iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Oil Spill 'Transfer': BP Considers Routing Crude To Non-Producing Wells Miles Away

First Posted: 07/09/10 08:08 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:00 PM ET

Gulf Oil Spill
Oil cleanup workers rake oil and sand into piles along the shore in Orange Beach Ala., Wednesday, July 7, 2010. Oil washed ashore with the tide overnight, leaving an ugly stain that brought out dozens of BP workers for cleaning duty. (AP Photo/Dave Martin)

THEODORE, Ala. (Associated Press) - The first of two relief wells being drilled to stop the Gulf oil gusher could be done by the end of the month, BP officials say, but if that doesn't succeed, one backup being considered is transferring the crude to non-producing underwater wells that are miles away.

BP would run the flow through pipelines across the floor of the Gulf of Mexico, said retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the Obama administration's point man on the crisis.

"That would take some construction and some time. It would probably move us into the late August timeframe," Allen said.

Still, the best hope to stop the spewing oil from the blown-out well a mile under the sea is the relief wells. Though officials said the first could be finished by the end of July, weeks ahead of schedule, they are quick to point out that such an optimistic timetable would require ideal conditions every step of the way.

That is something that has rarely happened since the leak began more than 2 1/2 months ago with the deadly explosion of the rig Deepwater Horizon 50 miles off the Louisiana coast.

"BP's credibility is basically shot," said Jefferson Parish Council Chairman John Young. "I hope they plug it as soon as they can, but I'm not holding my breath. They're unreliable and they haven't been transparent or open."

In New Orleans, a federal appeals court Thursday rejected the government's effort to restore an offshore deepwater drilling moratorium, opening the door to resumed drilling in the Gulf while the legal fight continues.

The ruling is not the final word on the Obama administration's fight to suspend new drilling projects so it can study the risks revealed by the disastrous BP oil spill. The same appeals court is expected to hear arguments on the merits of the moratorium case in late August or early September.

In the meantime, Allen said crews expect to intercept and penetrate the pipe from the Deepwater Horizon about 18,000 feet below sea level in seven to 10 days. The drilling crew is attempting to hit a target the size of a dinner plate at a depth where water pressure is great enough to crush a submarine.

But crews will not know how long it will take to stop the oil until they get there. Because the gushing well essentially is composed of pipes within pipes, oil could be coming up through multiple layers, Allen said.

The plan is to inject heavy mud and cement into each layer of the pipe, if needed, to overcome the pressure of the huge oil reservoir below.

Several times in the past week, BP Managing Director Robert Dudley has said drilling for a relief well is making fast progress and could be done before August.

But he's quickly made a caveat: Everything would have to go flawlessly, something he considers unlikely especially during hurricane season. Though a series of storms in the Gulf have not disrupted drilling, it has curtailed skimming and other cleanup and containment efforts.

"In a perfect world with no interruptions, it's possible to be ready to stop the well between July 20 and July 27," Dudley told The Wall Street Journal. He made similar remarks to the Houston Chronicle in a story published July 2.

Allen has confirmed that the operation is ahead of schedule, but he won't budge from the expected August completion date.

"There are certain things that can move that date up, but my official position is the middle of August," Allen said Thursday.

If for some reason the drilling doesn't succeed, another plan is to divert the oil.

Donald Van Nieuwenhuise, a University of Houston geology professor who has worked as a lead geologist on several offshore drilling projects, said the transfer to wells two to 10 miles away would take time but would avoid the need for surface vessels and possible interruptions from storms.

"It's easy," he said. "It's just not quick. You have to put more equipment on the (sea)floor."

But the idea outlined by Allen apparently calls for storing the oil with gas and water from the gushing well in a different well so it could possibly be separated and removed at a later date, according to Van Nieuwenhuise.

"Producing the oil now is not something they need to be worried about while they're trying to get oil out of the Gulf," he said.

For the region, the bottom line remains the same: An estimated 68 million to 169 million gallons of crude have gushed into the Gulf since the April 20 blast that killed 11 workers. And a few days' difference matters less than the prospect of stopping the leak for good.

Weather is another factor. A major tropical storm or hurricane nearby would shut drilling down.

Also, as the drill gets closer to the well pipe, the work becomes more delicate, and any mistake becomes nearly catastrophic. That's why Allen and BP are sticking to August as the target.

