More

EU CAPS Bank Bonuses: Company Performance To Dictate Bonus Pay

Swiss Cow

AOIFE WHITE   07/ 7/10 10:50 AM ET   AP

BRUSSELS — European Union lawmakers have voted overwhelmingly to cap bankers' short-term cash bonuses from next year, a move that European leaders hope other parts of the world will follow.

Members of the European Parliament voted 625-28 in favor of the new rules which will become final when they are approved by EU finance ministers as expected next week.

From 2011, bankers will only be able to get part of their yearly bonuses in cash upfront. The other 70 percent will be held back and paid out if the company performs well.

The caps come after a European outcry over payments to executives of banks that received huge state bailouts during the financial crisis. Some say bonuses encouraged bankers to take massive risks at the expense of the long-term future of their businesses.

Michel Barnier, the EU's financial services commissioner, said the new rules sent a strong message that "there will be no return to business as usual."

"Banks will need to change radically their practices and the mentality that have led in many cases to excessive risk-taking and contributed to the financial crisis," he said.

Starting next January, cash bonuses will be capped at 30 percent of the total bonus and 20 percent for "particularly large" bonuses. The measure leaves it to individual governments to determine what "particularly large" means in their economies.

While some European countries including Britain have already imposed limits on banker bonuses, the new rules set minimum caps for all 27 members of the EU. French and German governments have also effectively set caps by pressing banks to agree to limit executive pay.

On the other side of the Atlantic, the U.S. Federal Reserve, in an in-depth analysis released last month, found that many U.S. banks' compensation practices were deficient in curbing excessive risk-taking. The Fed – and other major banking regulators – under a newly adopted plan can veto pay policies that cause too much risk-taking by executives, traders, loan officers and other key employees.

"We found that many banks had not modified their practices from what they were before the crisis," Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke told a House panel last month. "The structure of the compensation practices needs to change so that there's not an incentive to take excessive risks, you know, packages where the trader gets all the upside and none of the downside. That's the kind of thing we're trying to get rid of," he said.

In Europe, a large part of the bonus will have to be deferred, though it is up to governments to determine for how long. At least half of the total bonus will be held as "contingent capital" for banks to call on first if they urgently need funding.

The measure also limits "exceptional pension payments" to avoid the kind of bloated severance packages for disgraced departing executives that have caused public uproar around Europe.

Douglas Elliott, a fellow at the Washington DC-based Brookings Institution and former JP Morgan investment banker, says he doesn't think the new rules will force bankers to quit Europe.

"There will be some effect, but generally bankers will continue to act the same way," he said. "It will have the least effect on the wealthiest ... the people who will be hurt are the investment bankers who actually need the cash."

European banks will also be required to hold a minimum amount of capital to ensure they are covering risk from their trading book and complex securitized investments – such as mortgage-backed securities – to avoid a repeat of risk-related losses like those seen during the financial meltdown. The capital requirements will take effect in 2012.

This could force banks to hold three to four times more capital against their trading risk than they do at present. Barnier, however, insists there would be an upside because the tougher requirements would help make the banking sector better able to cope with shocks.

Global banking regulators are also separately drafting tighter capital requirements that European banks complain could force them to put aside far more money to counter risks. They say this could hit their profits and even force them to curb lending to companies and households.

Associated Press writers Jeannine Aversa in Washington and Rafael Mesquita in Paris contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
BRUSSELS — European Union lawmakers have voted overwhelmingly to cap bankers' short-term cash bonuses from next year, a move that European leaders hope other parts of the world will follow. Mem...
BRUSSELS — European Union lawmakers have voted overwhelmingly to cap bankers' short-term cash bonuses from next year, a move that European leaders hope other parts of the world will follow. Mem...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,167
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (52 total)
03:42 AM on 07/09/2010
I don't seem to like the idea.

http://www.bankreviews.org/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
03:25 PM on 07/08/2010
So banking execs will only get a bonus if they do a good job? What's up with that. Who decides if they did a good job, the board of directors the banker hand picked? Well, at least they are thrying to do something, that's more than I can say about the United States. Maybe they will have better luck, because they don't allow corporations "freedom of speech", and by freedom of speech I mean political contributions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
02:43 PM on 07/09/2010
Remember "contributions" means bribes and since historically this has meant Republicans benefited the most it was a back door way of ensuring the party of the rich and corporate got all the help they needed to shout down the truth...their policies are a sham and result only in more wealth in fewer hands
03:22 PM on 07/08/2010
CEO pay based on performance? What a novel concept! We must be talking an inverse correlation. And we accuse the europeans of not having any nads.. Looks like they showed us..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Armando Olmos
Political Advocate For Seniors And
01:52 PM on 07/08/2010
It's very interesting what happening in the European Union (EU) on banking financial reform. This is something the United States Senate hasn't any backbone to do, the filibuster rule must be abolished, transactions should be taxed, bonuses should be taxed, and profits taxed to keep them honest. To restore funding to states and local governments for the commons. The GOP is hurting our country and a few Blue Dogs Democrats because they refuse to fight for the people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:03 AM on 07/09/2010
Well,i`m glad we don`t have backbone to do this nonsense my friend.As much as i don`t like the pay of some ceo`s i surely don`t want the govt. to dictate their pay.You are starting to go down a dangerous slippery slope there.You want to tax everything business does i can live with that but don`t come back in 6 months claiming they don`t pay enough.As for the filibuster you will be glad it is around when the republicans are back in charge.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:24 AM on 07/08/2010
Bonuses should be for performance only. You get 100% of your bonus if you earn it. If you do not earn it, you do not get it. Your bonus should come at the end of each year and if your company does not perform no one is rewarded at all. How and why should you get a "bonus" if you and/or your company does poorly?
03:49 AM on 07/09/2010
"Your bonus should come at the end of each year..."

