iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dodd: Wall Street Reform Conference Committee Will Be Reopened

First Posted: 06/29/10 12:51 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:55 PM ET

Frank

UPDATE - 4:19 p.m. - The conference committee will meet at 5:00 Tuesday afternoon to make final changes to Wall Street reform. Ahead of the gathering, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told reporters that he had been informed that Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) would now be voting for the final bill, though he added that he had not spoken to her. A Cantwell spokesman didn't immediately respond a call, but earlier in the day, Cantwell told HuffPost that she was reviewing the legislation to determine whether changes she had sought in the derivatives section could be made during the rule-writing process by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. He had also been told, he said, that Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) were on board.

* * * * *

UPDATE - 2:53 p.m. - Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) told reporters that he plans to re-open conference committee negotiations Tuesday afternoon in an effort to win the GOP votes needed to overcome a filibuster. Sens. Scott Brown (R-Mass.), Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) objected to a fee imposed on major banks. Collins told reporters she met with Dodd for an hour Tuesday morning to outline her concerns.

Without the fee, the bill would increase the deficit by some $20 billion. Dodd proposed raising roughly 90 percent of that by ending the TARP program early and by increasing FDIC fees on all banks.


* * * * *

Negotiators have yet to file the Wall Street reform conference report on the House floor, meaning that Democrats can still reopen bicameral conference committee negotiations over the shape of the final bill. House leaders are waiting to file until they have a signal from the Senate that Democrats in the upper chamber have the 60 votes needed to overcome a GOP filibuster, a spokesman for Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told HuffPost.

"We have a pay-for problem," he said.

Democrats are having difficulty finding the 60 votes because Republicans who previously voted for financial reform are now objecting to fees and assessments the final bill levies on major banks in order to pay for the resolution of failing institutions.

The fees assessed to the big banks are modeled after the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's system for seizing and liquidating failed banks. Banks pay into the insurance fund and when one bank goes bad, the FDIC comes in on a Friday, protects depositors, sells off parts of the bank and re-opens it under new ownership. The system is designed to build confidence and prevent bank runs.

Democrats initially proposed a $50 billion fund that would be used to wind down failing megabanks. But Republicans, led by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), repeatedly referred to the set-aside money as a "permanent taxpayer bailout." The fund was stripped and replaced by fees on major banks that would amount to roughly $3 to $4 billion per year until the fund's coffers are filled with roughly $20 billion. If the money hasn't been used within 25 years, it goes toward deficit reduction.

Republicans say they will have trouble voting for Wall Street reform if it includes any taxes on Wall Street. "I was surprised and extremely disappointed to hear that nearly $20 billion in new assessments and fees were added in the wee hours of the morning by the conference committee," said Brown on Friday. "I've said repeatedly that I cannot support any bill that raises taxes."

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who voted for the bill the last time around, told reporters Monday she is "not happy with the $19 billion new fee, or tax, that would be imposed that did not have consideration in the Senate."

Her Maine Republican colleague, Sen. Olympia Snowe, said that "obviously I'm concerned, anytime you're placing taxes in the legislation that was not in the Senate bill."

Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) plans to join Republicans in filibustering the bill, he said on Monday, arguing that the bill doesn't end the policy that deems some banks implicitly too big to fail. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), meanwhile, opposed the bill before conference and has yet to say how she'll vote this time. Without Cantwell or a replacement for Sen. Bob Byrd (D-W.Va.), who passed away Monday, Democrats need all four Republicans who voted for the underlying Senate bill to agree to approve the conference report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
UPDATE - 4:19 p.m. - The conference committee will meet at 5:00 Tuesday afternoon to make final changes to Wall Street reform. Ahead of the gathering, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told reporters that h...
UPDATE - 4:19 p.m. - The conference committee will meet at 5:00 Tuesday afternoon to make final changes to Wall Street reform. Ahead of the gathering, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told reporters that h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 201
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
It IS what it IS!
10:57 PM on 06/30/2010
There's something crooked going on! (Of course, I could say the same thing about any topic in the entire business section.)
outnow
Ban the bomb
05:48 PM on 06/30/2010
Dodd and Frank are both corrupted by contributions from bankers and insurance companies. Glass-Steagall must be pushed through or the United States will collapse. Pay attention to this issue. These two are key to preventing real reform.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BocaMom
12:50 AM on 06/30/2010
The thought of Dodd and Frank heading up financial reform is like having BP head up energy reform. Which I'm afraid they are since they are one of President Obama's biggest financial supporters. Washington is a joke and it's broken. I can't wait to vote all the bums out of office in November.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
12:31 AM on 06/30/2010
They are all crooks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danglines
11:47 PM on 06/29/2010
Once again the republicans stiff the tax payers of the US in favor of the fat cats on wall street. I see them committing class warfare. The kettle is calling the pot black.
07:19 AM on 06/30/2010
The Dems should have broke up the "too big too fail" banks in the first place - then this fund and this issue would not exist. But the Repubs didnt want that - so the Dems backed down, even though the Dems have a clear majority in both houses of Congress.

