More

Sierra Club Receives $11k In Mail, Botched Drug Deal Suspected

First Posted: 06/24/10 09:35 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:55 PM ET

Sierra Club Drig Money

This story comes courtesy of California Watch

By Sarah Terry-Cobo

A Sierra Club mailroom worker combing through the arriving mail at the group's San Francisco headquarters in April opened a package addressed to someone who had never worked for the environmental advocacy group.

In it, the worker found $11,000 in cash, and the Sierra Club called the San Francisco police immediately.

A large, anonymous donation? Apparently not.

Something about the package prompted authorities to launch an investigation, believing the money was part of a drug transaction gone awry. The sender of the package remains a mystery. There was no return address.

The matter came to light earlier this month when a legal notice was posted in the June 10 edition of the Wall Street Journal. It noted that postal inspectors had seized $11,000 from the Sierra Club on April 7 under a federal forfeiture statute of the Controlled Substances Act.

The Sierra Club has been fully cooperating, according to spokeswoman Kristina Johnson. After the mailroom attendant discovered the cash, the group contacted the San Francisco Police Department.

The published legal notice is a requirement of asset forfeiture, so that anyone with a legitimate claim to the money may come forward to claim it, said postal inspector Hilary Rickher. It is not uncommon for people to use the postal service to send proceeds from criminal activity, she said in a telephone interview.

Rickher could not provide further details of the case, citing the open investigation, but she said, "I believe the investigation into prohibited mailings indicates part of a larger criminal conspiracy," related to the Controlled Substances Act.

It's unclear why the Sierra Club mailroom attendant opened a parcel that wasn't addressed to the Sierra Club or one of its employees. It also remains a mystery exactly why the postal inspection service has determined the cash to be drug money. Those details are part of the ongoing case, Rickher said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

Filed by Billy Silverman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
12:23 PM on 06/25/2010
From the facts which the story gives about the conclusion that the money is drug money, one has to conclude that it is not drug money and the cops are stealing $11,000.00. Anyone who finds money gets to keep the money after reasonable efforts to find the owner such as publicizing the find.

The burden of proof is on the cops to prove the money is drug related, but as we see with almost all government, corruption reigns supreme from Officer Perez and the LA's Corruption which resulted in a Consent decree to MMS's allowing the BP oil disaster, power tends to bring corruption and absolute power tends to bring absolute corruption.

Since the sender did not anticipate his package being intercepted, the packaging probably has substantial evidence of its origins. If a forensic investigation does not establish that it is drug money, then it belongs to the cops.

While the law says that people who find money need to make reasonable attempts to find the owner, turning the cash over the the cops is not always "reasonable."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
05:05 PM on 06/25/2010
I don't see how the story shows that the police are improperly seizing money and I'm sure the US Postal Inspection Service has a valid reason for seizing the money, even if it hasn't been published (very common when dealing with ongoing drug investigations). It's not normal for large amounts of cash to be sent through the mail and it was the Sierra Club mailroom worker who contacted police because he found it suspicious.
10:36 AM on 06/25/2010
Nothing suspicious about his opening the package. He works in a mailroom, and after a while, you don't bother to look at mailing addresses. Do you always check to see if the mail in your mailbox is for you before you open it? Good job turning it in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:19 AM on 06/25/2010
The mail clerk did what??!! That just doesn't seem right.
Sounds fishy to me.
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
08:24 AM on 06/25/2010
Sounds fishy that he was honest and reported the discovery?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:59 PM on 06/25/2010
No, it just seemed strange he opened someone's mail that wasn't addressed to them or the Sierra Club. But Tyler's post below seems to clear that up!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tyler-Durden
leading a revolution of one
11:41 AM on 06/25/2010
it's probably safe to assume that opening parcels sent to the organization is part of his job.

i receive all incoming shipments for this agency (that i'm at right now, not Sierra), and i open anything not addressed specifically to a current employee. i also have an established protocol to follow for suspicious packages.

what i'd like to know is why the cops suspect it's drug money rather than an anonymous donation to the org.

