More

Gun Rights Advocates SUE Mayor Daley, City Of Chicago Over New Handgun Ordinance

Daley

First Posted: 07/07/10 01:10 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:00 PM ET

Gun rights advocates in Illinois filed a federal lawsuit against Mayor Daley and the City of Chicago Tuesday, claiming the city's gun ordinance--put in place following the Supreme Court decision that is expected to overturn the Chicago handgun ban--violates their rights.

In the lawsuit (download the filing here), the Illinois Association of Firearms Retailers and four Chicago residents claim that they should have the right to carry a handgun outside of their homes, and that the new gun ordinance, passed by the City Council last week, violates their constitutional rights.

The Sun-Times Media Wire reports:

The "Responsible Gun Ownership Ordinance" limits gun purchases to one per month, bans gun shops in city limits and prohibits gun owners from stepping outside their homes, even onto their porches or garages, with a handgun. It becomes law in 10 days, Corporation Counsel Mara Georges said.

...

The plaintiffs include Brett Benson, 37, a trader on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange who owns a farm in central Illinois; Raymond Sledge, 53, a public elementary school teaching assistant who owns his own home but lives with his mother, who lives near a high-crime area on the South Side, in order to take care of her; and a Chicago couple -- Kenneth Pacholski and Kathryn Tyler -- he works in aircraft restoration, she is a veterinarian. All the plaintiffs own multiple guns but keep them outside the city limits, the suit says.

Daley and the City Council rushed to approve the ordinance after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Americans have the right to have handguns anywhere for self-defense - making the city's 28-year-old ban on such weapons unenforceable.

Plaintiff Raymond Sledge's situation was explained in the lawsuit filed against the city on Tuesday:

The Sledge home is located just a few blocks from a high-crime area, and Mr. Sledge often has to travel through that part of town. According to the City Council representative for the area, Alderman Lyle, the neighborhood has a shortage of commercial establishments, and residents complain of high crime and poor city services. Since June 18, 2010, the following crimes have been reported within an eight-block radius of the Sledge home: battery, aggravated assault with a handgun, aggravated assault with a knife, and aggravated vehicular hijacking.

...

Both Mr. Sledge's house and that of his mother have been burglarized; in each instance the burglars broke into the garage and stole property. But a garage (attached or unattached) is expressly excluded from the statutory definition of one's "home,"... and therefore the Ordinance would criminalize use of a firearm to defend one's life, family, and property in one's own garage.

While the National Rifle Association did not join in on the city's lawsuit, they did issue a statement supporting the plaintiffs:

"The Supreme Court has now said the Second Amendment is an individual freedom for all. And that must have meaning," said Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the National Rifle Association. "This decision cannot lead to different measures of freedom, depending on what part of the country you live in. City by city, person by person, this decision must be more than a philosophical victory. An individual right is no right at all if individuals can't access it."

The plaintiffs want the new gun control ordinance to be declared "null and void."

Mayor Daley has repeatedly said he would do everything he can to limit the number of guns on Chicago's streets.

"As a city we must continue to stand up ..and fight for a ban on assault weapons .. as well as a crackdown on gun shops," Daley said last week. "We are a country of laws not a nation of guns."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

Gun rights advocates in Illinois filed a federal lawsuit against Mayor Daley and the City of Chicago Tuesday, claiming the city's gun ordinance--put in place following the Supreme Court decision that ...
Gun rights advocates in Illinois filed a federal lawsuit against Mayor Daley and the City of Chicago Tuesday, claiming the city's gun ordinance--put in place following the Supreme Court decision that ...
Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:19 PM on 07/08/2010
Handguns belonging to the bodyguards of Netanyahu came up missing as they traveled through Chicago on their way to D.C.. Has anybody asked Daily where they might be?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lakeview Greg
12:57 PM on 07/08/2010
Hand guns were designed for only one purpose, to kill people. While I do support the right to bear arms, I would not classify a weapon of human destruction as self defensive. If you wanna walk around with your loaded shotgun out, fine and dandy with me. But handguns really have no place in society, imo.The bad guys will only have hand guns argument holds no water with me. Too many domestic shootings with handguns. A rifle or shotgun gives a moment to think before being an idiot. Long guns, fine. Pistols, leave them for law enforcement. No handguns in the city. Just my opinion.
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
12:46 AM on 07/09/2010
How does a longgun give you more time to think?
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
08:14 AM on 07/09/2010
exactly, just your opinion, and one based in emotion at that
02:23 AM on 07/08/2010
In many ways, Daley is the proRKBA advocates best friend--it is much easier to get courts to throw out legislation that is written to violate the court's decision than it is to have courts toss more reasonable legislation (a $20 licensing fee would survive when $500 will not (and if it goes back to court because of a series of still outragous fees--at some point the court will prohibit ANY fees)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:07 AM on 07/08/2010
"We are a country of laws not a nation of guns."

And that whole Constitution thingie is the highest law of the land.

Face reality, King Daley...and then grab a dictionary and look up the word "fundamental."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:46 AM on 07/08/2010
Or how about the word "infringe."
photo
Sugarmaker
Act like what you do makes a difference, it does
09:44 PM on 07/07/2010
No surprises here. It was understood there would be more irrational roadblocks to discourage gun ownership. Because there is no plan to stop the violence, gun control becomes the scapegoat. In time these too will fall.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:44 PM on 07/07/2010
One of the strange things about the new Chicago gun law is that it requires several hours of training including gun range training. However the new law also outlaws gun shops and gun ranges within the city limits. So where are chicago residents who want to comply with the law supposed to get training and certification? The suburbs? A gun shop and range in another state? Mail order training?

