06/25/2010
"American people should know the facts, back on white". For that to happen you may have to wait for couple of centuries!
http://counterpunch.com/weir02262010.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:02 PM on 06/25/2010
fanned
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hodz
05:58 PM on 06/25/2010
I am not surprised that she is lying to her teeth because she is a staunch supporter of Israel and dead against Iran. In fact, she is well-informed, but intentionally lies in order to mislead the public.
03:39 PM on 06/25/2010
CONGRESS: IRAN SANCTIONS RESPONSE TO NUKE THREAT, OIL SPILL, ICELAND VOLCANO

Congress overwhelmingly approved a sweeping round of sanctions against Iran, putting further pressure on the embattled Islamic Republic. Sponsors of the bill in the house and senate insisted that the lopsided support for the sanctions in both houses had nothing to do with Israel or AIPAC, but was in reality a response to recent actions of the Iranian regime which may have led to a series of disastrous events in the world community.
Senator Chuck Schumer of New York remarked: "Iran's outright refusal to abandon its rights under the Non-proliferation treaty has had a hand in rising global tension, and could have been a cause of increased seismic activity leading to the volcanic eruption in Iceland and a volatile Gulf of Mexico seabed, precipitating the BP rig's blowout. This kind of seismic terror has long been a modus operandi of the fanatical mullahs in their genocidal policy against Israel," remarked the senator.
Congresswoman Jane Harman from California, was equally vehement: "Iran continues to insist on its rights under the NPT, and its continuing cooperation with the IAEA inspections and the lack of evidence of a nuclear weapons program only serves to put pressure on our chief ally in the region, embattled little Israel, with its outlaw arsenal of merely two to three hundred nuclear weapons. The fanatics at the helm of the Islamic Republicregularly often use rhetorical terror and dangerous invidious comparisons to achieve their ends. "
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:03 PM on 06/25/2010
It is hard to believe that Chuck or Jane know what NPT or IAEA stand for! They sure know what BP or AIPAC stand for.
02:36 PM on 06/25/2010
Iran sancions serve only one cause: to get foreign competition out of Iran so US.Corps can get juicy contracts.

You seen footage of the elections?

McDonald's
Caterpillar
Coca Cola
Pepsi Cola
Halliburtoen (yup they are in there)
Dow Chemical
Apple (What did YOU think the twittered with?)
IBM
HP.

You name it - You get it. - Inside Iran.

What You do NOT get is

Any non-american product. Because our oh so vigilant politicians ferreted otu the traitorous non-american corporations dealing with Iran. Weird how they overlooked the american ones, right?
02:53 PM on 06/25/2010
Please watch some political oriented TV Program like this http://www.presstv.com/llnw/, so you know what is really going on.

Please come back in few days after watching a few hours of this program and share your experience.
05:44 AM on 06/30/2010
That's ok. I read books. - You know: the things with pages You flip over and letters You can not copy and paste? - The things written by journalists who actaully know what they are doing and even - yes, it exists! - put references to everything they say?

Try it some time.
02:01 PM on 06/25/2010
Quite honestly, Iran is not at the top of my US concern list at the moment. The economy, campaign finance reform, the Gulf and BP, Afghanistan... all of these things seem to be more pressing than passing more Iran sanctions just now. What good are the current round of sanctions actually doing? Are we honestly benefiting from them as a nation in any way?
02:05 PM on 06/25/2010
It should be.

Another war in ME and we have WWIII.
03:21 PM on 06/25/2010
Absolutely correct the U.S. has alot more pressing issues to deal with than the non-existant threat and nuclear weapons program from Iran - but hey, Iran is a good distraction to divert the attention of the American public from our own domestic ills. And unfortunately, at a time when we need to put our people to work we are imposing sanctions on a country who could provide major source of revenue, and income for the U.S. - now this is what is called stupid foreign policy!
03:55 PM on 06/25/2010
That is also another way to look at this sanction.

But even looking from economical interest of US, this sanction does not make any sense.

We have to make clear that hostility toward Iran has negative consequences for the economy in US.

This sanction and incoming future war with Iran is only good for interest of MIC and Zionists.

