More

Closing Arguments Heard In Blagojevich Trial, Will Continue Into Tuesday

Blagojevich

DON BABWIN and MICHAEL TARM   07/26/10 11:59 PM ET   AP

CHICAGO — Rod Blagojevich's defense attorney clashed with the judge Monday over his planned closing arguments, pledging to go to jail if he is prohibited from telling jurors about witnesses that prosecutors never called.

Hours after prosecutors summed up their case against the disgraced former Illinois governor, Judge James B. Zagel sent the jury home early after attorney Sam Adam Jr. complained the judge was gutting his closing arguments.

"With all due deference, I have a man here fighting for his life," Sam Adam Jr. angrily told Zagel outside the presence of the jury. "I can't effectively represent him. I can't follow your order ... I will go jail on this."

"You will follow that order because if you don't follow that order you will be in contempt of court," Zagel told Adam, known for his theatrical courtroom style.

The judge said he was giving the defense attorney the night to rework his closing arguments, and said Adam could designate another defense attorney to give the closing Tuesday if he could not follow the rules.

After court adjourned, Adam told reporters that prosecutors did not call dozens of potential witnesses, including now-convicted influence peddler Antoin "Tony" Rezko, and "the jury should know that." He said he did not know what he would do on Tuesday.

"My job as a lawyer is to do everything I can for my client, and if (going to jail) is what it takes, if it's necessary, in a heartbeat," Adam said, recalling that his attorney father once went to jail for a client.

Monday's action came just five days after Blagojevich announced he would not testify in his own defense, despite months of promises. His defense team promptly rested without calling a single witness, accelerating a seven-week trial that had been expected to last all summer.

Prosecutors spent the day hammering the message that U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald voiced from the day Blagojevich was arrested in December 2008: That the governor of Illinois was involved in a "political crime spree."

In methodical tones, Assistant U.S. Attorney Chris Niewoehner laid out the government's allegations of how Blagojevich tried to "shake down" everyone from a racetrack owner to a children's hospital executive to President-elect Barack Obama, whose vacated Senate seat he allegedly sought to exchange for money or a job.

"That dirty scheme was the culmination of years of dirty schemes," he said.

Niewoehner described Blagojevich as desperate for money, in large part because of his own lavish spending on himself and his wife and his mounting legal bills. That desperation showed in late 2008, the prosecutor said, when Blagojevich saw the Senate appointment as a way to get himself an ambassadorship to India, a seat in Obama's cabinet or another high-paying job.

Niewoehner opened his remarks by repeating the most famous phrase of the seven-week trial, a quote that will be forever associated with Blagojevich.

"I've got this thing and it's (expletive) golden," he recalled Blagojevich saying on one of dozens of phone calls secretly recorded by the FBI. "I'm just not giving it up for (expletive) nothing."

Neiwoehner also told the jurors that that Blagojevich need not have made money nor gotten a high-profile job in order for his alleged schemes to be illegal – a pre-emptive shot at the arguments Blagojevich's attorneys are sure to make, that he did not make any money or turn the appointment into a new life for himself.

"You don't have to be a successful criminal to be a criminal," he said.

The prosecutor argued that Blagojevich indeed profited from a scheme in which his wife, Patti, was paid by Rezko for real estate work that she allegedly did not do. He said the payments stopped soon after the FBI began investigating one of the governor's confidants.

As Niewoehner described the sometimes profanity-laced language on FBI wiretap tapes, Blagojevich showed little emotion, sometimes biting his lip or rocking slightly in his defense table chair.

For the first time, he was joined in court by his two daughters – Amy, 14, and Annie, 7. His wife sat a few feet to his left holding their youngest on her lap, sometimes handing her pieces of candy.

Blagojevich, 53, has pleaded not guilty to scheming to trade or sell Obama's old Senate seat and illegally pressuring people for campaign contributions. If convicted, he could face up to $6 million in fines and a sentence of 415 years in prison, though he is sure to get much less time under federal guidelines.

The former governor's brother, Nashville, Tenn., businessman Robert Blagojevich, 54, has pleaded not guilty to taking part in the alleged scheme to sell the Senate seat and plotting to illegally pressure a businessman for a campaign contribution.

Robert Blagojevich's attorney, Michael Ettinger, said in his closing argument that jurors never heard any testimony linking his client's fundraising to demands for anything in exchange.

"Raising campaign funds is not illegal. It is not against the law," he said.

Earlier Monday, prosecutors dropped one of five counts against Robert Blagojevich, a count of wire fraud. They said the count pertained to a Dec. 4, 2008 phone call that he did not take part in directly.

Adam, who was credited with helping win the acquittal of R&B singer R.Kelly two years ago on child pornography charges, had been expected to deliver a booming closing argument uncommon in Chicago's staid Dirken Federal Courthouse. Before his clash with the judge, he said that the defense's message to jurors would be simple:

"First and foremost, the government has proved nothing," he told the Associated Press said over the weekend.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

CHICAGO — Rod Blagojevich's defense attorney clashed with the judge Monday over his planned closing arguments, pledging to go to jail if he is prohibited from telling jurors about witnesses that...
CHICAGO — Rod Blagojevich's defense attorney clashed with the judge Monday over his planned closing arguments, pledging to go to jail if he is prohibited from telling jurors about witnesses that...
Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cogs
01:21 PM on 07/27/2010
Bringing his daughters to court will not please the jury. Using them as pawns to help generate sympathy shows the defense is desperate.
10:37 AM on 07/28/2010
If I were on the jury, having two young daughters myself, I would have a lower opinion of the man, especially since he knew they would be talking about some very nasty things about the father. I think this would sway the jury in the wrong direction as far as the defendant is concerned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:15 AM on 07/27/2010
I think Rod will be acquitted as well - he probably intended to do wrong, but never committed the crime.
His hair should go to jail, though.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
08:08 AM on 07/27/2010
To Mecormany, whose post has disappeared.

