Gaza Flotilla Raid Report: Israeli Military Finds Flotilla Killings Justified

IAN DEITCH   07/12/10 02:17 PM ET   AP

Gaza Raid

TEL AVIV, Israel — Flawed intelligence-gathering and planning led to Israel's botched and deadly raid on a Gaza-bound protest flotilla, with security forces underestimating the potential for violence, said the official report released Monday.

The report, however, praised the commandos who took part in the operation, saying they were justified in opening fire and killing nine after being confronted by violent pro-Palestinian activists on board one of the ships.

The report concluded that intelligence-gathering was deficient and that various intelligence units did not communicate properly with each other. It criticized the operation's planners for not having a backup plan in the event of violence.

It did not recommend any dismissals, though it is possible that some senior officers will be ousted or demoted in an ensuing shake-up.

"We found that there were some professional mistakes regarding both the intelligence and the decision-making process and some operational mistakes," the report's author, retired general Giora Eiland, told reporters at a Defense Ministry briefing where declassified sections of the report were discussed.

Some of the mistakes took place at fairly high levels of command, he added, giving few details. The report itself was not made public.

The criticisms that were aired at the briefing – as well as the praise for the soldiers who took part in the raid – have been widely voiced inside Israel since the May 31 raid.

Video footage of Israeli commandos being beaten by the activists on the Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara, coupled with an international outcry over the bloodshed, led Israelis to close ranks around their military.

But the raid also had an effect opposite to the one Israel desired. It focused international attention on the three-year-old blockade on the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip and forced Israel to ease the movement of goods through land crossings.

Israel's naval blockade on the territory, meant to keep weapons from reaching Hamas militants, remains in place. Later this week the blockade will be challenged again, this time by a Libyan protest ship.

In a statement, the Israeli military chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, said the inquiry did not reveal failures or negligence, but "brings up mistakes which must be corrected for future incidents."

Military officials briefing reporters said that as a result of the lessons from the botched raid and the inquiry, the navy will be able stop such ships in the future. However, if the activists on board attack soldiers with the intention of being killed themselves, that might well happen.

The officials made the observation after playing footage that he said showed passengers aboard the Mavi Marmara saying they wanted to die as martyrs. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were going beyond the findings of the inquiry.

On the flotilla's five other ships, there was only passive resistance.

Organizers of the Libyan ship, which was sent by a charity group headed by the son of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, have said they do not seek confrontation with Israel but are determined to reach Gaza.

"This ship is carrying humanitarian aid and its organizers are not looking for political propaganda or media campaigns or any provocation," said Youssef Sawani, executive director of the Gadhafi International Charity and Development Foundation, which dispatched the protest vessel.

Sawani has said he hoped the vessel would reach Gaza by Tuesday.

The boat may bypass Gaza altogether, however, and head straight for Egypt's nearby port of El-Arish.

On Monday, Egypt's Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said the boat was welcome to dock at El-Arish if the organizers made a formula request and then aid would be transported overland to Gaza.

Israel has resisted calls for a U.N.-led inquiry into the raid, saying it would be biased. In addition to the investigation conducted for the military, Israel has appointed a civilian inquiry with a mandate limited to investigating the legality of the operation.

Two international observers have been attached to the civilian commission, which is led by a retired Israeli Supreme Court judge.

In unrelated news, the Israeli military said Monday it plans to investigate the death of a Palestinian man killed by a tear gas canister fired by Israeli security forces during a protest against Israel's West Bank separation barrier 15 months ago.

The military said it reopened the investigation because new information came to its attention. The B'Tselem group, which investigates alleged Israeli human rights abuses in the West Bank, pressed for an investigation and rejected the military's original contention that Bassem Abu Rahmeh was standing in a group of Palestinians hurling rocks at troops.

Video footage showed him shouting, not throwing rocks, when he was shot.

Also Monday, Jerusalem's city planning committee approved construction of 32 housing units in a Jewish neighborhood in east Jerusalem. The U.S. and Palestinians object to new construction there. Palestinians claim east Jerusalem as their capital. Several steps remain in the approval process and actual building would probably be years away.

______

Associated Press Writer Maggie Michael contributed to this report from Cairo.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TEL AVIV, Israel — Flawed intelligence-gathering and planning led to Israel's botched and deadly raid on a Gaza-bound protest flotilla, with security forces underestimating the potential for vio...
TEL AVIV, Israel — Flawed intelligence-gathering and planning led to Israel's botched and deadly raid on a Gaza-bound protest flotilla, with security forces underestimating the potential for vio...
Filed by Alexander Corwin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,798
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (28 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:22 AM on 07/25/2010
The operation did not having a backup plan in the event of NON-violence.

