iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Dems, Citing Corruption, Block Reconstruction Funds For Afghanistan

First Posted: 06/28/10 04:43 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:55 PM ET

The House Democrat who oversees funding for Afghanistan's redevelopment and reconstruction said on Monday that she is stripping money from her foreign aid bill in reaction to pervasive corruption. Dave Obey, chairman of the Appropriations Committee, supports the move made by subcommittee chairwoman Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.), according to an Obey spokesman.

Lowey cited pervasive corruption in Afghanistan as the cause for her decision to pull the funding from the appropriations bill working its way through her State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee.

"I do not intend to appropriate one more dime for assistance to Afghanistan until I have confidence that U.S. taxpayer money is not being abused to line the pockets of corrupt Afghan government officials, drug lords and terrorists," said Lowey.

A Lowey spokesman said the restrictions would not apply to direct humanitarian assistance for projects such as refugee camps, but would limit funds for USAID and the State Department, which funnel money to reconstruction efforts -- money that is often siphoned many times over.

The request that Lowey is rejecting amounts to $3.9 billion for the 2011 fiscal year.

On Friday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she recently traveled to Afghanistan and found the corruption staggering. "I was just there for Mother's Day, in Afghanistan, that weekend, and traveled into the country even more remotely than Kandahar," Pelosi said in an interview in her office. "And the corruption issue, it's problematic. And you know what? A lot of it is our money."

"This is about systemic, huge money," she said.

The chairman of the Senate subcommittee who oversees the same funding stream in the upper chamber is war opponent Pat Leahy (D-Vt.), who was chairing Elena Kagan's confirmation hearing and couldn't be reached.

Pelosi said that she wasn't sure if there are enough votes in the House to approve funding for the war operations, either.

"I don't know how many votes there are in the caucus, even condition-based, for the war, hands down. I just don't. We'll see what the shape of it is the day of the vote," she said, but added that she believes President Obama's surge should be given time to work until the planned drawdown in 2011. "The thing is, is this president has to give his plan a chance until next year, when we have to withdraw them," she said.

A Lowey spokesman said that the chairwoman's move was a response to a Wall Street Journal report about $3 billion in cash being openly flown out of Kabul International Airport over the past three years and a Washington Post item about top aides to President Hamid Karzai repeatedly derailing corruption probes.

"The alleged shipment of billions in donor funds out of Afghanistan and allegations of Afghan government insiders impeding corruption investigations are outrageous," said Lowey. "Furthermore, the government of Afghanistan must demonstrate that corruption is being aggressively investigated and prosecuted."

UPDATE: Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) took to the House floor Monday to make the case that the corruption is endemic to the occupation and that the only way to limit it is to leave Afghanistan.

WATCH:

Ryan Grim is the author of This Is Your Country On Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,173
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (110 total)
04:12 PM on 06/30/2010
asdasd
04:12 PM on 06/30/2010
Testttt
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
12:59 PM on 06/30/2010
Thank god someone in power is taking the failure of leadership and the pervasive corruption seriously. We need some fixin here at home. How 'bout diverting some of those tax dollars to the taxpayers districts that generated them?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flabingo
01:54 AM on 06/30/2010
We can not afford this war financially, unless we decide to continue to borrow tne money from our best friend CHINA to fund it. Obama is our commander-in-chief and he is failing us, because he wants to get re-elected! "Change we can believe in" NO WAY
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whitney Kyle
02:32 PM on 06/30/2010
The military/industrial/financial/congressional complex of corruption is far more powerful than the office of the US president. Changing the course of the international uber rich cannot be done in a year, two years, or even four years. For one, the m/i/f/c complex is backed by 5 judicially active supreme court justices. The process of taking back our government began in 2006 and will take at least another decade to dislodge them and change course.
Blaming our weak presidency on Obama is just deflecting from the real entrenched power that rules America. As angry as I am over the seemingly slow pace of reform, I also am fully aware that the idea of an all powerful president is a myth. Especially if you expect him to not follow in the footsteps of his predecessor, making up his own law as he goes along.
photo
suzc
Speak the Truth, even if your voice shakes
05:22 PM on 06/30/2010
If you are right about the m/i/c complex, and I suspect you may be, then it is far Too Big To Be Allowed to Live. Period. Because it has nothing to do with democracy or elections. Just money and power. If they have so weakened the presidency (or run it, as with W), then we need to revolt in the streets if necessary to reverse that.
photo
suzc
Speak the Truth, even if your voice shakes
05:22 PM on 06/30/2010
PS No more Rocky; only Denver Post; Rosen one of those who made the switch.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whitney Kyle
12:57 AM on 06/30/2010
We left millions of unemployed with no means of support and we give drug lords and war lords billions of our money? So the Japanese can get first dibs on the mineral rights? Bin Laden left the area how long before our troops arrived? Who did we fight this war for again?
Where are congress's fiscal conservatives? Why aren't they more vocal on this? What were the tax offsets Americans had to give up to pay for this? Why wasn't a little left for job saving or creation and unemployment extensions?
What exactly were Bush and Cheney's objectives for invading two countries again? Why have so many people died again? Why didn't we invade the country that attacked us on 9/11 instead of two that surround Iran?
Is the American media capable of ever telling us the truth? Wasn't that once its lofty purpose?
Thank you Nita Lowey!
photo
suzc
Speak the Truth, even if your voice shakes
10:19 AM on 06/30/2010
All good questions!
I'm certainly asking them!
Maybe I'll make appts with my senators and ask them directly.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
omega777
Yellow cake is the Bomb
09:14 AM on 06/29/2010
Did you see the article posted a little earlier? Harry Reid’s spokesman said NO - actually derided a Republican proposal for a STAND ALONE extension bill!!!!!!!!! WAKE UP! It isn’t just the conservatives - the Democrats are using this issues as a way to roll all the blame on the Republicans. They’re just as guilty!!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Debbie McPherson
07:54 PM on 06/30/2010
omega777

