iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Border Plan Doesn't Include Money For Already Overwhelmed Courts

AMANDA LEE MYERS   06/29/10 10:22 PM ET   AP

Obama Border Bill

PHOENIX — President Barack Obama's $600 million border security plan seems to have it all: More than 1,000 agents, seven gunrunner teams, five FBI task forces and more prosecutors and immigration judges.

But it doesn't include $40 million to help the already overwhelmed federal courts along the U.S.-Mexico border that will likely be inundated with additional drug and other criminal cases, a judiciary official tells The Associated Press.

Increased patrols will mean more arrests and more cases sent to the five district courts on the border, from California to Texas. The courts handle cases including drug trafficking, smuggling and illegal immigrants charged with other serious crimes.

"The current workload in our Southwest border courts is staggering," said James Duff, director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

Duff said the judiciary asked Congress for the $40 million on June 22 after realizing it wasn't sent with Obama's plan. He said judiciary requests are usually included with the president's budget proposals, but wasn't in this case.

White House spokesman Luis Miranda said the request wasn't submitted with the president's because it's a separate branch of government.

Obama's plan does include more money for immigration judges, which operate in the executive branch. But those judges deal almost exclusively with civil deportation matters, not criminal cases, like the district courts.

The chief judge for the District of Arizona in Tucson, located in what's become the busiest corridor for illegal immigration and drug smuggling, said he fears that increased patrols will bring even more cases to his already swamped court.

"If you have more agents in the field, they're going to make more apprehensions. ... Being here on the ground in the middle of everything happening, we would have to have more resources if they're going to bring us more cases," Judge John Roll told The AP.

Last fiscal year, which ended Sept. 30, nearly 2,700 of the district's more than 5,200 criminal cases involved immigration, Roll wrote in a letter this month to a handful of lawmakers on appropriations committees. He said judges work long hours and take cases home on weekends and while they travel.

Judges in the five border courts handle hundreds more cases than most of their counterparts in the rest of the country.

The system became so overrun with pot busts, for example, that until recently federal prosecutors in Arizona generally declined to press charges against marijuana smugglers caught with less than 500 pounds.

The increase in immigration cases since 2005 can be attributed to increased law enforcement and a Border Patrol initiative to arrest and prosecute illegal immigrants in federal courts on charges of illegal entry, rather than send them to an immigration judge for civil deportation proceedings.

In Arizona, nearly 23,000 people were charged with immigration offenses in fiscal year 2009, almost triple the 7,700 people charged with such offenses in fiscal year 2005, according to Duff's office.

Immigration offenses more than doubled in that time in New Mexico and the southern district of California, and nearly doubled in the western district of Texas. Such cases grew by 70 percent in the southern district of Texas, which saw the most total cases at 26,700.

Combined, the border districts handled nearly 75 percent of criminal immigration cases in the nation's 94 districts in fiscal year 2009 and almost 40 percent of all the nation's federal criminal case filings, Duff said.

Duff said his office was not trying to get the $40 million to "feather our own nests. We're doing this basically out of desperation for our courts."

"It's going to overwhelm the system," Duff said. "It undermines the effectiveness of law enforcement if the system can't handle all the cases. The system can't work without additional resources being given to the judicial branch, as well."

He said the $40 million would go toward a new judge in each border district, attorneys for indigent defendants, court security officers and other staff.

David Leopold, a Cleveland immigration lawyer and the incoming president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said he's worried that justice will be compromised in federal courts unable to keep up with the caseload.

"If you get a lot more defendants than you have lawyers to represent them, you get into situations where people feel pressured to plead out their cases without adequate investigation," he said. "You're overloading the system and it has to break somewhere."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
PHOENIX — President Barack Obama's $600 million border security plan seems to have it all: More than 1,000 agents, seven gunrunner teams, five FBI task forces and more prosecutors and immigratio...
PHOENIX — President Barack Obama's $600 million border security plan seems to have it all: More than 1,000 agents, seven gunrunner teams, five FBI task forces and more prosecutors and immigratio...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 644
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
04:46 PM on 07/02/2010
In the 1950s the people and government of the United States had a "yes we can" attitude. When veterans returning from war needed jobs or a recession was displacing American workers, the federal government stepped up to the plate and supported American workers. That's right, the government of the people and for the people actually stood up for the people against illegal aliens. Operation WBI was a complete success, it rid the nation of illegal aliens and opened up job opportunities for legal residents.

