iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

CIA Whisked Detainees From Guantanamo Before Giving Access To Lawyers

MATT APUZZO and ADAM GOLDMAN   08/ 6/10 11:36 PM ET   AP

Guantanamo Cia
This Boeing 737, seen in Glasgow, Scotland on Sept. 7, 2003, has been identified by European investigators as a plane used for CIA rendition flights. Flight records and interviews with The Associated Press show the plane brought at least four high-value terrorists into Guantanamo Bay in 2003, years earlier than has been previously disclosed. The CIA whisked them back into secret overseas prisons before the Supreme Court could grant them access to lawyers. (AP Photo/Fred Seggie)

WASHINGTON — A white, unmarked Boeing 737 landed in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, before dawn on a CIA mission so secretive, many in the nation's war on terrorism were kept in the dark.

Four of the nation's most highly valued terrorist prisoners were aboard.

They arrived at Guantanamo on Sept. 24, 2003, years earlier than the U.S. has ever disclosed. Then, months later, they were just as quietly whisked away before the Supreme Court could give them access to lawyers.

The transfer allowed the U.S. to interrogate the detainees in CIA "black sites" for two more years without allowing them to speak with attorneys or human rights observers or challenge their detention in U.S. courts. Had they remained at the Guantanamo Bay prison for just three more months, they would have been afforded those rights.

"This was all just a shell game to hide detainees from the courts," said Jonathan Hafetz, a Seton Hall University law professor who has represented several detainees.

Removing them from Guantanamo Bay underscores how worried President George W. Bush's administration was that the Supreme Court might lift the veil of secrecy on the detention program. It also shows how insistent the Bush administration was that terrorists must be held outside the U.S. court system.

Years later, the program's legacy continues to complicate President Barack Obama's efforts to prosecute the terrorists behind the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The arrival and speedy departure from Guantanamo were pieced together by The Associated Press using flight records and interviews with current and former U.S. officials and others familiar with the CIA's detention program. All spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the program.

Top officials at the White House, Justice Department, Pentagon and CIA consulted on the prisoner transfer, officials said.

"The so-called black sites and enhanced interrogation methods, which were administered on the basis of guidance from the Department of Justice, are a thing of the past," CIA spokesman George Little said.

The American Civil Liberties Union renewed its call for a broad criminal investigation into the detention program Friday.

"Secret detention constitutes a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions, and the officials who authorized the CIA's secret prisons and torture program should be held accountable," Jameel Jaffer, the ACLU's deputy legal director said.

At least four admitted al-Qaida operatives, some of the CIA's biggest captures to date, were on the plane to Guantanamo: Abu Zubaydah, Abd al-Nashiri, Ramzi Binalshibh and Mustafa al-Hawsawi.

Binalshibh and al-Hawsawi helped plan the 9/11 attacks. Al-Nashiri was the mastermind of the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole. Zubaydah was an al-Qaida travel facilitator. They had spent months overseas enduring some of the harshest interrogation tactics in U.S. history.

By late summer 2003, the CIA believed the men had revealed their best secrets. The agency needed somewhere to hold them, but no longer needed to conduct prolonged interrogations.

The U.S. naval facility at Guantanamo Bay seemed a good fit. Bush had selected the first six people to face military tribunals there, and a federal appeals court unanimously ruled that detainees could not use U.S. courts to challenge their imprisonment.

And the CIA had just constructed a new facility, which would become known as Strawberry Fields, separate from the main prison at Guantanamo Bay.

The agency's overseas prison network, meanwhile, was in flux. A jail in Thailand known as Cat's Eye closed in December 2002, and in the fall of 2003 the CIA was preparing to shutter its facility in Poland and open a new one in Romania. Human rights investigators and journalists were asking questions. The CIA needed to reshuffle its prisoners.

The prisoner transfer flight, outlined in documents and interviews, visited five CIA prisons in Afghanistan, Poland, Romania, Morocco and Guantanamo Bay. The flight plan was so poorly thought out, some in the CIA derisively compared it to a five-card straight revealing the program to outsiders: Five stops, five secret facilities, all documented.

