Senate Dems To Press GOP Lawmakers On Whether They'd Support Repeal Of Wall Street Reform

First Posted: 07/14/10 12:10 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:05 PM ET

Wall Street

Not even waiting for the passage of the soon-to-be-authorized financial regulatory reform bill, the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee is poised to use the legislation as a cudgel against the GOP.

From now through November, the campaign committee will push Senate Republican candidates to state whether or not they would repeal the proposed law, which the Senate is set to pass this week.

"If Republicans who oppose Wall Street reform are so offended by holding big banks accountable, then they should have to share with voters whether or not they would support repeal of the bill if elected," said DSCC spokesman Eric Schultz. "Any Republican who wants to return to the no-holds-barred, letting the big banks run rampant... jeopardizing Americans' savings and investments will absolutely be held accountable for that position during the campaign."

The strategy is adopted from the one the committee used following the passage of health care reform. At that time, the party similarly pressed Republicans lawmakers and prospective candidates as to whether they would repeal the new law, noting the expanded coverage to the uninsured and the tax breaks offered to small businesses that were integral to the legislation.

Not every Republican took the bait. National Republican Senatorial Committee chairman John Cornyn (R-Tex.) said, initially, that he wanted only parts of the health care bill repealed, before clarifying that he thought the whole law was problematic and potentially unconstitutional.

But the strategy has been a beneficial one for the DSCC, to the extent that attitudes about health care reform have grown more positive and the party has become more willing to embrace reform's passage.

Whether the same tactic can be used for financial regulatory reform is an open question. For starters, there has been scant talk within Republican circles about repealing the bill, in part because there is no current debate about its constitutionality (a la health care reform).

A congressional Republican aide called the question of finreg repeal "humorous" before deeming it a partisan political ploy: "This is the Obama/Pelosi/Reid playbook -- point the finger at everyone else rather than run on their record. And in light of their abysmal record, and how unpopular their big spending policies are with the American people, they have little other choice." An email to the NRSC was not immediately returned.

Meanwhile, it's not entirely clear how much people know about or are invested in financial regulatory reform. A Bloomberg National Poll released on Tuesday showed that a plurality -- 47 percent - thought the legislation would do more to protect the financial industry than consumers, with only 38 percent saying that consumers would benefit more.

Still, the DSCC's efforts seem likely to be constructive, in that they underscore that the party actually has produced legislative accomplishments. The theme that the Obama White House has pushed for months now is that the choice in November is between going back to "failed" policies or moving forward with a reform agenda. No debate gets more directly to that choice than the one over repeal.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Not even waiting for the passage of the soon-to-be-authorized financial regulatory reform bill, the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee is poised to use the legislation as a cudgel against the GOP...
Not even waiting for the passage of the soon-to-be-authorized financial regulatory reform bill, the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee is poised to use the legislation as a cudgel against the GOP...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 192
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
09:34 AM on 07/15/2010
Hi all, I am doing research on the potential financial economic impact of a total US default on the national debt in terms of dollars, including stakeholders. You will find my opening discussion points at:

http://wjmc.blogspot.com/2010/07/what-about-default-option.html

All public comments are welcome through the link above, and thank you in advance for helping me out with this potentially devisive issue for public policy...
photo
wonketteRAWKS
Hypocrisy is prevalent in BOTH parties!
11:18 PM on 07/14/2010
Does this reform prevent "Too Big To Fail" and another economic disaster?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:28 PM on 07/14/2010
What's to oppose? It is reform in name only.
07:22 PM on 07/14/2010
Sure, the Democrats want to act like they want reform. But then why did Obama throw $2trillion at the rich before he had a deal on reform? After you sold the cow you can't get your milk!
07:19 PM on 07/14/2010
Senate Dems had their chance to straighten out the economy, health care, the endless wars. But they took the money and looked the other way. Now they're Populists again! Hooray for election season.
06:35 PM on 07/14/2010
One of the governments biggest functions is to create regulation to protect the people. You know, laws. The republicans are against regulation. Anyone see a problem here?