Now we have a government that says "no we can't" when it comes to defending our borders and deporting foreign invaders. Maybe our beloved leader should look at history and institute operation WBII but I doubt he has the stomach for serious action on the issue. The Dems constant position of "no we can't" protect the border and deport the illegals makes me think I'll vote no you can't have another term in 2010 and 2012. Adios illegals and the pandering politicians that support them.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
06:20 PM on 07/01/2010
For the many FRight-wingers here who claim to be Libertarian, you should support the complete decriminalization of pot.

Why would you want big brother telling you if you can or cannot chose to smoke pot?

If you are Libertarian, you agree that prosecution of pot offenses should be dropped all together.
06:32 AM on 07/01/2010
Across the nation the children of illegals are planting drug gangs where none existed before. Obama is blissfully unaware of this and La Raza calls anyone who points to this fact a racist.

Obama and La Raza would have us believe the murderers of 23,000 Mexicans over the past five years do not number among the 30 million illegals. Gullible pro-amnesty level-5 vegans want us to believe this murderers will all stay in Mexico.

Chuck Schumer, the architect of Obama's "immigration reform" bill tells us all illegals will go through a thorough background check before being granted citizenship. Chuck Schumer doesn't tell us how the most corrupt criminal justice system in the Western Hemisphere will accomplish this daunting task.

And it is 30 million, not the 12 million the U.S. Census gives. Micro-economic indicators such as remittances, K-1 to K-12 enrollment, border inflow, housing data tell us of population of illegals is larger than all but three South American countries, a population almost as large as America's African American population.

These are all not hard-working peasant farmers and you and Obama are fools to think so.

Shouldn't we at least devise a way of weeding out the criminals before giving them the right to vote?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
GinnyW
Socialize education, public health and military
03:48 PM on 07/01/2010
"weeding out the criminals before giving them the right to vote"??? Exactly what we've been saying! Get back to the war on drugs (after legalizing all pot, not just "medicinal" and taxing its sale), go after ALL criminals, and quit the diversion of concentrating on civil violators of immigration regulations and, more narrowly, only those with brown skin (birth rates for non-whites have always been higher, primarily because of their religion, but those stats include legal Americans and legal residents and white Catholics, too).
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
04:23 PM on 07/01/2010
"La Raza" just means "the community." BTW, there are Republican Latinos involved in "La Raza" too.

You just want to make "La Raza" into a Latino bogeyman like you did ACORN.
11:15 PM on 06/30/2010
“Playing the race card gets you no cigar from me, and although it will get you some votes from gullible gringos, it won't get you the amount you need to pass Obama's amnesty bill.

And exactly how will questioning people at the border reveal who is a felon? That's ridiculous, precisely the kind of cluelessness Obama embraces.

We won't be able to verify who's a felon that's why La Raza is already preparing it's initiative for doing away with criminal background checks: "The Mexican criminal justice system is corrupt. Why should all Mexicans be punished?"

This is the kind of lying and bullying that went on during Reagans amnesty program. None of the rules were followed. No one was refused, the lawyers saw to that and they'll see to it again.

We will under-count illegals by tens of millions. We will not verify anyone's criminal background. We will dump 30 million people on this country we know noting about.”

La Raza is bullying Obama. La Raza is telling Obama if he doesn't amnesty the 30 million he'll be out of a job in 2012.

Obama is running scared.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:02 PM on 06/30/2010
They are already so overwhelmed that they don't prosecute for less than 500lbs., but even discussing regulating and taxing it is seen as a "joke" by our President, the hope and change guy, that has admitted to using himself. The drug dealers couldn't do more to guarantee their own profitability if they tried.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
05:01 PM on 06/30/2010
Decriminalize marijuana and tax it. Fewer criminal prosecutions and higher tax revenue. Problem solved.

Or AZ could just drop their stupid low quantity marijuana prosecutions. Problem solved.

Or Americans could just stop smoking pot. Problem solved.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
frixx
04:49 PM on 06/30/2010
More guilt tripping from the LA Times:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-summer-meals-20100630,0,6438591.story

When María Elena García rushes off to work at a Mexican restaurant, she takes comfort in knowing that her two children, ages 12 and 16, will get a healthy lunch at school.

But now that school is out, she worries about what they will eat.

"I know it is nothing good," said the MacArthur Park mother. "We don't have good food at home."

- When did it become the responsibility of taxpayers to feed everyone's illegal kids?

Sorry but these people need to learn self reliance instead of constantly reaching for a hand out from the govt.