That is because a nighttime boarding done by commando assault in international waters preceded by gunfire from above from those on board Israeli helicopters was the initiation of the violence in the first place. To have those initiating the violence determine whether their violence was justified seems rather incapable of providing credible analysis.

Will they ever return the stolen property (particularly camera and video memory cards) now that they've ascertained they've done nothing wrong? This exoneration means they now have nothing to hide and fair-minded independent investigators could only come to the same conclusion, right?
11:34 PM on 07/17/2010
With hundreds of tgerrorists on board the ship, it showed amazing restraint on the part of the Israelis to limit the deaths to nine terrorists.
07:06 AM on 07/18/2010
Afre you being sarcastic?
02:27 AM on 07/20/2010
No just factual.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
03:34 PM on 07/18/2010
And your evidence backing your claim is...?

If these passengers (or some of these passengers) were dangerous terrorists, why were NONE of them detained by Israel, and charged and tried?

Why were ALL of the passengers immediately released and deported without even an investigation?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevethetruck
06:17 PM on 07/16/2010
It's Hamas fault? Oh, That does justify killing anyone you want. The U.S. supports terroism.
02:30 AM on 07/20/2010
No, it just justifies killing murderous terrorists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevethetruck
07:27 PM on 07/30/2010
Well since the people bringing aid to Gaza didn't murder anyone and the IDF did, I agree. I would justify killing the murderers of those aid workers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wirehedd
10:32 AM on 07/15/2010
no surprise there. the killings of thousands of Palestinians is supposedly "justified" too. All those little children dying from malnutrition and random IDF gunfire must be firing rockets into israel too.
BubbaC33
Jimmy Buffett is the greatest American
11:38 PM on 07/15/2010
Any collateral damage that took place dsuring Operation Cast Lead is directly the fault of Hamas. First, Israel warned that repeated missle and rocket attacks would bring about a response from the IDF. Hamas ignored that warning. When the IDF entered Gaza Hamas fired on them while mixing with ordinary civilians, placing those folks in harm's way.
Blame Israel and in doing so you are releasing Hamas from the responsibility that is theirs. If any group has displayed disdain for the civilians in Gaza it is Hamas. If any group has put the civilians in Gaza at risk it is Hamas.
03:02 AM on 07/16/2010
> Any collateral damage that took place dsuring Operation
>Cast Lead is directly the fault of Hamas

Actually: it's the fault of the people who pulled the trigger

> When the IDF entered Gaza Hamas fired on them
> while mixing with ordinary civilians, placing those
> folks in harm's way

Of course this is a lie. IDF just flat out didn't care and never cared a wit about bystanders, and the purpose of the operation was to cause pain and punishment to the people of Gaza for having the audacity to vote for Hamas.

IDF has all kinds of cameras but they got not a shot of Hamas using anyone for shields. IDF attack buildings with hundreds of people inside them with tank shells and bombs.

War crimes.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
10:37 PM on 07/16/2010
Sorry Bubba,

but it is not "collateral damage" it's innocent civlians who were killed, some of them deliberately. 300 of them were children.

As far as blame, I blame both combatants. It is the responsibility of any military force to do the best it can to see that noncombatants are not involved in the conflict.

That clearly did NOT happen here, and this has been attested to by the Goldstone Report, the report of various NGOs (including Israeli ones) and has been the testimony of some of the IDF soldiers who participated in the conflict, and has been corroborated by two senior IDF officers who admitted that the IDF changed the Rules of Engagement to allow IDF soldiers to fire on noncombatant civilians.

The other point that must be made is that there HAD been a cease-fire in place, and it was violated by the IDF -- NOT by Hamas. This occurred on the night of November 4, 2008, when the world's attention was distracted by the US election.

Hamas even went so far as to offer to reinstate the cease-fire, and this offer was rejected by the government of Israel.

So Israel COULD have chosen a diplomatic path and avoided Cast Lead altogether, but chose not to. It is my belief that that decision was made in an attempt to boost the then government's standing in the polls.

But let's stop kidding ourselves as to what is going on, and let's stop using dehumanizing euphemisms like "collateral damage"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:21 PM on 07/16/2010
*All those little children dying from malnutrition*

Can you kindly list documented cases of Palestinian kids that died from malnutrition as a result of the blockade?

Many thanks.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
07:24 PM on 07/16/2010
It is difficult to know exactly how many children have died from malnutrition, since usually mortality results from a secondary cause -- usually disease from a weakened immune system.

I would be particularly interested to see how many children have also died fro disease due to lack of adequate, treated drinking water.