The flight logs were compiled by European authorities investigating the CIA program.

The flight started in Kabul, where the CIA picked up al-Hawsawi at the secret prison known as the Salt Pit. The Boeing 737 then flew to Szymany, Poland, where a CIA team picked up professed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and took him to Bucharest, Romania, to the new prison, code-named Britelite.

Next it was on to Rabat, Morocco, where the Moroccans ran an interrogation facility used by the CIA.

At 8:10 p.m. on Sept. 23, 2003, the Boeing 737 took off from a runway in Rabat. On board were al-Hawsawi, al-Nashiri, Zubaydah and Binalshibh. At 1 a.m. the following day, the plane touched down at Guantanamo.

The existence of a CIA prison at Guantanamo was reported in 2004, but it has always been unclear who was there. Unlike the overseas black sites, there was no waterboarding or other harsh interrogation tactics at Strawberry Fields, officials said. It was a holding facility, a place for some of the key figures in the 9/11 attacks to await trial.

Not long after they arrived, things began unraveling. In November, over the administration's objections, the Supreme Court agreed to consider whether Guantanamo Bay detainees could sue in U.S. courts.

The administration had worried for several years that this might happen. In 2001, Justice Department lawyers Patrick Philbin and John Yoo wrote a memo saying courts were unlikely to grant detainees such rights. But if it happened, they warned, prisoners could argue that the U.S. had mistreated them and that the military tribunal system was unlawful.

"There was obviously a fear that everything that had been done to them might come out," said al-Nashiri's lawyer, Nancy Hollander.

Worse for the CIA, if the Supreme Court granted detainees rights, the entire covert program was at risk. Zubaydah and al-Nashiri could tell their lawyers about being waterboarded in Thailand. Al-Nashiri might discuss having a drill and an unloaded gun put to his head at a CIA prison in Poland.

"Anything that could expose these detainees to individuals outside the government was a nonstarter," one U.S. official familiar with the program said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the government's legal analysis.

In early March 2004, as the legal documents piled up at the Supreme Court, the high court announced that oral arguments would be held in April. After that, a ruling could come at any time, and everyone at the island prison – secretly or not – would be covered.

On March 27, just as the sun was setting on Guantanamo, a Gulfstream IV jet left Cuba. The plane landed in Rabat the next morning. By the time the Supreme Court ruled June 28 that detainees should have access to U.S. courts, the CIA had once again scattered Zubaydah, al-Nashiri and the others throughout the black sites.

Two years later, after The Washington Post revealed the existence of the program, Bush emptied the prison network. Fourteen men, including the four who had been at Guantanamo Bay years earlier, were moved to the island prison. They have remained there ever since.

The four men who were making their second journey to Guantanamo Bay received what they nearly obtained years earlier, before they were spirited away.

"The International Committee of the Red Cross is being advised of their detention and will have the opportunity to meet with them," Bush said in a White House speech Sept. 6, 2006. "Those charged with crimes will be given access to attorneys who will help them prepare their defense, and they will be presumed innocent."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — A white, unmarked Boeing 737 landed in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, before dawn on a CIA mission so secretive, many in the nation's war on terrorism were kept in the dark. Four of the nat...
WASHINGTON — A white, unmarked Boeing 737 landed in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, before dawn on a CIA mission so secretive, many in the nation's war on terrorism were kept in the dark. Four of the nat...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 666
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
N8tracks
I'm a workaholic
06:16 PM on 08/07/2010
How is it a secret if you're reporting it?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ghee99
04:53 AM on 08/07/2010
guantanamo is still open?

i thought obama said he was going to close it as one of the first things he would do if he were elected

it cant be still open, if it were that would mean that he played the liberals forFools to get their votes

and there's NO WAY that could have happened

well, no worries...

at least he ended the wars, right?

