iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran Claims To Have S-300 Surface-To-Air Missiles

ALI AKBAR DAREINI   08/ 4/10 12:09 PM ET   AP

Iran S300 Surfacetoair Missiles
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks with media during his press conference at the presidency, in Tehran, Iran, Monday, June 28, 2010. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran has obtained four S-300 surface-to-air missile systems despite Russia's refusal to deliver them to Tehran under a valid contract, a semiofficial Iranian news agency claimed Wednesday.

The Fars news agency, which has ties to the country's most powerful military force, the Revolutionary Guard, said Iran received two S-300s from Belarus and two others from another unspecified source. Fars didn't elaborate, and there was no official confirmation of the report.

Russia signed a 2007 contract to sell the S-300s, but so far has not delivered. The sophisticated anti-aircraft missiles would significantly boost Iran's ability to defend against air strikes and Israel and the United States have strongly objected to the deal.

A spokesman for Belarus' state military trade committee, however, denied there were any missile deliveries.

"Talks with the Iranian side about the delivery of such systems have not taken place and, consequently, no deliveries to Iran have taken place, neither of these systems or elements of them," said Vladimir Lavrenyuk. "The Belarusian side strictly observes all international agreements on export control."

The S-300 is capable of shooting down aircraft, cruise missiles and ballistic missile warheads at ranges of over 90 miles (144 kilometers) and at altitudes of about 90,000 feet (27,432 meters).

The report comes as Iran faces increasing pressure from the West over its nuclear program.

The U.S. accuses Tehran of seeking to build an atomic weapon, a claim Iran denies. The United Nations has imposed four rounds of financial sanctions on Tehran for its refusal to halt uranium enrichment, a process that can be used to produce fuel for a reactor or a warhead. Iran says it has a right to conduct enrichment for what it says is its peaceful nuclear program.

Moscow said in June that the latest round of U.N. sanctions would prevent it from delivering the S-300s to Iran. The U.S. State Department said that Washington appreciates Russia's restraint.

But last month, Sergei Chemezov, the head of the state-owned industrial giant Russian Technologies, said the contract for the delivery of S-300s to Iran had not been annulled yet pending a decision by President Dmitry Medvedev.

Asked to comment on the Iranian report, Vyacheslav Davidenko, a spokesman for the Russian state arms trader Rosoboronexport, said that his company hadn't delivered any S-300s to Iran. "We are abiding by the U.N. sanctions," he said.

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has forged close ties with Tehran, and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who visited the ex-Soviet nation in 2007, has called the Belarusian leader one of his best friends.

Former Belarus' leader Stanislav Shushkevich, now an opposition politician, said that Russia in the past has used Belarus as a conduit for weapons deliveries to rogue nations.

"Belarus might well have used the established "gray" schemes to deliver S-300s to Iran," Shushkevich told The Associated Press. "The deliveries of S-300s from Belarus to Iran would have been absolutely impossible without Russia's knowledge and sanction."

Iran has insisted that Moscow is under an obligation to carry out the contract to provide the S-300 missiles to Tehran.

"Iran possesses four S-300 PT missiles," Fars reported.

The agency said Iran's possession of the missiles was revealed for the first time last year by Al-Manar TV, which is affiliated the Iranian-backed Islamic militant Hezbollah group in Lebanon. Fars said Iranian government officials never denied the report.

It added that Iran may try to start building the missiles itself.

Russia – which has sold other air-defense missiles, aircraft and other weapons to Iran – is in a difficult position in the international standoff with Iran, in part because it does not want to jeopardize decades of political and trade ties with the Islamic republic.

Still, Moscow has lately shown increasing frustration with Iran, and last month backed the new sanctions.

___

Associated Press Writers Vladimir Isachenkov in Moscow and Yuras Karmanau in Minsk, Belarus contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran has obtained four S-300 surface-to-air missile systems despite Russia's refusal to deliver them to Tehran under a valid contract, a semiofficial Iranian news agency claimed W...
TEHRAN, Iran — Iran has obtained four S-300 surface-to-air missile systems despite Russia's refusal to deliver them to Tehran under a valid contract, a semiofficial Iranian news agency claimed W...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 505
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
Guytar
I'm sorry that I made you cry
01:09 PM on 08/25/2010
Iran has a long history of reverse engineering serious military defences from China and Russia.
02:14 PM on 08/06/2010
The truth about people who advocate war with Iran is that they are not really patriotic, at all.
01:53 PM on 08/06/2010
Just for clarification, I would like to reiterate that I am totally opposed to the stupid and evil idea of attacking Iran. And no, I don't want all the Jews to die.
02:43 PM on 08/05/2010
There was no bombing in Iran and there was no news about S-300 missiles from Iran!

The last two stories about Iran are artificially manufactured to take American people's focus away from president Ahmadinejad's invitation to talk with Obama.

A meeting between the two presidents can answer questions which has real positive effects on lives of both Americans and Iranians.

Questions like:

Why Obama has refused to sit down and talk to president Ahmadinejad, despite several invitation from Ahmadinejad?

