iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

BP: Static Kill Is Working On Gulf Oil Spill, 'It's A Milestone'

First Posted: 08/04/10 06:20 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:15 PM ET

Bp Static Kill Gulf Oil Spill
Ships work near the site of the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill on August 3, 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana. BP is to begin plugging the damaged oil well today with a 'static kill', by pumping mud into it. A new estimate puts the total amount of oil leaked into the Gulf at 205.8 million gallons. (Photo by Chris Graythen/Getty Images)

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO (Associated Press) - Mud that was forced down a blown-out well was holding down the flow of oil at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, BP said Wednesday.

In a significant step toward stopping the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history, BP PLC said workers stopped pumping mud in after about eight hours of their "static kill" procedure and were monitoring the well to ensure it remained stable.

"It's a milestone," BP spokeswoman Sheila Williams said. "It's a step toward the killing of the well."

The next step would be deciding whether to cement the well, Williams said.

The pressure in the well dropped quickly in the first 90 minutes of the static kill procedure Tuesday, a sign that everything was going as planned, wellsite leader Bobby Bolton told AP. Bolton said Tuesday night that the procedure was going well. "Pressure is down and appears to be stabilizing," he told the AP then.

But the mud that was forced down the broken wellhead to permanently plug the gusher is only half the story. To call the mission a success, crews working on a flotilla of vessels on a desolate patch of water need to seal off the well from two directions.

The static kill -- also known as bullheading -- involved slowly pumping the mud from a ship down lines running to the top of the ruptured well a mile below. BP has said that may be enough by itself to seal the well.

Still, an 18,000-foot relief well that BP has been drilling for the past three months will be used later this month to execute a "bottom kill," in which mud and cement will be injected into the bedrock 2 1/2 miles below the sea floor to finish the job, retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said.

"There should be no ambiguity about that," Allen said. "I'm the national incident commander, and this is how this will be handled."

A 75-ton cap placed on the well in July has been keeping the oil bottled up inside over the past three weeks, but that is considered only a temporary measure. BP and the Coast Guard want to plug up the hole with a column of heavy drilling mud and cement to seal it off more securely.

Before the cap was lowered onto the well, 172 million gallons of crude flowed into the sea, unleashed by the April 20 explosion aboard the drilling rig Deepwater Horizon that killed 11 workers. A previous, similar effort failed in May when the mud couldn't overcome the unstemmed flow of oil.

BP won't know for certain whether the static kill has succeeded until engineers can use the soon-to-be-completed relief well to check their work.

The task is becoming more urgent because peak hurricane season is just around the corner, Allen said. Tropical Storm Colin formed then dissipated far out in the Atlantic on Tuesday, but early forecasts say it will travel toward the East Coast rather than the Gulf.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO (Associated Press) - Mud that was forced down a blown-out well was holding down the flow of oil at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, BP said Wednesday. In a significant step tow...
ON THE GULF OF MEXICO (Associated Press) - Mud that was forced down a blown-out well was holding down the flow of oil at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, BP said Wednesday. In a significant step tow...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 470
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KidShalleen
If I'm posted, a moderator is asleep.
10:50 AM on 08/05/2010
Now I've been watching this whole process since April, like many people out there, and with the m9st recent happenings I've come up with a question. If for all intents and purposes the well has been controlled and stabilized, why can it not be put into production??

Further; I'm sure most would agree that if it were put into production any benefit realized by BP should at the very least be attached for the benefit of those affected by the blow out (It is after all a blow out, not a spill).

Now if it IS agreed as to who should benefit, let us go a step further. Why not declare the well forfeited by BP, the government find another oil platform company to extract the oil (awarded by bid) and all profits over and above costs of production going to the affected, the clean up,and further monies after that could go toward funding a quick response force to handle any future problems, and/or funding organization assigned with regulatory duties, and/or some other worthwhile use for profits made from this well for the greater good, not to exclude the Federal Government directly, as an additional possibility.

He//, we can use the money to offset the deficit, NO!?!?
11:53 AM on 08/05/2010
The second relief well is completely redundant and could easy be repurposed as a production well But I see no good reason for the government to start an oil company, even if they use the profits for 'good things'