because, i'm sure they definitely must be over, as he promised to bring the troops home, as the VERY FIRST thing he would do if elected

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjyOQyW5EPY
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
N8tracks
I'm a workaholic
06:18 PM on 08/07/2010
You're conveniently stupid.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ghee99
09:00 PM on 08/07/2010
i guess you didn't watch the video

......or perhaps you did (which would explain your anger)

i was mad when bush betrayed nearly all the truly conservative/small govt principles he ran on

so, i can understand how you feel, now that your candidate has played you for a fool as well
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenhamlett
10:33 PM on 08/06/2010
Since this Administration is a mirror of the Bush Administration when it comes to the wars, Guantanamo, limitless incarceration, etc., my guess is that the people on that plane were members of the bin Laden family, once again being reunited with loved ones at our expense. How sad is it that the story could actually be true? As a Democrat, can't we find someone to run the government honestly?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OkieIntellectual
So tired of all the irrational idiots in the world
11:01 PM on 08/06/2010
Hah, no such thing. Politicians get into the game for the power, not to help the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
N8tracks
I'm a workaholic
06:20 PM on 08/07/2010
Here's a thought, some people wanna blow up bombs in American cities. How would you approach it? I'm guessing with American casualties.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hedah
Live Better...Live Vegan.
03:25 PM on 08/06/2010
TRANSPARENCY ?! lol...lol.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
N8tracks
I'm a workaholic
06:22 PM on 08/07/2010
The lack on intellect this county shares is frightening. Transparency doesn't mean a weak national security. That means you don't get to know everything, nor should you know everything. Telling you is like texting the enemy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hedah
Live Better...Live Vegan.
07:29 PM on 08/07/2010
N8tracks, I suggest u change your Avatar, coz u got the face look of those terrorists ! UNBELIEVABLE !!!
03:22 PM on 08/06/2010
The CIA broke or attempted to operate beyond the scope of the law????!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
N8tracks
I'm a workaholic
06:22 PM on 08/07/2010
As if you know the law.
photo
GreatTruthsSeeker
Paying attention is both priceless & free
03:20 PM on 08/06/2010
Somerset Maugham, 1874-1965, said, "Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable."

The truths reflected in this article await their consequences. The cabal that condoned and hid torture will have an ineluctable meeting with justice. It’s just a matter of time.

If you are like me and don't like torture, you can take personal action against it.

Please read the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) at the Hague:

http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/EA9AEFF7-5752-4F84-BE94-0A655EB30E16/0/Rome_Statute_English.pdf

Article 7 defines crimes against humanity. Article 8 defines war crimes. Article 15 describes the process of prosecution.

You can contact the Prosecutor with evidence:
http://www.icc-cpi.int/Menus/ICC/Contact

Stories like this are great examples of evidence for the ICC.

And then, there is the War Crimes Act of 1996, signed by President Bill Clinton:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00002441----000-.html

Where is the outrage? Please take your keystrokes to places in addition to HP and make a difference. Feel free to share this post with your friends.

Peace from Austin
03:17 PM on 08/06/2010
Lots of stuff getting scrubbed by the robot moderator today. I'm outa here.
03:35 PM on 08/06/2010
Absolutely agree! Im going with ya.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Radarman
03:11 PM on 08/06/2010
So where are they now and why hasn't Obama taken steps to locate them and bring them back?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:04 PM on 08/06/2010
"Fourteen men, including the four who had been at Guantanamo Bay years earlier, were moved to the island prison. They have remained there ever since."

Obama promised to close Gitmo and put these people on trial, but then the right-wing made such a stink that no funding was allocated by congress and all the Democrats, including the White House, lost their nerve. It's really a shame.
02:44 PM on 08/06/2010
"The transfer allowed the U.S. to interrogate the detainees in CIA "black sites" for two more years without allowing them to speak with attorneys or human rights observers or challenge their detention in U.S. courts. Had they remained at the Guantanamo Bay prison for just three more months, they would have been afforded those rights."