Why Obama says that he has extended hand toward Iran, but in reality Iran has received only sticks?

Why we are going toward another war with Iran?

Why a country ignores its own interests to defend Israel's interests in ME?

Why all media in west are focusing on Iran and demonizing her?

While US cooperating with countries that are far worse than Iran in regards to human rights and danger to peace, why US cannot even tolerate existence of an independent Iran?

American people have the right to know the real motivations behind aggression towards Iran. Don't they?
06:13 PM on 08/05/2010
Hands Hassan a valium and a one way ticket to Tehran.

"Tehran, August 04, 2010 (Hamsayeh.Net) - Iran’s semiofficial Fars News Agency reported that Iran has four complete units of Russian made S-300 surface-to-air missiles as part of its defense system."

from this source: http://www.hamsayeh.net/hamsayehnet_iran-international%20news1526.htm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:27 PM on 08/05/2010
Janes reported this in 2008.

http://www.janes.com/news/defence/systems/idr/idr080117_1_n.shtml
08:56 PM on 08/05/2010
Shomali 23 hours ago (10:04 PM)
70 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
They source this for Fars news agency. Here is everything at Fars news with anything with 300 in it since July 1.

http://english.farsnews.com/rslt.php?txt=300&asdate=07%2F01%2F2010&todate=08%2F05%2F2010&aor=sh&area%5B%5D=Title&nr=14&srv%5B%5D=0
09:35 PM on 08/05/2010
Program about Iran's Navy.

http://www.presstv.ir/Programs/detail.aspx?sectionid=3510506&id=137430#137430
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fredday
Nyak Nyak Nyak
01:29 PM on 08/05/2010
"Israel has a right to defend itself."

So should Iran.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
01:54 AM on 08/05/2010
Jeez! They're almost as powerful as Hezbollah!
08:15 AM on 08/05/2010
don't quit your day job.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
09:34 AM on 08/05/2010
You too!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EJavaM07
Doing what no one else will.
12:24 AM on 08/05/2010
Let's test 'em!

Doesn't the U-2 fly at altitudes above this?

We could tease them into shooting one off, or call their bluff, or distract them long enough to send a primary attack into their base while they're looking the other direction.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:34 AM on 08/05/2010
Iran has plenty of HQ-2 SAMs that has several Taiwanese U-2 shoot down to its credit.
12:35 AM on 08/05/2010
How about, it is not our business as long as the weapons are for defensive purpose?

Do you go and test the other 188 counties around the world and test their air defense system?
12:18 AM on 08/05/2010
This is a curious “news” report almost as curious as the Ahmadinejad “fire-cracker” news report. Why would the Iranians be announcing the acquisition of the S-300 missles on the black market and publicly naming Belarus as the source of some of them? If the weapons were acquired last years and there was a report about it last years how it is being reported a year later as breaking news? If the S-300 are a game changer and a red-line for the Israelis the drive to attack Iran will only intensify. S-300 will not stop war it makes it more likely and gives the Israelis further reason (excuse) to attack a nation that it insists is an “existential nuclear threat”. The imperative of the war is that the S-300 would give the Iranians more cover to acquire nuclear wapons and that would be unacceptable.
A regional war involving the US (reluctantly), Lebanon, Syria and even others is inevitable and close even if it is based on a false report about the S-300 (remember Uranium from Niger). Israel wants war and has been preparing for it. During this time Iran has not been a passive observer. All the war needs is a trigger that justifies an urgent Israeli strike. A report (true or planted) about the delivery of the S-300?
A war is coming and unlike the Iraq war it will not be a video game for us.
08:15 AM on 08/05/2010
"The imperative of the war is that the S-300 would give the Iranians more cover to acquire nuclear wapons and that would be unacceptable."

the hypocrisy is that when israel buys missile defense shields, the same argument is vehemently rejected as false by the israeli supporters. israel is an aggressor in the middle east, when it acquires missile shield systems to protect itself from possibly an iranian threat, it makes their decision an easier one to attack iran.

always one sided perspective of things isn't going to help achieve peace.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:48 AM on 08/05/2010
Not to worry, there is no reliable defence against ballistic missiles, and Israel knows it.
07:22 PM on 08/05/2010
I agree that the Israeli government has tendency to see law and morality in a one-sided manner - it alone has a right to exist, to self defense etc. This is not in the interest of Israel going forward. It is also dangerous for us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
12:40 PM on 08/05/2010
"Why would the Iranians be announcing the acquisition of the S-300 missles"

A deterrent doesn't work if nobody knows about it.
07:11 PM on 08/05/2010
Marc it was the fact that Iran went the extra mile to announce the source of the weapons that was so curious. Why would Iran publicly put Bleraus in such a pickle? Who will sell Belarus sophisticated arms?
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
11:42 PM on 08/04/2010
A truthful headline would be:
"AP Claims That Iran Claims To Have S-300 Surface-To-Air Missiles"
11:57 PM on 08/04/2010
Or better AP quoted from jpost .com(Israelis website) that falsely quoted Fars news that Iran Claims To Have S-300 Surface-To-Air Missiles.
10:04 PM on 08/04/2010
They source this for Fars news agency. Here is everything at Fars news with anything with 300 in it since July 1.

http://english.farsnews.com/rslt.php?txt=300&asdate=07%2F01%2F2010&todate=08%2F05%2F2010&aor=sh&area%5B%5D=Title&nr=14&srv%5B%5D=0
10:49 PM on 08/04/2010
Western media are repeating Israel like parrots and do not check other sources.

