More

Gulf Oil Spill: Army Of Robot Subs Working To Contain Leak

LISA LEFF and RAMIT PLUSHNICK-MASTI   06/24/10 08:58 PM ET   AP

Robot Sub Army

NEW ORLEANS — They're like Superman, but underwater: able to withstand 5,000 pounds of subsea pressure, lift up to a ton, take 3D video images and transfer hydraulic power to other equipment.

Submersible robots can do what no person ever could, and they're serving an important role in the fight to stop the oil gushing from the blown-out well in the Gulf of Mexico.

A subcity of underwater robots is busily working 5,000 feet below the surface to help contain the leak that has gushed millions of gallons of oil into the water since the Deepwater Horizon blew up April 20, killing 11 workers.

Anyone who has watched online video of the crude spewing from the seafloor has seen their work – the cameras that provide the feeds are attached to the robots as they maneuver around the spill site.

They also made news this week when one bumped into a cap that has been collecting some of the oil, forcing BP to remove it for about 10 hours and leaving the flow into the Gulf unchecked. But there's been only one other problem in two months, despite the robots' busy task.

"They are very active and they are playing a very vital role in everything we do," BP spokesman Mark Salt said. "People can't be down there."

"Pilots" operate the robots from comfortable-looking, La-Z-Boy-type chairs. On the left armrest of each is a joystick that moves the robot's mechanical arm. On the right, is the joystick that maneuvers the machine through the water. In front of the pilot are 11 monitors, DVD video recorders and a sonar screen.

"It's the most fun job in the world," said Jeffrey Harris of Oceaneering International Inc., which is providing about 14 robots to work on the Gulf spill. The joysticks resemble the ones used in fighter jets and, he joked, they're "a little more sophisticated than your Gameboy."

The most popular remotely operated vehicle – or ROV – being used in the project is the Millennium, an 11.5-foot-long, 8,000-pound, rectangular, foam-topped device with human-like arms that has the added benefit of wrists that can rotate continuously like a drill.

"It's like a construction worker," Harris said. "But it's got a lot more whistles and bells than a construction worker."

The devices using fiber optic technology are what allow the oil industry to drill and remove oil and natural gas from thousands of feet under the water. While a human cannot work in underwater pressures of more than 1,000 feet, these robots have been able to operate in depths of up to 18,000 feet – and for unlimited time, as long as parts don't fail.

Robots have been part of offshore drilling since the 1980s, said Andrew Bowen, director of the National Deep Submergence Facility at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. The technology was first developed by the U.S. Department of Defense to examine downed Soviet submarines.

Since then, the technology has advanced greatly, with the ROVs moving from relatively simple, basketball-shaped devices to the massive boxes of today.

But in 30 years in the industry, Bowen said, he's never seen them used quite like this.

They're helping to hook up fluid connectors, hoses and plumbing; install newly developed oil recovery systems; and build the relief wells that are considered the best hope of stopping the gusher.

Bowen and other scientists also have submersibles monitoring oil flow, gathering data on the ecosystem and sea life and surveying the underwater plume of dispersed oil.

The challenge now is getting the robots to perform new tasks in real time, without the benefit of prior testing or tweaking.

Said Bowen: "It is going to require a range of new techniques and technologies developed and tested and put into service so we are far better prepared to respond in the case, heaven forbid, where we are confronted again with a situation like this."

___

Plushnick-Masti reported from Houston.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS — They're like Superman, but underwater: able to withstand 5,000 pounds of subsea pressure, lift up to a ton, take 3D video images and transfer hydraulic power to other equipment. S...
NEW ORLEANS — They're like Superman, but underwater: able to withstand 5,000 pounds of subsea pressure, lift up to a ton, take 3D video images and transfer hydraulic power to other equipment. S...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 143
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:58 PM on 06/28/2010
Articles such as this should have been running front and center in the Tech section, if not the front page, since day one. There is so much information about the technology involved with drilling, or any fuel extraction method for that matter, that goes unknown to the general public. Had we had more in depth reporting in this area we might have had a much better understanding of the complexities that face these operations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:24 PM on 06/28/2010
Someone should make a video of the robots working to the music of Kraftwerk:

"Vee are zee robots... vee are dancing mekanik..."
01:40 PM on 06/27/2010
Hi QuidamHP,

Part 2
“I don't understand what you are trying to say” – likely because I confused flow rates / force with pressure.

“The pressure in the reservoir is something less than the hydrostatic pressure of 5,000 feet of water (2200 psi) and 13,000 feet of rock (14,400 psi), drilling into the reservoir has not increased the pressure. The pressure of the oil at the well head is reduced by the flow resistance through the well (around 1000 psi) and by the hydrostatic pressure of the column of oil (4,600 psi) i.e. net 8,000 psi – considerably more than the 2,200 psi water pressure. The only thing that will balance the pressures is a few thousand feet of dense drilling mud and concrete”
A diagram would likely avoid this question but what is forcing the oil to gush up?
If it is water, explosives sent down (air, I even read walnuts) to increase the force of flow, why couldn’t they stop sending these down?