However, there ARE several reports by various UN organizations (UNICEF) (WHO) which have provided evidence of many problems caused by malnutrition, including stunted growth, waisting and underweight, anemia, and other serious helath problems --and with many of these problems, there is inadequate medical treatment in the Gaza strip.

One serious problem (and I am sorry I cannot remember the link) is an increase in premature births, and a shortage of incubators to treat such infants.


Here are some links which you can peruse which will provide plenty of evidence on the effects of malnutrition on the weakest, and most innocent, residents of the Gaza Strip.



http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/CB9A27EF05BB52408525759F0061B366


http://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/47d4e277b48d9d3685256ddc00612265/80e8238d765e5fb7852576b1004ec498?OpenDocument


http://www.irinnews.org/pdf/UNICEF_Rapid_Nutrition_Assessment_report_Gaza.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeniseA
Most Americans support Israel.
07:11 PM on 07/17/2010
Here's an Amnesty International online booklet that doesn't mention anything about starvation or malnutrition. If it WAS happening wouldn't they have mentioned it?!
http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_20012.pdf
10:27 AM on 07/15/2010
Haaretz reports.

The Foreign Ministry advised the defense establishment yesterday to wait until the Libyan aid ship reportedly headed for Gaza approaches or enters the coastal strip's territorial waters before making any attempt to stop it. The ministry made the recommendation to avoid the risk of breaking international law.
BubbaC33
Jimmy Buffett is the greatest American
11:40 PM on 07/15/2010
Israel will not be in violation if it stops ships, any ships, from getting to Gaza. By your thinking the US violated i-law when JFK ordered a blockade of Cuba. One thing is clear, your understanding of i-law always seems to be tilted away from Arabs putting Israel and the West at fault.
03:05 AM on 07/16/2010
Nope, nothing illegal in 1962 in blocking ships carrying missiles into Cuba.

If Israel's blockade was legal, you'd trot it out.

Why not give of the (cough) list of countries that back this blockade.
photo
SamSeven
You're either with Humanity or you're not.
01:38 PM on 07/16/2010
Israel can do no wrong right. I got it. Maybe I should covert to Judasism and move to Israel, thus getting free money from the US and I kill without impunity.
10:26 AM on 07/15/2010
My friend in Israel says that the Israeli news there is trying to suppress the information about the crying commandos or the fact they were treated for wounds and had their weapons taken away.

She says this would be worse news than if they had violated laws of savagery. She explained news of their weakness is far worse, if that tells you anything.

Imagine U.S. Marines being captured by civilians on a boat and crying within 15 minutes. Israel's IDF is children and civilian soldiers. It's not what they want you to think. More importantly, it's not what THEY want you to think.

Every US military I know who has dealt with IDF in the last 10 years all says the same "what!?"
05:31 PM on 07/15/2010
It's true Markovich, if you watch Yoav Shamir's film Checkpoint (which is on YouTube) you see very clearly that these are a bunch of indoctrinated schoolyard bullies who have acquired some spurious power simply because they have guns and the civilians they are pushing around, including kids and old people, have no way of defending themselves. There is a telling scene where an elderly peace activist makes one of the "soldiers" take off his gun and his helmet, and you see he is just a young boy who says he doesn't like being in the West Bank and misses his mum. I am not at all surprised they cried - I expect they thought they were going to be killed, and must have been surprised when they were not. I hope one day one of them tells the truth about what happened.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:02 PM on 07/16/2010
I hope that EVERYONE tells the truth one day, both the Israeli and Palestinians.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:55 PM on 07/14/2010
Global Voices is on some pbs stations tonight, maybe about 10est at least....

