BP Oil Spill: Off Death Watch, BP's Future Still Open Question

CHRIS KAHN and JANE WARDELL   07/18/10 02:41 PM ET   AP

Tony Hayward Bp Gulf Oil Spill
Protestors stand behind BP CEO Tony Hayward, as he arrives on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 17, 2010, to testify before the House Oversight and Investigations subcommittee hearing on "the role of BP in the Deepwater Horizon Explosion and oil spill.

NEW YORK — The future of BP PLC has shifted in recent days from a death-watch discussion to a debate about how valuable the British oil giant will be after it finishes paying for the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

BP gained temporary control of its broken well in the Gulf of Mexico on Thursday and is counting on shutting it off permanently within weeks. Its shares have regained more than a quarter of the value lost in the wake of the April 20 explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig. Talk of a possible bankruptcy or takeover of the company has mostly faded.

But the company still faces the daunting task of paying huge government fines and royalty payments, cleanup costs, damage claims and legal expenses for years. Analysts estimate BP's final tab for the Gulf oil spill will be anywhere from $50 billion to $100 billion.

Many analysts feel BP can cover the costs if they're spread out over years or even decades. But others don't like the uncertainty. They note that the asset sales needed to offset at least part of those costs will likely make it a smaller company with reduced cash flow.

"We still don't have any way of gauging" how much BP could eventually spend on the spill, Macquarie Research analyst Jason Gammel said. "We're certainly not buying the stock."

Others are more encouraged. "People are relatively optimistic about the situation for the first time since this started," said Dougie Youngson, an analyst with Arbuthnot Securities in London.

BP shares traded in the U.S. were worth $60.48 on April 20, hours before the explosion of the drilling rig triggered the oil spill. They then spiraled downward to as low as $26.75 during trading on June 28. That slide wiped out $105 billion in market capitalization.

The stock began to rebound this month as details emerged about the possible sale of $10 billion or more in assets to help cover BP's liabilities. The temporary capping of the well helped send the stock 9 percent higher last week to $37.10.

BP promised the Obama administration it will set aside $20 billion over four years to pay spill-related claims along the Gulf and has spent $3.5 billion so far. But beyond that, BP says "it is too early to quantify other potential costs and liabilities associated with the incident."

Those include:

_ Possible civil fines of up to $1,000 for every barrel of oil spilled. With the government's estimate of the spill ranging from 2.15 million to 4.3 million barrels, the fine could be from $2.15 billion to $4.3 billion.

_ The government also wants BP to pay royalties at a rate of 18.75 percent on the oil it collected from the well. BP put that figure at 826,800 barrels. However, the company could also owe royalties on the oil spillled into the Gulf if investigators determine that the spill was the result of BP's negligence.

_ BP has vowed to stay in the Gulf until the oil is cleaned up, which will take years. It's hired thousands of people to clean beaches and marshes and skim oil off the water. It also has to pay cleanup costs incurred by the government.

_ Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and MOEX LLC, BP's partners in the blown-out well, are contractually obligated to pay 25 percent and 10 percent of the costs, respectively. But they have refused to pay BP's initial bills totaling $388 million because they claim BP was negligent in its management of the well.

_ The biggest wild card is legal liabilities. Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of workers who died or were injured in the blast, as well as local businessmen, shareholders and employees.

Analysts estimate BP's operations will generate about $30 billion in cash this year if oil prices hold steady. BP recently cut back capital spending to around $18 billion, so that leaves about $12 billion in free cash. Normally, dividends totaling $10.6 billion would come out of that, but BP suspended dividend payments in June.

BP also has another $5 billion in cash, plus a $15 billion credit line. Adding in potential asset sales, that means BP will have as much as $30 billion available for paying penalties and other liabilities.

The company's debt level stood at about $32.15 billion at March 31. It has talked to banks about borrowing more money if needed.

