Al Qaeda Plants Flag, Burns Bodies In Baghdad Attack

REBECCA SANTANA   07/29/10 05:59 PM ET   AP

Iraq Violence
Iraqi security forces inspect the scene of an attack on their checkpoint in Baghdad, Iraq, Thursday, July 29, 2010.

BAGHDAD — Militants flew an al-Qaida flag over a Baghdad neighborhood Thursday after killing 16 security officials and burning some of their bodies in a brazen afternoon attack that served as a grim reminder of continued insurgent strength in Iraq's capital.

It was the bloodiest attack in a day that included the deaths of 23 Iraqi soldiers, policemen and other security forces across the country who were targeted by shootings and roadside bombs.

The mayhem serves as a stark warning that insurgents are trying to make a comeback three months after their two top leaders were killed in an airstrike on their safehouse, and as the U.S. military presence decreases day by day.

The complex attack began when militants struck a checkpoint in the largely Sunni neighborhood of Azamiyah, once a stronghold of insurgents that in recent years has become more peaceful. Then the militants set it on fire, burning several of the soldiers' bodies, according to an army officer who was on patrol in the neighborhood. Minutes later, attackers detonated three roadside bombs nearby.

Hospital, police and military officials all confirmed the death toll.

A large pool of blood and what appeared to be char marks could be seen on the ground near an Iraqi army truck. Authorities immediately sealed off the area. Police and army officials said between 16 and 20 assailants took part in the highly orchestrated attack; all appeared to have escaped.

A day before the Azamiyah attack, Vice President Joe Biden predicted there would not be an extreme outbreak of sectarian violence in Iraq as all but 50,000 U.S. forces leave the country at the end of August. He said the American troops left behind would be more than enough to help Iraqi forces maintain security.

"I can't guarantee anything, but I'm willing to bet everything that there will be no such explosion," Biden said on NBC's "Today" show. He was speaking from Ft. Drum in upstate New York where he and his wife were welcoming troops home.

Still, the Obama administration is keeping a wary eye on Iraq's security. White House officials said Biden is sending two of his top national security advisers to Baghdad this weekend to help push along Iraq's stalled political process in a sign of impatience and concern that sectarian tensions could escalate as the Americans forces withdraw.

It has been more than four months since Iraq's March 7 election, with little indication that a government can be formed before the Muslim holiday of Ramadan begins in mid-August and brings a halt to business in much of the Middle East.

As politicians bicker, Iraqis point to such violent attacks as Thursday's as a clear indication that the terror groups are trying to use the political instability to regroup.

Officials in Azamiyah said the provocative flag-planting and bold attack are part of an attempt by the terror group to once again infiltrate the Sunni neighborhood.

"Al-Qaida is trying their best to return to Iraq or to Azamiyah because they have no existence here now," said a member of the Azamiyah provincial council, Haitham al-Azami. "Al-Qaida, by this act intends to pretend that they have an existence and to show their muscles."

The daylight attack was the boldest move by militants since their commando-style assault on the central bank in June that left 26 people dead during morning rush hour. Suicide bombings, roadside bombs and nighttime assassinations have tended to be their pattern of violence.

The Azamiyah blast was the deadliest of a series of attacks around the country, aiming to kill and maim members of Iraq's security forces who are increasingly taking over security from Americans.

Earlier, a suicide bomber drove a minibus into the main gate of an Iraqi army base near Saddam Hussein's hometown north of Baghdad, killing four soldiers, said police and hospital officials.

In the western city of Fallujah, 40 miles (65 kilometers) west of Baghdad, two roadside bombs targeting Iraqi army patrols killed two soldiers, police and hospital officials in the city said.

In the northern city of Mosul, a bomb attached to a police vehicle killed one policeman and injured two others, a police official said.

All officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

The attacks underline the fact that militant groups can still strike with lethal force across Iraq, despite an improvement in the security situation over the last three years.

Also Thursday, an al-Qaida-linked group claimed responsibility for a bombing earlier this week that targeted the Baghdad offices of a pan-Arab television station killing six people, describing it as a victory against a "corrupt channel."

The Arabic-language news channel Al-Arabiya is one of the most popular in the Middle East but is perceived by insurgents as being pro-Western.

"We take responsibility for targeting this corrupt channel, and we will not hesitate to hit any media office and chase its staffers if they insist on being a tool of war against almighty God and his prophet," the announcement said.

