iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Body Scan Images From Security Checkpoints Were Saved By Feds

Huffington Post   First Posted: 08/04/10 11:23 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:15 PM ET

Body Scan Images Saved

*UPDATED*
Despite past statements by federal agencies that images from body scanners were not and could not be saved or recorded, a government agency has admitted to storing approximately 35,000 body scan images, CNET reports.

According to CNET, "U.S. Marshals Service admitted this week that it had surreptitiously saved tens of thousands of images recorded with a millimeter wave system at the security checkpoint of a single Florida courthouse."

The resolution and detail of the body scan images varies depending on the technology used in the scanner (i.e. X-ray backscatter vs millimeter wave. See full-body millimeter wave images on TSA.gov).

Privacy advocates have denounced the machines for generating images so graphic they are tantamount to "virtual strip-searching," and, in the UK, minors were recently barred from passing through the controversial full body scanners over child pornography fears.

As CNET writes, the TSA recently noted that it requires all checkpoint scanners used at airports to have the ability to save and share images. The agency added that such features are only for "testing, training, and evaluation." CNET reported that these capabilities "are not normally activated when the devices are installed at airports," although TSA spokesperson Sari Koshetz later told the Huffington Post that the body scanners' image storage capabilities are "never activated when deployed in airports."

The TSA wrote in a blog,

While we have said this many times, it bears repeating, TSA will not keep, store or transmit images. Once deleted, they are gone forever. For additional privacy, the officer viewing the image is in a separate room and will never see the passenger and the officer attending to the passenger will never see the image. The officers have 2-way radios to communicate with other in case a threat object is identified.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center is currently suing to "suspend the deployment of body scanners at US airports."

UPDATE: TSA spokesperson Sari Koshetz noted that the images produced by millimeter wave scanners resemble "blurry negatives" with a "humanoid form" and compared the images produced by scanners using X-ray backscatter technology to "chalk etchings." No faces are shown and "very little detail" appears "unless a threat object is visualized," she said. Additional information on privacy and body scanners is available from the TSA here.

Below, an example of the images saved by the machines at the Florida courthouse, via CNN:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

*UPDATED* Despite past statements by federal agencies that images from body scanners were not and could not be saved or recorded, a government agency has admitted to storing approximately 35,000 body...
*UPDATED* Despite past statements by federal agencies that images from body scanners were not and could not be saved or recorded, a government agency has admitted to storing approximately 35,000 body...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,425
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
02:37 PM on 08/20/2010
Well the Buffalo NY airport will soon be getting these machines.

Funny how the reporter for the 5pm August 17th news cast that "the machines are incapable of storing images". Right from the Federal statements regardless of numerous news outlets running this story two weeks earlier.
06:55 PM on 08/15/2010
The government has a long and consistent history of lying to the citizens. So why do citizens keep assuming they're not lying? I never have been able to quite wrap my head around that one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:31 PM on 08/09/2010
Well, when a federal agency says the images _could_ not be saved nor _would_ they be saved, who are you going to believe?

The federal agency or your lying eyes?
01:05 PM on 08/08/2010
Anyone that thought any differently is naive. This is exactly why many of us opposed this from the get-go - we knew they would save the images. Give people access to data, and they are going to retain it. Give people access to retained data, and eventually it will be abused.
photo
Libertarian09
Anti War Socialist with a taste for freedom
10:51 PM on 08/08/2010
I've read some of your comments on this issue and find you have left me nothing to addso I will simply say well done. You are right on target!
10:53 PM on 08/08/2010
I'm not a libertarian yet, but I am becoming one by the day :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
conservicide
I don't play nice.
01:04 PM on 08/08/2010
That's like saying we require GPS locators on cell phones, but we'll never use it to locate and track people unless its an emergency. NOBODY believes that crap.
11:14 PM on 08/07/2010
Airport body scanners 'could give you cancer', warns expert
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1290527/Airport-body-scanners-deliver-radiation-dose-20-times-higher-thought.html
======================================================
Radiation from airport scanners may increase cancer risk
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/292414
=====================================================
Airport body scanners 'could give you cancer'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/7862265/Airport-body-scanners-could-give-you-cancer.html
=====================================================
Scientists: Full-body scanners' radiation underestimated, could pose cancer risk
http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/scientists-full-body-scanners-radiation-underestimated-could-pose-cancer-risk
=====================================================
Full-Body Scanners to Fry Travelers With Radiation
http://www.prisonplanet.com/full-body-scanners-to-fry-travelers-with-radiation.html
=====================================================
Do a search, "bodyscanners, cancer"
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MilesLong
Livin' the Dream
11:01 AM on 08/06/2010
What kind of idiot ever believes anything the government tells them? (laughing)

Let me ask you this: do you get a flu shot every year?

Did you get an H1N1 shot last year?

Do you know who makes money off Tamiflu? Donald Rumsfeld.

Miles "Still Following The Money, And Checking Out The TSA Screen Saves Too" Long
01:06 PM on 08/08/2010
I don't get a flu shot because I don't trust it, and I never was gullible enough to think they wouldn't retain this data. Anyone that thought differently was probably just shilling for the companies that profit from making these scanners.