"If it happens sooner than that, I think we can all jump for joy," he told reporters.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

THEODORE, Ala. (Associated Press) - The first of two relief wells being drilled to stop the Gulf oil gusher could be done by the end of the month, BP officials say, but if that doesn't succeed, one ba...
THEODORE, Ala. (Associated Press) - The first of two relief wells being drilled to stop the Gulf oil gusher could be done by the end of the month, BP officials say, but if that doesn't succeed, one ba...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 161
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
12:00 PM on 07/15/2010
A Market-Based Solution to the Deep Water Horizon Oil Disaster

The oil that is currently escaping to the Gulf should be recovered before it hits the land (or sea beds) if at all possible. Many approaches have been proposed – booms, skimmers, surface burning – but all have focused on implementation details. We propose a plan based on market incentives, which is, after all, what drove BP to undertake costly and risky deep-water drilling in the first place.

The proposal is to pay $1,000 for each barrel of oil from the Deep Water Horizon well that is proven to be recovered from the gulf. This method produces an incentive to recover the oil before it hits the shore, when it will do tens of thousands of dollars damage to the environment. The money can come from the fines that will be levied on BP which is $1,000 per barrel released. BP can control these fines by investing in the most effective methods for recovering the oil. In addition, the high premium would provide incentives for other companies in the petroleum industry to compete with BP to develop the most effective, earliest-deployed recovery methods.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctordoubt
It is never too late to try.
10:46 AM on 07/10/2010
I have said from the start that BP had no intention of killing the well. I fully expect the end result to be that BP will divert the oil to another well, or simply position the equipment needed to harvest the well. The spill loss at this point is very small compared to what is left to be processed. Besides, once they break the first pipe, the oil will have another outlet, and while it may reduce the amount pouring from the first pipe, the split pressure will still prevent any serious plug efforts.
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
10:17 PM on 07/09/2010
What could possibly go wrong?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
07:30 AM on 07/10/2010
Well, you were right about that Trojan Horse!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
07:05 PM on 07/09/2010
6'4" Cop Bullies 4'11" Videographer as She Videos a BP Worker Taken Away in Ambulance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pi8R_FUGys
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
429freckles
Ex Republican Now Devoted Democrat
06:58 PM on 07/09/2010
BP has no credability. I don't think they can stop this well.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
06:40 PM on 07/09/2010
Published: July 9, 2010
New BP Data Show 20% of Gulf Spill Responders Exposed to Chemical That Sickened Valdez Workers

In an under-the-radar release of new test results for its Gulf of Mexico oil spill workers, BP PLC is reporting potentially hazardous exposures to a now-discontinued dispersant chemical -- a substance blamed for contributing to chronic health problems after the Exxon Valdez cleanup -- among more than 20 percent of offshore responders.

BP's new summary of chemical testing, posted to its website this week after a nearly monthlong absence of new data, also makes notable revisions to the company's public characterization of the health risks facing Gulf workers. The oil giant now describes the government as a partner in developing the program for monitoring cleanup crews.

more: http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/07/09/09greenwire-new-bp-data-show-20-of-gulf-spill-responders-e-82494.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
04:56 PM on 07/09/2010
Dont they sound optimistic?
03:27 PM on 07/09/2010
I just read in a quality Dutch news paper that a group of 30 top drilling engineers have called upon BP to stop drilling the relief wells since there is a chance (they estimate around 10%) of an even (much) bigger disaster. This is because the drilling process will lead to many fluctuations in pressure in the Macondo pit that is already in a bad state. They are afraid this may eventually lead to ruptures in the sea floor which would be a totally uncontrollable situation.

They call on BP to publish all data of the Maconda-pit so that experts from around the world can help devise an optimum solution... The group have also drafted an alternative plan which they deem much safer..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pat2 718
FOSS emergency management software developer
05:34 PM on 07/09/2010
Can you post a link? Have they got an English translation?
12:34 AM on 07/10/2010
I am afraid it is in the paid section of the website http://www.nrc.nl (http://www.nrc.nl/digitaleeditie/NH/20100709___/2_013/article8.html). The Netherlands have extensive expertise and knowledge in this field a.o. because of the Anglo-Dutch company Shell. (There is a special faculty at the Dutch University of Technology for it).

I tried to translate the article:
-------
By our editor
MARCEL AAN DE BRUGH
Rotterdam, July 9.
A group of thirty Dutch engineers from the oil and gas industry called for the British oil company BP to immediately stop the drilling of two relief wells near the source of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. According to the group, there is a small chance that the procedure will have catastrophic consequences.

