iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Speaks About Rangel For First Time: 'He's Somebody Who's At The End Of His Career'

Charles Rangel Trial

LAURIE KELLMAN   07/30/10 11:11 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Friday called ethics charges against Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel "very troubling" and said he hopes the longtime lawmaker can end his career with dignity. Several House Democrats went further, flat-out urging the New York congressman to resign.

"He's somebody who's at the end of his career," Obama said in an interview that aired Friday on "CBS Evening News with Katie Couric." "I'm sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity. And my hope is that it happens."

Obama, speaking on the issue for the first time, praised the 20-term Rangel for serving his constituents well but called the more than one-dozen tax and disclosure charges against him "very troubling."

It was hardly an endorsement for the veteran lawmaker, but fell well short of the calls for resignation Rangel received on the eve of the House's August recess. As House Democrats headed home, they wrestled with how to handle the matter in their districts ahead of the midterm elections.

Republicans, meanwhile, raced ahead with plans to make Rangel the face of corrupt Washington under the rule of Democrats who had vowed to clean up Congress.

For his part, Rangel met with perhaps his staunchest supporters, members of the New York state delegation, in the stately Capitol parlor named for the Ways and Means Committee that he headed until March.

"He indicated there was some sloppiness" in his official papers, Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., told reporters, "but, you know, there's no criminality here."

House rules and credibility – not criminality – were the reasons cited by more than a half dozen House Democrats known to have called for Rangel's resignation by late afternoon Friday.

A House panel on Thursday made public for the first time 13 charges of misusing his office and tax and disclosure violations against Rangel, 80, as it opened the trial phase of the ethics proceedings against him. If Rangel and the ethics committee do not settle the case, it goes to a public trial this fall, at the height of an election season in which every member of the House, 36 in the Senate and the Democratic majorities of both chambers are on the line.

Either conditionally or outright, Democrats calling for Rangel's resignation included Rep. Walter Minnick of Idaho, Betty Sutton of Ohio, John Yarmuth of Kentucky, Zack Space of Ohio, Ann Kirkpatrick of Arizona and Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio.

"Too many politicians, both Democrats and Republicans, have fallen victim to the idea that they are 'different' than regular folks and nothing could be further from the truth," Kirkpatrick said in a statement.

"It is our job as members of Congress to hold each other accountable to a higher standard regardless of party," she added. "If the serious charges against (Rangel) are accurate, he needs to resign."

Rangel denies the charges and says the indictment released Thursday contains factual errors.

"We've heard Charlie in the Ways and Means Committee, and he's addressed these charges. He never denied they happened. He always has an explanation. You can excuse one or two, but not 13," Yarmuth told the Louisville Courier-Journal in an interview published Friday. "I don't see how he can stay if they're true. I believe they are."

Back home in Rangel's Harlem district, he remains revered and could well win reelection if his political career survives the ethics probe. One constituent said Friday she had mixed feelings after reading news accounts of the allegations against him.

"I don't think he is 100 percent honest, but he's no worse than other politicians," said Charynda Morez, a college student, who was buying groceries at a deli.

She said that she didn't know how he should be punished, but that Rangel should resign anyway. Rangel has four apartments "when there are people who don't have a home," she said, citing allegations that Rangel lived in four combined rent-stabilized apartments instead of one, in violation of New York City law.

Democratic leaders are urging their members to cast the election as one about a choice between their party, which under President Barack Obama has overhauled health care and Wall Street, and a GOP-tea party combination that wants to roll back Democratic accomplishments.

House Republicans relished using Rangel to change the subject – especially if he does not reach a settlement with the ethics committee. A public trial equates to a free media presentation of the misdeeds of one of the most senior Democrats in the House.

The House Republicans' campaign arm released a list of Democrats who have not returned campaign contributions they received from Rangel during their careers and said those lawmakers would face questions about the matter from constituents during the August break.

"It's very difficult for Democrats to make the case that this is a 'choice' election when the national headlines are focused around an ethics scandal that has clearly impacted the party in power," said Ken Spain, spokesman for the National Republican Campaign Committee.

Rangel retained many supporters Friday. The New York delegation and the Congressional Black Caucus, which was co-founded by Rangel, urged their colleagues not to rush to judgment. House leaders eager to avoid alienating black voters remained mum on what Rangel should do.

Some Democrats privately said they took a small measure of comfort in one revelation. Rep. Gene Green, the Texas Democrat who led the four-member bipartisan panel of investigators, told reporters that his committee recommended a relatively mild punishment for Rangel – reprimand, a statement of wrongdoing voted by the whole House that carries no other penalty.

But statements continued to trickle out that left no doubt that at some point, Democrats would have to look out for No. 1 - themselves.

"If at the trial's conclusion Mr. Rangel is found guilty by his peers, then he should incur the full punishment allowed by the House, including removal from office," said Rep. Bobby Bright, D-Ala.