PS there are NO gun shops or ranges within the City at the present time. So the new law outlaws something that doesn't exist and has not existed in chicago for decades.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:10 AM on 07/08/2010
Even if one were to leave the city proper and buy a handgun, travel to a gun range and get the training, could they legally transport that weapon back into the city of Chicago, back to their residence?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bgood0822
10:56 AM on 07/08/2010
Not according to the New Law. Can't have the firearm outside of you home. SO how do you get it home in the first place?
05:59 PM on 07/07/2010
Why do people vote for this man? He clearly has NO respect for their rights nor the rule of law. He is acting like a closet tyrant.
06:14 PM on 07/07/2010
Most cities have the mob. Chicago has Mayor Daley. He and the City have way too much power. They have passed so many ordinances and regulations stifling business and property owners, that commercial properties are becoming less and less valuable. What the City of Chicago has done to discourage businesses is a worldwide disgrace!
photo
Dimensio
I just don't know what went wrong!
09:03 AM on 07/09/2010
Mr. Daley has, somehow, obtained extensive support from deceased voters who, in most locales, are not a significant voting bloc yet in the city of Chicago represent a significant percentage of teh voting population.
05:50 PM on 07/07/2010
I hope all the lawsuits bankrupt the city of Chicago; perhaps then, the people will refrain from voting for him and others of his ilk!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:11 AM on 07/08/2010
"I hope all the lawsuits bankrupt the city of Chicago"

Last I checked, Chicago was already bankrupt...financially and morally.
04:32 PM on 07/07/2010
No state shall convert a liberty to a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor.
- Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 US 105

If the state converts a right into a privelege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity.
- Shuttleworth vs City of Birmingham, Alabama 317 US 262

The court is to protect against any encroachment of constitutionally secured rights.
- Boyd vs US 116 US 616

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no legislation which would abrogate them.
- Miranda vs Arizona 384 US 436

An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as though it had never been passed.
- Norton vs Shelby County 118 US 425
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:15 AM on 07/08/2010
Fan #2
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:35 AM on 07/09/2010
Fan #3. Do you have a site for these cases? Thanks and great post!
photo
Catch22isms
Schizo-political
03:48 PM on 07/07/2010
As an Illinois resident I'm seriously becoming concerned about the levels, frequency and kind of crime happening in Chicago every day now. Seems to be Mayor Daley ought to be more concerned with actually stopping criminals instead of stopping regular citizens from defending themselves from all that crap!
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
07:59 AM on 07/08/2010
Fellow Illini, well said!
09:16 AM on 07/08/2010
http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/96453814.html#IDComment80390725
I left Chicago for Iowa 18 years ago. we have rights to defend ourselves here.
03:34 PM on 07/07/2010
Daley does not want the law abiding populace to be armed...It's a power thing, all Dictators feel the same way.

If he applied the same amount of resources toward the criminals in Chicago as he does keeping the good people of this city unarmed and afriad, maybe the crime rate could be improved.

Just remember, don't go out after sundown because the criminals own the city....

When seconds count, the police are only minutes away!
03:28 PM on 07/07/2010
What Daley is doing is empowering criminals and attempting to create criminals out of those law abiding citizens that would choose to excercise their rights and freedoms that have been supported (twice now) in modern times by the highest Court in the land. Criminals could give a rat's rear about any of this. It has zero bearing on their daily lives. The quotes from the Aldermen in this matter appear to be designed to make them look like they're supporting the "come save me, I'm needy" rather than remotely suggest that these problems begin at home; that people should accept and excercise personal responsibility. It's always easier to blame someone or something else and wait around for someone to save you. As for this absolute abuse of power (read: bully), if I can't protect my garage and porch, how about deleting that percentage of my property taxes? They both sit on X number of square feet of land. Sorry, folks, you can't have it both ways. The mayor pouts and bullies until he gets his way, legally or not. Remember the X's bulldozed over the runway when he couldn't get his way?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPMac
02:56 PM on 07/07/2010
Who does this guy and city council think they are. Their gun law don't work for Sh%T, thus the killing spree that has been going on there and the only people that would actually be caught up in them are law abiding people not the gangs and criminals!!!! I guess the Supreme Court and the 2nd Amendment don't apply to Chicago!!!
01:54 PM on 07/07/2010
Daley is always entertaining.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marie Gage
01:02 PM on 07/07/2010
daly is certainly tenacious if nothing else
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rhdsma
08:25 PM on 07/07/2010
Why are there so many shootings in Chicago? Where are all the armed citizens that are suppose to be stopping all the crime?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuPaMan
08:32 PM on 07/07/2010
I've had this argument so many times in this group about "armed citizens coming to the rescue". It never happens, it just make people feel good saying (we all seem to spew ideas based on little to nothing). They can possibly google a hand full of stories about how it happened a few times, but an armed citizen stopping another armed citizen almost never happens. To use the word "perspective" is appropriate here. If there are a million acts of gun violence by criminals daily or weekly in the U.S., and less than 1% are stopped by someone else with a gun, then it's a weak argument.
06:52 PM on 07/12/2010
Daley and the aldermen have disarmed them