iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

BP: 'Static Kill' Finishing Up As Cement Is Pumped Into Well

First Posted: 08/05/10 12:24 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:15 PM ET

Gulf Oil Spill

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — BP pumped cement into its blown-out oil well in the Gulf of Mexico on Thursday, hoping to start sealing it for good a day after it forced a slow torrent of heavy mud down the broken wellhead and pushed the crude back to its underground source.

This next step in the so-called "static kill" was another bright spot as the tide appeared to be turning in the months-long battle to contain the oil, with a federal report this week indicating that only about a quarter of the spilled crude remains in the Gulf and is degrading quickly.

Even so, Joey Yerkes, a 43-year-old fisherman in Destin, Fla., said he and other boaters, swimmers and scuba divers continue to find oil and tar balls in areas that have been declared clear.

"The end to the leak is good news, but the damage has been done," Yerkes said.

It could take hours to pump enough fresh cement to fill the well and hours more for it to dry, engineers said. But BP said it decided to begin after testing concluded that it would not do more damage to the ruptured well.

If the mud plug in the blown-out well is successfully augmented with the cement, the next step involves an 18,000-foot relief well that intersects with the old well just above the vast undersea reservoir that had been losing oil freely since the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded off Louisiana on April 20, killing 11 workers.

The hope has been to pump mud and possibly cement down the relief well after its completion later this month, supplementing the work in this week's so-called "static kill" and stopping up the blown-out well from the bottom.

Despite the progress on the static kill, BP executives and federal officials won't declare the threat dashed until they use the relief well – though lately they haven't been able to publicly agree on its role.

Federal officials including spill response commander Thad Allen, a retired Coast Guard admiral have insisted that crews will shove mud and cement through the 18,000-foot relief well, which should be completed within weeks. Crews can't be sure the area between the inner piping and outer casing has been plugged until the relief well is complete, he said.

But for reasons unclear, BP officials have in recent days refused to commit to pumping cement down the relief well, saying only that it will be used in some fashion. BP officials have not elaborated on other options, but those could include using the well simply to test whether the reservoir is plugged.

"We have always said that we will move forward with the relief well. That will be the ultimate solution," BP Senior Vice President Kent Wells said Wednesday afternoon. "We need to take each step at a time. Clearly we need to pump cement. If we do it from the top, we might alter what we do with the relief well, but the relief well is still a part of the solution. The ultimate objective is getting this well permanently sealed."

The game of semantics has gone back and forth this week, with neither yielding.

Allen clearly said Tuesday that to be safe, the gusher will have to be plugged up from two directions, with the relief well being used for the so-called "bottom kill."

"There should be no ambiguity about that," he said then. "I'm the national incident commander and this is how this will be handled."

The apparent success of the static kill had some along the Gulf curious about why BP waited so long to try it.

"I'm wondering, as smart as the people in the U.S. government are, they couldn't have done this sooner?" asked 78-year-old Willie Jones, a retiree from Baton Rouge, La., who sat in the shade in Pensacola Beach, Fla., while his wife and granddaughter ventured onto the white – and oil-free – sand.

Whether the well is considered sealed yet or not, there's still oil in the Gulf or on its shores – nearly 53 million gallons of it, according to the report released Wednesday by the Interior Department and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. That's still nearly five times the size of the Exxon Valdez spill, which wreaked environmental havoc in Alaska in 1989.

But almost three-quarters of the nearly 207 million gallons of oil that leaked overall has been collected at the well by a temporary containment cap, been cleaned up or chemically dispersed, or naturally deteriorated, evaporated or dissolved, the report said.

The remaining oil, much of it below the surface, remains a threat to sea life and Gulf Coast marshes, NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco said. But the spill no longer threatens the Florida Keys or the East Coast, the report said.

President Barack Obama, while noting that people's lives "have been turned upside down," declared that the operation was "finally close to coming to an end."

An experimental cap has stopped the oil from flowing for the past three weeks, but it was not a permanent solution.

The static kill – also known as bullheading – probably would not have worked without that cap in place. It involves slowly pumping the mud and now the cement from a ship down lines running to the top of the ruptured well a mile below. A similar effort failed in May when the mud couldn't overcome the flow of oil.

