iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Alvin Greene Paid Senate Race Registration Fee Himself, Says South Carolina Law Enforcement

Alvin Greene

MEG KINNARD   07/ 9/10 07:58 PM ET   AP

COLUMBIA, S.C. — An unemployed military veteran will face no state charges over the $10,440 filing fee for his successful bid to win South Carolina's Democratic nomination to run for U.S. Senate, the state's top police official said Friday.

The State Law Enforcement Division also opted not to charge Alvin Greene with misrepresenting his finances to a court, SLED Chief Reggie Lloyd told The Associated Press.

Greene cooperated with agents and Lloyd said he hoped the findings will put questions about Greene's finances to rest.

Greene, who did no fundraising, won an unexpected victory over former state lawmaker Vic Rawl in the June 8 Democratic primary to face GOP U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint.

Greene had reported just over $1,000 in monthly income on court paperwork and was appointed a public defender to represent him on a pending obscenity charge. His meager finances raised questions about how he paid the required $10,440 fee to run as a U.S. Senate candidate.

But when state agents reviewed Greene's bank accounts, they found an October deposit of nearly $6,000, which was Greene's military exit pay, and about $3,000 deposited early this year from state and federal tax refunds, Lloyd said.

The records matched Greene's story that the 32-year-old candidate, who has been collecting unemployment benefits since he left the military in August, was able to afford the fee because he saved his money and lived frugally.

"He clearly does not have someone paying him. He just decided to take his money and run for U.S. Senate. There's no big conspiracy," Lloyd said.

Greene said Friday that SLED's findings vindicated him.

"It was just as I said: It came from the Army," Greene said Friday. "I'm happy."

Lloyd also wanted to look into whether Greene had misrepresented his financial situation in court. In November, a court-appointed attorney was named to represent Greene on a felony charge of showing obscene Internet photos to a University of South Carolina student.

Court records show Greene reported just over $1,000 in monthly income. Last month, Greene notified the court he had retained a private attorney to represent him.

Greene says he didn't ask for a court-appointed attorney or intend to mislead anyone about his financial situation.

"They just gave me one," he said Friday.

SLED agents listened to a recording of Greene's testimony at a hearing and felt he was honest and didn't try to deceive anyone, Lloyd said.

Rep. Chip Limehouse, the state lawmaker who asked state police to investigate, says he's not satisfied with their probe and will continue to ask questions about where Greene got the money for his filing fee.

"Did the $10,400 fall out of the sky?" the Republican from Charleston asked Friday. "This doesn't clear it up for me."

Democratic Party leaders were stunned by Greene's 18-point primary victory. After The Associated Press reported Greene's arrest, they called for him to withdraw from the race.

Greene has declined to comment on the charge in a series of awkward, often terse news interviews. He has not entered a plea or been indicted.

Greene's victory prompted some to accuse Republicans of having a hand in the election, a charge GOP leaders have repeatedly brushed aside. A Washington-based watchdog group suggested that South Carolina's top prosecutor should look into whether someone gave money to Greene. Attorney General Henry McMaster, however, says his office has received no evidence supporting that claim.

Greene insists he's done nothing wrong and is staying in the race.

Multiple theories have surfaced about Greene's success, including the possibility that voters simply picked the first name on the ballot.

