iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

BP: RICO Law Made To Combat Mafia Used Against Oil Giant In Lawsuits

First Posted: 07/19/10 10:47 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:05 PM ET

Tony Hayward

MIAMI (AP) -- Using a law originally enacted to combat the Mafia, attorneys are filing lawsuits accusing BP PLC and Transocean Ltd. of committing a longterm series of crimes by concealing flaws in deepwater drilling plans and lacking safeguards to contain a catastrophic Gulf of Mexico spill.

BP has been named in at least three lawsuits brought under the federal law known as RICO, which stands for Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations. Transocean, which leased the ill-fated Deepwater Horizon drilling rig to BP, has been named in two lawsuits filed in Louisiana and Florida.

The lawsuits accuse both companies of committing wire and mail fraud over a number of years by filing false documents with the U.S. government, and by misleading investors through other documents and falsehoods. They also claim both companies are guilty of bribery because they are part of an overall oil and gas industry effort to "infiltrate" federal regulators by providing favors such as alcohol and drugs, sex, golf and ski trips, concert and sports tickets, and more.

"The pattern of racketeering activity engaged in by defendants involves a scheme to fraudulently create a pretense of safety to the public while, at every turn, seeking to avoid the costs associated with actually conducting their operations in a safe manner," claims a lawsuit filed by Louisiana attorney Daniel Becnel and others on behalf of a restaurant seeking to represent a huge class of businesses suffering economic loss from the oil spill.

RICO, passed by Congress in 1970, contains both a civil and criminal component, but both of them rely on proof of longterm violations of at least two specific crimes from a lengthy list. The attraction of the civil portion, which are being used in the current lawsuits, is that any damages would be tripled.

In the past, civil RICO cases have often been followed by criminal prosecutions. The Justice Department has not ruled out using RICO in its ongoing criminal investigation of the Deepwater Horizon explosion, which killed 11 rig workers and triggered a massive oil spill that has affected five Gulf Coast states.

Criminal convictions can lead to prison sentences of 20 years on each racketeering count, plus hefty fines and forfeiture of ill-gotten gains.

"We are investigating any possible violations of the law," said Justice Department spokeswoman Hannah August.

BP declined comment on the RICO allegations. Transocean did not respond to a request for comment.

Florida attorney Peter Prieto, a former federal prosecutor, said it might be a stretch for the Justice Department to bring a criminal RICO case when there might be easier-to-prove offenses.

"If it's a simpler crime, that's what they are going to do. Prosecutors are going to use RICO when it is truly applicable or when it involves organized crime," said Prieto, who is not involved in the oil spill cases. "It is kind of a hammer, but if the facts fit RICO, you can use RICO."

Even as use of RICO in criminal cases has waned somewhat, it's become increasingly popular on the civil side. This year alone, RICO lawsuits have been filed against the Roman Catholic Church over priest abuses; Toyota over its sudden acceleration problems; a group of title insurers over alleged overcharges; and online cigarette vendors over lost tax revenue.

In March, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer was ordered by a Boston jury to pay $142 million in damages for wrongly marketing the epilepsy drug Neurontin as treatment for migraines and bipolar disorder.

The difficulty in the BP and Transocean cases, some experts say, is finding evidence tying the companies' actions to damages caused by the spill. On the criminal side, a prosecutor would have to have ironclad proof of criminal intent, not just negligence or stupidity.

"The problem is just connecting the dots," said Thomas Walker, an Idaho attorney who has tried about 20 civil RICO cases and maintains a blog on RICO. "The fraudulent communications, if they were fraudulent, went from BP to the government. The damage was not caused by the letter, it was caused by the oil spill."

The RICO lawsuits are among more than 200 filed against BP, Transocean and other companies seeking damages for economic losses, environmental damage and shareholder losses. A federal judicial panel will meet July 29 in Boise, Idaho, to consider whether to consolidate some or all of them for pretrial purposes.

Potential damages from those lawsuits would come on top of the $20 billion BP has pledged to set aside to pay claims and other spill cleanup costs.

Most of the criminal allegations in the RICO lawsuits are taken from testimony and documents produced by congressional investigations of the spill, documents filed with financial regulators and investors, and even investigative news articles by The Associated Press and other news outlets. For example, the Louisiana complaint charges that:

-According to an AP story, an independent firm hired by BP in 2009 found the company was violating its own policies by failing to have key engineering documents aboard the deepwater drilling rig Alantis. The study was never disclosed to regulators.

