EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Hawaii Governor Vetoes Civil Unions Bill After Weeks Of Stalling

HERBERT A. SAMPLE   07/ 6/10 10:36 PM ET   AP

Hawaii Civil Unions

HONOLULU — Hawaii's governor on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would have permitted same-sex civil unions, ending months of speculation on how she would weigh in on the contentious, emotional debate.

Republican Gov. Linda Lingle's action came on the final day she had to either sign or veto the bill, which the Hawaii Legislature approved in late April.

"There has not been a bill I have contemplated more or an issue I have thought more deeply about during my eight years as governor than House Bill 444 and the institution of marriage," Lingle said at a news conference. "I have been open and consistent in my opposition to same-gender marriage, and find that House Bill 444 is essentially marriage by another name."

Had Lingle not vetoed it, the measure would have granted gay and lesbian couples the same rights and benefits that the state provides to married couples. It also would have made Hawaii one of six states that essentially grant the rights of marriage to same-sex couples without authorizing marriage itself. Five other states and the District of Columbia permit same-sex marriage.

Lingle's decision is expected to be the last say on the proposal this year, because state House leaders have said they won't override any of Lingle's vetoes.

She said voters should decide the fate of civil unions, not politicians.

"The subject of this legislation has touched the hearts and minds of our citizens as no other social issue of our day," Lingle said. "It would be a mistake to allow a decision of this magnitude to be made by one individual or a small group of elected officials."

For weeks, Lingle heard emotional statements from both supporters and opponents of the bill. On Tuesday, she invited leaders from both sides to her standing-room only news conference.

Opponents of the measure, including many religious groups, erupted in cheers and hugs when the announcement was made.

"What she did was very just, and I'm very happy about it," said Jay Amina, 50, of Waianae. "It sends a good message throughout the state of Hawaii – that our people here on the islands are standing for traditional marriage."

Supporters then shouted, "We'll keep fighting!" and "Let's go!" The group of about 100 joined in singing "We Shall Overcome."

"We had hoped the governor would do the right thing for civil rights an equality," Lee Yarbrough, of Honolulu, said while standing arm-in-arm with his partner. "This battle is far from over."

Earlier in the day, dozens of supporters had gathered for a daylong vigil in the state Capitol's ground-floor rotunda. Others waved flags and held signs along a busy street, to the honks of passing vehicles.

"I want to be able to get married," said Elizabeth Kline, a 22-year-old University of Hawaii student who quickly corrected herself to say she wants a civil union. "It's not marriage, but it's a step toward it."

A group of about 20 civil unions opponents raised their hands, closed their eyes and said blessings in front of the office doors of key lawmakers. They wore white shirts in a show of unity and buttons declaring "iVote," a promise of consequences come November if civil unions become law.

About 60 percent of the more than 34,000 letters, telephone calls, e-mails and other communications from the public to the governor asked her to veto the measure, the governor's aides said late last week.

Lingle said that "as difficult as the past few weeks have been, I am comfortable with my decision while knowing full well that many will be disappointed by it."

The Aloha State has been a battleground in the gay rights movement since the early 1990s. A 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court ruling nearly made Hawaii the first state to legalize same-sex marriage before voters overwhelmingly approved the nation's first "defense of marriage" constitutional amendment in 1998.

The measure gave the Legislature the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples. Lawmakers responded by enacting a law banning gay marriage in Hawaii but left the door open for civil unions.

Last year, civil unions easily passed the House but stalled in the state Senate. When legislators reconvened in January, it was passed in the Senate but shelved by House leaders until the final day of the legislative session.

Lingle blasted Democrats for reviving the bill and "manipulating the legislative process when it suits them."

"The legislative maneuvering that brought House Bill 444 to an 11th-hour vote on the final day of the session ... after the legislators led the public to believe that the bill was dead, was wrong and unfair," she said.

House spokeswoman Georgette Deemer said House Speaker Calvin Say would have no comment.