___

Associated Press writers Larry Margasak and Ben Evans contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Friday called ethics charges against Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel "very troubling" and said he hopes the longtime lawmaker can end his career with dignit...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Friday called ethics charges against Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel "very troubling" and said he hopes the longtime lawmaker can end his career with dignit...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,558
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (108 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maxhnb
calling it like it is
08:35 PM on 08/02/2010
In fact Steven's charges were dropped doesnt eliminate the obvious appearance of impropriety. An appeal is not based on guilt or innocence but on procedure. Breaking the law is a matter of verdict not charges. What is the diffrence between taking liberties with and breaking the law. If the law is absolute, then taking liberties with it, is breaking it. The appearance of impropriety is not an ethics violation. If charges are made, the accused has a right to provide a defense. Not guilty is not innocence, it is procedural.
12:35 PM on 08/02/2010
Hey Kudos to the Dem. Party , if they are " cleaing up the swamp " and start with their own and make two of their own sacrificial lambs , it would actually make a statement that they are serious ....
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
criticallydampedroots
07:31 AM on 08/02/2010
My oh my I can hardly contain myself. We're gonna have two big deal Democrats on trial during the 2010 election campaign for corruption. Yippee! Swamp perfumed, not drained. You know if the Democrats had even half a box of rocks for brains they would have gotten rid of Rangel and Waters six months ago.
02:23 PM on 08/02/2010
Now if Repubs. had half the courage that Obama has, they would have said this a while back, and few would be left to continue obsessing over the Dems.! No rocks for brains left in their box. None to begin with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krechsd
06:52 AM on 08/02/2010
He's an old school politician, who needs to take a hike. At this point he's no better than a Repug.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
davcrock
04:32 AM on 08/02/2010
As essentially the head of the Democratic party, if the President says a party member is at the end of a long career, the loose translation comes down to this: Scram.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MuchMadness
01:27 AM on 08/02/2010
There was no need for the president to make a comment about the Rangel situation.
This is a matter for the House of Representatives to deal with, and this matter has nothing to do with the executive branch. Congress needs to learn how to operate on its own without a lot of guidance or comment from the executive branch. The executive branch has become far too powerful, and the congress has become far too weak, over the past 40 years.
11:06 AM on 08/02/2010
The comments from President Obama were not made on the basis of the executive branch speaking to the legislative branch . This was one of the Highest (If not Top Dog ) ranking Dems telling a senior Dem he is being cut lose , perhaps not even for what has or hasnt happened but regardless of whether he is innocent or not the fact that we are entering Mid Term Elections is just bad news for ALL Dems
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:13 PM on 08/01/2010
Did Charlie support Obama?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duhtruth
04:04 PM on 08/01/2010
Charlie is at the end of a long career and what better place to end it than a nice jail cell.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markpkessinger
08:33 PM on 08/01/2010
These are ETHICS charges, not criminal charges. Get a clue!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mattoon
Independent Libertarian
08:36 PM on 08/01/2010
Wrong again, they are only looking at the ethics charges in congress, Tax Cheating is a crime and that part is still under investigation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duhtruth
01:07 PM on 08/02/2010
Thanks for your expertise. However, one never knows where ETHICS charges lead to. Do they? Or are you psychic in addition to brilliant?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlawyer56
Level 2 Superuser
09:28 AM on 08/02/2010
Excuse me but he's paid the taxes owed.
03:30 PM on 08/01/2010
If it weren't for the fact that I know it will just turn into a theatrical farce, I'd be praying to any god or goddess who listens that Rangel forces the ethics committee into open hearings. If we had any chance that independent media investigations as a result of the hearing would dig up dirt on more politicians.... unfortunately, we no longer HAVE an independent media.

After watching the performance at the BP hearings not so long ago, I was reminded how ineffective our congress becomes the minute cameras and accountability enter the room. There is no chance that any meaningful questions will be asked. Everything substantive will take place outside the view of the public, and the politicians will go right back to milking the teat of public office.
01:18 PM on 08/01/2010
Arrggghhhhhhhhhh

People here still don't understand the FACTs.

Afghanistan and Iraq had NOTHING to do with 911.

These are WARS OF AGGRESSION plain and simple.

Just what Adolph was doing in the 30's.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
01:47 PM on 08/01/2010
Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11? What do you call protecting Al Qaeda?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duhtruth
04:01 PM on 08/01/2010
Al Qaeda can be and is protected in a number of countries. The Iraq and Afghanistan wars were complete fantasies of a president and vp who were comsumed with Napoleonic complexes. There actions have cost the US lives, many injuries, respect and a debt that the US may never recover from. In addition, Al Qaeda is alive and well throughout the world.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
01202009
04:05 PM on 08/01/2010
9/11 was the excuse and the Afghanistan natural resources and a route for a trans-country oil and natural gas pipeline were the spoils. The only thing we've done to Al Qaeda is make them stronger and more dangerous.
12:56 PM on 08/01/2010
Israel attacks and murders a US citizen in cold blood in international waters attempting to deliver cookies to Gaza.

Not a peep out of the USA. Now you know who runs your country. Shalom, suckers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsSr3hOlpOs
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid!
11:17 AM on 08/01/2010
If Obama wants to ensure that Charlie Rangel is at the end of his career, he need only do one thing: campaign for him!

The NY Times is reporting today that "To help Democrats in the Fall, Obama may stay away..." PERFECT. Stay away. Far away.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BocaMom
11:06 AM on 08/01/2010
Thanks for throwing Charlie under the bus, Mr. President. Whatever happened to loyalty?
photo
Tribal Knowledge
Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid!
11:15 AM on 08/01/2010
HAHA!!!

Since when did Obama EVER equal loyalty?
04:18 PM on 08/01/2010
Loyalty to a Crook?
10:13 AM on 08/01/2010
"The American people voted to restore integrity and honesty in Washington, D.C., and the Democrats intend to lead the most honest, most open and most ethical Congress in history"

- Nancy Pelosi 11/8/06
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Mattoon
Independent Libertarian
08:38 PM on 08/01/2010
What happened?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lab Sharpei
09:19 AM on 08/01/2010
Ya think? Quite observant Mr. Prez