Police Officers CHARGED In Katrina Bridge Shootings

MICHAEL KUNZELMAN   07/13/10 09:36 PM ET   AP

Hurricane Katrina Bridge Shootings

NEW ORLEANS — In a case that rocked a city already torn by the horrors of Hurricane Katrina, four police officers accused of gunning down two unarmed people in the storm's chaotic aftermath could face death themselves.

The officers who could face the death penalty were charged along with two others in a 27-count indictment unsealed Tuesday. Five former New Orleans police officers already have pleaded guilty to helping cover up the shootings on the Danziger Bridge that left two men dead and four wounded just days after the August 2005 hurricane. In one instance, a mentally disabled man was shot in the back and stomped before he died.

Prosecutors say officers fabricated witness statements, falsified reports and planted a gun in an attempt to make it appear the shootings were justified. It was a shocking example of the violence and confusion that followed the storm.

With 80 percent of New Orleans underwater, officers from a department with a history of corruption were forced to battle rampant crime, and some became criminals themselves. Dozens of officers were fired or suspended for abandoning their post. In an separate case, an officer is charged with shooting a man whose body turned up in a burned out car.

The latest indictments have also come shortly after the city's new mayor replaced its former police chief and invited a Justice Department team to overhaul the city's corruption-plagued police department, which already is the target of several federal investigations separate from the bridge shooting.

In the bridge shooting case, seven officers were charged with murder or attempted murder in December 2006 but a state judge threw out all the charges in August 2008. Federal authorities then stepped in a month later to launch their own investigation.

So far, five former New Orleans police officers have pleaded guilty to lesser charges of helping cover up the shootings on the Danziger Bridge and await sentencing.

Tuesday's indictment charges Sgts. Robert Gisevius and Kenneth Bowen, officer Anthony Villavaso and former officer Robert Faulcon with deprivation of rights under color of law and use of a weapon during the commission of a crime. They could face the death penalty if convicted, though U.S. Attorney Jim Letten said prosecutors haven't decided whether to seek that punishment.

Sgt. Arthur Kaufman and retired Sgt. Gerard Dugue, who helped investigate the shootings, were charged with participating in a cover-up to make it appear the shootings were justified. Charges against them include obstruction of justice.

The case is one of several probes of alleged misconduct by New Orleans police officers that the Justice Department opened after the August 2005 storm. Last month, five current or former officers were charged in the shooting death of 31-year-old Henry Glover, whose burned body turned up after Katrina.

Attorney General Eric Holder said the Justice Department is working with city officials to restore residents' trust in the police department.

"Put simply, we will not tolerate wrongdoing by those who are sworn to protect the public," Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday in New Orleans.

It's not the first time Justice has intervened. In the 1990s, the Justice Department investigated several high-profile police corruption cases, including a police officer convicted of arranging a woman's 1994 murder.

The new batch of federal probes are bearing fruit as the city welcomes a new mayor, Mitch Landrieu, and his new police superintendant, Ronal Serpas. At Landrieu's request, the Justice Department launched the top-to-bottom review of the department.

Mary Howell, a civil rights attorney who represents relatives of one of the Danziger bridge shooting victims, said the police department has been plagued by a pattern of "episodic crises" that have eluded lasting reforms.

"There is either a refusal or inability by local authorities to take care of them," she said. "I think it's a question of leadership. This stuff requires institutional changes that require the political leadership of the community to make it last."

Eric Hessler, a lawyer for Gisevius, said the indictment wasn't a surprise.

"We have long anticipated that this day may come," he said.

Claude Kelly, a lawyer for Dugue, called the indictment "a travesty" and denied his client participated in a cover-up.

"This is just overreaching, Monday morning quarterbacking by the government," Kelly said.

Faulcon, who resigned from the department shortly after the storm, was arrested at his home in Houston on Tuesday. Gisevius, Bowen and Villavaso surrendered at FBI headquarters in New Orleans.

U.S. Attorney Jim Letten said prosecutors will ask for all four of them to be detained.

Some of the defense attorneys bristled at the arrest of Faulcon.

