More

Chicago Violence Shows No Sign Of Slowing Down In July: More Than 220 Murders Since January

Cpd

First Posted: 07/08/10 02:34 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:00 PM ET

On Wednesday, Chicago police officer Thor Soderberg was killed with his own weapon on the South Side.

Soderberg, 43, was a police academy instructor who volunteered his time by serving as a guide to a blind triathlete, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. A convicted felon who is reportedly mentally ill attacked and disarmed Soderberg as he was standing near his car.

As the gunman ran from the scene, he exchanged gunfire with other officers. He was shot in the abdomen and under guard at an Oak Lawn hospital, the Sun-Times reports.

"I'm still shaking, shaking," DePaul University Professor Mazen Istanbouli told the Sun-Times. Istanbouli is a blind triathlete whom Soderberg guided as they ran, biked and swam as a team. "It's disturbing news. He was a great man. He exemplified the best police officer I have ever seen."

Soderberg is the second Chicago police officer to be killed in the last few months. In May, Officer Thomas Wortham was shot and killed outside of his home.

Before the Wednesday shooting, the Chicago Tribune's Red Eye released a "Chicago Homicide Report." The series tracked murders in the city, and reported 217 deaths between January 2010 and the end of June. Hundreds more were wounded.

The West Side's Humboldt Park neighborhood saw the biggest spike in shootings. The Red Eye reports:

From January through June, the Humboldt Park community area saw 17 homicides, all gunshot deaths, the most of any of Chicago's 77 community areas, a RedEye analysis of preliminary police data found.

Community outreach worker Derrick House told the Red Eye that a gang feud was likely to blame.

"It can get worse," House said. "But it can change."

While the Red Eye's shooting report ended in June, early July has been filled with violence. On Independence Day alone, four people were killed and at least 12 others wounded by gunfire.

Following the afternoon slaying of Soderberg on Wednesday, the violence continued.

The Chicago Tribune reports that two people were killed and 12 others wounded Wednesday night into early Thursday morning throughout the city. All were shot.

The violence has led many to question the effectiveness of the city's long held handgun ban--including the Supreme Court. In their ruling in late June, SCOTUS mentioned the increase in homicides since the ban began:

Chicago Police Department statistics, we are told, reveal that the City's handgun murder rate has actually increased since the ban was enacted and that Chicago residents now face one of the highest murder rates in the country and rates of other violent crimes that exceed the average in comparable cities.

The gun ban was deemed unconstitutional, and Mayor Daley quickly got the City Council to pass a strict handgun ordinance. But will the ordinance really make a difference?

In a Thursday Chicago Reader article, reporter Mick Dumke--who has questioned the mayor about the effectiveness of the city's gun laws--wrote that the main person benefiting from the gun ordinance seems to be the mayor himself.

Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association, called the mayor's gun battle "smoke" that allows him to avoid dealing with the real causes of Chicago crime.

"They don't want to address the problem of a 49 percent dropout rate or of deteriorating families and neighborhoods," Pearson told Dumke. "They just want to blame somebody else."

Democratic Congressman John Fritchey, who has previously suggested that the National Guard come in to deal with Chicago violence, agreed.

"At some point there is going to have to be some recognition that what we've been doing isn't working," Fritchey said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

On Wednesday, Chicago police officer Thor Soderberg was killed with his own weapon on the South Side. Soderberg, 43, was a police academy instructor who volunteered his time by serving as a guide to...
On Wednesday, Chicago police officer Thor Soderberg was killed with his own weapon on the South Side. Soderberg, 43, was a police academy instructor who volunteered his time by serving as a guide to...
Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:20 PM on 07/09/2010
I think its important to remember that the gangs will always have access to firearms. If you ban you're average Joe from owning a gun you haven't really done anything but make the poor guy a target, at least let people have a fighting chance.
06:43 PM on 07/09/2010
guns are not the real issues here it is illegal activity and hopelessness are the problems in Chicago...the mayor needs to focus on activities that shows he cares and sense he does not please elect someone else right now the same old person is dried out ...much love for Chicago
05:06 PM on 07/09/2010
I see that it's become easier for crimminals now that law abiding citizens no longer have their guns.

I wonder what would happen to crime rates if every governor in the country would carry out death penalty daily? Every state executes one per day for 5 years. 91,250 less lifelong crimminals permanently off the books.

I personally would like to see more done daily - but we'll start with one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeaderofMen
Bilingual former US Marine.
12:53 PM on 07/09/2010
The number of handgun deaths in Chicago proves - and can be used as evidence, since it's proof - that the handgun ban was irrelevant. In addition, making it seriously difficult for law-abiding citizens to own one in the city is also irrelevant to the number of deaths - since CRIMINALS get their guns from sources that by-pass registration.

