iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Google's Net Neutrality Flip-Flop?

Huffington Post   First Posted: 08/05/10 01:09 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:15 PM ET

Google Net Neutrality

Google and Verizon are reportedly finalizing an agreement that could bury net neutrality.

Details are scarce, but according to the New York Times, the deal "could allow Verizon to speed some online content to Internet users more quickly if the content's creators are willing to pay for the privilege." Meanwhile, Bloomberg reports that the compromise between the two companies "would restrict Verizon from selectively slowing Internet content that travels over its wires, but wouldn’t apply such limits to Internet use on mobile phones."

Google has denied via Twitter that negotiations between the two companies are in the works, stating, "We've not had any convos with VZN about paying for carriage of our traffic. We remain committed to an open internet."

Although the deal is unconfirmed, Google's support for a plan that would overthrow net neutrality would run counter to the company's long-standing position on the issue. Google has been one of the most outspoken supporters of the Internet policy that would require service providers to treat all information passing over their networks equally.

For example:

  • In a January 24, 2010 blog post, Google explained its support for the FCC's efforts to "keep the internet open: "We've argued that the FCC should re-adopt rules to prevent network providers from discriminating against certain services, applications, or viewpoints on the Web, and requiring them to be transparent about how they manage their networks."
  • In 2006, Google CEO Eric Schmidt wrote "A Note to Google Users on Net Neutrality," urging users to contact the House of Representatives to ask them to vote down a bill that would "give the big phone and cable companies the power to pick and choose what you will be able to see and do on the Internet." "Today the Internet is an information highway where anybody - no matter how large or small, how traditional or unconventional - has equal access," Schmidt wrote in his blog post. "But the phone and cable monopolies, who control almost all Internet access, want the power to choose who gets access to high-speed lanes and whose content gets seen first and fastest. They want to build a two-tiered system and block the on-ramps for those who can't pay."
  • In 2005, Vint Cerf, the "Father of the Internet" and Google's "net neutrality guru" advised a House Committee on Energy and Commerce that "a lightweight but enforceable neutrality rule is needed to ensure that the Internet continues to thrive."

A Google/Verizon deal of the kind described by the New York Times would enact precisely the pay tiers that Schmidt fiercely fought in 2006. Jeff Jarvis calls Google's agreement a "devil's pact with Verizon for tiered internet service." Huffington Post blogger and Free Press president Josh Silver warns, "The deal marks the beginning of the end of the Internet as you know it."

This may in fact be just the latest crack in Google's support for net neutrality. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2008 that Google was approaching broadband providers in the hopes of creating a "fast lane for its own content."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Google and Verizon are reportedly finalizing an agreement that could bury net neutrality. Details are scarce, but according to the New York Times, the deal "could allow Verizon to speed some online...
Google and Verizon are reportedly finalizing an agreement that could bury net neutrality. Details are scarce, but according to the New York Times, the deal "could allow Verizon to speed some online...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:25 PM on 08/10/2010
It all comes down to power and money in the end. We should have known. I will quit
using Google for anything and Verizon is on my "Do not buy" list, which I know does not make impact on them, however, I know I am not helping them either. Wal-Mart is the other company on my list as being instrumental in the destruction of Democracy.

Why do two large corporation's power and money get to take away the rights of the American people. The air waves do not belong to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
twinite
10:31 AM on 08/10/2010
Bing......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
09:10 AM on 08/10/2010
details are scarce, but that doesn't stop the author from forming an opinion does it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
09:07 AM on 08/10/2010
another opportunity for baggers to blame the president.
08:56 AM on 08/10/2010
Consumers ultimately will drive business. They have the final choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
09:09 AM on 08/10/2010
yeah sure. like the way consumers cause companies to form corporations that curtail competition. way too simplistic and largely disproven - not that you'll ever acknowledge it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:03 AM on 08/10/2010
Google's power comes from us. Just switch to Yahoo.
07:03 AM on 08/10/2010
Unfortunately, Google and Verizon have enough cash to spread around to enough of the right politicians to get this done. Does the FCC have the guts to get in the way ? Forgetaboutit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
06:42 AM on 08/10/2010
Big corporations have rigged every other game and now they will rig the net in thier favor also!!
"Don't start the revolution without me"!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
06:12 AM on 08/10/2010
This is the (expetive deleted) face of (expetive deleted) greed. You dirty rotten no good (expetive deleted) (expetive deleted) (expetive deleted) (expetive deleted) (expetive deleted) (expetive deleted) (expetive deleted)
photo
Trapster
Veni, vidi, vomui
06:06 AM on 08/10/2010
HOW DO WE BUILD NEUTRAL NET?
COULD THE FOUNDER OF THE NET PLEASE LET USE KNOW HOW TH BUILD A PARALLEL NET?
photo
mariusvinchi
Saint Lucia is looking better and better every day
11:27 PM on 08/09/2010
Why are people surprised by this revelation? Google is a "publicly" traded company, not a "garage" enterprise. Wall Street demands ever increasing revenue and profit. Greed is now, and always has been the driving force. Google is no more "evil" than any other corporation, but they ARE beholden to the evils of the financial system. What this WILL do, is solidify the dominance of Google that will go unchallenged unless Congress and the broken (FCC) regulatory system step in.
That being said, the issue is quite complex and not nearly as clear cut as opponents will have you believe.
11:09 PM on 08/09/2010
The original concept behind the internet was for military purposes during the Cold War so communications could bypass bombed cities and be re-routed to other places in a complicated algorithm. The only hitch was the military AT THAT TIME needed the help of hippie techies, high hackers, amateur computer nerds and geniuses from MIT, UC Berkeley, etc. to set it up.

This is going to be a dirty fight. But it's a fight for our rights.
10:53 PM on 08/09/2010
If this move is the corporate beginning to the end of the free and equal internet, then all concerned libertarian hackers must prepare to do battle -- like the Minutemen rushing to Lexington, Concord and Bunker Hill to use whatever tactics and weapons are necessary to kill this concept in the bud.

Make no mistake. This will change the internet and our access to it in ways that an Orwellian would appreciate.
09:52 PM on 08/09/2010
Time to start using Alta Vista again or better yet, bing. Google sold out users so the users need to support some other platform. Try out cuil for a different approach.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bittancurt
Elderly crank.
12:07 AM on 08/10/2010
Easy to change Safari browser search pref to Bing. Google now more even evil than Microsoft.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgilley
Question Authority!
06:43 AM on 08/10/2010
That's a tight race.
08:51 PM on 08/09/2010
Did someone say B*I*N*G ??????????????
07:16 AM on 08/10/2010
Microsoft wouldn't do better if under the same circumstance