If Israel newspaper reports Fars news as the source, the western media repeating the Israel source without checking the main source in this case Fars news.

Sometimes it is comical like this case when there were no stories in Fars news about S-300 missile defense system and nobody check the obvious lie from Israelis source.

I think ALI AKBAR DAREINI read the story in Israelis websites like this:
http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=183608
and repeated it without checking the facts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
08:47 PM on 08/04/2010
Four decoys will take care of the four S300 PT missiles.

Not a significant development.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:54 PM on 08/04/2010
Each air defence system has 4 launchers and each launcher has 4 missiles. Also, planes don't carry decoys, they have chaff and flares.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackbutler5555
11:57 PM on 08/04/2010
Are you saying, then, that incoming planes would have to deal with the missiles? And that reason they would is they don't carry decoys. Do you also think decoys could not be deployed in any other manner than by the planes themselves? We won't be sending some old missile hardware to use them up, for instance?
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
08:21 PM on 08/04/2010
we are completely peaceful. oh, and by the way, we just bought some surface to air missiles, but really, we're just a peaceful nation.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
writerjohnny
10:00 PM on 08/04/2010
Yep they are really dangerous. Nothing like the tens of thousands of Soviet intercontinental ballistic missiles with MIRV capability aimed at the US for 30 years. Are you afraid of your shadow?
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
02:33 PM on 08/05/2010
the russians have not openly called for another country to be wiped off the map. the russians have not been funding and arming groups like hezbollah and hamas. the russians are equally deterred by complete annihilation as we are. the russians don't believe in martyrdom.

the fact that hardly any blood has been shed in the "war" between america and russia does make me fear the ICBM's a little bit less than the jihadis who daily kill hundreds of their own people and seek to bring the "great satan" to its knees. the russians can be negotiated with, the mullahs and ayatollahs cannot precisely because of their religious zealotry.
10:13 PM on 08/04/2010
S-300 is a purely defensive weapon, as all surface to air missiles are. They shoot down attacking planes or attacking missiles, which by nature are offensive. How can it be considered threat? In any case this whole story seems bogus as who they source it to doesn't seem to have anything about it.
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
02:29 PM on 08/05/2010
why were putin and the russians up in arms about the missile defense system poland and the czechs asked the US to install in their countries?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:41 PM on 08/04/2010
I just spent half an hour searching Iranian news sources, and there is no mention of this.

There is no Fars news, Mehr news, or even a Press TV article on this. The only mention of it is from YnetNews and Haaretz.
06:54 PM on 08/04/2010
Western medias have this very bad habit of repeating Israelis sources without checking Iranian sources to see if the story is new/true or just part of demonizing Iran.

The story started here.

http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=183608

And then it was repeated by AP parrot and the rest of the parrots followed.

Iran has announced that she has manufactured a home made version of S-300 long time ago and even paraded with it in spring 2010.

http://www.iranmilitaryforum.net/index.php?topic=3431.0
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
01:58 AM on 08/05/2010
AP=associated propaganda
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
08:55 PM on 08/04/2010
Same here. The story is bogus. What is frightening is to see how the media echo chamber has picked up this bogus story and how it has multiplied over the web.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:50 PM on 08/04/2010
As a country, I ran has a right to be able to defend herself. I think they only need about 300 people and the S300s to win.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nrglaw
08:37 PM on 08/04/2010
Defend herself from what? But for a loudly advertised war footing on the part of the Iranians, no one would bother them.
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
09:36 PM on 08/04/2010
Are you being disingenuous, or do you have cognitive difficulties?
03:09 PM on 08/04/2010
The fact is that Iran is prepared and ready to confront the US/Israeli attacks. Also, Russia and China will not allow Iran to become the US satellite again.

Therfore, I do not think that the US/Israel will attack Iran because their casualities will be very heavy.
03:26 PM on 08/04/2010
MIC does not care about US causalities or cost to US tax payers.

MIC wants more power and money for a few elite corpocrats to make a shadow goverment that controls the world.

MIC is already controlling EU, former soviet satellite countries in east Europe and of course US.

A few countries like Brazil, Iran, China, Venezuela, Syria resisting the world take over by new MIC fascism.
04:33 PM on 08/04/2010
I am comfortable with Iran being able to defend herself. I think every country should... (and that DOES include Israel too, right?). However, I'm having a hard time getting past the "heavy casualties" comment....LOL. But whatever blows your skirt. :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nrglaw
08:38 PM on 08/04/2010
Unusual to post an LOL at your own comment. Just saying.