"They really didn't have to do that," said Frank DeSalvo, a lawyer for Bowen. "Nobody is going anywhere. We've never thought about doing anything other than face these charges."

Kaufman and Dugue weren't arrested. A date for the six men's initial court appearances wasn't immediately set.

The indictment claims Faulcon shot 40-year-old Ronald Madison, who had severe mental disabilities, in the back as he ran away on the west side of the bridge. Bowen is charged with stomping and kicking Madison while he was lying on the ground, wounded but still alive.

His brother, Lance Madison, was arrested and charged with trying to kill police officers. He was jailed for three weeks and released without being indicted.

Bowen, Gisevius, Faulcon and Villavaso also are accused of shooting at an unarmed family on the east side of the bridge, killing 17-year-old James Brissette and wounding four others.

All six officers are charged with participating in the cover-up.

"This indictment is a continuing reminder that the constitution and the rule of law do not take a holiday, even after a hurricane," said Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez, head of the Justice Department's civil rights division.

Dugue retired from the force earlier this year. Kaufman has been on paid sick leave.

___

Associated Press writer Kevin McGill contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
NEW ORLEANS — In a case that rocked a city already torn by the horrors of Hurricane Katrina, four police officers accused of gunning down two unarmed people in the storm's chaotic aftermath coul...
NEW ORLEANS — In a case that rocked a city already torn by the horrors of Hurricane Katrina, four police officers accused of gunning down two unarmed people in the storm's chaotic aftermath coul...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 538
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
TheHandyman 11:53 PM on 07/13/2010
"With 80 percent of New Orleans underwater, officers from a department with a history of corruption were forced to battle rampant crime"

Once again Huffpo does a sloppy job of reporting the facts. There have been numerous investigations and reports that show that the rampant crime mentioned here did not happen. Who were the source of the reports that there was rampant crime, the police  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Akhet
Is kind of like 2Pac+Doctor Who
05:28 PM on 07/16/2010
Its about time. The hole thing is tragic but I don’t know. The I guess craziest part about it. Is if they had of had guns. And fought back to defend themselves and managed to save the lives of those that were killed. No one would believe they were attacked with out reason. Im a firm believer of self defense against any and all. So its just sad that we have to die, be beaten or go to jail if assaulted by cops. If you defend yourself it’s a guarantee that the cop will say you started it and the courts and media will believe them. If just a few of them on the bridge had guns and fired back. Which I believe would have been well in their rights to do. This would have never made it to court. The cops probably would have got medals for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy49
Paratrooper, Spec Ops (RET), Mgmt Anlyst
10:35 AM on 07/14/2010
My question is, why did it take so long? My next question is, how many blacks have died at the hands of white police and got away with it? Answer: 1000's. White people have been killing blacks at will and will continue to do so as long as they are white! I have no mercy on anyone who kills black people because of their skin color. They deserve the death penalty..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tulane-grad
master-debater
09:38 AM on 07/14/2010
Wait, I thought this was a state issue, to be adjudicated in the state courts. Had the officers been convicted by the state would federal chargers been pursued?

I suppose if a state sees the feds dropping the undocumented ball, they should be able to respond in kind?

I not saying I don't support the indictments. I'm just noting that politics breeds hypocrisy.
09:47 AM on 07/14/2010
Study history. Jury nullification by all white juries of the south have historically acquitted white defendants accused of hurting black victims. There is no hypocrisy involved, just the quest for justice. Do you deny that federal civil rights were violated here?

But I do see your point and if the state lets crooks get away, the Federal government should not. .. and yes I know some of the cops are minority.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tulane-grad
master-debater
10:37 AM on 07/14/2010
qdog;

