iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

9/11 Responder Aid Package Fails In House

ANDREW MIGA and DAVID B. CARUSO   07/29/10 11:05 PM ET   AP

911 Responder Aid

WASHINGTON — A bill that would have provided up to $7.4 billion in aid to people sickened by World Trade Center dust fell short in the House on Thursday, raising the possibility that the bulk of compensation for the ill will come from a legal settlement hammered out in the federal courts.

The bill would have provided free health care and compensation payments to 9/11 rescue and recovery workers who fell ill after working in the trade center ruins.

It failed to win the needed two-thirds majority, 255-159. The vote was largely along party lines, with 12 Republicans joining Democrats supporting the measure.

For weeks, a judge and teams of lawyers have been urging 10,000 former ground zero workers to sign on to a court-supervised settlement that would split $713 million among people who developed respiratory problems and other illnesses after inhaling trade center ash.

The court deal shares some similarities with the aid program that the federal legislation would have created, but it involves far less money. Only the most seriously ill of the thousands of police officers, firefighters and construction workers suing New York City over their exposure to the dust would be eligible for a hefty payout.

But supporters of the deal have been saying the court settlement is the only realistic option for the sick, because Congress will never act.

"Ladies and gentlemen, you can wait and wait and wait for that legislation ... it's not passing," Kenneth Feinberg, the former special master of the federal 9/11 victim compensation fund, told an audience of ground zero responders Monday in a meeting on Staten Island.

Democratic leaders opted to consider the House bill under a procedure that requires a two-thirds vote for approval rather than a simple majority. Such a move blocked potential GOP amendments to the measure.

A key backer of the bill, U.S. Rep. Peter King, a Long Island Republican, accused Democrats of staging a "charade."

King said Democrats were "petrified" about casting votes as the fall elections near on controversial amendments, possibly including one that could ban the bill from covering illegal immigrants who were sickened by trade center dust.

If Democrats brought it to the floor as a regular bill, King said, it would have passed with majority support.

GOP critics branded the bill as yet another big-government "massive new entitlement program" that would have increased taxes and possibly kill jobs.

To pay the bill's estimated $7.4 billion cost over 10 years, the legislation would have prevented foreign multinational corporations incorporated in tax haven countries from avoiding tax on income earned in the U.S.

Bill supporters said that would close a tax loophole. Republicans branded it a corporate tax increase.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg called the vote an "outrage." He said it was clearly a tactic designed to stall the bill.

"This is a way to avoid having to make a tough decision," Bloomberg said, adding that the nation owes more to "the people who worked down at 9/11 whose health has fallen apart because they did what America wanted them to do."

John Feal, a ground zero demolition worker who has lobbied extensively for the legislation, expressed disgust.

"They pulled the rug out from beneath our feet," Feal said. "Whatever member of Congress vote against this bill, whether Republican or Democrat, should go to jail for manslaughter."

The bill would have provided up to $3.2 billion to cover the medical treatment of people sickened by trade center dust and an additional $4.2 billion for a new fund that would have compensated them for their suffering and lost wages.

The potential promise of a substantial payout from the federal government had caused some ground zero workers to balk at participating in the proposed legal settlement, which would resolve as many as 10,000 lawsuits against the city.

Initially, the bill would have prohibited people from participating in the new federal compensation program if they had already been compensated for their injuries through a lawsuit, but a change was made in recent days eliminating that restriction.

Nevertheless, with the House rejecting the bill and no vote scheduled on a similar Senate version, it appears almost guaranteed that there will be no new federal law by Sept. 8, the date by which ground zero workers involved in the lawsuits must decide whether to accept the settlement offer.

Under the terms of the deal, 95 percent of those workers must say yes for the court settlement to take effect.

The compensation system set up by the court would make payments ranging from $3,250 for people who aren't sick but worry they could fall ill in the future to as much as $1.5 million to the families of people who have died. Nonsmokers disabled by severe asthma might get between $800,000 and $1 million.

About 25 percent of the money would go to pay legal fees. Contested claims would be heard by Feinberg, who would act as an appeals officer.

Researchers have found that thousands of New Yorkers exposed to trade center dust are now suffering from breathing difficulties similar to asthma. Many have also complained of heartburn or acid reflux, and studies have shown that firefighters who worked on the debris pile suffer from elevated levels of sarcoidosis, an inflammatory disease.

Many of the workers also fear that the dust is giving people cancer, although scientific studies have failed to find evidence of such a link.

The exact number of sick is unclear. Nearly 15,900 people received treatment last year through medical programs set up to treat Sept. 11-related illnesses, but doctors say many of those people suffered from conditions that are common in the general public.

The House bill is named for James Zadroga, a police detective who died at age 34. His supporters say he died from respiratory disease contracted at ground zero, but New York City's medical examiner said Zadroga's lung condition was caused by prescription drug abuse.