Proposing a 'special 100% tax' on a particular well in uneccessary. The goverment has existing and adequate legal recourse to extract more than enough money from BP. Whether BP gets that money from this particular well, this reservoir, elswhere in the Gulf or from Nigeria, is irrelevant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KidShalleen
If I'm posted, a moderator is asleep.
12:15 PM on 08/05/2010
I take your point, but. The but is that I have no real confidence that the necessary monies can and will be extracted from BP without yet unforeseen problems. In the event you misunderstood me, I am not proposing the government get in the oil industry,only that they take proprietary ownership of any and all profits from this well, and have the working of the well contracted out to a more reliable company, to work the well.
Possibly you do not agree with my feeling that BP has forfeited their right to profit from this well due to their gross mismanagement and sloppy safety practices. If not, by doing it this way any and all penalties that may be attributed to BP due to their practices,could still be assessed and then subsequently fined, but additionally by extracting these profits that they may otherwise have garnered had they not screwed up, we will have put in place a fool proof mechanism by which to make whole those who have been damaged.
I understand that this may sound like "pie in the sky" thinking, but what the he//, I can dream, can't I?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Organic-Guy
Organic Gardener, Carpenter, Philosopher, Agitator
10:39 AM on 08/05/2010
This is one of biggest cover ups in history. The only reason BP did things this way was so they wouldn't have to pump oil to the surface in a controlled way through the new cap and get an exact measure of just how much oil leaked out. They could have done that without leaking any new oil and it would have even been good to relieve the pressure for a while until the relief well could be finalized and sealed. This is corruption from the top down, from government to industry. Now BP can make whatever claims they want about how much leaked out and fight it in court for years. The EPA report about how much oil is collected and how much is left is a sham as well. Kind of convenient it was released just as they were reporting such great success with this cover up plan at the bottom of the ocean. You can't ever know how much evaporated, was eaten by microbes and to be dispersed does not mean to be gone. What a sham this whole operation has been from the beginning to the end. 11 people dies horrible here. Does anyone care and does anyone want to know exactly what went wrong and do something to prevent it from happening again? We can't even get a moratorium on drilling 33 wells or drilling in the arctic for gods sake.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:50 AM on 08/05/2010
It now appears the oil outflow from the cap has increased which makes no sense unless the casing has been more severely damaged by the initial methane explosion than advertised. They start the concrete portion of the static kill today where temperatures increase in the well bore dramatically. Parts of the downed platform blocks the well bore so another methane touch-off and subsequent explosion might be kept from blowing material onto the surface.

This is far from over.
11:12 AM on 08/05/2010
It now appears that you are speaking gibberish and make no sense

There is no oil outflow from the cap. There are no indications the casing was severely damaged by the explosion.

BP are using a light mud so as not to cake the reservoir and jeopardize the cementing

The well is under control and unless BP does something really silly, like pump out the mud and replace it with sea water, there will be no subsequent methane ‘touch-off’ or explosion. The wellbore is not blocked by the downed platform.

BP have approval from Allen to cement the well. Having a capped well, full of mud and then cemented is very good thing. It’s not over but it’s very much under control. Be thankful for the good news and stop making stuff up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:19 AM on 08/05/2010
With all due respect - Look at the Skandi Neptune camera 7 at http://climate.the-environmentalist.org/2010/06/live-video-feeds-of-gulf-oil-disaster.html and tell me I'm making stuff up.

Oil rises, mud sinks.
07:51 AM on 08/05/2010
See? Everyone got all worked up over a little oil. No big deal. The government should pay BP a reward for its kind efforts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:40 AM on 08/05/2010
At least seven Exxon Valdez payloads so far is not a "little oil."

Unless you are trying to be funny? At which you FAIL.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
03:42 AM on 08/05/2010
My typing is execrable tonight. Sheesh.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
03:39 AM on 08/05/2010
I am afraid that this is the beginning of the amnesia. Oh, perhaps the posters here won't forget (but don't count on it). But the overwhelming majority are already losing consciousness. Of it. Did I say "of it." But the amnesia always kicks in. Everything is a trend, a fad, a evanescent will o' the wisp. Figure out a way to increase world's attention spans past the news cycle and the world will beat a path to your door. I ain't, however, holding my breath.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:41 AM on 08/05/2010
I blame the medz.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
General Public
Microbiologists have found my microbio contagious.
01:31 AM on 08/05/2010
BP also said they were stopping the leak back when "top kill" and earlier failed efforts happened, and they consistently lied about the amount of oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico. Everyone quoted in this article works for BP. This article is pure BP propaganda. I trust BP even less than the Republicans. At least the Republicans who want to repeal the 14th Amendment that guaranteed equal rights to freed slaves are honest about wanting to repeal it. BP shuts off the undersea cameras whenever it doesn't want people to see what is going on. Even if the leak is permanently sealed, this does not undo the environmental damage, or all the damage caused by BP's toxic chemical dispersants. The reason most of the oil can't be found anymore is the dispersants mixed it in with the water, as part of a cover-up of the true size of the spill. The oil is still there, just mixed in with water and diluted so people won't notice it, but that will make it cause more damage in the long run by making it impossible to get rid of.
12:01 AM on 08/05/2010
...static kill...after the "kill" done to the environment and marine life...
11:58 PM on 08/04/2010
Whats interesting about this whole affair is that a Swiss company called Transocean, LTD. actually owns and operates the rig for BP.

In other words, the negligence, if any, that caused this accident was Transocean's.

How come they get a pass while BP gets all of teh blame?