That's the problem in american thinking. You only think in one year cycles, not in long term strategies like 5-10 years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:55 AM on 07/09/2010
No, I think long term and over the long term if you have an employee that knows at the end of 1 year they will get a bonus based on their performance then they are more likely to work hard every year for that bonus. If you just give someone a huge bonus weather they do well or not why should they perform? Also, you have to base the bonus of a percentage of the profit not on a flat fee in order to remain solvent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
10:43 AM on 07/08/2010
How incredibly socialist -- making performance bonuses conditional on doing a GOOD job!
(sarcasm over)
photo
GonzoBrawler
Hunter S. Thompson is my hero
09:31 AM on 07/08/2010
Didn't other countrys used to look at the United States, because we were the role models? Now, if I were them, I wouldn't look to the United States for anything.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
12:53 PM on 07/08/2010
At the government, at the businesses, at how businesses manipulate the government (via lobbying), or something else?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
08:36 AM on 07/09/2010
Sadly they only look at us in shock.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:57 AM on 07/08/2010
Oh boy, it look like it's time to move to the EU!
02:59 AM on 07/08/2010
I have no idea why some of you call social democratic democracies socialist ? Is it simply not being informed or long exposure to right wing media ? There is a big difference between countries like Germany, France or the former Poland, or former Russia. When citizens elect a representation to work for their electorate and they do this precisely, why is this called socialism ? How come all our big companies in Gemany show huge profits almost every year like BMW,Siemens, Audi,etc. Do you seriously think that would be possible in a socialist state ?

Maybe some things have to be broken down to a more common ground to understand them, but confusing a social democracy with a socialist country is simply wrong and stupid.
03:23 AM on 07/08/2010
ROFL
Is that why 86% of Germans are dissatisfied with their government.?
http://article.wn.com/view/2010/06/16/Poll_86_percent_of_Germans_dissatisfied_with_government_Merk_v/

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=10926724

Is that why Germany is suffering a massive brain drain, the educated people leaving the country to start from scratch somewhere else?
03:27 AM on 07/08/2010
Have you ever seen an owner satisfied with its employees ? Germans never are satisfied with their government, there is always room for improvement. Brain drain is common in every developed, progressive society. Look at how many good educated Americans flee their country. Some come back others don't, same goes for Germany. A few years abroad is always good for the track record of any executive. These days, when you are poor or not educated or both, the doors of any country attractive enough to migrate to are closed.
05:37 AM on 07/08/2010
The brain drain from France got Fabien Tourre into Goldman Sachs - I'm sure everyone in the socialist state of France would agree that the US can keep him!
12:33 AM on 07/08/2010
I don't know why people are getting excited about this. All they did was limit the percentage of bonus that could be paid in cash with the remainder to be paid in long term payments (usually stock vesting over the next several years). Frankly this is no different than the large bulge brackets are already doing.

The capital requirements are interesting and likely a good move but you must know changes like this come with consequences. In particular, banks will not be able to lend out as much and thus the cost of capital (i.e. the interest rates someone pays on loans) will almost certainly go up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
12:06 AM on 07/08/2010
Phew, good that I voted during the European election. My vote paid off. Well it always does unlike here. 625 YEAs and 28 NAYs. Democracy in action and Republicans try to tell me that they are trying to create an empire... Tsss
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zell
08:15 PM on 07/07/2010
Why is it European governments treat their people so much better than the United States government????? Witness healthcare in European countries--there is no comparison when you think about what we have over here..........Our country should have been the leader on controlling the bonuses of the bank executives............It seems as if we don't lead at all anymore..........Europe and Canada seems to have the good health and strong economy of their countries first and foremost as their objectives........... which is the right thing to do.......,..Congress, it is time for you to lead.............
photo
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
11:37 PM on 07/07/2010
Corporations are not considered people?

Europeans think that corporations exist because the society allows them to exist. Corporations need society, not the other way around.
Additionally, HUGE salaries were not known in the USA when Unions are strong. Europe has strong unions.

In the USA, it is Corporations who run the place. Two parties? Just buy up both sides.
Easy.
08:13 PM on 07/07/2010
Two "modest"(?) suggestions for dealing with "big bank" EXCESSES:
1.) Apply the anti-monopoly (anti-trust in the U.S.) statutes and triple the NUMBER of banks.
2.) .....and--most heinous to the "banking community"--tax capital gains at the same rate as EARNED INCOME. Why isn't all income treated equally? Recently, most capital gains have merely inflated asset prices (real estate....anyone?) and have been spent offshore to the U.S.
11:29 PM on 07/07/2010
3. Move your money to a member owned, local credit union without all the hidden fees and abuses.
4. Encourage your pension funds, state and local governments to also move that money to member-owned, local credit unions.

The only way to get this train wreck under control is to vote with the dollar. Nobody else is doing anything about the fact that Wall Street now plans for the taxpayers to bail them out of their scams so they get paid not just once, but twice for creating nothing of value. (and then takes our tax dollars and invests in foreign countries)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyvader
Less apathy, more empathy!
08:08 PM on 07/07/2010
What a great idea, too bad it will never happen here.
10:16 PM on 07/07/2010
Good thing the government doesn't take over businesses?
photo
swift goat pet for truth
The Life of the Land is preserved in Righteousness
11:39 PM on 07/07/2010
Businesses are taking over government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwilson1
07:31 PM on 07/07/2010
I almost wish we where still part of England. I give props to the EU for it's leadership.