iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Alberto Gonzales On U.S. Attorney Firing Scandal: 'I Feel Angry That I Had To Go Through This'

Alberto Gonzales

07/23/10 07:04 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Friday he's angry about being put through a long-running criminal investigation into his role in the firings of U.S. attorneys.

"I feel angry that I had to go through this. That my family had to suffer through and what for?" Gonzales said in an interview with CNN.

The investigation by career prosecutor Nora Dannehy that began in September 2008 found the Justice Department's actions in the firings of U.S. attorney David Iglesias of New Mexico during the Bush administration were inappropriately political, but not criminal. The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias.

Dannehy's "judgment as to political correctness of a decision by the attorney general or by the president of the United States, quite frankly, is inappropriate and unwarranted," said Gonzales.

He added the job of a prosecutor is to determine whether a crime has been committed, and there was no evidence in the removal of any of nine U.S. attorneys that any of the cases they handled were improperly influenced.

"This was about making a decision on personnel," Gonzales said. "I made the decision based upon what I thought was best for the department and for the American people. All these investigations have now confirmed that this was not to influence improperly any ongoing investigation or to punish anyone for political reasons."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,597
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (113 total)
10:24 PM on 08/13/2010
Dannehy said that she could find no evidence of a crime, but that hardly means Gonzales did nothing wrong. The IG and OPR were scathing in their criticism and said that policies and laws were set aside. And Dannehy just looked at the prosecutor findings-- one issue in regards to Gonzales.

http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25rich.html?hp
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
04:58 PM on 07/27/2010
The job of an Attorney General is to act as a check on presidential power, not as an enabler of wrongdoing. The politicization of the DoJ, especially under Gonzales, and their abandonment of entire areas of the U. S. C., was perhaps the darkest time in the history of the American system of justice.

But all he's concerned about is his own feelings?

"not illegal" is not just setting the ethics bar low, it is throwing it in a ditch by the side of the road.

Alberto, go eat a tort!
photo
rickroland
Two Parties, Same Crap
10:22 AM on 07/27/2010
The following deserves repeating:

"He added the job of a prosecutor is to determine whether a crime has been committed, and there was no evidence in the removal of any of nine U.S. attorneys that any of the cases they handled were improperly influenced."
12:26 PM on 07/26/2010
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh!!!!! Cry me a river, Alberto!!! I hope you've been traumatized by the scandal.
04:34 AM on 08/14/2010
Dannehy said that she could find no evidence of a crime, but that hardly means Gonzales did nothing wrong. The IG and OPR were scathing in their criticism and said that policies and laws were set aside. And Dannehy just looked at the prosecutor findings-- one issue in regards to Gonzales.

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2010/07/hbc-90007449

http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25rich.html?hp

http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/070510nj1.htm
12:06 PM on 07/26/2010
Mr. Gonzales is a gentleman of middling ability who hitched his horse to the Bush wagon many years ago and whose slavish devotion was ultimately rewarded with his appointment as Attorney General. By the time of his appointment, he had forgotten the important legal and ethical distinctions between service as a political counselor and service as the nation's top lawyer. The consequences were predictable and inevitable. That he is now expressing outrage over an investigation that he is solely responsible for causing means only that he remains a gentleman of middling ability who still does not understand the important legal distinctions between service as a political counselor and service as the nation's top lawyer. Since he is unlikely ever to figure it out, we can expect him to wallow in his martyrdom for the balance of his life.
09:41 AM on 07/26/2010
Can someone explain the difference between what Gonzales did and what Blago (former gov of IL) tried to do? Did Lincoln turn in his grave?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
07:28 PM on 07/27/2010
50 tns of cncreate keeps lincoln from spinning!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
03:10 AM on 07/26/2010
Have go through the article and find that Alberto Gonzales is aggrieved of harassment of being investigated into even after being innocent.

There a provision of law, the if a person even if unwittingly hurts a other person's sentiment morbidly then he is deemed to have caused a grievous hurt which is a criminal offence and has penal provision. May be Gonzales is forgetting that section of law.

Here the firing of the attorney as per the version quote "The investigation by career prosecutor Nora Dannehy that began in September 2008 found the Justice Department's actions in the firings of U.S. attorney David Iglesias of New Mexico during the Bush administration were inappropriately political, but not criminal" unquote.

Could it be that the prosecutor missed the point mentioned above of inflicting grievous hurt to the attorney by firing him on grounds of political motive but for no fault of the individual causing grievous hurt to his sentiment? .Thus committed a criminal offense and is punishable under the proper section of law and its penal provision.

It is therefore felt that Alberto Gonzales's anger and statement is totally unjustified. Thus authority may ignore him opined the eminent legal experts.
photo
DaveyDavey
Micro-biohazard
01:22 AM on 07/26/2010
You got away with murder, Gonzo, Now go away, OK?
photo
Cimms
Escaped from NC.
01:20 AM on 07/26/2010
Boo Hoo. Welcome to Clinton's world Alberto.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cvkathy
12:11 AM on 07/26/2010
Then I guess you shouldn't have held a job in the public sector. Duh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:10 AM on 07/26/2010
Would that there was a hell he could burn in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sandy2814
10:39 PM on 07/25/2010
I feel angry I had to go through him!
photo
gomezrules
Why Don't We Do It In The Road?
10:31 PM on 07/25/2010
Gee, this site FINALLY got around to reporting this. Clinton fired the better part of a hundred DOJ lawyers, for his own political reasons, and as usual, the hypocrites of the left defend and adore him for doing so. Gonzalez got hosed. I hope as many Dems as possible pay a similar price via the same means. They cry "foul" the loudest and the longest when they are subject to their own kinds of antics..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
futbol4fun
A lot of you are too obtuse to understand sarcasm
12:37 AM on 07/26/2010
Clinton did is to for the good of the country, Bush did it for rotten political means that were meant to punish the people of a nation. God Bless Bill Clinton, Down With W!!!!!!
photo
Jeff1958
What a long strange trip it's been
12:59 AM on 07/26/2010
All presidents traditionally let the previous administration's go - at the beginning of the new president's term. This isn't what happened with Bush/Gonzales. It's very different that your Clinton example. You are wrong.
10:31 PM on 07/25/2010
I feel angry that the first Latino Attorney General was a lapdog and rubber stamp with no conscience of his own.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
grizhead63
10:30 PM on 07/25/2010
This guy oozes something...and it isn't called confidence.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dunkleberger Karl
Historian,Humanitarian,Hedonist.
03:56 PM on 07/28/2010
If we spray him with the safe dispercents bp uses on the gulf , will alberto just go away?