BP is drilling two new wells to the faulty pit Macondo, from which 40000-60000 barrels of oil is leaking daily. From the two new wells, the original pit will soon be pumped full with heavy drilling fluid and then filled with cement. The Dutch experts are concerned that during the process many pressure oscillations will occur in the Macondo-pit, already in poor condition. The pit could thereby be further damaged. Oil and gas could push upwards outside the drill pipe to accumulate underneath the seabed. The pressure would build up there, until it becomes so high that cracks will be created in the seabed. The oil spill would become much greater. And totally uncontrollable.

-- continued ---
12:35 AM on 07/10/2010
Drilling Expert Dick Swart estimates that the operation of BP has a 10 percent chance of failure. "I think that's enough to stop the operation," he says. An earlier attempt by BP to push back the oil that is driving up through a "top kill" - during which heavy drilling fluid was pumped into the well from above - also failed, even though BP said there was a chance of 60-70 percent that it would succeed. At the time Swart had advised to BP to not carry out top kill.

A spokesman for BP has announced that the oil company does not intend to stop the drilling of relief wells. Board member Robert Dudley announced yesterday that the operation lies ahead of schedule. He took over coordination of the rescue efforts in the Gulf of Mexico three weeks ago from chief executive Tony Hayward.

According to Dudley, the Macondo well could be filled up with cement in two to three weeks, if everything goes well. "In a perfect world, without interruptions, we can stop the well between 20 and 27 July," he said.

-- Continued --
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
02:39 PM on 07/09/2010
OT

BP clean-up crews not cleaning the oil that is burried under the sand - VIDEO PROOF

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAQPr83SgKQ
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uchenna Oguekwe
12:00 PM on 07/09/2010
BP=Epic Fail! I find it funny how Repubs say we should continue to drill in deep waters. Them being against the moratorium has nothing to do with jobs, but everything to do with the fact that the oil companies line the pockets of the politicians who are against it. If airline companies allowed their pilots to fly through hurricanes if it gets their flights to their destinations faster, but that method causes major crashes, no one would have a problem if the FAA halted to use of that practice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleo Creech
Atlanta writer, poet, activist.
11:39 AM on 07/09/2010
I keep wondering why BP only tries one thing at a time, they'venever heard of multi-tracking? they're working on the relief wells and they have this back up plan just in case. Why not start construction on this now so that if the relief wells don't do the trick they've already got a head start.
11:59 AM on 07/09/2010
That's what they have been, and are, doing
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:43 PM on 07/09/2010
they are multi-tasking, they are drilling 2 relief wells, and also working on a new larger tight fiting top hat that will most likely be attempted today or over the next few days (with weather permitting and government approval) they are also working on other back up ideas - but each idea takes actual engineering and design input, analysis before it can be put in place - unfortunately everything is being thought up now - since no one bothered to do this research before the drilling started.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:32 AM on 07/09/2010
Howcome Rachels' in Afganistan? Was she putting too much light on BP and its criminal lack of responsibility?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sporty1
being me
11:44 AM on 07/09/2010
She wanted to see how far she can go without wearing a shawl and all that business. Apparently some, but not too far. he he
11:09 AM on 07/09/2010
"68 million to 169 million gallons"

This is why neither BP nor the Coast Guard have any credibility left. 100 million gallons is quite a variance. Not to mention the Coast Guard PR representative also works for the same firm for BP.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
11:21 AM on 07/09/2010
If theses numbers are correct 86.5 Million + and... its a sort of guess meter

http://www.google.com/crisisresponse/oilspill/
10:42 AM on 07/09/2010
http://waxforpollution.blogspot.com/

Why have they waited so long???? This wax on / oil off works like a charm and BP can reclaim oil from wax.
And his name is Willy Nelson, even cooler.
photo
OzoneTom
Living on the border
11:58 AM on 07/09/2010
> "Why have they waited so long?"

I'm guessing that someone is making big bucks doing it the way that doesn't work as well.
12:03 PM on 07/09/2010
And/or saving big bucks doing it the way that doesn't work/or as well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:38 AM on 07/09/2010
This is absolutely not the first optimism shown by the Broken Pipes company. Take the first cap, second cap, the"siphoning", the burning, the dispersants, the health of the cleanup workers, the validity of dumping clean sand over oiled, and oh yeah, lets not forget Tony getting his life back, while the small peoples' pain is being felt.