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/transocean_ltd/index.html?inline=nyt-org
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CB5
We do not want to repeat 2010 in 2014! VOTE:)
01:00 AM on 08/05/2010
Souns like out sourcing to me? And the reason for hiring someone else to do your work?
I am so frustrated with Corporations. People say that's what we get for electing a President who got an MBA in college: Masters of Business !
01:34 AM on 08/05/2010
Good question MIKEinNYC. What's in it for BP to take the hit?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:18 AM on 08/05/2010
BP leases and manages the operations of the platform. They are in-charge.

BP hired and directed the activities of dozens of contractors for their operation on the Deepwater Horizon.

Incidentally, Schlumberger another contractor, requested immediate evacuation for it's personnel just prior to the explosion. BP refused so Schlumberger leased a helicopter at their expense to evacuate their people. Not a coincidence, y'all.
11:48 PM on 08/04/2010
I am trying to get my arms around the massive disconnect between PBS news this evening (Susan Browners' contends that the oil is mostly gone) and the TED.com presentation by internationally recognized eco-toxicologist, Susan Shaw, who addresses the issue of the dispersants. Shaw contends that oil is toxic, that dispersants are toxic, none moreso than Corexit, and that the two (oil and corexit) together increase toxicity, clearly the opposite of what government spokeperson, Susan Browner, said on PBS news tonight - essentially stating that the dispersants are safe. Sorry, Susan Browner, but I'll put my money on the toxicologist. I invite you to look at her presentation. I hope PBS will pursue this issue more with vigorous and rigorous journalism featuring toxicologists like Susan Shaw among the line up of experts who are interviewed. It's important that this happen before the oil spill drops off the news horizon. Here is the link to Susan Shaw's chilling presentation: http://www.ted.com/talks/susan_shaw_the_oil_spill_s_toxic_trade_off.html "
01:33 AM on 08/05/2010
I'm surprised PBS is presenting what the other traditional media is presenting; we know the dispersants are NOT safe!!!

This is really just the beginning.
The mess is huge and far-reaching, and BP – Transocean and their collaborators should be prosecuted so something like this is less likely to happen again.

Evidence of long term damage from the oil spill:

Scientists Deeply Concerned About BP Disaster's Long-Term Impact: http://www.truth-out.org/scientists-deeply-concerned-about-bp-disasters-long-term-impact61946

The article starts out: “Contrary to recent media reports of a quick recovery in the Gulf of Mexico, scientists and biologists are "deeply concerned" about impacts that will likely span "several decades".

Scientists Find Evidence That Oil And Dispersant Mix Is Making Its Way Into The Food chain: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/29/scientists-find-evidence_n_664298.html

Prof: Gulf chemicals very concerning: http://www.wpri.com/dpp/news/us_news/professor-says-gulf-chemicals-will-have-long-term-effects

This informative report, "Gulf Oil Spill Health Hazards", describes the toxicity of chemicals in crude oil and in the dispersants currently being used in the Gulf area. http://www.sciencecorps.org/crudeoilhazards.htm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
AllenD
8 years of Obama, deal with it!
11:24 PM on 08/04/2010
So what did Bobby "The Exorcist" Jindal's brainchild, the sand berms that he was crying for do? How much oil out of the millions of barrels spilled and the 60,000 cubic yards of dredging material to create those berms? A whopping 1,200 pounds of "oily debris." This has to be the biggest waste of resources in this entire episode.

http://www.thegovmonitor.com/world_news/united_states/louisiana-removes-1200-pounds-of-oil-from-e-4-sand-berm-36221.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamaRican
Easier to curse the dark than look for light!
09:14 PM on 08/04/2010
"I'm the national incident commander, and this is how this will be handled."

Maybe it's me but this sounds weird...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tc399
Your personal Eschatologist.
11:10 PM on 08/04/2010
It's not you. It's deja vu all over again.
08:52 PM on 08/04/2010
BP is making light of a very serious situation and now it's business as usaual, as if nothing ever happend, the Gulf coast is in serions trouble and it's just a matter of time before we really know just how much damage all of this oil has caused! Oil, fish and birds don't match. I would like to see BP discontinued before they cause another disaster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giverny
Truthiness
08:42 PM on 08/04/2010
They have been buying meta tags and removing articles as fast as they can and now they are buying scientists to keep them from producing the truth.

http://blog.al.com/live/2010/07/bp_buys_up_gulf_scientists_for.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyResponsibility
Action over hope
09:22 PM on 08/04/2010
Sounds a bit loony. I just did a simple Google search using "BP disaster" and got nothing but negative hits. Te two ads that appeared at the top of the page were for a lawfirm www.gallagher-law-firm.com (oil spill legal guidance) and BP.com/GulfOfMexicoResponse. So they aren't really "buying up meta tags." The top of the hits is News for BP Disaster headin, and all "news" is on huffingtonpost.com. So who's buying tags?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giverny
Truthiness
07:30 PM on 08/04/2010
BP turn it into a Gulf of Mexicoil". They should be permanatly shut down. FOREVER, ANYWHERE.