Actually, I concede all you points, which means that mine might have been missed. I was taking exception to the DOJ's political position regarding immigration. I find it (hypocritical) to tell states that immigration is strictly a federal matter, when they have laws that mirror almost every states criminal statutes. For instance, the investigative work on the Danzinger case was conducted at the local level, and picked up by the feds. I believe this is perfectly acceptable, for all the reasons you previously mentioned. However, I also believe that immigration can be investigated at the local level and adjudicated at the federal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vulpecula762mm
09:31 AM on 07/14/2010
So long as the police police the police you will have problem
09:27 AM on 07/14/2010
*4 yrs*
09:26 AM on 07/14/2010
5 years...five freaking years it took to finally charge them! SMDH!!!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
maxfax
Taa - dah!
09:16 AM on 07/14/2010
The New York media bubble is all over this, even moaning Joe repeated the story every twenty minutes are so today, the worst environmental and ecological destruction in the history of this country, not so much.
09:07 AM on 07/14/2010
Another reason why only the police should have guns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maritimer
09:51 AM on 07/14/2010
Did you even read the story?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
09:56 AM on 07/14/2010
Care to expound on this piece of offal?
10:22 AM on 07/14/2010
sarcasm
09:02 AM on 07/14/2010
Most cops, not all (there are a few good ones still) have watched way too many episodes of COPS and are just one trigger click away from being the thugs, thieves and murderers they arrest.

It's been shown that jobs like this and a few others attract and are loaded with sociopath/psychopaths who're barely keeping their seething mental state from view. But once they strap on a gun, pin on a badge and get official sanction of power over We, The People who pay them, then they think it's suddnely party time to let their inner-Manson loose.
09:24 AM on 07/14/2010
"It's been shown that jobs like this and a few others attract and are loaded with sociopath/psychopaths who're barely keeping their seething mental state from view."

Really? Citation, please.
tqcobb
Free your mind and the rest will follow
09:02 AM on 07/14/2010
surely the Repubs will see this as an example of AG Holder being being a "racist" because police officers are being charged in the killings of black people
08:35 AM on 07/14/2010
OK, all you guys who like to accuse others of "playing the race card", what do you say now? It seems these evil acts were carried out by a racial mix of cowards. Now, let me see you come to the cops' rescue. If you don't, is it because you don't want to back the dark skinned cops or if you do, is it because, as usual, the victims were poor and black?

Are you racists presented with a dilemma? Cop defenders who always back them, no matter what, where are you on this? I wonder if the minority cops will say they felt pressured to participate, lest they become targeted. Like in every crime, if you witness it, you're threat, so the only way the first criminal can be assured you won't talk, is to get you to participate.

Anyway, I'm anxious to hear the defense on this site.
09:26 AM on 07/14/2010
When did you stop beating your wife?

Anyway, I'm anxious to hear the defense on this site.
photo
Lochness71
Here I am.
10:31 AM on 07/14/2010
What is with inject race into this situation? This was an obvious abuse of power by the police no matter what color anyone was.
12:10 PM on 07/14/2010
You are right, it's about abuse of power, but it seems some always side with the cops when they are all white and the victims are all black, which you have to admit, is the typical situation.

I was curious where the various factions would end up this time. I do think it creates a dilemma. You don't have to be around long to know that some here would say the cops are always justified if members of a certain group are the victims. Then there are those that side with the victims, only when one or more are white.

Let ask you this. Is 5 years a long time to bring forth charges? Can you say that with white victims, it would have taken that long?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:49 AM on 07/14/2010
When is someone around here going to do something to protect our free speech rights? This site has got to be the world's biggest hypocrites when you run a giant head line story about us winning a so-called victory for free speech rights, then you deny my very rights to me on here??

What's up with that?? Who was the brilliant person who thought up that idea and became today's world's biggest hypocrite??
08:23 AM on 07/14/2010
I have not tried to post on this subject, but I support you and your concerns, as it has happened to me many times. HP, be happy someone has something to say on your site.
09:04 AM on 07/14/2010
Fanned and faved. Won't do any good though. They don't care about or respect us, we their readers/posters, outisde of the hits to be counted for negotiation purposes with their sponsors.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:48 AM on 07/14/2010
Rachel Madow led with this story yesterday. I think she understands how important it is. Not sure why it didn't get more traction. I didn't even know about it til I saw her show yesterday. This story is a big deal. Kudos to the Holder admin.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:48 AM on 07/14/2010
I try and quote the article, but my post gets wiped as a result? What's up with that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:47 AM on 07/14/2010
I could take the above article, put it in here and it wouldn't make it on here either. So why is H P allowed to bypass it, but we users can't use the same exact words as are in the article?