It's so simple, even a caveman can understand it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevJimIII
Open Carry Oklahoma!!
06:06 PM on 07/09/2010
Criminals will find a way, the issue really is allowing law abiding citizens to arm themselves in the face of potential violence.
04:33 PM on 07/10/2010
Can you cite any scientific studies or documentation to backup you claim that Chicago's handgun ban has had no effect, at all, on the of rate of violent crimes and more specifically the rate homicides in Chicago. If not, unless you have some kind of unusual power, not possessed by the rest of us, then you can not possible know what Chicago's violent crime rate would have been had the gun ban not been in effect. Or, is your comment a statement of opinion and nothing more.
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
04:57 PM on 07/10/2010
Here is a hint. Look at the difference between Chicago crime and the rest of the state....suprise suprise, it is higher by as much as 5 times and we non-Chicago Ilinois citizens do not labor under the oppresive Daley Democratic machine. Could that possibly have somethng to do with it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeaderofMen
Bilingual former US Marine.
05:47 PM on 07/10/2010
Not opinion. Fact: http://qrc.depaul.edu/djabon/images/murderrates.jpg

The statistical evidence is in. The handgun ban has NOT significantly reduced Chicago's homicide rate. Criminals can and will obtain handguns anywhere they want. There is no 'ban' that can prevent the proliferation of handguns in this country. One good reason is the NRA. Their name has the word 'rifle' in it, but that' not all they advocate people to possess. They advocate unfettered access to any and all weapons of whatever make, model or manufacture. Their lobbyists in DC gutted the Brady Bill. They decided for the rest of the nation that assault rifles are fair game. Indeed, their gun shows are designed to allow their participants to MAXIMIZE profits in the most unregulated way possible. Criminals can obtain weapons of choice there or on the black market, which is totally under any radar, ban or regulation. The NRA is only partly about law-abiding citizens owning weapons for hunting or sport.

The only people this handgun ban affects is law abiding citizens. WE are the ones who have to jump thru hoops to own one in the city limits.
09:53 AM on 07/09/2010
How is a gun ban unconstitutional?! And furthermore, who cares if it's unconstituional?! The founding fathers did not foresee widespread gang violence on the mass scale as it exists in Chicago and many other urban communities today. It's ridiculous. And bringing in the National Guard is not going to end violence in Chicago or anywhere - we cant end violence with punitive measures. We need to change the structures - that means better schools, increased spending on community development/mentorship programs, and intervention.
photo
Sugarmaker
Act like what you do makes a difference, it does
10:05 AM on 07/09/2010
"How is a gun ban unconstitutional?!"

The Heller and McDonald decisions do a pretty good job of explaining that.

"And furthermore, who cares if it's unconstituional?!"

Hopefully, most people in our government.
12:06 PM on 07/09/2010
What about the constitutionality of violating posse comitatus by having the military serve as police inside the United States?? Isn't that why we are supposed to have a well-armed militia for the state? Not a Federal one?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:31 AM on 07/09/2010
I blame former Presidents Bush and Reagan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevJimIII
Open Carry Oklahoma!!
06:07 PM on 07/09/2010
For what?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:29 AM on 07/09/2010
Good thing Chicago bans handguns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevJimIII
Open Carry Oklahoma!!
06:08 PM on 07/09/2010
They no longer can.
11:34 PM on 07/08/2010
Illinois, Chicago in particular, has now descended into the depths of lawlessness. This is the result of Liberalism that has gone unchecked for many years....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mister C
02:55 AM on 07/09/2010
Just like your mother forgetting to feed you some Pablum!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:29 AM on 07/09/2010
You're not from here and you don't know what you're talking about.

Chicago Homicides 1990-2009

1990: 851
1991: 927
1992: 943
1993: 931
1994: 929
1995: 827
1996: 789
1997: 759
1998: 704
1999: 641
2000: 628
2001: 666
2002: 647
2003: 598
2004: 448
2005: 449
2006: 467
2007: 442
2008: 510
2009: 458
06:03 PM on 07/09/2010
Cite your source.... If you can....
08:21 PM on 07/08/2010
No matter what someone says or what someone writes, if one puts the issue of Chicago violence in historical perspective, then The City of Chicago is MUCH LESS violent than it was as recently as 15 years ago. Anyone can look into this matter for themselves, the United States Department of Justice/FBI keeps statistics on the crime rates in U. S. cities. So we can do some research and find out what the facts are, there is no need to accept information, without documentation, as being factual. Yes, Chicago is a relatively violent city and it has been for as far back as I can possibly remember and I was born in the Forties. BUT, Chicago has come a long way and Chicago has made a great deal of improvement from what it was just a few years ago. Chicago had 943 homicides in 1992, in 2009 Chicago had 458 homicides which means we still a long way to go to get this situation under control, but there has been improvement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevJimIII
Open Carry Oklahoma!!
06:10 PM on 07/09/2010
Regardless of the direction of violence trends, it is still not constitutional to have an outright ban on self defense weapons.