Even if BP sells some assets, it's likely to remain one of the largest non-government-owned oil companies in the world. Just how big? The high-end estimate of around 4 million barrels spilled in the Gulf amounts to no more than one day's output from BP's vast global operations.

If BP can continue to get between $70 and $75 a barrel for the oil it produces, analysts believe its cash flow will remain sufficient to cover its Gulf liabilities. That doesn't mean people pressing claims against BP have to root for higher prices, but the reality is that a sharp drop in oil could put them at risk.

West Texas Intermediate crude, the light oil that is the benchmark for global prices, is trading at around $76 a barrel. Brent crude, which is found in the North Sea among other areas, is priced around $75.40.

The company's financial condition will become clearer when BP reports results for the second quarter on July 27. There's a chance it will announce the sale of assets at that time.

Published reports have suggested the company is talking with Apache Corp. about selling a stake in the Prudhoe Bay oil field in Alaska, but BP has declined to disclose specifics.

Youngson, the Arbuthnot analyst, said a sale to Apache would fit with BP's plan to sell assets that don't affect the company's long-term growth, a strategy it had before the Gulf spill. It also would make sense politically, he added.

Another candidate for a sale is BP's 60 percent stake in Argentine Pan American, an Argentine oil and gas producer that also has operations in Bolivia and Chile. Analysts estimate the stake is worth about $9 billion.

Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Fadel Gheit said BP doesn't need to sell assets now, but the company is digging in for years of damage claims. "Eventually they know they're going to have to sell something," he said. "It's not if, but when."

__

Wardell reported from London. AP Reporter Jennifer Quinn contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK — The future of BP PLC has shifted in recent days from a death-watch discussion to a debate about how valuable the British oil giant will be after it finishes paying for the worst offsh...
NEW YORK — The future of BP PLC has shifted in recent days from a death-watch discussion to a debate about how valuable the British oil giant will be after it finishes paying for the worst offsh...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
07:49 PM on 07/20/2010
Joe 'I apologize, BP' Barton loses $150,000 in campaign investment money

Rep. Joe Barton lost more than $154,000 on investments of his campaign funds during the last three months, according to a CQ MoneyLine study of campaign finance reports. The Texas Republican’s campaign fund losses are due in part to drops in energy company stocks, including BP.
Turbulence in the financial markets has taken its toll on several House campaigns, which lost in total more than a quarter of a million dollars in campaign funds since March because they invested in the stock market, but Barton’s losses make up the largest chunk of that.

http://www.americablog.com/2010/07/joe-i-apologize-bp-barton-loses-150000.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Americablog+%28AMERICAblog%29
12:16 PM on 07/20/2010
they can certaily help pay some of these bills by selling oil spill condoms! have you seen these? Drill Without The Spill... haha... http://bit.ly/dnlZPV
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OlskoolDem
10:15 AM on 07/20/2010
I hear BP helped the Lockerbie Bomber get a trip home in exchange for an OIL DEAL.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Left on Red
Micro Bio 201 T-Th 1 - 2:30 Lab W 1-5 Dr. Price
09:37 PM on 07/19/2010
Sure reads like BP is still on the Death Watch.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:46 PM on 07/19/2010
SeizeBP.org

Is the oil isn't in the seafood, the dispersant is.
photo
cambo
cough
02:43 PM on 07/19/2010
All these oil companies will be out of business if they don`t innovate. Oil is yesterday`s energy, and is already on the down slope of the bell curve. Solar, wind and magnetic forces will be more widely used thanks to some brilliant minds. www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/05/01/ebm-720-free-magnetic-energy-power-plant-for-sale/
01:57 PM on 07/19/2010
I just can’t see how BP can pull out of this mess financially, unless it short-changes a lot of people. I feel all the billions they plan to spend will probably go to PR folks, contractors, and possible ‘bribes’ to government officials. I just don’t think they or any one company has the resources to really straighten out the damage that was caused to the environment, and to all the people whose livelihood has been disrupted!
01:38 PM on 07/19/2010
Will Victims of the BP Oil Gusher Also Be Victims of Class Action Lawsuits and the BP Oil Spill Victim Compensation Fund?