As Judge Zagel has said, you don't have to actually receive any money or take the threatened action to be guilty. It is still conspiracy.

It is no different than when an FBI mole busts terrorists who are planning to put a bomb in a subway. Talking about it, ordering someone to scope out the setting, setting a date - those actions are enough to meet the legal definition of conspiracy, even if the action is never carried out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:02 AM on 07/28/2010
Yes, where did my posts go? HuffPost, you are pissing a lot of people of.

I still think it was a pathetic prosecution that proved nothing more than he wanted campaign funds but when it got right down to it, he did nothing he said he would or wouldn't do if they didn't come through. I'm not saying he's innocent or not a crook, but Fitz sure picked some very lame examples to try and convict him on.
10:26 AM on 07/28/2010
"he did nothing" . . . I don't think you have been following things closely enough. He shook down a hospital and may others for contributions, shopped around a Senate seat, just for starters. He was actively doing these things and as a former prosecutor, he knows what he did was not legal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:03 AM on 07/28/2010
a lot of people "off".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
VOTER
Freedom from fear - the philosophy of human rights
04:11 AM on 07/27/2010
It sure appears the Prosecution has failed to prove their case and has left
"reasonable doubt" on the table for the jurors.

Not Guilty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
01:13 AM on 07/27/2010
The judge in this case, Zagel, does not make the least attempt to appear impartial. It's as if Blagojevich is fighting two prosecution teams.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MamandesFilles
VinoVerve.com Editor, Mom, Nerd, Wino
12:24 AM on 07/27/2010
You probably have to do more than talk to your wife to be this kind of criminal. Inept is not criminal in politics.
12:24 AM on 07/27/2010
The feds stopped Bloggo too soon. He was trying to committ a crime, he was conspiring (unsuccessfully) to commit a crime, but he had not yet committed a crime.

As much as I'd like to see politics cleaned up in IL -- Bloggo did not actually commit a crime.Fitz jumped the gun, and hyped the charges.

When I was a 8 years old, I wanted to sneak into a bakery down the allley to get some free cookies, during lunch hour when they all left. Okay -- I DID sneak in and take the cookies. But I wasn't a criminal until I actually did it. Now that Im sure the statue of limitation has run, I can reveal this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keysbreezin
07:54 PM on 07/26/2010
The prosecution is hanging by a thread. I don't see any crime committed here. Unless thinking out loud about committing a crime is punishable. If that's the case then I should go to jail for thinking of robbing Fort Knox when I was ten so I could build a tree fort in the woods.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MamandesFilles
VinoVerve.com Editor, Mom, Nerd, Wino
12:26 AM on 07/27/2010
Doesn't it make you wonder about US Atty. Patrick Fitzgerald, particularly in light of how we all know that the USAttys were pressured by the Bush administration to make cases against political targets? How slimy.
10:29 AM on 07/28/2010
He did more than think out loud about committing a crime. Let's see if I talk to a hit-man about killing someone is that a crime? Conspiracy to commit a crime is a criminal offense, and he did more than just talk about it . . .
07:15 PM on 07/26/2010
The key question is....... did he act on those words or was he just blowing smoke? It's not a crime to be a, "Blowhard." I'm not a fan of his, but did he accept money for arangements or not?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kathryn Maver
05:40 PM on 07/26/2010
Wow. They brought their kids to court. If that's not trying to influence the jury, I don't know what is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jayevans20
01:26 PM on 07/26/2010
I seriously doubt he goes to jail. Based on reports, the prosecution haven't proofed anything. If he does go, he won't George Ryan years. Maybe six months to a year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jayevans20
01:36 PM on 07/26/2010
Sorry, proved anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
01:40 PM on 07/26/2010
If I were on that jury (or any jury for that matter), proof beyond a reasonable doubt would be an important part of my decision. Here you have "intent" to commit a crime, not hard proof of commission, and that "intent" has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Just mho.
12:26 AM on 07/27/2010
Except for conspiracy -- it's against the law to CONSPIRE with someone to kill your spouse, even if your spouse is never touched.

Is conspiracy one of the charges?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:00 PM on 07/26/2010
sam is not clarence darrow
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
11:45 AM on 07/26/2010
The HP is acting like the Chicago Tribune by identifying the lead lawyer for the defense as the Ex R. Kelly lawyer. Any prejudicial tidbit or headline you can throw in. Anyone interested in a serious post on this trial should go to TalkLeft where Jeralyn Merritt sums up the charges and has an interesting exchange on the thread. For one thing, I never knew that Fitzgerald had to have approval from the DoJ to arrest Blagojevich and he obtained this approval in October or November of 2008 from then AG Mukasey right when Obama won the election or appeared certainly to win it. There are definitely political implications to this case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
11:22 AM on 07/26/2010
He will be exonerated by Wednesday.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
01:17 PM on 07/26/2010
I don't think so. They may not get him on all counts, but listening to the tapes, they'll get him on some of them.

The man is a crook. He's just not good at it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
01:28 PM on 07/26/2010
I don't think anyone wants to see this appealed. Blagojevich would certainly call witnesses then. I think hung jury is a possibility.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jayevans20
01:35 PM on 07/26/2010
Like I said, if he get convicted hell probably do six months to a year. Prosecution couldn't prove anything besides those tapes. The tapes however, didn't have any real criminal info on them.