If we don't put a stop to this, we will soon see these people sending their children to be in the streets for money.

And lastly, the women cited in the story has a 16 year old, who can't cook herself a meal? Puhleese.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
05:05 PM on 06/30/2010
The parents can be self reliant when they can earn a living wage.

And yes, tell those school kids to earn their keep. You wanna put little slave labor facotries in schools? Forget that, I shouldn't give you sociopaths ideas.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
frixx
05:45 PM on 06/30/2010
Actually, adults who cannot manage to restrain themselves from having as many children as they wish, will never manage to attain a decent wage.

We all make choices. Choosing to have children you cannot feed is a rather poor one. Perhaps the Church that encourages this behavior should pay their way. Oh, wait, I forgot, they are declaring bankruptcy so they don't have to pay their victims. No free food there.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
posttime2010
12:59 PM on 06/30/2010
Not prosecuting those with under 500 pounds of pot....500 pounds...WOW

In my state you'd be in jail for life
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josephking
02:33 PM on 06/30/2010
But if you put them in jail you are a racist.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Le Facteur 99
Jeremiah was right.
02:35 PM on 06/30/2010
That Strawman dog won't hunt.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Artemis34
"Women 4 the GOP" is like "Chickens 4 the KFC"
06:20 PM on 06/30/2010
1 oz is "under 500 pounds"
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
IllTakeTheRedEye
Do you know what a nonemployer business is?
02:45 AM on 07/02/2010
You wrote, "US "bought" the Mexican territory in the same way I "buy" your car when I steal it & leave a dollar. "

The land you want to claim to be Mexico's, WAS NOT purchased by Spain or Mexico.
Spain w/Mestizos stole the land from
http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/california/
http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/texas/
http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/arizona/
THESE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE MEXICAN ANCESTRY

Mexican-American war, Mexico UNCONDITIONALLY LOST.
No part of Mexico had to be restored.
It could of been named Arizona today.
Tratado Guadalupe Hidalgo
Part of that treaty was Gadsen Purchase.
NavajoHopiEtc land, never Mexican land

Therefore, does not belong to Mexico today

"The indigenous people were not wiped out. Their genes don't lie."

PLEASE DO LOOK AT THEIR GENES... PLEASE DO.
70-90% MEXICO'S PEOPLE today are descendents of SPAIN.
Mestizo are genetically linked to SPAIN, you know Europe
Source 1, pg 12
http://convergencia.uaemex.mx/rev38/38pdf/LIZCANO.pdf
Source 2
http://www.pnas.org/content/106/21/8611.full
(Too lazy to read?)

"This could help you:

http://www.angelfire.com/realm/shades/nativeamericans/1maps.htm "

I looked at it, unlike your laziness
1) Contradicts you...states USA natives are immigrants from Asia
2) Where it states at the bottom
"Early Peoples of Mesoamerica"
This guy wiped them out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hern%C3%A1n_Cort%C3%A9s

3) angelfire? missed this too
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toltec

Do more research, Ihave
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
IllTakeTheRedEye
Do you know what a nonemployer business is?
02:51 AM on 07/02/2010
Artemis34 10 hours ago (4:31 PM) 697 Fans
"Obama didn't violate the sovereignty of Iraq or Afghanistan, you may be thinking of G W B."

Not what I said.
Libeling again.
Does not make you look smarter, makes you look intimidated.

I said, "According to Obama, we are giving Iraq its country back."

I stand by my statement.
Your's is shifting an argument to suit your backwards purpose, libel.

"At any rate, conservatives have no respect for the sovereignty of other nations, so you put that karma into the world, don't be surprised when you get some of that karma back."

You can name-call all you want, it does not prove your thesis.
I will read EVERY piece of research that you have, if you do not read ones I provide.
I think we know what karma will do.
Up to this point, I know you are refusing to look at what I have provided you.
Karma knows too.
12:33 PM on 06/30/2010
The problem facing AMerica is the millions, tens of millions of "illegals" that were allowed to enter, stay and expend local state and federal monies.

How do we repatriate these "illegals?" That is a question the EU in Europe faces also. FOr us, I really doubt boxcars full to Mexico is the answer, since Mexico doesn't want the problem anymore then we do. In fact, Mexico is hit the hardest since, 99% of these illegals are not Mexican Nationals, let alone the majority when fully analized may not even be latino.

We have a serious problem, and amesty is not the answer.

