iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Junk Food Crackdown: Feds Draw Up Strict Standards For Marketing To Kids

First Posted: 07/08/10 09:59 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:00 PM ET

Is the federal government preparing to impose strict new standards on the food industry and how it markets junk food to kids?

On Wednesday, BNET pointed to an interagency document (embedded below), from the FTC, FDA, CDC, and USDA proposing new nutritional standards for food marketed to children ages 2-17. Sugary fruit juices and fatty foods would be off limits, and could not be aimed at children. According to the new guidelines, foods marketed to kids must actually include food.

While the USDA did help to write the guidelines, they're the only agency who hasn't signed off on the proposal, reports BNET:

So what's the status of these standards? Nobody knows. They were presented at a meeting in December 2009 and were supposed to be finalized by February or March. Both the FTC and the FDA have reportedly signed off on them, but the USDA has not, leading some watchdog groups to speculate that the food industry has unleashed a lobbying effort aimed at its friends in the Agriculture Department. No one from the food industry was present at the meeting in December.

For years, the food industry has tried to avoid reforms that would have imposed stricter requirements on the products they aim at children.

A section titled "Meaningful Contribution to a Healthful Diet" explains some of the new standards that the agencies came up with:

Foods marketed to children must provide a meaningful contribution to a healthful diet.
Option A:
Food must contain at least 50% by weight of one or more of the following: fruit; vegetable; whole grain; fat-free or low-fat milk or yogurt; fish; extra lean meat or poultry; eggs; nuts and
seeds; or beans

Option B:
Food must contain one or more of the following per RACC:
0.5 cups fruit or fruit juice
0.6 cups vegetables or vegetable juice
0.75 oz. equivalent of 100% whole grain
0.75 cups milk or yogurt; 1 oz. natural cheese; 1.5 oz.
processed cheese
1.4 oz. meat equivalent of fish or extra lean meat or
poultry
0.3 cups cooked dry beans
0.7 oz. nuts or seeds
1 egg or egg equivalent

Last month, the Federal Trade Commission publicly admonished cereal maker Kellogg's for the second in time in as many years for making unsupported health claims regarding children.

Last year the company reached a settlement with the FTC, which criticized its unfounded claims that Frosted Mini Wheats cereal was "clinically shown to improve kids' attentiveness by nearly 20%." Yet shortly after coming to an agreement on that previous marketing campaign, Kellogg launched another effort for Rice Krispies, claiming that the cereal could boost children's immunity, according to a statement released yesterday by the FTC.


Under the previous settlement, Kellogg was banned from making any claims about their products' benefits to cognitive health or function unless such claims could be backed up by scientific evidence. In light of the subsequent claims -- that Rice Krispies can boost children's immunity -- the original order has been expanded, and now more broadly bars the company from "making claims about any health benefit of any food unless the claims are backed by scientific evidence and not misleading."

READ THE NEW STANDARDS:

Interagency Working Group's Tentative Proposed Standards for Marketing Foods to Children

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

Is the federal government preparing to impose strict new standards on the food industry and how it markets junk food to kids? On Wednesday, BNET pointed to an interagency document (embedded below),...
Is the federal government preparing to impose strict new standards on the food industry and how it markets junk food to kids? On Wednesday, BNET pointed to an interagency document (embedded below),...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,255
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (94 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:50 AM on 08/26/2010
Yeah it's getting a little silly, I was in the market and saw some kind of 'healthy choice' logo on fruit loops. I wonder if they really are fooling people or if it's just some kind of practical joke on the consumer.

No worries, the government is here to save us from ourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madgrrl
08:32 PM on 07/15/2010
Finally, it's about time! No way should vitamin coated sugar, dye be marketed as a "healthy breakfast for children" The food marketers have done an end run around the parents to the point that they even advertise in schools to children. Also, this is probably the third generation of children eating this crap, so the parents really don't see anything wrong with it. They ate it as children, and think that feeding their children sugary cereal is perfectly fine. So, maybe with super obese kids running around it's about time the government (who publishes the food pyramid etc.) says: "excuse me, but no, this is not a healthy breakfast, snack food, maybe, breakfast, no."
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
10:51 PM on 07/10/2010
Junk food companies need to be accountable for the chemicals they put in food and stop blaming parents. Parents aren't hovering over their kids 24/7. If someones slowly kills your family or quickly kills your family what's the difference?
07:56 PM on 07/10/2010
Funny, everyone including the CEO of McD's complaining that this legislations would be wrong because it's the parent's choice/responsibility, is actually proving the point that this crap shouldn't be MARKETED to CHILDREN and that the information on the label really ought to be truthful. So we can make those, you know, good choices.

I do make good choices for my kids, but really I could do without the meltdowns at the grocery store because they HAVE to have the junky stuff designed to catch their attention. No 3 year old needs to be drawn to a particular cereal because of the cartoons on the box.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OMG1
The Myth Slayer
05:28 PM on 07/09/2010
Just do it... no debate and no endless blabbering by republiturds about nanny state. This is the right thing to do and if they don't like it .... waaaaaa! here's a ba ba.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lifencompass
12:39 PM on 07/09/2010
~"According to the new guidelines, foods marketed to kids must actually include food."~

Really... well, better late than never.