As you say - follow the money. Always.
12:41 AM on 08/06/2010
If any of you think there is no problem with this machine and that these images are not able to be used to recognize the person in the image you need to check out this video, it just might make you understand what a violation of your rights it is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skdm1e441W4&feature=...
photo
clearwaterclearmind
couldn't stand bush. can't stand obama for the sam
07:17 PM on 08/05/2010
that's our government's MO; lie and lie and lie to get they want then immediately break any promises made.

they SWORE up and down that this would not happen.
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
09:11 PM on 08/05/2010
TSA swore THEY would not save images from airport checkpoints.

These stored images were done by the US Marshals, not the TSA and were taken at court houses, not airports.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:47 AM on 08/07/2010
If they don't intend to save them then they shouldn't need machines with the capabilities to do the saving. You can bet that they retain images as a matter of course in case they need to prosecute someone for something.. And no, just because something is deleted doesn't mean it can't be recovered. The argument about the resolution is also garbage. If its too low a resolution to show details, then it is going to be too low to properly identify threats. You can bet they do everything they can within their budgets to get the highest resolution machines.
01:08 PM on 08/08/2010
BS. Give someone the right and ability to collect data, and they will also retain it. The only people who didn't believe that this data would be collected and retained were people that were shilling for the companies that make these devices. The TSA has already been caught doing exactly the things we knew they would do - retain it, ogle people with it, make copies.

It has already been done, and will be done again. This is just another example of it.
06:16 PM on 08/05/2010
The media is just flat lying for the government. These machines show far higher detail as in a digital photo. Another story on this stated that the images resolution was significantly reduced for the print media.
These scanners could be even more hi-tech and put to good use: some travelers are more susceptible to strokes following air travel.
Now the machines just seem perverted and I cannot believe the idiots that comment "I have nothing to hide".
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
09:12 PM on 08/05/2010
"These machines show far higher detail as in a digital photo. "

Not the ones used by the US Marshals at the court houses.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Livin in Spin
Corporate Fat Cat is keepin teh bonus
04:56 PM on 08/05/2010
Putting this into my "why we need an effective train system in America" file...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
03:35 PM on 08/05/2010
You all know Eisenhower warned us against what he coined "The Military Industrial Complex" on his way out the door. I call it the "so-long suckers" speech.

Are you aware General Colin Powell warned two years ago that he saw the creation of an "Intelligence Industrial Complex". More than 2,000 private companies now have security clearance. It's all part of the Bushies big push to privatize the Federal government. Really difficult to undo.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SarcasticFringehead
Mute Nostril Agony
03:46 PM on 08/05/2010
Hi Tulka.
I guess Big Brother is here amongst us now and he's taking names.
George Orwell has been frightening right about many things and I fear we may all be living "1984" if Americans are willing to give up their freedoms for "security."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
04:07 PM on 08/05/2010
Hey, Fringy. Nice to see you you. As Ben Franklin said, if they are willing to give up freedom for security, they deserve neither. And... what about the radiation?! I suppose we, none of us go overseas often enough to make a difference, but what about the workers who run the thing? Did you see the news the other day about all the people who lost hair in a perfect circle round their heads? Turns out they were all "safely scanned" by one of those machines that look for signs of stroke. The U.S. has become a banana republic.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
L3p3rm3ss14h
Morality is Temporary. Wisdom is Permanent.
03:31 PM on 08/05/2010
That's why when I fly, I just sh00t myself out of a cannon. No security hassles, no lines and no tacked on fees!

Sure the landings are...rough, and the targeting system still has some bugs I need to work out (never was any good at trigonometry!) but I still think it beats the conventional travel industry!

Thank you Doctor, that's enough transcribing, now can you PLEASE attend to this itch under my full body cast? No, wait, you didn't have to type that last part! I said, STOP TYPING!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Astrazoic
02:51 PM on 08/05/2010
I still don't get the fuss. IMO, this is a joke compared to ID theft, home invasion, and other forms of real and destructive violations of privacy. I imagine this has more to do with self-loathing and vanity than anything else. I could care less if my body is scanned, especially as it reveals very little about who I am beyond being male, eating right and exercising, and these are hardly private issues for me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoxiousNan
04:22 PM on 08/05/2010
ID theft and home invasion are criminal activities purported by individuals, and it's actually worse that a government victimizes its citizenry than if an individual (facing actual consequences) victimizes another individual, even if said individual is you.

How exactly does outrage over the gov't saving images they said they would not save make it an issue of vanity? That's as moronic and thoughtless as the idea that one should not be concerned with illegal wiretapping since they "don't have anything to hide."

I used quotes because everyone - that's every single person alive and over 3 - has something to hide. Nothing wrong with that provided that something is not illegal. If you think otherwise then you have not done much self examination.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cmaurand
02:33 PM on 08/05/2010
Unfortunately, nobody in Washington is listening to us.
11:17 PM on 08/07/2010
VOTE em ALL out of office!!!
Every Friggin one of them!