-BP filed documents showing it had a solid response plan for a catastrophic oil spill, when in fact it "lacked any meaningful ability" to resond.

-BP repeatedly failed to disclose to the U.S. Interior Department a range of safety concerns about the Deepwater Horizon, including use of a risky well cementing technique and problems with pockets of flammable natural gas.

-Transocean assured investors and regulators that it had an excellent safety record, when in fact it was responsible for an increasing number of accidents on deepwater drilling rigs.

-Both companies are part of an oil industry effort to prevent the Minerals Management Service - now renamed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management - from imposing tough rules, in part through industry events where government officials were given cocaine, marijuana and alcohol, had sex with company executives and received gifts ranging from exotic travel to concert tickets.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

MIAMI (AP) -- Using a law originally enacted to combat the Mafia, attorneys are filing lawsuits accusing BP PLC and Transocean Ltd. of committing a longterm series of crimes by concealing flaws in de...
MIAMI (AP) -- Using a law originally enacted to combat the Mafia, attorneys are filing lawsuits accusing BP PLC and Transocean Ltd. of committing a longterm series of crimes by concealing flaws in de...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 148
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
12:53 PM on 07/20/2010
Source: The Times-Picayune

The Deepwater Horizon's blowout preventer -- the key device for shutting off a wild oil well -- had a leak in the days before it failed to operate and BP did not comply with a federal regulation requiring the rig to suspend operations, a BP company man testified Tuesday.

Well site leader Ronald Sepulvado told a Marine Board investigative panel in Kenner that before he wrapped up his stint as BP's top man on the rig four days before the April 20 accident, he reported that one of the control pods on the blowout preventer, or BOP, had a leak.

He said he told his supervisor in Houston, BP team leader John Guide, and assumed that Guide would notify federal regulators at the Minerals Management Service. According to investigators, that never happened.

Federal Regulation 250.451(d) states that if someone drilling in federal waters encounters "a BOP control station or pod that does not function properly" the rig must "suspend further drilling operations until that station or pod is operable."

more: http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/07/hearings_bp_did_not_suspend_dr.html
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
11:56 AM on 07/20/2010
BP's Secret Ticket Request Line

For more than a decade, BP has operated a hush-hush phone line that California lawmakers can call to request box seats to NBA games and concerts at the Sacramento stadium named after its West Coast subsidiary.

In the past five years, BP has given state officials more than 1,200 complimentary tickets to the Arco Arena, hosting them in its corporate suite to see Sacramento Kings games, World Extreme Cagefighting matches, and Britney Spears and Lil Wayne concerts. Getting the tickets is as easy as calling the BP ticket request line, an exclusive, unpublished phone number that appears to exist for the sole purpose of granting freebies to lawmakers, regulators, and their staffs.

"You make a request, leave it on the voicemail, and at some date the tickets either magically appear or they don't," says a legislative consultant who gave me the ticket line's number and spoke on condition of anonymity. "They don't talk to you; you just see 'em or you don't." The ticket line's message was taken down sometime in the past week, shortly after I began my reporting. You can still listen to the original recording below.

more: http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/07/bp-secret-ticket-request-line-california
09:26 AM on 07/20/2010
British Petroleum case is perfect for the RICO laws. They have connived, planned and plotted to maintain control of much of the world's oil for decades. The British and American governments used the CIA to overthrow a duly elected democratic government in Iran in 1953 so BP could maintain control of Iran's oil fields. (of course the plunder was split up between Britain and the US). Known as AIOC prior to 1954 BP has constantly used its money and power to influence governments to do whatever BP wished them to do. If that doesn't fall under the RICO statutes then nothing does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RRanch
08:26 AM on 07/20/2010
Gh, Goody, finally
05:02 AM on 07/20/2010
USA the new dumping ground... wanna sell some nefarious drilling, tainted food products, cars that accelerate at will... look no further.

We will buy, even as we know that buying the product eliminated jobs for our neighbor... if the neighbor gets vocal, blame their union, pretend that protections cost too much, let the companies police themselves... we end up with kids die from eating burgers, cribs, toys and fast-food freebies that no other major country accepts.