They want small government. If the republicans don't want to regulate what are they there for?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Cantor
I am a human being descended from an exclusive gro
06:50 PM on 07/14/2010
"The poor object to being governed badly, while the rich object to being governed at all."
G. K. Chesterton
06:10 PM on 07/14/2010
We can do more with less, if we use common sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Cantor
I am a human being descended from an exclusive gro
06:51 PM on 07/14/2010
the we should do great with nothing at all! let us all take vows of Buddhist poverty and don the saffron robe!
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
06:08 PM on 07/14/2010
Why is it that Howard Dean is the only Dem with any ideas on how to beat Repubs?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Cantor
I am a human being descended from an exclusive gro
06:52 PM on 07/14/2010
the far right provides cover to the corporate center
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chabuka
05:03 PM on 07/14/2010
Harry Reid and the cowardly Democrats could use the Nuclear Option, it does NOT does not require a two-thirds vote, as I just heard Senator Dorgan incorrectly state on the Ed Schultz Show) .the Nuclear Option is a series of steps designed to BY-PASS the two-thirds vote requirement to change
The "nuclear option" which Republican leaders are threatening is actually a series of steps designed to bypass the two-thirds vote requirement to change rules: (cite)
1.The Senate moves to vote on a controversial nominee.
2.At least 41 Senators call for filibuster.
3.Majority Leader Frist raises a point of order, saying debate has gone on long enough and that a vote must be taken within a certain time frame. (Current Senate rules requires a cloture vote at this point.)
4.Vice President Cheney -- acting as presiding officer -- sustains the point of order.
5.A Democratic Senator appeals the decision.
6.A Republican Senator moves to table the motion on the floor (the appeal).
7.This vote - to table the appeal - is procedural and cannot be subjected to a filibuster; it requires only a majority vote (in case of a tie, the Vice President casts the tie-breaking vote).
8.With debate ended, the Senate would vote on the nominee; this vote requires only a majority of those voting. The filibuster has effectively been closed with a majority vote instead of a three-fifths vote.
( reverse the names of Republican majority leaders then, to Senate Democratic majority leaders of now.....)
05:00 PM on 07/14/2010
Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are fixing anything, they are just different sides of the same coin for wall street. They all need to be replaced with people who are actually in the same tax bracket as the middle class. None of these tools will ever know what it is to be middle class, rent an apartment or live month to month. They probably know very few people who do either. The facts are that if we don't get some real people into office who are actually representative of the majority of the people, (middle class), we are all screwed and we are already half way there with everyone cheer leading about which side is better. Let's stop this fraternity mentality and actually change something because it is what has to be done and it's the right thing. None of this half steppin' garbage where everyone sells out a little to get very little when people need it all immediately, what a joke! If anyone thinks the people in congress now are going to fix things after screwing it all up it's a big joke. All they will do is try and cover their tracks and be sneakier doing again later on
06:08 PM on 07/14/2010
I cannot agree more with you. We have too many politicians, we need real and genuine people running for office. We don't need smart politicians, we need people with common sense. We are in this mess thanks to the politicians, including both parties. Both are guilty as well.
A great majority of these politicians come from a "silver spoon" background. They cannot blend in with the people because they don't belong. How can they relate if they haven't been there?
04:55 PM on 07/14/2010
This is all bait and switch. Good cop, bad cop. Both sides are the same! People claiming that the republicans or democrats are middle class heroes or something are just unconscious fools. These tools claiming this are just foolish reactionary sheep who think they only have two choices because some politicians tell them what the debate is about. We need to wake up and realize that both sides are to blame and we need real leadership right now to get the necessary job done NOW. We need real actions and fast. Glass Steagal reinstated will alone do more than all proposals from either side put together and no one is discussing this. Why has this not been done yet people should ask themselves. It is at the heart of our problems at wall street.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:34 PM on 07/14/2010
Many are discussing it. None of them apparently matter though.

If you aren't, you should read Karl Denninger, the ticker guy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
04:35 PM on 07/14/2010
One measure showing the worthwhile nature of this bill is how hard the financial institution lobbied to defeat it. If the Cons don't want it, it must be good enough. Like health care reform, it's a good start. And if progressives will get off their duffs and vote for Dems in Nov, we will keep a strong majority and make both of these bills stronger in the future.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
06:08 PM on 07/14/2010
I think Progressives should vote for Progressive Dems and only as a last resort for Blue Dog Dems.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynettema
Little old lady
10:54 PM on 07/14/2010
As long as you vote. We must not let the teabaggers have the majority. We can agree that Blue Dogs are preferable to teabaggers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheCrimeDog
04:30 PM on 07/14/2010
This fixes nothing ... nor will the Republicans plans fix anything.

Capitalism and free markets are a good thing ... but Wall Street's definition and practice of capitalism has been abusive ... enabled by corrupt career politicians ... which must be dealt with honestly.

Term Limits ... we must ban career politicians.

Publicly Financed Campaigns ... we must ban "all" campaign contributions.

FairTax ... we must replace the thoroughly corrupted income tax code ... with a fully transparent consumption based tax ... with "no" exemptions ... except for those living in poverty.

We need to get the corrupting influence of money out of the business of governing once and for all ... and be honest about why it needs to be done.

Once we have removed Wall Street's corrupting influence from our government ... we should then mobilize behind "new" peer-to-peer (P2P) capital formation models ... and compete with Wall Street ... for the hearts & minds of the American consumer.

Mayby consumers will pick Wall Street's greed & excess ... maybe they won't ?
04:28 PM on 07/14/2010
What a tepid gambit. Coming for the DSCC it's not surprising. A real challenge to Republicans would be to ask why they don't think the current system needs to be fixed and not let them weasle-out of the hot seat by addressing cosmetic issues. I suppose that would be asking the Democrats to think seriously, and they are no more proficient at it than their Republican counterparts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Longtimeliberal
04:13 PM on 07/14/2010
It had to be done and I am glad the moderate Republicans are supporting it. I hope they are tired of McConnell and will start voting on a reasonable level. These are not just voting no to stop something.