http://donovanlawgroup.wordpress.com/2010/07/19/165/
11:25 AM on 07/19/2010
http://kunstler.com/blog/2010/07/what-if-hes-right.html
Matt Simmons is a sober individual [and Bush's energy advisor] and a very nice man (I've met him twice over the years), a button-downed corporate executive who's been around the oil business for forty years. His knowledge is deep and comprehensive. From the beginning of the BP Macondo blowout incident in April, he's taken the far out position that the well-bore is fatally compromised and that BP has been consistently lying about their operations to stop the flow of oil. Perhaps most radically, Simmons claims that an oil "gusher" is pouring into the Gulf some distance from the drilling site itself.
...he is concerned that a tropical storm will bring this oil up - as tropical storms and hurricanes usually do with deeper cold water -and with it methane gas dissolved at pressure, and that as the oil rises toward the ocean's surface, and lower pressures, the gas will bubble out of solution, move toward the Gulf shore and kill a lot of people.
The company itself cannot be saved because the claims against it are much greater than the value of its assets -the people running the company could be sent to jail, so the incentive to keep lying remains high.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
JaxReader
Charity is no substitute for justice withheld.
10:56 AM on 07/19/2010
Unfortunately, BP is most likely here to stay. England cannot let the company go under. they have a symbiotic relationship that will well documented throughout history. They are jointly responsible for getting terrorists released, and for causing "coupe de tat" in countries such as Iran.

If it were not for BP's intervention, Iran would most likely be our ally and the Islamic Republic wouldn't exist, it would have more over been a modern democracy.

BP started as the "Anglo Persian Oil Company", research it and you will understand a lot more the power that is behind this company.
10:55 AM on 07/19/2010
Personally as awful as this spill is I don't consider it anywhere near as serious a charge against BP as this new information coming out about their involvement with the Lockerbie Bomber's release.

If it is true that they were the driving force behind his release then I believe the company and those behind that should be utterly destroyed, charged with Treason...yes Treason (Crimes against the state) and EVERY hidden detail exposed to the public so we can see just what levels these oil companies are able to operate at.

Treason I say...that's the level of such a crime

He is a terrorist responsible for the deaths of hundreds of people and a deal was reached with a Government and a Corporation for his release so they can get at the oil???

Hang everyone involved in public if it is true
10:39 AM on 07/19/2010
All of BP's American holdings should be dissolved and given to the American people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Harker
02:01 PM on 07/19/2010
congress lacks that authority.
03:03 PM on 07/19/2010
They sure do have that authority and the president too. Congress by legislation in the same manner that they use eminent domain. There is nothing in the constitution that says property is protected. The president can do it by declaring a national emergency, which there is. In fact, there is a law that was passed after Exxon Valdez that orders the president to do everything possible to protect our shores.
10:35 AM on 07/19/2010
Let's get real. Does anyone thing either party would let BP go out of business?! No possible way. Bailout. You can bet on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
10:13 AM on 07/19/2010
What they're using in the Gulf is killing plant life. How is it affecting humans? Just go to any of these and keep watching. Your government is lying to you and covering up the impact of this disaster.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9wut9Xb4g8&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rokZikefcyg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp7RO5ptlVA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1CPeuOQzVw&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfAQdHucNUA&feature=related
10:40 AM on 07/19/2010
fanned faved
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
08:26 AM on 07/19/2010
According to a recent Reuters report the basic fine under the Clean Water Act is currently $1100 per barrel, increasing to $4300 per barrel if gross negligence is determined (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64O75Q20100526). Using these numbers the range of fines is 9.245 -B$18.49 . BP clearly has a legal motivation to keep the actual number of barrels leaked as murky as possible and this seems to be reflected in how they are handling containment of the oil.