American people are losing financially on hostility toward Iran as they did on hostility toward Iraq.

Somebody will make money on sold weapons and stolen oil, but Americans will not see any of that money. Instead multinational corporation fill up their pockets and Americans are left with more jobless and deficit.

People of America should be more educated about their real interests and should not trust their politicians who are controlled by a bunch of elites.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:13 PM on 06/25/2010
At the same time we give away more than $3 billions of aids to Is_rael!
jrfromdallas
I find squirrels untrustworthy too...
01:20 PM on 06/25/2010
I'm sure they are as toothless as they've always been.
12:45 PM on 06/25/2010
U.S. is supporting the wrong ally - Israel. Why would the U.S. support a regime who spies on the U.S.? Why would the U.S. support a regime which steals sensitive classified documents from the U.S.? Why would the U.S. support a regime which killed U.S. marines on USS Liberty? Why would the U.S. support a regime who has killed U.S. humanitarian aid workers (Rachel Corrie and the recent execution style of an American citizen on the Turkish humanitarian Flotilla, and another woman who got blinded by the IDF recently)? Why would the U.S. support a regime who has no resources of its own but can only have access to them by stealing other peoples' and other countries resources? Why would the U.S. support a regime who has helped make the U.S. one of the most hated countries in the world due to its foreign policy and its double standards in support of everything Israel does? Why would the U.S. give its
tax dollars to Israel for financial aid - when the American people are in need of that money right here in this country? Why does the U.S. provide the most sophisticated military equipment to Israel so that it can massacre innocent people in Gaza and in Lebanon?

Is AIPAC the only reason? Our are representatives that greedy and power hungry that they forego the interest of the U.S. and that of the American people who voted them into office?

Is this what they call support for American values?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:19 PM on 06/25/2010
Please add this question to your list. Why is it that one of the most press free nations in the world, has large percentage of her population either misinformed or uninformed?
http://counterpunch.com/weir02262010.html
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
omobob
left coast, usa
12:14 PM on 06/25/2010
Because sanctions worked so well against Iraq? Or Cuba. 50 years of sanctions against Cuba one might just get the impression that they don’t work? Duh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slogward
11:24 AM on 06/25/2010
Congress might just as well send Obama a cake with a file in it. Iran will ignore it,Islamic nations will break it - and removing Ahmadinnejhad will mke no difference.

http://nbyslog.blogspot.com/2010/06/iranian-islamism-dont-ever-assume.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:47 AM on 06/25/2010
From the article you posted, on Iran developing nuclear weapons:

"Iran has always denied the existence of such plans, but then it would. Most UN security council members don't believe the regime, and will vote through the sanctions."

Another perspective:

"since the 1990s there are reports in the Israeli press that within a year or two years Iran will have had nuclear weapon capabilities. In 1990 they said it will happen in 1993, then 1995, 1997 and so on. This is just a continuation of the same game. ..

The worst case scenario would be that Israel with the support of the United States or without it, goes and attacks Iran's nuclear facilities. That would be catastrophic, especially now when the regime in Iran is increasingly losing its legitimacy and its hold over the restive population. ...

An Israeli strike against Iran is possible, it would have horrendous consequences for Israel in particular and the Middle East in general. This is something that I am very, very worried about. As an Israeli, I have seen my leaders many times taking very irrational decisions, which had very negative effects on Israel. The best case scenario would be to recognize that Iran has thus far not really acted outside of the NPT, Whatever Iran has been doing up till now has been in accord with the NPT. This is something which we cannot say about Israel."

http://www.eastwest-review.com/article/iranophobia-interview-proofessor-haggai-ram
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
12:03 PM on 06/25/2010
I have been saying same since Iran announced that they will make nuke energy. Just look how the head of IEIA was elected. They want the world to see and yet they will
finagle the story and leave doubt as to nuke weapons. Do we really want another war ask yourselves that. Can we not exist without a war. I think someone needs to put sanctions on the USA.
12:19 PM on 06/25/2010
Bravo to your logic of reason. I wish others would follow suit.
11:51 AM on 06/25/2010
I read your blog man, honestly, you need to get your head examined. You sure seem to have pent up anger directed at evryone.