Charley Miller
charleymiller2010
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josephking
12:48 PM on 06/30/2010
Box cars? How about the LPCs that got them here in the first place.

LPC = leather personnel carriers; aka shoes.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PWM
Eisenhower Republican. Liberalism = Liberty
01:11 PM on 06/30/2010
So you are for death marches.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
GinnyW
Socialize education, public health and military
03:48 PM on 06/30/2010
Most of the 12 million illegals who are visa overstayers didn't walk or come by train; they flew to or drove through regulation checkpoints, but became illegal by not renewing their visas. It is not illegal to walk into this country, or to boat or bike in; Canadians and others do this daily from Canada, eat, go to sporting events, stay with American friends for a week or so, and walk, sail, or bike back home . . . nothing illegal. Illegal acts, except for AZ, are smuggling or falsifying documents to obtain federal benefits. In AZ it's simply being here that can be a felony charge. I'm a Jewish refugee from Europe, came here with my mother in 1945, so I find your box cars/death marches to be a throwback to hatred of another century. Not here, Joe!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
IllTakeTheRedEye
Do you know what a nonemployer business is?
03:30 PM on 06/30/2010
You wrote, "In fact, Mexico is hit the hardest since, 99% of these illegals are not Mexican Nationals, let alone the majority when fully analized may not even be latino."

Where did you get this?

Were you writing about this?

"Mexico is the source of by far the largest number of unauthorized immigrants [in the USA], accounting for 7 million of the 11.9 million unauthorized immigrants in 2008."
Pg31
http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/107.pdf

"About three-quarters (76%) of [USA's] unauthorized immigrant population are Hispanics."
Pg2
http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/107.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
12:13 PM on 06/30/2010
More than 50 people found in Phoenix drop house

PHOENIX (AP) - Authorities say 51 Guatemalan citizens were found in a drop house in southwest Phoenix on Tuesday.

Arizona Department of Public Safety officials say 44 males and seven females were found inside the house. The group included at least six children younger than 12.

DPS spokesman Bart Graves says Phoenix police followed a suspicious looking pickup truck with a large piece of plywood in the truck bed.

Police followed the truck and when they got to the house, officers discovered the people inside.

They were described as thirsty but in relatively good shape. It's unclear how long the group had been inside the house but authorities believe they were paying smugglers between $2,500 and $7,000 apiece.

Graves says two suspects have been taken in for questioning.

http://www.wtvm.com/Global/story.asp?S=12731329
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
posttime2010
01:03 PM on 06/30/2010
Can't be to poor if they pay 7 grand...

But I'm still blow away by the article up above, until recently Fed officials didn't prosecute smugglers with less than 500 pounds of pot....no wonder the drug dealers thought the door were being thrown open to them.....
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
GinnyW
Socialize education, public health and military
04:02 PM on 06/30/2010
Individual states have medical marijuana laws that Feds don't feel it to be sensible to take the the SCOTUS. BORDER smuggling is a different matter, immediate arrest and deportation (with confiscation) by non-entry is accomplished. How do you think the state of AZ has been able to attain such a significant decrease in crime and the US such a large increase in deportation? Whole villages will pool resources from an impoverished mountain village in Chihuahua, for instance, to get a person to a better place, or the individual becomes an indentured servant to a sweat shop or restaurant to pay back the loan, but it never gets paid, and the people are kept as slaves and are moved to other states. Careful! It's "toO poor"; poor command of English could get you thrown in jail, even if you have a driver's license in AZ, unless you're white?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TXfemmom
Grandma with eye on the future
12:06 PM on 06/30/2010
If individuals are detained, have not committed other offenses, and it is the first time they are detained, just make them have a simple hearing and send them back. If they are detained again, make it a criminal matter.

Then, just legalize marijuana, give legal allotments to small farmers to spread around the income, process it, sell it in government stores for medicinal and pleasure use, enforce the laws about no driving while stoned, but otherwise get it out of the criminal courts and SAVE BILLIONS IN JUDICAL AND INCARCERATION, and MAKE SOME MONEY ON IT, LOTS OF MONEY for the sale and taxation of it. That would pull 60% of the income from Mexican cartels and that alone could weaken them enough to be able to get them under control.

We have to learn to be pragmatic and SMART.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
11:26 AM on 06/30/2010
Why don't we declare marshal law and set up military tribunals to handle non citizen pleas? Take this out of our court system and expedite the process. I guess it's because we are a nation living in denial. Many still do not believe there is actually a problem.