“The reservoir is not a void or chamber filled with oil, it's porous sand and rock. To 'apply a cone' to it would require sending the cone down 18,000 feet of drill pipe 6" in diameter”
(Forget the cone)
If relief wells don't work, can’t they remove the structures (drills, etc (need diagram)) - leaving the lower pressure reservoir they started with?

Is this up-to-date?

HowStuffWorks "Offshore Production Platforms
http://science.howstuffworks.com/offshore-drilling6.htm

Thanks again for your replies and expertise
01:28 PM on 06/27/2010
Hi QuidamHP,
Part I
Hope questions aren’t out of article scope
“The How stuff works explanation is simplistic and out of date. It's diagrammatic of a shallow well from about 25 years ago..."

Know of Deep water Horizon Diagram??

“A deep well is not one diameter all the way down. The Macondo hole reduces in diameter starting at 36" and reducing down to 28, 22, 18, 16, 13 7/8, 11 5/8, 9 5/8 and 7.

After the smaller casing is run down inside it must be sealed to the larger diameter with cement. That is what"... "the seal between the two diameters (9 5/8 and 7) of casing. Oil is making its way up the outside of the casing and in through the joint”
Diagram with sagittal section (lengthwise slice) of decreasing Macondo hole diameter??

“The hydrostatic pressure is the same horizontally and vertically”
I assume at same depth (same water weight above?)

“The relief well will approach at an angle and the mud is pumped at high pressure” – Assume mud's pumped at calculated angle within vertical and horizontal?

“There will be erosion outside the casing causing a void and there's a gap between the casing and rock (that's the annulus I was referring to) that should have been filled with cement but obviously wasn't...”
IMO 1 area government failed (along with BP); government should've inspected this omission (along with multitudes more)

Thanks for the very clear link!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjlim
10:47 AM on 06/27/2010
It appears to me that this army is losing the battle......
12:42 PM on 06/26/2010
How Come no one has talked about Cheney's pals "Halliburton's" involvernent withBP.
l say this was "Political Sabotage" to bring down our fine President, Barack Obama
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:53 PM on 06/25/2010
ya, but are the robots properly programed?
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

No way I'm the first one to bring this up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
08:54 AM on 06/26/2010
are the Diebold robots ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 PM on 06/28/2010
These robots aren't even robots in the proper sense, but remote-controlled machines. So no, they're not programmed with the 3 laws, since they're not autonomous.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:51 PM on 06/28/2010
Maybe they should be programed so that we can get rid of human error- maybe hand over the whole oil industry to robots to manage.
Stupid humans!
08:31 PM on 06/25/2010
This crisis reminds me of one of my favorite poems by Antonio Machado:

The Wind, One Brilliant Day


"The wind, one brilliant day, called
to my soul with an odor of jasmine.

"In return for the odor of my jasmine,
I'd like all the odor of your roses."

"I have no roses; all the flowers
in my garden are dead."

"Well then, I'll take the withered petals
and the yellow leaves and the waters of the fountain."

the wind left. And I wept. And I said to myself:
"What have you done with the garden that was entrusted to you?"

What have we done to the beautiful environment that is such a gift to us?
08:17 PM on 06/25/2010
When a hurricane picks up the oil and dispersant and dumps it on inland crops and entire lakes that provide water to millions of people like lake Lanier or Okachobee are irretriveably poisoned, I want to see the magic robot subs make everything better. Oh, and instead of criminal prosecution I guess we will get another apology, and the Government planners will say, "Oh, we never thought that could happen. We too are sorry.
photo
duvster
a legend in his own mind
07:35 PM on 06/25/2010
where's wall-e when you need him?
photo
GeorgeMilquetoast
Striving for a mediocre amount of mediocrity
07:34 PM on 06/25/2010
Picking nits now, but as a technogeek I have both the right and the responsibility to do so.

Huffpo, these underwater submersibles are NOT robots. They are teleoperators. Huge difference.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/585960/teleoperator

Operating these submersibles requires as much human-operator real-time control as operating a Predator drone aircraft. I note that we don't refer to Predators as "robots". One flies through the water while the other flies through the air. While the submersibles have actuators that can manipulate valves, the Predators actuators that can release ordinance.

A true robot, once programmed, requires no human control while completing its designated task.
12:55 AM on 06/26/2010
They're just trying to get us all sci-fied up about the whole thing.
07:17 PM on 06/25/2010
Let's hope it does. Sadly, most humans have to be forced to do the right thing.
07:19 PM on 06/25/2010
Ignore. This was supposed to be a "reply" to a comment below.
05:11 PM on 06/25/2010
Make one of them President. It's not so different than a guy reading from a teleprompter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredisfred
11:44 AM on 06/28/2010
You're right, a robot can read from teleprompters just like Bush did. A robot would also be smarter than Bush without giving it a brain.
05:00 PM on 06/25/2010
Can't wait till the "Firecaine" sweeps through the southeast.

Awesome!
04:56 PM on 06/25/2010
Robots give me gas - gasoline! Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!