___

Contributing to this report were Associated Press writers Jennifer Kay in Pensacola Beach, Fla., Mary Foster in Grand Isle, Tamara Lush in Tampa, Fla., Annie Greenberg in Miami, and Jay Reeves in Birmingham, Ala.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — BP pumped cement into its blown-out oil well in the Gulf of Mexico on Thursday, hoping to start sealing it for good a day after it forced a slow torrent of heavy mud down the ...
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — BP pumped cement into its blown-out oil well in the Gulf of Mexico on Thursday, hoping to start sealing it for good a day after it forced a slow torrent of heavy mud down the ...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
08:41 AM on 08/07/2010
Hi QuidamHP
Well I think those bio-scientists were depressed from having there funding cut that. Some put their cars in drive and put the nooses around their necks got dragged to death in their driveways because of budget cuts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
03:46 PM on 08/06/2010
QuidamHP
I forgot they are playing the two well trick!
http://jailthebanksters.blogspot.com/2010/08/red-alert-other-well.html
10:08 PM on 08/06/2010
And Obama was born in Kenya, NASA didn't go to the moon and homeopathy works but it being suppressed by big Pharma
08:59 AM on 08/06/2010
Thank gosh everything's O.K. now. I was worried there for a second! Hey! Did you guys see Dr. Phil's house in Beverly Hills? It looks just like Mel's house in Malibu! Is anyone looking in to this?
02:25 AM on 08/06/2010
This is really just the beginning.

The mess is huge and far-reaching, and BP – Transocean and their collaborators should be prosecuted so something like this is less likely to happen again.

Evidence of long term damage from the oil spill:

Scientists Deeply Concerned About BP Disaster's Long-Term Impact: http://www.truth-out.org/scientists-deeply-concerned-about-bp-disasters-long-term-impact61946

The article starts out: “Contrary to recent media reports of a quick recovery in the Gulf of Mexico, scientists and biologists are "deeply concerned" about impacts that will likely span "several decades".

Environmental and Health Impacts of the BP Gulf Oil Spill By Dr. Tom Termotto: http://oilspillsolutionsnow.org/?page_id=176

Scientists Find Evidence That Oil And Dispersant Mix Is Making Its Way Into The Food chain: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/29/scientists-find-evidence_n_664298.html

Prof: Gulf chemicals very concerning: http://www.wpri.com/dpp/news/us_news/professor-says-gulf-chemicals-will-have-long-term-effects

This informative report, "Gulf Oil Spill Health Hazards", describes the toxicity of chemicals in crude oil and in the dispersants currently being used in the Gulf area. http://www.sciencecorps.org/crudeoilhazards.htm
08:32 PM on 08/05/2010
The worst case scenarios didn't occur. The best news possible began with the capping of the well. The dispersant use involved mitigation of a small percentage of the crude. The natural processes of sunlight degradation and microbial remediation strongly mitigated the crude. The wetlands and marshes weren't impacted as severely as feared by many, although any damage is significant. The oil didn't keep spewing until the well was depleted. The cap held and didn't leak in any significant way. Fish fled from the oil. The bird deaths were minimal relatively speaking. etc....The spill is and will have a lasting legacy for the Coast. The environmental damage will take perhaps decades to resolve. Any loss of wetlands and birdlife is significant and unacceptable. But the worst case scenarios of fevered and fearful imagination didn't materialize thankfully. Now it is time to charge BP with criminal negligence. Now it is time to throw BP out of American territorial waters. Now is the time to continue proactive mitigation efforts in all possible manner. Now is also the time to take account of the efforts of the Coast Guard and the Presidential Advisory Panel as well as all the folks skimming and burning and vacuuming and removing tar balls and cleaning sand and separating oil from water and doing all the remediation activities. Now is perhaps also the time to say "Job Well Done."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
AllenD
8 years of Obama, deal with it!
10:02 PM on 08/05/2010
Now we need a nice large slow moving wet Cat 1 hurricane to move over the area to weather the remaining oil and help clean out the wetlands by weathering the oil and bringing in water to flush those areas out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mundane Egg
Decency is the new black.
04:00 PM on 08/05/2010
This is like an alcoholic sobering up and saying ,"I stopped drinking...everything's all better."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
03:22 PM on 08/05/2010
Since too many engineering people have been messaging me thus iz what it izz;