i AM impressed that the employee didn't just "lose" that package. " what? no i thought it was just packing material!" haha!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:03 PM on 06/25/2010
Thanks for that info. My friend used to work at the Post Office, which I'm sure is run different than a mail room for a specific company, but he would have had to turn that undeliverable package in to a supervisor. You couldn't just go around opening letters.
Truth is stranger than fiction, so who knows. But it might be a way for the worker to "laundry" some $$$. Send a package, open it, no one claims it? you get to keep it??
Like I said who knows??? But thanks.
photo
quoveritas
Surgeon General warns: too much truth can cause...
01:54 AM on 06/25/2010
Stinks like rethuglican chicanery to me.
photo
1logicalthinker
with occasional humorous overtones :)
01:44 AM on 06/25/2010
They meant to send it to the bank for laundering :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:43 AM on 06/25/2010
Meg Whitman was sending her toilet paper to her Locker at the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club will be hurt from this when Meg is in office. You wont like it when Meg is angry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bibulus
On my way back from Hawaii with the long-form bio
01:40 AM on 06/25/2010
The definition of character is the mail room employee who turned over the $11k cash fictitious recipient and no-return address. Kudos!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
charon
Censorship is the betrayal of democracy
12:48 AM on 06/25/2010
After the smear job they did on ACORN, I would suspect an attempt to smear the Sierra Club. Similar M.O. Reeks of old Tricky Dicky. And $11,000 might be fair amount to a wannabee Fox Channel hero, but it's chump change in the drug world.
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
08:25 AM on 06/25/2010
It reminds me of when GW Bush's secret "debate practice tapes" were mailed to the Gore campaign. They didn't bite, either.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SteveSFM
politically incorrect left-winger
10:06 AM on 06/25/2010
I thought the same thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcd8822
10:43 PM on 06/24/2010
If they cannot find the original sender I will be happy to accept the package on their behalf.
photo
1logicalthinker
with occasional humorous overtones :)
01:43 AM on 06/25/2010
You beat me to it :) Mark me down as an alternate, if you fail to show up :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcd8822
10:45 PM on 06/25/2010
You've got it. I am one to always have a back up. LOL
photo
CaroleK1970
I want my country forward
09:47 PM on 06/24/2010
it was a payment from Meg Whitman to secure someones vote at the Sierra Club. Based on the ebay method, she is going to keep throwing money on things in hopes to possess them
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcd8822
10:44 PM on 06/24/2010
ROFL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:20 AM on 06/25/2010
"it was a payment from Meg Whitman to secure someones vote at the Sierra Club"

_FAT CHANCE_, LOL...
09:37 PM on 06/24/2010
San Francisco??

Must be drugs.

Lousy hippies
09:46 PM on 06/24/2010
Try reading the article again.
10:01 PM on 06/24/2010
Maybe you could give the article another go before your next munchies run
11:15 AM on 06/25/2010
Yeah! Hippies and their pot. They should be cracked out on prescription drugs, like responsible members of society.
02:12 PM on 06/25/2010
They don't even know if the money had anything to do with drugs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
09:27 PM on 06/24/2010
Follow the Money!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LiberalTreeHugger
09:12 PM on 06/24/2010
Something smells like Big Government..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:06 PM on 06/24/2010
If the parcel wasn't addressed to the Sierra Club, why was it in their mail room to begin with?
Anyhow, the criminals are not going to claim it, I hope the Sierra Club gets to keep the cash. They do good work (yes, I'm a member of their Canadian affiliate... :) )
12:15 AM on 06/25/2010
i'll alert the media.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:21 AM on 06/25/2010
Good, spread the voice, the more people support the Sierra Club, the more people wake up about BP's _fascism...
11:18 AM on 06/25/2010
I think it had the Sierra Club's physical address, just not their name.
08:56 PM on 06/24/2010
I guess the Sierra Club does not need the money. Mail room guys open mail all the time, this one blew it.

Sierra Club office is in the same building that has some aids programs also, I bet it was a donation.

Drugs, ya right just a way the feds can keep it.
11:16 AM on 06/25/2010
Only if the Feds can prove it, I'm pretty sure.

From the circumstances listed, it does seem likelier that this is drug money than that it's anything else. Sounds like whoever sent it got the wrong address, OR the wrong person delivered it or opened it....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tyler-Durden
leading a revolution of one
11:51 AM on 06/25/2010
"hey, this money smells like cocaine!"

"wait, let me smell that again........yeah, we're gonna need to hold on to this."