It's so obvious GOP & DEMS are two sides of the same corporate coin

take healthcare reform - Obama is busy patting himself on the back - but it is just anotehr windfall for BIG Insurance - their stocks went up after it passed

and our premiums followed suit - up, up UP

Thank you Obama for the big nothing you do for Main Street

and even though we got that huge tax break (amounting to up to $700.00!! big whoppe!) most Americans are far worse off than ever

but you are seeing to it that the rich continue to get richer.

No change there.
photo
AmigaMan
Your micro-bio will never meet our guidelines.
09:02 AM on 06/29/2010
Good! Our public school system and Medicare could use that money instead of those stupids over there laughing at America.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tosc
07:22 AM on 06/29/2010
one hundred Billion dollars of aid????? wth.....I can't pay my student loans and this smuck was getting billions of dollars...and washington honestly thought that there would not be some foul play some where??? Every time I read these kinds of things and then look down at my measly part time pay check and see all the taxes taken out I could scream. Our own education system is crumbling and washington gives billions of OUR dollars away....
09:05 AM on 06/29/2010
And that's just the start of it. We're giving billions away to government contractors too. They have been caught left and right over billing in the billions. But, we reward them with more contracts. In fact, there's only one reason our government won't end these wars. There's absolutely nothing to win militarily and no chance of success in nation building in Afganistan. But, our largest government contractors would lose billions if we did the logical thing and start using that money in our own country where it's needed most.

This is worse than Vietnam because, at this point, our government is complete hijacked by big corporations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChanEpic
09:20 AM on 06/29/2010
yeah, that's called Fascism and it is alive and well and has been for decades..Unfortunately.
07:13 AM on 06/29/2010
finally. now they need to stop the funding for the deployment of our troops and pull them all out. if we're going to spend money we don't have it should be here at home. not some rat trap halfway around the world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
06:36 AM on 06/29/2010
Here's the fallacy with our game plan. It assumes the Afghan people are all that motivated to fight the Taliban, ever! If they were wouldn't it had happened within the last nine years!! Second, the plan assumes that Karsai or whomever replaces him will partner with us in this goal.

I see very little evidence either of these assumptions are true. It took the Taliban a matter of months to rise to the occasion to defend their country. Why would it take a decade for the ordinary Afghan on the street to do the same?

It depresses me to think, "...be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in," means the same thing as that sick , "Stay the course," we heard for all those years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rendy Bee Mulyono
Someone with constant stream of
05:29 AM on 06/29/2010
SUPER!
photo
egal
Reality disagrees with Conservative assessments
04:58 AM on 06/29/2010
The corruption is endemic to the system, not the occupation (which really needs to stop just as much as the war needs to never have started, and is only a little less unlikely at the current moment). Leaving won't stop it, nor will it let our troops actually LEAVE.

But it's about time we stopped these ridiculous money sinks from taking what our country needs. Now, we just need to tax all monies made through business with/in the US...probably even less likely.
ClaudiaL
Grover, please proceed...
02:58 AM on 06/29/2010
Good for the Dems. I like this strategy.
06:36 AM on 06/29/2010
That's two of us. GW Bush and his handlers created huge sinkholes to shovel money into and it needs to stop. Now.
07:18 PM on 06/29/2010
Even in the most seemingly nonpartisan of articles, one of you parrots finds a way to blame G.W. At what point do we realize that we are arguing in circles? Poor Bush doesn't make Afghans corrupt any more than Barry Obama causes oil spills. No CEO would ever pull the economic stunts Bush and Obama have pulled. That's why they say "good enough for government."
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
02:55 AM on 06/29/2010
$3.9 BILLION for Afghanistan, yet the incumbents fight over giving unemployment benefits, insurance, or jobs for Americans. This shows the contemp incumbents have for the American people.
02:43 AM on 06/29/2010
Was there ever any doubt?