So it's called Obama's plan? It's a failure before its even begun. Not a good move for a politician.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Le Facteur 99
Jeremiah was right.
11:42 AM on 06/30/2010
Because that's illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Garspies
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
11:44 AM on 06/30/2010
----------"Take this out of our court system and expedite the process"-----

We don't do this because we are a nation that is living under our constitution>
11:52 AM on 06/30/2010
The Constitution is a very convient document for ideologies.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
11:00 AM on 06/30/2010
Maybe we need to address the U.S. obsession with the need for drugs.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Le Facteur 99
Jeremiah was right.
11:07 AM on 06/30/2010
That would make too much sense, but this country is flooded with Puritanical, knuckle draggers.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
gino618
12:10 PM on 06/30/2010
Yes, because those currently illegal drugs are so helpful to society, aren't they?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
11:13 AM on 06/30/2010
As well as our obsession with selling guns to Mexican drug dealers.
11:46 AM on 06/30/2010
You know the last time I checked my local gun stores, none carried automatic rifles of any kind. Now it seems to me that the guns that are being used in Mexico are mostly automatics. So, call me stupid, exactly what does gun control in this country have to do with the automatic weapons being used in Mexico? Would you name who is obsessing selling guns to the Mexican drug dealers from this country? At this point it would have to be Obama, right. The military is the only ones with access to that type of weaponry.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Don't blame me, I'm not a republicrat.
10:58 AM on 06/30/2010
Why are the courts struggling? I thought these immigrants weren't committing crimes, they just want to work hard and live the American dream...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Le Facteur 99
Jeremiah was right.
10:59 AM on 06/30/2010
Deportations have hearings in Immigration court.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Don't blame me, I'm not a republicrat.
04:04 PM on 06/30/2010
That's nice. Immigration courts aren't the courts being discussed in this article.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
11:01 AM on 06/30/2010
Do you think people are deported without going to court? Really?
12:36 PM on 06/30/2010
Historiucally, we have done so.

1900 - Chinese Exclusion Act
1950's Bracero Program

both basically rounded up racial groups and kicked them out.

and I will avoid War interminents, exodus or aslyum runs (Haiti/S. Africa)
or our early days...Irish, catholic...

charleymiller2010
12:56 PM on 06/30/2010
I been deported a few times, and One never get to see a Judge. farther more, the immigration Officers coerce into signing the "Self deportation" document. the office gets allocated some 45$ per each deportation. And if there's a lot of work they get to do over and sometimes double time. People gets deported just to try it again and get deported again.
10:48 AM on 06/30/2010
As only 520 are being sent to AZ, I doubt the courts will be overwhelmed.
Obama has no intention of protecting the borders from criminals, much less
illegals. He is pressing this against the wishes of the American people
solely for political reasons. No country in its right mind would
legalize what will be 25+million illegals, mostly of one nationality, when the
cost of their social services will decimate both federal and state budgets
and unemployment is 10%. I spend time in 3 different areas of the country
and have seen no evidence of illegals "living in the shadows". They have
taken over many communities, are welcomed at schools, have health care,
and have no concerns about authorities as they know enforcement is non-
existent. A policy of giving amnesty to whomever enters, guarantees illegals
will continue coming in droves for employment and outrageously generous
benefits of free health care and EiC payments. The American people deserve a balanced LEGAL immigration system that actually processes
applications in a timely matter. I am sure there are millions who've been
waiting in line and deserve first consideration. Forcing citizens to get
biometric IDs to accommodate the illegals is outrageous. Listening to
Rep Gutierrez blame drug and gun trafficking on America is too twisted to
discuss. If illegals apply legally and agree to be self-sufficient and not
burden social services, maybe opposition will diminish. Otherwise amnesty
is a slap in the face to every citizen who deserves financial solvency and
security.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Le Facteur 99
Jeremiah was right.
10:57 AM on 06/30/2010
There are no plans that call for amnesty in ANY bill, not even Rep Gutierrez's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josephking
11:09 AM on 06/30/2010
If there are no plans for amnesty, why have you posted that "he"; Obama will grant amnesty on more than one occasion?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:19 AM on 06/30/2010
25+ MILLION? Where are you getting that one in twelve people living in this country is here illegally?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
11:30 AM on 06/30/2010
More than a bit exaggerated I think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
seegray
Nobody can bring you peace but yourself (Emerson)
12:18 PM on 06/30/2010
pfa.....

if you just keep tossing numbers out there, folks will unfortunately start thinking you know what you are talking about.