I'm sure a bunch of "unconscious eaters" are going to have FITS over this one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanMan2012
10:16 AM on 07/09/2010
Seeking to turn the tables on the group, Skinner called for an apology.

"CSPI's twisted characterization of McDonald's as 'the stranger in the playground handing out candy to children' is an insult to every one of our franchisees and employees around the world," Skinner wrote. "When CSPI refers to America's children as 'an unpaid drone army," you similarly denigrate parents and families, because they are fully capable of making their own decisions. You should apologize."

"Parents, in particular, strongly believe they have the right and responsibility to decide what's best for their children, not CSPI," he wrote. "It's really that simple."

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/2476982,CST-NWS-happy08.article
photo
AngryMonkey
Stop believing in fairy tales
09:31 AM on 07/09/2010
Being someone weened on Pepsi I say it is about time. We are wired to enjoy pleasure and sugar is definitely a pleasure. Being a later in life parent I did much more to at least delay this with my youngest. He still has never had a Mountain Dew, just had his first Coke at a birthday party. Once they reach peer pressure age it is much harder, he just turned 13 and at least had a better start that I.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:57 AM on 07/11/2010
I applaud you for your efforts. It isn't easy raising children to eat healthy, when you are consider to be extreme in society. Schools often offer foods that you don't want your kids to eat, but you can't control what they pick. The kids want to be like their peers. When your children go over to their friends' homes, their parents may be offering the sodas and junk foods to your child believing that your child is "deprieved".

Its one think for a parent to make choices for their family, but they are fighting a battle everywhere they go - movies, amusement parks, zoos, sporting events - what food do they offer as refreshments?

Then the advertisers want to say that people really are making their own choice?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
05:59 AM on 07/09/2010
Post to all Parents? Are you responsible for your kids behavior? Are you raising your kids?

Do your kids purchase food at the Grocery Store or do you as an adult?

Can you tell your kids NO!! Can you choose Healthy for them? Can you exercise with them and monitor their weight?

I am responsible for everything my kids do. Good and Bad. Sometimes I fail, but upon realizing this I double down and teach them the lesson they need to succeed. I'm not the best parent, but I am accountable and responsible for what they do.

If your kid is fat or unhealthy. Odds are you as the parent are to blame. If your kids is bad, odds are you failed them somewhere.

Every Parents goal should be to raise the best kid possible and give them lifeskills to succeed. That includes you looking out for their health.

Stop blaming others. At some point you run out of others to blame. Your ability as a parent isn't decided by race, color, intelligence or political party.
07:02 AM on 07/09/2010
As a parent of two healthy and intelligent teens I agree with your point, mostly. Your last sentence, however, actually points to the problem. "Your ability as a parent isn't decided by race, color, intelligence or political party."

Unfortunately, our ability to parent is decided by intelligence, not academic intelligence, but common sense. Many parents don't read labels. Many believe everything they see on the front of a package. I've often thought it odd that many people don't trust the government, but when it comes to food, they completely trust the FDA, run by the government. The government wants us to believe GMOs are harmless, just like pesticides in the 50s.

Intelligence does have a lot to do with our ability raise kids. So does time to think about food choices. Single moms and dads are usually doing all they can to get by. I know, my mom was single. We had fast food for dinner many evenings after she taught school and coached sports for 10 hour workdays. Are you going to tell me I didn't make food choices with my pocket money? That the colorful candy packages didn't get my dollar more often than not?

Kids do make food choices. Vending machines prove it. We need to regulate advertisements, and if you don't agree, then let them sell cigarettes in vending machines at schools, right next to the candy cigarettes. Your kids, and the kids they hang out with, certainly will be able to say no.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
09:16 AM on 07/09/2010
Good post. I still stand by the intelligence. I don't know how to do alot of things. But I can google and research them. I can be of high intelligence and not be aware. If you have a lack of awarness then yes, I can agree with you.

With my wife traveling I to have made the fast food choices over time. But those are my choices. I knew they were bad, but a trade off for time.

Kids do make choices. But you influence that. If kids grew up in a family that smoked and drank, they would see that as okay. If they were educated about the abuses and harm, they would be less adapt to think that was okay.

I suprise my kids about every other week at lunch. I'm lucky I work near their school.
photo
AngryMonkey
Stop believing in fairy tales
10:17 AM on 07/09/2010
You make good points. I have friends that are processed food junky's. Their son makes up two of my son. Mom and son both have weight problems but they do nothing to correct their eating habits. Sam's club premade everything. Their son also has mental problems, like ticks and such. I think to myself well if you would get him off softdrinks and red bull maybe he wouldn't have the problem, but instead they go to doctors to get a cure. They are both intelligent but low on the common sense. Food is the most important part of my monthly budget. I know alot of people can't or don't think that way but they really need to. Even if there was a big red X on the 50 pound box of frosted flakes they would still buy it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanMan2012
10:17 AM on 07/09/2010
Fav'd and Fanned: And this today from the CEO of McD's:

Seeking to turn the tables on the group, Skinner called for an apology.