It is about Arab and Israeli kids growing up in Jerusalem...
Being on pbs we can hope, not necessarily expect, some balance...
Those who are concerned about the region might find it interesting...
photo
BluestateGuyInTX
A Connecticut yankee in Emperor Bush's Town.
08:54 AM on 07/14/2010
surprise surprise!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeannette Harris
08:32 AM on 07/14/2010
Because of commentary particularly within Huffington Post, I've been wondering lately if and how the dynamic of the situation discussed generally and specifically might be changed if Israel and Israelis *purchased* the lands they now have and those they might like to have from the (non-terrorist) Palestinian government representing those who were admittedly its majority inhabitants in 1946? At that time worldwide Jewry had been decimated physically and financially, so that was not really a viable option then in reclaiming and reinstating their native historical and spiritual home. However, perhaps that monetary situation has changed to the extent that an omission of necessity might be corrected. It would also provide honorable funds for officially structured social assistance by and for Palestinians who wish really to live in peace and prosperity rather than a constant state of agitation, conflict, even denigration, and impoverishment. There are precedents for that historically -- including within the United States where some tracts of land large and small were bought from native tribes rather than simply seized through military actions (and disease). The consequence has generally been much healthier interaction and accomplishment mutually and otherwise.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:25 AM on 07/14/2010
In all due respect, if you are giving the situation with Native Americans as an example...stating that "The consequence has generally been much healthier interaction and accomplishment mutually and otherwise."....I would simply invite you to come and visit NativeAmerican tribes across the country...it might very well have been a "healthier interaction"...but "accomplishment"?
Certainly not to the NativeAMericans...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeannette Harris
09:49 AM on 07/14/2010
I have close extended family and friends who are Native American, mostly Cherokee, and are integrated productively into our community and commerce. One, Apache actually, is retired from owning her own successful shop for years after working as a quasi-governmental employee previously. The others own their own homes. One is a gainfully and helpfully employed MSW, another a retired state worker, the others degreed, skilled and professionally employed workers. This fairly good-sized county purchased all of its land from the Cherokee in the late 1700s at what was considered then by most involved a fair price. Qualla Boundary, the (Eastern Band) Cherokee "reservation" (actually they purchased the land back in the 1800s) in the Smokies of North Carolina has thriving entertainment, tourism, and arts and crafts industries that are well-regarded and also a congenial casino/hotel that has been successful financially and provides some additional annual income for lineal Cherokee residents. I realize there are tribes and reservations in dire straits at the moment, many living with the legacy of deliberate near-annhilation in terms of culture, language and ancestral lands. That isn't the case everywhere though throughout what are now the borders of the United States. Your comment does point toward yet another reason for devoting our attention and national resources more toward important problems that exist with our own citizenry and historic disputes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
09:36 AM on 07/14/2010
Before the Arabs invaded Israel in 1948, the Jewish immigrants actually did purchase all the land they settled on.

Avneri's "The Claim of Dispossession" is a must-read.

http://books.google.com/books?id=ud1xBeZZRDsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+claim+of+dispossession&source=bl&ots=eLQBoCHP-8&sig=pbqCiKfBtwpCdQO3BVlahKphEiY&hl=en&ei=Ur09TKfhA43tngeSxu3dDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeannette Harris
02:31 PM on 07/14/2010
Thank you. I did look it up and bookmark it, although I've not time to read it all right now. In searching for a kinda snappy synopsis though, I came across this (amongst others) in trying to get a quick-study of that history. (If I ever knew it, I've forgotten except perhaps very foggily.) In my personal experience, and there are always exceptions to general rules, Jews are honorable in business dealings and would infinitely prefer purchase to anything that might be construed as theft, which is of course against one of the Ten Commandments. http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/History/Modern+History/Centenary+of+Zionism/The+Redeemers+of+the+Land.htm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:01 PM on 07/14/2010
let's even assume that might be true, it certainly is not for many years....

Right wing Israel delays peace so they can take more land....do the Arabs have
some responsiblity, sure, but Israel has about 80-90% of the cards in this
poker game and has for decades....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bigdaddyvike
left and rightly so...
12:39 AM on 07/14/2010
guess I'll tame down my last scrubbed post and just say: "Gosh, if Israel says it was justified, than it sure must have been. End of story." We'll see if this makes it...
photo
Aussieposter
And so it begins
08:59 AM on 07/14/2010
bigdaddyvike Wrote

"guess I'll tame down my last scrubbed post and just say: "Gosh, if Israel says it was justified, than it sure must have been. End of story." We'll see if this makes it... "

Let me guess? You talked about the need for an independent judiciary. Of how in 100% of cases rapists that investigate themselves found that the sex was consensual
BubbaC33
Jimmy Buffett is the greatest American
11:48 PM on 07/15/2010
Your analogy does not work. In fact, it is insulting and insensitive to any women who have endured the horror of a sexual assault. You ought to be ashamed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:13 AM on 07/14/2010
RandyRagoonanan
14 Fans

1. Ashkenazi Jews constitute the largest group among Jews in Israel
http://www.jcpa.org/dje/articles3/sephardic.htm.
Those jews did come from other countries and have no claim to the land.
____________________
Actually, not true.
According to recent studies in DNA, almost half of Ashkenazi Jews in the world can be traced to only FOUR women...all carrying distinct mtDNA that is virtually absent in other populations. Non-Ashkenazi also carry this distinct mtDNA, providing evidence of
shared maternal ancestry of Ashkenazi and Non-AshkenaziJews.
This is also consistent with findings of Y-chromosome studies and a similar shared paternal ancestry of global Jewish populations....

The conclusion of the researchers?