____

Associated Press Writers Mazin Yahya, Lara Jakes and Barbara Surk in Baghdad contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGHDAD — Militants flew an al-Qaida flag over a Baghdad neighborhood Thursday after killing 16 security officials and burning some of their bodies in a brazen afternoon attack that served as a ...
BAGHDAD — Militants flew an al-Qaida flag over a Baghdad neighborhood Thursday after killing 16 security officials and burning some of their bodies in a brazen afternoon attack that served as a ...
Filed by Alexander Corwin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 150
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
drjasonmd
Shalom, compa!
08:28 PM on 07/31/2010
They have a flag now? Now they'll be able to take possession of territory!! If they hold it long enough, they'll say the reality on the ground makes it impossible for them to leave and we'll all have to recognize their legitimacy.

We're all totally screwed.
01:47 PM on 07/31/2010
Amazing how FEW posts are here...but when an Israeli belches toward an Arab...it gets hundreds of comments!!
photo
drjasonmd
Shalom, compa!
08:29 PM on 07/31/2010
What's amazing is how single-minded your posts are.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:04 AM on 07/31/2010
No matter how long we stay in the mid east we are not going to defeat the so called "terrorists", our very presence adds to their ranks every day. And should we leave (and we should) they will continue to work at eradicating any gains our so called puppet "government(s) have created, until all vestiges of said "gains" are gone.
It's highly arrogant of us to think we can defeat a way of life, for that's what militant insurgencies in the mid east represent. They are plays for power and control of peoples in an area of the world that has acted in this manner for power and control for centuries. We can not replace our methods too "power" upon theirs, the mindset is not in harmony to receive what we have to offer, and is counter to what they have know to be true. This being said it seems to be intrinsic to our American natures to try to lead horses to water and too make the drink as well, however broken our system may be we still see it as the best available, and wonder why the world doesn't rush out to grasp what we offer.
In conclusion, the real motivation of the " war hawks" is either money driven, or is driven by desires to have our military defeated and demoralized. It's time to come home, let those who will do what they do, do it. We could never stop it anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:45 PM on 07/31/2010
"Our very presence adds to their ranks every day"
Again with this assumption that it is US who are radicalizing millions of Muslims. Understand, we are responsible for some radicalization, through botched drone strikes, through half-cocked soldiers making stupid spur-of-the-moment decisions. These things do happen, no question.

But the vast majority of the "radicalization" you refer to occur doesn't exist as a direct response to American aggression. Rather it is a result of millions of beautiful little children being brainwashed in muslim Madrassas (funded by Saudi Arabia) to hate the West, Americans, outsiders, Israel, non-believers, women, and (this is perhaps most important) change, and modernization.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:52 PM on 07/31/2010
Hi Evan:
I agree, I was speaking from a viewpoint on the effects we have. You point about the influence of the Saudi's is well stated, I to have often wondered why (besides oil) we do business at all with them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:30 PM on 07/30/2010
Please, my fellow leftists, understand that the wikileaks memos have not told us anything we haven't known for years! Pakistan's ISI agency supports the Taliban and undermines the United States war effort, and they are driven by ideological extremists. No %$#!

And to the bravenewfilms crew, please learn to see the world for what it is, not what you'd like it to be.

What should be understood, what MUST be understood are the ramifications for women in the country if we do pull out: A power vacuum will be filled by those who are most violent and most determined to undermine civil society. In this case, The Taliban. They will be ruthless in their implementation of shariah law, they will undermine ANY effort at peace, stability, rule of law, women's rights, or civil liberties. And they will continue to to brutalize the good people of Afghanistan: Publicly executing women for imagined crimes (without a trial), pulling little girls out of schools and executing raping and them for having the audacity to pursue an education. Forcing other underage girls to become married and subsequently (yet again) raping them, and brainwashing little boys to follow their strict interpretation of the koran, hate and fear outsiders and westerners, and continue the cycle of generational abuse. We simply cannot allow this to happen.

Please, to all who read this. Especially my friends on the left, (the REAL left...)
You absolutely MUST see this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9aw6Cnw0hY
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1776 or 1984
IT'S AN EMPIRE, NOT A REPUBLIC!
09:21 AM on 07/31/2010
Though the Empire never invaded Iraq to help women, now you suggest the Empire must stay to help women.

The Empire gives its subjects a menu of reasons (i.e., WMB, women, etc.) to choose from, but it's never the Empire's reasons. They do that to make the subjects feel good, and somehow, connected to the decision-making.

Subjects are not connected to the decision-making. At best, they can perceive the real reasons the Empire conquered Iraq.

==================
Be a rebel, not a subject
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:44 AM on 07/31/2010
An inspiring call-to-arms for anarchists and molotov-cocktail-enthusiasts everywhere!
01:46 PM on 07/30/2010
Mission accomplished.
12:52 PM on 07/30/2010
And most of America sits in ineffective silence while they plant another of their flags near the WTC site. Disgraceful.
photo
INDIVIDUALTERRY
Occupy this!
12:11 PM on 07/30/2010
Hear that huge sucking sound? Thats the vacuum that will be created when we pull out.
Guess who is going to fil it.
08:06 PM on 07/30/2010
Iran
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:46 PM on 07/31/2010
Whoever has the biggest and baddest guns. On that side of the world, it doesn't matter who fills it. It won't be good for the people.