We eat jumbo produce, hormone, genetically altered animals all the while shouting we are number 1...

cpmpany profits above all else has come to ruin our quality of life.
03:33 AM on 07/20/2010
Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase are loving this if anyone should be subject to a RICO its them. BP are a media diversion from a band of Wall St Crooks who should be in prison. Responsible for the destruction of wealth running into the trillions and we are not out of it yet.

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice should stand trial for lying to get America and Britain into an oil war causing the deaths of thousands of their own

As far as Oil disasters are concerned there is no excusing what has happened but there is more than a hint of hypocrasy when you consider the pollution the big US oil majors have caused and continue to cause around the world.

Why don't you have a RICO investigation on the banks, the Fed and Congress? BP are a miracle diversion from the financial crisis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSWatchdog
citizen
01:13 AM on 07/20/2010
A black man for California can go to jail for life using the strike law for stealing a loaf of bread yet none of these BP crooks have even been charged for killing 11 people and destroying the Gulf eco system.

What's wrong with this picture?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
12:40 AM on 07/20/2010
"It is kind of a hammer, but if the facts fit RICO, you can use RICO."

Hammer away then and don't forget to nail Haliburton.
12:23 AM on 07/20/2010
I'm left with the quandary of finding a distinction that defines a difference between the Mafia and BP.
03:48 AM on 07/20/2010
And the US Oil Majors
And the US Banks
And the US Congress

You are in an altogether bad way you need a foreign whipping boy to take it out on
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:01 AM on 07/20/2010
If I had my way, I would take everything the have here and throw them off the continent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:13 AM on 07/20/2010
obama et. al. will put the kibosh on the lawsuits, directly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ConnectedTraveler
imithe as an saol seo ach i mo chroí go deo
12:12 AM on 07/20/2010
RICO was used against Michael Milliken successfully. I don't see anyone crying over that.

The law was created to prosecute conspiracies not just the Mafia.

If there are RICO predicates involved then I hope the Justice Department crucifies them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:03 AM on 07/20/2010
Yep
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:03 PM on 07/19/2010
I wholeheartedly applaud anything from jaywalking and illegal parking on up to and beyond this RICO idea.

To whom should we complain about the unsightly American Apparel "Bloomers" ad. I have no idea what they were thinking.

RICO, good: bloomers, bad. Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aDelphinium
Occupy with heart
04:24 AM on 07/20/2010
Re: American Apparel Ads their ads have been troublesome for some time now ~ which is troublesome as I was a big fan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 PM on 07/19/2010
Sink 'em permanently.
09:52 PM on 07/19/2010
It is deceitful for prosecutors to use the RICO statute to go after oil companies or abortion protesters. That's not what the law was intended for. To put it another way, one RICO more or less isn't worth lying for.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:17 AM on 07/20/2010
the petroleum industry doesn't have elements of racketeering????

3a: a fraudulent scheme, enterprise, or activity b: a usually illegitimate enterprise made workable by bribery or intimidation c: an easy and lucrative means of livelihood

CLEARLY, none of THOSE elements exist in BIG OIL, you phule.
12:53 AM on 07/20/2010
Oh, sure, BP is pretty tough, and it usually just wants more (Yeah, that's it. MORE!), but remember, soldier, there's only one Johnny Rocco.
09:50 PM on 07/19/2010
Don't forget, B.P. is responsible for the Shah of Iran, the student revolutionary government, the Hostage crisis, Reagan getting elected, the impoverishment of the Middle Class and the surge in our debt. You want links I suppose?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'état

: “Ronald Reagan and Alan Greenspan pulled off one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated against the American people in the history of this great nation, and the underlying scam is still alive and well, more than a quarter century later. It represents the very foundation upon which the economic malpractice that led the nation to the great economic collapse of 2008 was built. Essentially, Reagan switched the federal government from what he critically called, a “tax and spend” policy, to a “borrow and spend” policy, where the government continued its heavy spending, but used borrowed money instead of tax revenue to pay the bills. The results were catastrophic. Although it had taken the United States more than 200 years to accumulate the first $1 trillion of national debt, it took only five years under Reagan to add the second one trillion dollars to the debt. By the end of the 12 years of the Reagan-Bush administrations, the national debt had quadrupled to $4 trillion!“
http://www.philstockworld.com/