The four founding women, mtDNA.... are of MIDDLE EASTERN ORIGIN.... and 40% of all Ashkenazi Jews share the same set of mutations that define one of the four women, along with people from Egypt, Arabia, and Levant ....again, conclusion: all four women originally lived in the middle east.
It is believed that small numbers of Jews migrated from the middle east app. A.D.70, and did not reach the Rhine Valley until the 10th century.
Therefore, Jews are not "indigenous of germany"...they are "indigenous" of the middle east....
12:33 AM on 07/14/2010
That was one long,slow journey. A miracle they survived it. Are we permitted to doubt this self interested version?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:01 AM on 07/14/2010
Firstly, I would not make this up.
Secondly, you can doubt all you want...but this information comes from several sources. The DNA testing was originally done as a study in genetic diseases.
The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York University, Duke University toname a few, as well as other well respected institutions....
the findings were printed in the American Journal of Genetics.

Sorry to burst your bubble....but scientific facts are scientific facts.
02:21 AM on 07/14/2010
Your hilarious, thats all bs
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:11 AM on 07/14/2010
It is not I that is hilarious....that would be all of the world's leading geneticists...for THEY are the ones that came to this conclusion. bs? tell them that.
01:35 PM on 07/15/2010
And you state this with what accompanying credentials??? And also let me know your peer reviewed work. Thank you.
09:51 PM on 07/13/2010
If I'm on a ship in international waters, and an armed force boards it, I'm going to fight them regardless of who they are and what their motives are. Rationalizing this outrage will not work.
10:10 PM on 07/13/2010
"Repel boarders! Repel boarders!"
10:28 PM on 07/13/2010
yes, they had no business being there!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:04 PM on 07/14/2010
where's Errol Flynn when you need him...
11:25 PM on 07/13/2010
Imagine if you are in international borders and heading straight for New York harbour. Will American just let you come in if you have 100 muslim fundamentalists on the boat with you?
11:58 PM on 07/13/2010
"100 muslim fundamentalists", dont get this into a relgious debate and label innocent people that got killed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
01:11 AM on 07/14/2010
New York is a red herring.
Its more comparable to a ship heading to Canada being boarded by the US in international waters.

Gaza isn't Israeli territory.
07:54 PM on 07/13/2010
I'm glad this matter is finally settled. The commandos were heroes for showing so much restraint in the face of irrational and violent activists. They could have been killed but they held their cool and minimized casualties. Very professional and altruistic of them.

On top of all that, now the flotillas are behaving properly and not trying to intimidate Israel. It's win-win for all parties involved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:40 PM on 07/13/2010
Really?

And the one from Libya is doing what?
09:15 PM on 07/13/2010
I think Libya should send the aid to Darfur or Somalia or Afghanistan or Pakistan where muslims are actually dying. But since it's muslim killing muslims/non-muslim it's not politically expedient.

These political stunts by Turkey or Libya and others are just to distract their population from the troubles they are facing in their own countries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StCuthbert
Anytime the mods are ready...
09:16 AM on 07/14/2010
Heading for Egypt.
09:54 PM on 07/13/2010
Sarcasm,right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eileenflemingWAWA
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
06:51 PM on 07/13/2010
On June 20, 2010, Haaretz reported "that the commando unit that embarked on the May 31 raid was inadequately prepared and lacked sufficient intelligence...The navy admitted that they were prepared for ‘resistance like we encounter in Bil'in.’”."

One of the commanders involved in the attack said that "I still awake at three A.M. every morning and ask myself: Damn it, how did we not know more?"

Lynda Brayer, an Israeli human rights lawyer who specializes in the laws of war and international law wrote:

“Since no state of war existed at the time, the attack on these vessels constitutes an act of war against those governments under whose flags the vessels were sailing...Because this attack was carried out in international waters, the status of the relationship between Hamas, or any other Palestinian body, and the state of Israel is of no relevance whatsoever...

"When U.S. Senator John Kerry visited Gaza last year, he was shocked to discover that the Israeli blockade included staple food items such as lentils, macaroni and tomato paste. Furthermore, Gisha, the Israeli Legal Center for Freedom of Movement, has documented numerous official Israeli government statements that the blockade is intended to put 'pressure' on Gaza's population, and collective punishment of civilians is an illegal act under international law.”

Israel's Investigation and Intelligence Flaws from the Mavi Marmara to Bilin @
http://wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1764&Itemid=234
07:34 PM on 07/13/2010
Look at a real argument with facts pro zionists
JacksonJones
Absit iniuria verbis!
12:46 PM on 07/14/2010
Except for the critical bit about no state of war existing at the time, which is not so.