What should be understood, what MUST be understood are the ramifications for women in the country if we do pull out: A power vacuum will be filled by those who are most violent and most determined to undermine civil society. In this case, The Taliban. They will be ruthless in their implementation of shariah law, they will undermine ANY effort at peace, stability, rule of law, women's rights, or civil liberties. And they will continue to to brutalize the good people of Afghanistan: Publicly executing women for imagined crimes (without a trial), pulling little girls out of schools and executing raping and them for having the audacity to pursue an education. Forcing other underage girls to become married and subsequently (yet again) raping them, and brainwashing little boys to follow their strict interpretation of the koran, hate and fear outsiders and westerners, and continue the cycle of generational abuse. We simply cannot allow this to happen.

Please, to all who read this. Especially my friends on the left, (the REAL left...)
You absolutely MUST see this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9aw6Cnw0hY
photo
drjasonmd
Shalom, compa!
08:31 PM on 07/31/2010
The Taliban are in Iraq?
photo
INDIVIDUALTERRY
Occupy this!
11:18 AM on 08/02/2010
This is why i agreed that we needed to blitz the taliban , anybody that sick deserved to be eliminated and AlQuida ,that they harbored and supported.
But we will never be able to fill the vacuum in Iraq , it was a stoopid move to invade.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
11:08 AM on 07/30/2010
At some point, somebody has to step up and deal with the Saudis.
photo
INDIVIDUALTERRY
Occupy this!
12:12 PM on 07/30/2010
How about a crusade ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
12:28 PM on 07/30/2010
Don't think we need a crusade, but we do need to realize that the Saudis are not our friends in any way whatsoever.
09:21 AM on 07/30/2010
Mission accomplished.
08:54 AM on 07/30/2010
"We take responsibility for targeting this corrupt [TV] channel, and we will not hesitate to hit any media office and chase its staffers if they insist on being a tool of war against almighty God and his prophet,"

You can't reason with this type of mentality. You can only destroy its adherents. The primary adherents who encourage and fund these activities are in Teheran.
09:12 AM on 07/30/2010
No, I believe you mean Riyadh, not Teheran. Al Qaeda is Sunni, Iran is Shia I think...
09:54 AM on 07/30/2010
Your analysis is completely flawed. Here's the chain...al-qaeda-KSA-USA
07:15 AM on 07/30/2010
We sure brought "democracy" to Iraq now, didn't we??? We destroyed a sovereign nation. End. Of. Story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
11:11 AM on 07/30/2010
I hate to say anything good about the invasion, but at least it allowed the majority Shia to control their own country. I know that was never Bush's intention of course. Al Qaeda is no doubt there for the Saudis, to attack the Shia and "remind them of their place", under the boot of the Sunni.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TStringfellow
Wobbly, politically and literally
07:40 PM on 07/30/2010
Yep. This war has changed, everyone knows the Americans are on their way out and that means all sides are preparing for the next stage. The Sunnis want back in power, the Saudis will support them and Iran will do it's best to ensure that doesn't happen. King George's experiment in Iraq is going to face it's real test when the American troops are out for real.
photo
Puller58
Man of Mystery
06:40 AM on 07/30/2010
This is what makes the legacy of Bush such a joke. The fantasy was that Iraq would recover and become a model for the Middle East. Instead, the former exiles that now inhabit the Iraqi government are a bunch of kleptocrats trying to raid the treasury before fleeing the country. The Army/police are sectarian and corrupt. This leaves the field wide open for any terrorist group to move in and cause trouble. Of course Bush apologists will forget that Bush committed to pulling out of Iraq, and will want to blame Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
11:13 AM on 07/30/2010
Well of course it's "sectarian". You cannot take a country where the Sunni majority were persecuting the Shia majority for decades and decades and expect the Shia to trust the Sunni with any power.
aristippe
no more war for oil
03:36 AM on 07/30/2010
i can't wait for Bush to don his flight suit and take it to the terrorist himself; he did that once before or am i dreaming
aristippe
no more war for oil
03:03 AM on 07/30/2010
cakewalk with flowers
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
03:33 AM on 07/30/2010
That's right. BigDick said they would throw rose petals at our troops
02:57 AM on 07/30/2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5ZkGHuj_Fc&feature=player_embedded#!

This young guy is one of the more INTELLIGENT Americans.

Nails everything about America in one small clip/.
07:25 AM on 07/30/2010
Good clip, I'll be looking for the full video when it comes out - though in my case Rys2sense is preaching to the choir. He nails it.