Then the Dems wanted the banks to foot the bill, fund the $20billion, for when one of these "too big to fail" banks does in fact fail. Now, the Repubs do not like that either, so the Dems are backing down again.

Nevermind that the Dems control Congress and the White House. Nevermind that the Dems were given the biggest land-slide of gov't control in 30 years. Don't blame the majority, which is running the country, and was given a historic mandate for change at the polls in 2008. Don't blame them if they can't get anything done.

There are a couple of Repub Senators out there, and once again we can blame the Repubs - and pretend like the Dems have their act together.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SO12
11:02 PM on 06/29/2010
Where does banks bank get money from ?? and who would they charge to replace there new tax ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
10:58 PM on 06/29/2010
REFORM THIS ISN'T!

Gyrations to PRETEND THIS IS REFORM = THE TRUTH!

CRIMINAL RICH GET RICHER VIA SCAMS and LOOPHOLES = THE TRUTH!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
10:59 PM on 06/29/2010
D0DD CH1T CONTINUES!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JShankel
I want my country forward
10:58 PM on 06/29/2010
Unless and until they absolutely outlaw any future bailouts, we know that "reform" is just hot air.

If you've really fixed "too big to fail," if you've really corrected the system, then you should never, ever need to ever again infuse any company with taxpayer dollars for the purposes of keeping it solvent, right? At most, at MOST, you should just need some supplemental wind-down funds to usher them out of existence.

Right? Because it's all fixed now, right? So should be no problem banning all future bailouts.

Right?
photo
Intolerantcentrist
No thanks…I brought my own air.
11:18 PM on 06/29/2010
Agreed; a system that perpetuates Bank Bailouts provides nothing more than a scheme of bankruptcy for profit (personal, more so than corporate profit). And because Congress continues to be neutered in the business of regulatory “reform”, only proves that our financial system will continue to suffer from self-fulfilling regulatory failure.
10:58 PM on 06/29/2010
Vote all this DINOs and RINOs out in November. We are owned by the Banks of Rothschild and the Military Industrial Complex.....PLEASE SEE THE ANSWER AT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vL1nuiQAlY8&NR=1 and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWxfrZyln9A&feature=related

Dodd and Barney Frank are corrupt liars who are destroying the democratic movement!!!!!!!!
10:38 PM on 06/29/2010
How's that Fannie/Freddie thing doing Mr. Frank?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lendiggy
10:03 PM on 06/29/2010
Our grandkids will ask us what it was like during the Great Depression 3: Electric Boogaloo
blogisti
Censor Approved Knowledge Only
09:58 PM on 06/29/2010
What a joke! If there is one person who believes this bill will stop the next bubble that person would be a fool. The legislators are a bad joke played on the American people.
If we are now in Depression Three this pathetic excuse for a Financial Reform Bill has just ensured Depression Four won't be too far down the road. Their grandchildren will curse them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
darnold120
09:15 PM on 06/29/2010
Tired of hearing about government deficits Tehy should look at all the unemployed deficits Also the credit rating we use to have Ours didn't come from over spending Ours came from them shipping jobs off shore
08:55 PM on 06/29/2010
Somebody explain why we would have to spend $20 billion to regulate financial institutions? Regulation is just damn expensive these days...
photo
RonK Michigan
Half of the people you know are below average
10:01 PM on 06/29/2010
It's a 20 Bil TAX that is to be paid by Wall Street, not us.......and it's not "spent", it's a fund to pay for the dissolution of any Wall Street organization that fails......

Ronk’s Steven Wright Quote Du-Jour:
“The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse always gets the cheese”
07:11 AM on 06/30/2010
The fund is being set-up because the Dems (despite what they say) are unwilling to break up the "too big to fail" banks. If we are going to allow such banks to exist, we must have a plan to deal with them when they do fail.

The repub talking points call it a "permanent bail-out fund" - as a good Democrat, I am not supposed to call it that, but really that is what it is.

(Now, I will get flamed for talking bad about the Democrats)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharkcellar
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL LIBRARY.
08:53 PM on 06/29/2010
This seems to be the formula at the moment. Proposal>republican hem & haw>demswater down proposal>republican hem & haw>dems water down some more>republican hem & haw>more dem dilution>some GOP jump on board>final stretch>traitorous backstabbing by any given republican/democrat>vexation>hem & haw>passage of homeopathic version of original proposal>media cheers>dems pat each other on back>next item.