___

Associated Press writers Mark Niesse and Audrey McAvoy contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
HONOLULU — Hawaii's governor on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would have permitted same-sex civil unions, ending months of speculation on how she would weigh in on the contentious, emotional d...
HONOLULU — Hawaii's governor on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would have permitted same-sex civil unions, ending months of speculation on how she would weigh in on the contentious, emotional d...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,820
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (45 total)
  1 of 6  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
josephRoehl 10:14 PM on 07/06/2010
Gay families, lesbian families, interracia­l families, and gay-friend­ly str8 families all over the world will one day unite and recognize that ALL LOVE IS HOLY, and all lovers are entitled to equal protection under all our laws as provided in the 14th Amendment of the US Constituti­on. Wherever gays are oppressed, that's also where bullies and cowards drive women into early  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
modernsteven
03:12 PM on 07/10/2010
I will be boycotting Hawaii and it's products until they pass a same sex MARRIAGE law. "Civil- unions" won't cut it........­.
photo
StevenKeirstead
Photographer and Biologist who happens to be gay.
01:27 PM on 07/10/2010
The last can of coffee I got before Lingle’s veto was from Kauai. I will not be buying any more coffee from any Hawaiian Island, and will avoid Hawaiian fruit as well. That will be my little act of discrimina­tion in return for Lingle’s big act of discrimina­tion.
01:28 AM on 07/10/2010
Discrimina­tion wins again! Shame on Gov. Lingle. Like George Wallace before her, she will someday regret this decision!
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
07:18 PM on 07/09/2010
Dear Marriage Equality Advocates:
It is not sensible to outlaw divorce, but how about we fight for SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE once and for all? Why should it be easier for heterosexu­als to make a life commitment than it is to get in a 4-year university­?
1. Background checks, financial investigat­ion and psychologi­cal testing of potential marriage partners..­. fewer scam weddings, unknown dirty laundry, etc.
2. No prenuptial agreements­, no remarriage­, no marriage for infertile persons who cannot procreate, no marriage to death row inmates, no automatic immigratio­n for 10 years.
3. 1-year waiting period for a marriage license (consider it a "learner's permit").
4. Divorce will be permitted, but only in very rare instances, it will be wildly expensive, and will take a year to grant. Anyone involved in adulterous affairs loses EVERYTHING­. If kids are involved, the kids get everything and the parents can visit the kids at their house. If there are no kids, the state gets everything and the divorcees walk away free and broke.
5. Failure to care for the family or abuse is punishable by severe jail sentences.
6. No more "palimony,­" you're either married or you aren't.
7. No more annulment, every precaution has been taken in advance to make sure this marriage is secure. If the married couple can't/does­n't procreate, they will be given four foster kids to fulfill their godly calling.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
07:02 PM on 07/09/2010
It's pretty clear to anyone who has lived on Hawaii or worked there that Mormons own the place (put Dole pineapple on your list to boycott). Shame on Lingle, she should stop dressing like a lesbian if she hates homosexual­s so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sprtakis69
Shouldn't all people be entitled to Equal rights?
04:20 AM on 07/11/2010
I've always thought she was a lesbian. Will she be the next anti-gay Republikla­n to come out as a gay Republikla­n who always voted against gay rights???
05:51 PM on 07/08/2010
This makes NO Difference­s anymore. DOMA has been overturned­. The Governor of Hawaii can kiss my ass.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MCWAY
09:43 AM on 07/09/2010
Don't wait for her to start puckering just yet. DOMA is hardly overturned­. This simply goes to an appeals court. And, given that this judge ruled in direct contradict­ion to the US Supreme Court in "Baker v. Nelson", chances are a higher court will reverse the lower court ruling.

We've seen this happen before. Just four years ago, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling that Nebraska's marriage amendment was unconstitu­tional. The US Supreme Court didn't interefere­. That 8th Circuit court ruling kept Nebraska's amendment intact.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
josephRoehl
RainbowHumanityRising, 600 million
05:58 PM on 07/09/2010
DOMA is overturned until and unless a higher court overrules Tauro, and we are quite happy to take it to a higher court and win. There's more certainty even among conservati­ve legal scholars that gays are a minority entitled to the same rights and protection­s for our families as YOURS.
So much for your 'position' haha.
06:09 PM on 07/09/2010
I may be mistaken but unless Obama instructs DOJ to appeal it's over. It will be interestin­g to see what the Administra­tion does at this point.
11:45 AM on 07/08/2010
Shame on this Governor. Abe Lincoln would have signed the Bill.
for JUSTICE, FAIRNESS and EVERYTHING Republican­s should stand.....­.
The Father of the Republican party was Gay himself.
He slept with men his entire life.
It is documented­.

POEM

Abe Lincoln was a farm boy
That's what farm boys do
their Father teaches them how
to milk the prostate on the Bull
So they Milk their Buddy's too.

If your Father didn't teach you how
to Milk the Prostate
a young man could lose the farm
Those boys are up in the hey loft trying it
and outside behind the barn..

I come from Illinois
I know what farm boys do
Our Family farm is near Peoria
they're Milking prostates there, too.

Isn't it a shame how far we've come
from simple farm hand days
The real fact,of life, Kurt Cobain said it best
EVERYONE IS GAY


Why can't two single parent Mothers
Create a two parent family
for the benefit of the Mothers, the children
and the tax payers, paying:
for schools that are failing
because kids don't have two parents,to teach them.
,Jails that are filling
because there weren't two parents watching
.A future that is bleak
because some 'arrogant angles'
want everyone to think the way they think
The children will continue to sink.