I am certainly glad to see a reduction in overall violent crime in any locale.
12:40 AM on 07/10/2010
What is the point in posting a odd reply such as yours to the comment? "checkthefacts" makes no comment whatsoever about Chicago's gun laws. Maybe we should have a scientific study to determine just EXACTLY how Chicago's guns law have effected the rate of violent crime in the City. It might be the laws are more beneficial that all the demagogues have led us to believe. We already know for certain, the huge changes in crime rates nationwide have occurred because of societal reasons and demographic reasons and not because citizens own and carry handguns.
04:01 PM on 07/10/2010
My post makes no comment whatsoever concerning Chicago gun laws. As far as the Chicago gun ban is concerned, it is a moot point because the ban no longer exists. What Chicago gun laws will finally emerge after the coming litigation, no one knows for sure. I believe that a citizen of Chicago does have to the right to own a firearm. We also need to know for CERTAIN that the tens of thousands of firearms which will be coming into Chicago will not result in an increase in Chicago's violent crime rate by make guns even more accessible to the thugs and the gangbangers. What we are looking for here, is what will do the greatest good for the greatest number of citizens of Chicago. Right now, no one knows the answer to that question, even though many profess that they do. Which is more beneificial to Chicago citizens...a gun ban or no gun ban? We in Chicago will find out.
05:39 PM on 07/08/2010
Looks like Chicago is on it's way to becoming Detroit. Where are the intelligent reporters? Let's look at the safest cities and see what they are doing to get to where they are.
tissa
Chicago Liberal /Sales/Marketing Director
06:57 PM on 07/08/2010
No, in Detroit you get blown away in regular areas or while driving your car on a regular highway....not the same thing...here in Chicago it is the gangbanger areas....so there is a big difference...and as far as violent cities...we are not even in the top ten...however, Detroit is.


http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/23/most-dangerous-cities-lifestyle-real-estate-dangerous-american-cities.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeaderofMen
Bilingual former US Marine.
12:55 PM on 07/09/2010
On it's way? Laughable. The number of handgun deaths has gone DOWN over the last 20 years. If anything, we're out our way OUT of being like Detroit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mortgagechief
04:08 PM on 07/08/2010
Preemptive strike: the new ordinance bans certain categories of citizens from even owning guns for unrelated offenses. For instance, you can own a gun if while sober, you kill someone in a car accident, but 2 duis resulting in no accident or death prevent you from owning a gun! This is another diversion, the price of which we cannot afford.
photo
knightoftheroundtable
Old Knight without porfolio or armor
02:28 PM on 07/08/2010
I am for the right to defend ones self with a licensed hand gun. If we good citizens had a carry law like many states I believe crime would go down. These so called toughs are cowards if the have to face the unknown. Daley is wrong, time for a new Mayor.
tissa
Chicago Liberal /Sales/Marketing Director
03:14 PM on 07/08/2010
You do realize that this was a highly skilled veteran police officer that was shot--with his own weapon....look your argument doesn't work.
03:30 PM on 07/08/2010
A rarity - and overwhelmingly police and citizens are safer in RTC states. Chicago has gone all wild west specifically because the bad folks know the citizens can't carry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RevJimIII
Open Carry Oklahoma!!
06:14 PM on 07/09/2010
Anyone can be the victim of a surprise attack and be overwhelmed, regardless of citizen or law enforcement. This is not an argument to disallow a citizen access to defense weapons on the chance they might be disarmed.
02:13 PM on 07/08/2010
Mayor's gun battle "smoke" that allows him to avoid dealing with the real causes of Chicago crime!

Ding ding ding! Winner, finally people are starting to understand that Daley has been avoiding the elephant in the room.

He dosen't know how to fix the problem, so he blames guns. Its just a diversion, the Chicago Reader article is really great. It sheds some light on what is the cause of violent crimes. Not blaming guns, but blaming the authority.
03:02 PM on 07/08/2010
I tend to blame desperation.
07:00 PM on 07/08/2010
I tend to blame the dope dealing gangsta's who have no regard for anyone .