"CSPI's twisted characterization of McDonald's as 'the stranger in the playground handing out candy to children' is an insult to every one of our franchisees and employees around the world," Skinner wrote. "When CSPI refers to America's children as 'an unpaid drone army," you similarly denigrate parents and families, because they are fully capable of making their own decisions. You should apologize."

"Parents, in particular, strongly believe they have the right and responsibility to decide what's best for their children, not CSPI," he wrote. "It's really that simple."


http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/2476982,CST-NWS-happy08.article
05:56 AM on 07/09/2010
What you know about Cholesterol may be wrong. Does High Cholesterol REALLY Cause Heart Disease? http://bit.ly/d454ZR
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Day Brown
05:07 AM on 07/09/2010
Consider the Athenian Deme. Individually, we really dont have the power to do much. But every Athenian citizen owned a share in a farm that he was expected to go out to from time to time to help with.

This provided the exercise that cleared the mind as well as the healthy organic food he raised his kids on; and it worked really well for a long time. But then, after so many victories, Athenians began using POWs as slave labor, quit getting the exercise they needed, began supporting demagogues, and this destroyed the democracy.

Native Europeans evolved in agrarian villages of 150-300. Kids inherited behavior patterns that fit this, which is why they dont innately fear strangers. There arent any strangers with candy in a village. The women know all the men, so there are no strangers raping.

They grow all their own food, so they know its not poisoned with chemicals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OMG1
The Myth Slayer
10:44 PM on 07/08/2010
I can't believe republicans would oppose laws that would protect our children from dangerous food and brainwashing by big business. Food companies spend millions of dollars on psychologist who work with advertisers to create ads that brainwash your children. Loud squeaky voices, bright colors, cartoon characters and flashing images, colors and lights are all design to create a hypnotic effect on young children. Attach these images to food and you create a tool that attacks a child's subconscious.

Parents have the final say when comes to making choices for their children but parents also need help in making the right choices. The GOP and all Americans should be outrage that businesses use brainwashing techniques to manipulate their child's minds. We all should be equally outrage by fake food filled with empty tooth rotting calories.

We have an epidemic of childhood and adult obesity, diabetes, mental illness and other health issues directly related to poor diet, sugary and fatty foods. The US is the fattest, sickest and most mentally ill country in the world. Connect the dots and the dots begin with infancy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:56 AM on 07/09/2010
I can see how Republicans could be opposed.
This is intrusion into the free market. Companies should be free to do whatever they want. Customers can choose whether to buy or not; it's their individual responsibility to buy what's good for them. Competition will ensure that the market produces what consumers want.
This is valid to a point. Many on the right (I call them free market worshipers) are absolutist and simplistic in their free market views. For example, that "free" always means competition, and that if you impose on Kellogg's freedom (or Comcast's or BP's) you're imposing on everyone's freedom.
This specific issue isn't so cut and dried. We have a crummy food system, but how much authority should the government have over regulating it? And the food system is supplying what people are buying - no one is forced to eat at McDonalds. How much do we deserve the food system we have, and how much has it been manipulated by the supply side?
It would be nice if food suppliers were interested in the health of Americans, but Capitalism doesn't use health as a measure, it uses money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Day Brown
04:43 AM on 07/09/2010
The problem with the free market is the 'free press', is actually corporate mass media, and it makes tons of money advertising this junk. So, its not going to, as the Founding Farmers who wrote the Constitution assumed, "educate the public".

And one of the reasons you read about this now, even tho its been going for 50 years or more, is the Internet is not supported by the same corporate advertising. Now, logically, if we tax tobacco and alcohol because of the damage to public health, the govt should also tax junk food. It'd go a long ways twards reducing the deficit, and mite even affect waistlines. Which would also reduce the cost of healthcare, thereby also reducing that cost. Win/win.

And it aint only waistlines. You see a lotta fat heads in the postings. Moreover, Capitalism is not limited to the profits in the junk food industry. If the money were not misspent on that, it'd be available for other products. Further, reducing junk food consumption will result in healthier workers who are therefore more productive, and thereby make more profits for their employers.

If Republicans are as smart as they claim to be, they'd figure that out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanMan2012
10:20 AM on 07/09/2010
To your last sentence, check a company called Harvesmark.They are a Client of mine and filled me in on their missiong. They are doing some awesome things. Consumer campaign to come.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
06:01 AM on 07/09/2010
If you think parents aren't making the right choices because they need the govt to tell them what to do, then you need to rethink your parenting stance.
10:15 PM on 07/08/2010
When they ban HFCS, I'll consider it progress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madgrrl
08:47 PM on 07/15/2010
agreed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:56 PM on 07/08/2010
Let the trolls eat whatever junk they want.....its more SS money for me when these porkers kick the bucket early. I'm living to 100.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
It IS what it IS!
09:46 PM on 07/08/2010
Big Biz doesn't want interference FROM Government becuse there has already been interference IN Government - from them!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:28 PM on 07/09/2010
Chicken/Egg. There has already been interference FROM Government so Big Biz wants to interfere IN Government. The result is still Crony Capitalism and Central Planning.

We need to get Big Biz out of Government AND Government out of Big Biz.