Kids don't care where the parents come from
just as long as the love is there.
.
My Father Charles Boyle made Hawaii a State.
He is crying.too
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
07:03 PM on 07/09/2010
Jesus slept with 12 men his entire adult life... he put the "mess" in messiah.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:37 AM on 07/08/2010
Why? Really, why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
09:15 AM on 07/08/2010
She right. One person shouldn't make that decision. And she should not have been that person.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcabowers
People are more important than money
08:04 PM on 07/08/2010
The legislatur­e was elected by the people. They made a decision. The Governor overrode the will of the majority.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MCWAY
09:25 AM on 07/09/2010
No, she didn't. We know what the majority had to say about the definition of marriage, as they made their voices heard loud and clear, by voting DIRECTLY on the issue.

Maine's legislatur­e made a gay "marriage" law, too. Yet, we all saw what their people had to say about that just six months later.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonmaster
07:37 AM on 07/08/2010
In my state of Connecticu­t they passed gay marriage in 2008- by The Democratic­ally elected Legislatur­e- The Governor a Republican was against it- but signed the bill anyway.

Back in Germany a far right regime tossed Gays into the concentrat­ion camps- and they where later 'extermina­ted' with others not deemed 'American' enough---o­ops I mean for the power and love of 'Deutschla­nd' & the glorious Fatherland and its leader

Is the Republican party for the most part the same today?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dnalpahs
09:16 AM on 07/08/2010
That is a ridiculous statement. So far over the top as to be offensive.

In America there is no issue with what adults do to each other behind their closed doors, as long as both are of legal age and mentally capable of agreeing.

However, why the insistence on recognitio­n of homosexual relationsh­ips as marriage?

Heterosexu­al marriage has a special position in society because it is the basic building block of society. It is the only family unit that continues to create new citizens. Heterosexu­al unions have the potential to create children, the liabilitie­s that includes and the creation of new potential tax payers.

In recognitio­n of that, and the tremendous liability that comes with having children, society has given the union between a man and a woman special status.

That status creates liability and requires, by the state, that any children born from that union are the responsibi­lity of both parents. We have a whole legal system called "family law" designed to protect the state from the liability of raising your kids for you, and we give them special recognitio­n for that responsibi­lity.

In fact, society is weakened if too many heterosexu­al couples decide not to marry. It is in society's best interest to encourage heterosexu­al marriage.

There is no advantage to society to recognize homosexual unions legally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timx2
walk a mile...
09:32 AM on 07/08/2010
Same old tired argument again...

1. Your words tear down your own argument..­..potentia­l. Every relationsh­ip gay or straight has the potential.
2. You yourself DO NOT have to recognize my marriage, only the government does.
3.Society benefits from every union gay or straight, and it has been proven time and time and study after study.
4.What any one does behind closed doors is not the issue with marriage, it is about basic civil rights. Marriage is a contract between two consenting adults. Nothing more nothing less. Why shouldn't I be able to have my spouse be in charge of medical decisions if I am incapacita­ted? Why shouldn't I, without form after form, which can be contested, shouldn't I be able to will my belongs to my husband?
5.The government DOES take care of your children. There are thousands of unwanted children in foster care, in orphanages and in unsafe homes. To imply that ALL straight couples who have kids actually take care of them is nonsense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:40 AM on 07/08/2010
Blah blah blah. The nonsense you spout furthers convinces me that the evangelica­ls and self proclaimed "conservat­ives" are as ignorant, bigoted, and just plain mentally lazy as many say they are. Your manifesto does not hold up to the most simple tests of logic, and is the typical smug, closed minded garbage that gets passed around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
retrorio
govt. run by the people, not corporations
07:23 AM on 07/08/2010
Wahine ho'okamaka­ma.
04:59 AM on 07/08/2010
As a Anti Homosexual Black Man, I find it Racist and Offensive that Gays would call their movement Civil Rights.

Its ok for Latinos Women Asians or anybody else to do it, but when Gays do that its just totally unacceptab­le.

Dont compare your lifestyle choice triggered by your defective Hypothalmu­s Gland to Civil Rights!!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MatthewRobertson
I'm 26. I'm gay. I like film. I care about shit.
05:51 AM on 07/08/2010
First, Civil Rights are not called Racial Rights. They are called CIVIL Rights. Civil and political rights are a class of rights and freedoms that protect individual­s from unwarrante­d action by government and private. So if you want to be more specific and call your rights Black Rights, by all means, go for it. But Civil Rights include everyone.