Static kill is like BP throwing 2 dozen hot dogs down a hall way.
I pray it works.
If it dose not this geography might give you few places too look for leaks.

http://phoenixrisingfromthegulf.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/an-autopsy-of-the-bp-gulf-oil-well-at-the-macondo-prospect/
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
02:03 PM on 08/05/2010
1. Seems as if every BOP should have a matching CAP that fits exactly over it and can close the well if the BOP fails (the BOP should not fail, and if challenged should be closed before it fails, not after). This CAP should be ON SITE for every well, period.

2. I don't want to hear that the relief wells will not be used. IF this VAST UNDERGROUND reservoir is as big as they say, the well must be closed permanently. IF they don't permanently KILL the well, I won't take off my "Boycott BP" sticker, hahaha. But seriously, if they don't completely kill this well, I will never, and you reader, should never, believe them again.

BZ.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:34 PM on 08/05/2010
The capping stack did not fit over the BOP. It was fitted over a new transition spool that was bolted on top the BOP and sealed by activating a special mechanism. Before it could be installed, a special flange overshot tool was used to remove the remnants of the LMRP. Had all this been onsite at the time of the explosion it would have been lost with the rig.

Once the well is sealed the blowout preventer will be recovered and investigators will be able to determine why it failed. BOPs are supposed to close before they fail but this one didn't and no one yet knows why.

The second relief well will most likely not be used because is a backup to be used if the first one fails. Admiral Allen has been as insistent as you that the first relief well MUST be completed at least into the annulus, the ring-shaped area of the well outside the casing. If, as seems to be the case from the rapid success of the static kill the well casing is intact, the cementing that is currently taking place will not put cement into the annulus, so the relief well will be used to fill the annulus with more cement. It most likely will not be necessary to drill into the original well casing. In allowing the cementing to proceed, Allen "made it clear that implementation of this procedure shall in no way delay the completion of the relief well."
09:40 PM on 08/05/2010
The static kill will be able to pump mud and cement anywhere the oil is coming from. Which includes the annulus where the original cementing job failed and allowed oil in.

I suspect the relief well is now uneccessary but it seems the administration will insist on it being completed. It won't do any harm but it's a stake through the heart of a decapitated body.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
11:16 PM on 08/05/2010
The answer is good equipment and keeping it in good working order and operating the well in a sane manner and following regs. ie good management.

None of the above applied to BP - and their BOP was additionally "modified" by outsiders for who knows what arsinine BP "better idea"...

You put the same DeepWater Horizon BP company man on another rig and you will have another blowout!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pending
10:23 PM on 08/05/2010
A mandatory relief well should be drilled when drilling a new well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
01:17 PM on 08/05/2010
53 million gallons of the of the nearly 207 million gallons of oil that leaked is unaccounted for and ready to damage the environment. Much of the oil that is accounted for is just dissolved, it isn't actually gone.

This is still a huge incentive to get off of oil as a fuel source.
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
02:05 PM on 08/05/2010
Oil spreads on a water surface to a thickness of one molecule. Given that there is 53 million gallons missing, how much area would that cover when the molecules finally rose out of solution in the plumes? ;0)

BZ.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
11:08 PM on 08/05/2010
Just guessing: Less evaporation of water... less rain over the globe on average?
03:27 PM on 08/06/2010
Actually, no it doesn't, that's the minimum possible thickness. And crude oil ( a complex mixture of hydrocarbons of differing fractions) less so. Look at any photo of the oil coming ashore - it's in clumps up to an inch thick.

The light fractions evaporate quickly in a day or so. Bacteria can munch on the heavier fractions leaving the asphaltenes as tar balls.

Without wanting to trivialize the spill, it's not a global event.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
04:07 PM on 08/05/2010
Hi playtoe
another figure thats understated all the time
http://www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/government-witness-over-42-million-gallons-of-dispersant-used-during-bp-oil-disaster
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
04:59 PM on 08/05/2010
Yes Boston, the dispersant did not disappear either. It is still there doing dirty things in the ocean.

(fanned 73)