___

Caruso reported from New York.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — A bill that would have provided up to $7.4 billion in aid to people sickened by World Trade Center dust fell short in the House on Thursday, raising the possibility that the bulk of...
WASHINGTON — A bill that would have provided up to $7.4 billion in aid to people sickened by World Trade Center dust fell short in the House on Thursday, raising the possibility that the bulk of...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,022
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eahce
01:44 PM on 08/02/2010
Our government doesn't seem interested in helping 9/11 responders nine years after the fact, after being told by the EPA that the air was safe at ground zero. Rather our government only seems willing and able to send their help just a few blocks away.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
12:53 AM on 08/02/2010
Every member of Congress who voted against this bill should immediately tender their written resignation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
julbar
08:21 PM on 08/01/2010
I know two very sick men who left work to volunteer.. I remember thinking how brave they were to put themselves in the face of that devastation, sifting for body parts with that repulsive burning smell in their nostrils every day when they were not hired to do it; now it turns out it was a true sacrifice of their own lives.

The bloated and BS stuffed US Congress only cares and postures for their individual power, there is nothing else.. We, the people really do not count to those pompous asses..
07:41 PM on 08/01/2010
A little tickle from the Wayback Machine:
"In a recent decision, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman's falsely reassuring and misleading statements of safety after the September 11, 2001 attacks were "without question conscience-shocking." The court also found the facts "support an allegation of a violation of the substantive due process right to be free from official government policies that increase the risk of bodily harm" by Whitman's misstatements regarding the air quality of the affected area. An EPA Inspector General review reached similar conclusions.
Christie, if you'll recall, refused to testify before Congress about her little lapse. Instead of being in jail, she's now a Washington DC lobbyist on "environmental issues." And it's widely believed that her orders to lie about the air quality in NYC came from--Dick Cheney!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eahce
01:45 PM on 08/02/2010
Wonder if she sleeps well at night?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
06:02 PM on 08/01/2010
The Mayor is right. It is an outrage, nothing less.
photo
AlexNYC
Pumps dont work cause the vandals took the handles
04:47 PM on 08/01/2010
King is a disingenuous corporate tool.
07:34 PM on 08/01/2010
And Staten Island keeps electing him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mister C
12:58 AM on 08/02/2010
Not Staten...Long Island they're the unfortunate idi0ts.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
10:11 AM on 08/01/2010
Republicans to America: We never do anything for the "small" people...except screw them over...and our backers like it that way
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
12:55 AM on 08/02/2010
Same treatment for all volunteers, responders, veterans and workers from every sector of the economy. Despicable cretins should resign.
holyghostie
Spiritus est qui vivificat
09:15 AM on 08/01/2010
I propose the following slogan for congress:

"Failing First Responders and the American Military since 1775."
07:35 PM on 08/01/2010
Don't be silly; Congress has been giving the military everything they ask for (and much, much more) for decades. Our national budget is in thrall to our imperial armies and navies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
12:55 AM on 08/02/2010
But only pennies for returning veterans.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
03:06 AM on 08/02/2010
agreed but the soldiers returning home get short changed just like any other non rich person...think VA hostpitals and the scandals they have had with underfunding
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
up420oz
02:12 AM on 08/01/2010
why should the Dems always compromise so the minority cons get their way?

this was a vote on morals, plain and simple. The cons again, showed where their loyalty is.

not paying attention?

The Dems went with a type of vote that required 2/3 majority to pass.
If they went with a simple majority vote, the cons would and planed on including all sorts of anit gay, racist, pay big banks win amendments.

The bill the DEMS sent was just on bennifits to 9/11 surviors.



"
The eruption also exposed a real difference among New York lawmakers over how to pass a bill vital to 9/11 responders.

Numerous Democratic sources told The News many in the delegation wanted to bring the bill up in the regular manner and pass it on a simple majority.

The downside: The GOP could make motions forcing ugly votes on immigration, abortion or other culture war issues
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
up420oz
02:06 AM on 08/01/2010
"
The eruption also exposed a real difference among New York lawmakers over how to pass a bill vital to 9/11 responders.

Numerous Democratic sources told The News many in the delegation wanted to bring the bill up in the regular manner and pass it on a simple majority.

The downside: The GOP could make motions forcing ugly votes on immigration, abortion or other culture war issues


Bet they still want tax breaks for the very rich?

wow, to vote for republicans now would really reflect a condition.
01:18 AM on 08/01/2010
The Dem had the votes why didn't they pass it. They don't need Rep.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bar1ed
midnight toker!
11:54 PM on 07/31/2010
Looking at the vote along party-lines, it boils down too one thing, we're going too lose in the up-coming elections so screw-you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
georgiegirl
10:23 PM on 07/31/2010
All I know is that even the dogs searching the rubble got sick/died. And yes, there will always be those individuals that perpetrate fraud, but there should ways to discover these frauds and hold them accountable for their actions.
Meanwhile, those people that are sick/dying/dead should get something for their pain and suffering.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
12:56 AM on 08/02/2010
Precisely correct.
08:09 PM on 07/31/2010
Please read. Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death. Patrick Henry March 23, 1775. http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/henry-liberty.html

The time for revolution is near. I love my country but if the Republican Party continues to exist...... screw the Republicans. Put every one of them on a boat to the Gulf and tip the boat over into the oily mess they legislated. Every last of them.
02:28 PM on 07/31/2010
95% of these "heroes" are frauds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Friction57
full grown and still a microbio
03:40 PM on 07/31/2010
What do you mean?
05:07 PM on 08/01/2010
Are you related to a certain group of 19 who want to promote your propaganda, chaos and mayhem?
06:53 PM on 08/01/2010
???? I just tell it like I see it. Most of these people are looking for cash.