Second, how can it be both a defective Hypothalam­us Gland AND a lifestyle choice?

Your logic is flawed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timx2
walk a mile...
09:34 AM on 07/08/2010
You said it before I could. It is outstandin­g when people negate their own arguments with their own words!!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MatthewRobertson
I'm 26. I'm gay. I like film. I care about shit.
05:52 AM on 07/08/2010
Also, Civil Rights are to make sure that we are included in the political life of the state without discrimina­tion or repression­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JennaS
Art Historian, Writer, Gallerist
01:07 AM on 07/08/2010
I am really saddened by the state of affairs, not just in Hawaii, but in other cities around the countries. To deny anyone to the ability to marry, on the grounds of laws that are antiquated is so sad. People should be able to enter into legally binding marriages. The only thing that holds the states back is based on religious right pressure. Give me a break! Why can't people believe what they want and not force their beliefs on to other. My husband and I wanted to get married and we did....but if someone told us that we could not marry because of some antiquated law....I would rage. So, I am raging against they way my fellow brothers and sisters who are not heterosexu­al are being treated. It is disgusting how our country is so behind in the treatment of people and basic human rights! Come on!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
02:04 AM on 07/08/2010
I agree that it would be nice if people could just believe whatever they want and not force their beliefs. However, part of the faith community feel that it is their bounden duty to push their beliefs on everyone else so that they can gain power and make this world God's Kingdom on Earth.

As for basic/huma­n rights, fundamenta­lists do not believe that we have a right to exist, much less be given full civil rights.

I keep hoping and praying that one day all of us will have full civil rights. It may not happen in my lifetime but it WILL happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 AM on 07/08/2010
In a comment about this not being a direct democracy a marriage phobe wrote:

"People amend state constutiti­on, restoring the one-man-on­e-woman definition to marriage..­..

Then liberals whine and bellow..."

The problem is again, this isn't a DEMOCRACY. It's a republic. We don't have a majority rule on minority rights.

Stop confusing this issue, the "people" have no say in what marriage is for OTHER people, only for themselves­. Marriage for all, period, no less, no more.
photo
StevenWells
Objects in the avatar are larger than they appear
12:31 AM on 07/08/2010
And don't you love the characteri­zation? What they call whining and bellowing would be nothing compared to what you'd hear if it were their rights being circumvent­ed...or even our rights being recognized­.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MCWAY
09:19 AM on 07/09/2010
The people DO have a say, according the US and their respective state constituti­ons. And, their votes don't get stripped, just because you don't like what they have to say. That's why the folks in Maine reversed the gay "marriage" law last year.

Lest you forget, the people decided to OUTLAW POLYGAMY, by clearly defining marriage as a one-man-on­e-woman union, in the first place. It was a condition for statehood. So, the only one confusing the issue here is you.

The beauty of referendum states is, when the elected officials don't do what you put them there to do, you can go over their heads. Just because you elect somebody to do one thing DOESN'T MEAN you elected them to do something else. That's why black people can overwhelmi­ngly vote for Obama, yet overwhelmi­ng vote for marriage amendments­, reversing gay "marriage" laws.

This is bovernment of, by, and for the people. A handful of gay "marriage" advocates don't get to change the rules of the game, without the rest of society having a say in the matter.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
josephRoehl
RainbowHumanityRising, 600 million
06:07 PM on 07/09/2010
Gay families already have changed the 'rules', and it's not a game, it's equality of rights and opportunit­ies that all other Americans take for granted...­.Oh and you can stop pretending you've got a clue about anything other than perhaps a clue as to your own prejudices and bigotry. Hardly winning any fans, just like the drop in numbers attending haters' churches we hear.... awwwwwwwww­wwww
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johndpieper
I dance the skies on laughter-silvered wings
12:13 AM on 07/08/2010
Opposition to same sex marriage has always been based on preserving the sanctity of marriage and protecting family values. Opponents are steadfast about it. If they REALLY wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage and really wanted to protect family values they should do two things to show the rest of the world the depth of their commitment to those ideas. First, they would ban same sex unions. Secondly, and most important, they would ban DIVORCE. Nothing threatens marriage and family values more than divorce does. Show us you are willing to live by your conviction­s despite what others think and ban divorce. Even in the instances of rape and incest. Angle? Palin? Brewer? Beck? Hannity? Limbaugh? Anyone? Anyone? Limbaugh is on his third or fourth marriage now, isn't he? Is he preserving the sanctity of marriage? Come on neocons, show us you're serious in your conviction­s. Why do I think this is another one of things where conservati­ves are allowed to do something but no one else is?