The state Democratic Party's executive committee has upheld Greene's victory, nixing a protest that could have required a new vote.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
COLUMBIA, S.C. — An unemployed military veteran will face no state charges over the $10,440 filing fee for his successful bid to win South Carolina's Democratic nomination to run for U.S. Senate...
COLUMBIA, S.C. — An unemployed military veteran will face no state charges over the $10,440 filing fee for his successful bid to win South Carolina's Democratic nomination to run for U.S. Senate...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,320
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
photo
darter22
Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes.
08:45 PM on 07/12/2010
DeMint is the prohibitive favorite here but who knows? Maybe between now and November, he will decide to take a hike on the Appalachian Trail with an hombre from south of the border. It has happened before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItAintNoRocketScience
"Zat's not my department," says Wernher Von Braun.
04:15 PM on 07/12/2010
One has to wonder if he were a white candidate, and the situation was identical, would there have been all this suspicion? Doubtful. If I can find a way to contribute to his campaign, I surely will. It's hilarious how all the analyzers, planners, plotters, schemers and political insiders got beat by this guy. I wish him every bit of luck he can get, and I hope he wins.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurical
Trolls Should Make Like A Tree & Get Out Of Here!
08:28 PM on 07/12/2010
Regardless of race or party it's suspicious when a candidate makes an investment of pretty much all the money they had to file for a race & then do nothing to campaign for. The overwhelming margin combined with a history of voter shenanigans by the GOP in South Carolina add to the suspiscion. I am sure that his race adds suspiscion in some people's minds, but that has to be above and beyond suspiscions that should have come up for even the most casual observer with no racial bias. If an unemployed Asian man ran and won 60% of the vote without being able to name one place they campaigned or without giving a single speech, I would be suspicious. As partisan and crooked as politics have become, I don't place limits on what the GOP would do to keep & gain power.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
02:06 PM on 08/15/2010
I do to. It is interesting to see a poor person run let alone win. I really do not think he can do a worse job than many of the hacks in power now.
photo
runtwelds
Father, Educator, & Artist
02:57 PM on 07/12/2010
you know we all should have just waited to see what the deal was with his finances instead of jumping on the "repub plant" business. now that it turns out he is a genuine guy i wish him all the best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aurical
Trolls Should Make Like A Tree & Get Out Of Here!
03:15 PM on 07/12/2010
With the history of dirty politics down in SC and the questions raised, an investigation was appropriate. The results of part of it seem to validate that much of the story at least. I guess we all will have to wait and see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ramsha
02:47 PM on 07/12/2010
Alvin Greene has not opened his mouth yet, may be he is sincere and will be a good Law Maker. We have to wait and see. He looks like he cannot be as bad as some Wing Nuts who are seeking office in November.
12:31 PM on 07/12/2010
Alvin Green goes to Washington...........it has a nice ring to it.......a la Forrest Gump.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HerbTee
An Aggressive Progressive, got a problem wit dat?
01:25 PM on 07/12/2010
I prefer, "The March of the Common Man" myself. :-) No matter what you may think of Alvin Greene or his faults, he simply CANNOT be any worse than current ReTHUGlipig SC Senator Jim "DeMinted".
02:11 PM on 07/12/2010
Hey, is all good. The man put his money toward a laudable effort. So "The March of the Common Man" it is.
11:34 AM on 07/12/2010
Alvin Green vs. Cong. Charlie Wilson D-Ohio. When Charlie was a State Rep. he was on the committee that wrote the proper way to file petitions in Ohio. When he filed his petition to run for the U.S.Congess as a Democrat his petiition was disqualified. Seems he did not know the proper procedures for filing a petition in Ohio. Thus he ran as a write in candidate and won. Alvin Green at least knew the proper procedure to file. Maybe the problem is that he is over qualified to run as a Democrat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juabdib
Man created god in his own image...
11:09 AM on 07/12/2010
Something here stinks, and it smells like DeMint...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:38 AM on 07/12/2010
Give me a break. He received 59% of the vote. The Democrats have to own this one. Even Jon Stuart said so. It's just more proof that many people vote with absolutely no information or thought. Gosh, I wonder how we got to where we are?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:08 AM on 07/12/2010
It appears the voters just picked someone they had never heard of or seen before. it's kinda a freak story.
11:02 AM on 07/12/2010
Ill root for him, question his qualifications for the office, and his preparedness, but he is still a sacrificial lamb. The democratic party will save resources letting him run.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
calindi
11:04 AM on 07/12/2010
Finally. Thanks for making some sense. #3.
10:45 AM on 07/12/2010
all the conspiracy theories go right out the door. Face it - democrats nominated him because his name is Al Green.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HerbTee
An Aggressive Progressive, got a problem wit dat?
01:27 PM on 07/12/2010
Any proof of that, tr011ie?
photo
squat6971
59 *was* divine -- 60? 61? not so much
09:43 AM on 07/12/2010
Still sounds like a Republican tool -- even if he doesn't know it
08:55 AM on 07/12/2010
Instead of mocking this man, who did have the guts to put himself into the race, the Democrats should get him a good campaign manager, help him with public speaking, and start attacking DeMint. The Republicans at least tried to coach Palin, and this man seems to basically have more smarts than she.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Twaine
10:41 AM on 07/12/2010
Just leave Rahm out of it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
calindi
11:06 AM on 07/12/2010
No, no, no.
Don't waste a dime or second on this guy.
He's making the party look idiotic.
Sarah Palin may not be smartest tool in the shed, but she is a performer....and a damned good one at that.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HerbTee
An Aggressive Progressive, got a problem wit dat?
01:38 PM on 07/12/2010
So, Democrats should sit back with our thumbs up our collective b utt s and do absolutely nothing, huh? Is that your answer...just let Jim DeMint cakewalk his way into a 2nd Senate term totally unopposed?

Hey...there was an SC open primary election and Greene won!

The SCDP has decided NOT to legally overturn the election results!

Greene's Democratic opponent Vic Rawl was denied a motion by the SCDP to overturn the election in his favor!

Greene has been cleared of any wrongdoing concerning this election to date.

What more do you people want? If there was any cheating involved in the primary election, it certainly does NOT appear it was Alvin Greene's doing or that he was collusive in it.

You want to question Greene's fitness for political office? Why hasn't anyone ever questioned the political fitness of Jim DeMint, Joe Wilson, Mark Sanford and other SC ReTHUGlipig political hacks for their fitness for political office??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:28 PM on 07/12/2010
Smartest tool? Palin isn't even in the shed. You comparing her to the tools is an insult to all the not-so-good tools
07:10 AM on 07/12/2010
What does Paul the Octopus think of Greene's chances?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ron071
05:32 AM on 07/12/2010
This is known as South Carolina CLear, and is not to be confused with any legitimate type of investigative result. Always remember to know it from whence it comes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:36 AM on 07/12/2010
Green 2012!