Why?

Because they're patsies. You torture for capitulation, not information--and they've been concealed at great effort and expense so they can't challenge the fiction that has been imposed in the absence of actual facts.

After all, did we ever actually investigate 9/11?

No. $50 million was spent investigating the Challenger Shuttle disaster. About the same if not more was spent on Clinton/Lewinsky.

But they only spent $14 million on the 9/11 commission--reluctantly, since the Bush administration didn't want any investigation at all. (Less cash than Eddie Murphy gets to re-make a Jerry Lewis movie, folks.) And the 9/11 Commission did not even have subpoena power!

Are you getting the picture yet?

But we did get billions of dollars in invasions, occupations, and new toys and powers here at home: Top Secret Americas, y'all, classified beyond any oversight and big (brother) business for private companies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:09 PM on 08/06/2010
So saddening.

Long time fan, faving.
photo
GreatTruthsSeeker
Paying attention is both priceless & free
03:27 PM on 08/06/2010
Fanned for your precision in observing the obvious.
02:43 PM on 08/06/2010
Poor, poor terrorists. Somebody should give them a hug.
03:13 PM on 08/06/2010
And when the secret police someday snatch up someone you care about thru a mistake of some kind, and you can't find them nor even find out if they're still alive? What then?

We had a system. Now we don't, because of short-sighted people who put security ahead of freedom.

God forbid the secret police snatch YOU. Couldn't happen, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
unimatrix0
03:18 PM on 08/06/2010
If they were guilty, why not just put them on trial? If a foreign country invades the US, I would hope you would fight back. I would also hope you would not be deemed a terrorist because you defended your country. If an Iraqi makes plans to blow something up in the US, after we invade their homeland, are they really a terrorist, or are they a freedom fighter, against the country that invaded them. Iraq had no connection to 9/11 even Chenney admits it. They just bring the two subjects up at the same time so we think there is a connection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
10:06 PM on 08/06/2010
Terrorism is the new fashionable excuse to invade countries for mineral resources.
10:29 PM on 08/06/2010
Bush didn't care about justice. He was into blind revenge, ignoring the collateral damage.

That may make for a good movie, but if we are willing to be criminals in order to get criminals, who are the good guys?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mattwg440
02:37 PM on 08/06/2010
Let's abolish the CIA, they are an unamerican agency that undermines our principles on a daily basis.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:10 PM on 08/06/2010
You mean our shadow gov't?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnDewey
Knowing Doing Being
06:47 PM on 08/07/2010
Ooh, better be careful! That's the kind of talk that gets people disappeared & Presidents assassinated. Lucky for you the Dulles brothers are gone, but Zombie Kissinger still roams the earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GerryOregon
01:49 PM on 08/06/2010
Fas#cism is a step by step process. That is the way it occurred in the 1930's and that is the way it has been inching forward since Reagan. Under Bush the pace increased dramatically but unfortunately Obama and Eric holder don't have the guts to really challenge the downward slide.
02:45 PM on 08/06/2010
Yes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:11 PM on 08/06/2010
x2 from a fellow Oregonian.

Which beach is that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GerryOregon
04:42 PM on 08/06/2010
I believe it was close to Newport but it you know it could also be close to Yachats. Sorry I have spaced it out. Love the Oregon coast and total public commons access.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:22 PM on 08/06/2010
Obama and the DOJ are impaled on the horns of a dilemma

It's common knowledge that detainees at gitmo were tortured.
Under both US and international law torture is illegal.

In a trial, any evidence garnered by using torture
and any further discoveries it led to would be ruled as inadmissible. [Fruit of the poisoned tree]
Since that could arguably include everything 'confessed' by the accused
we would have no case for the prosecution and consequently
real terrorists would walk because we tortured them.
Not a good outcome for any politician.

The alternate course is to have no trial at all
or to have secret trials , neither of which would assure us
or the rest of the world that justice has been done,
and in that respect still undermine any credibility or moral authority
we still proclaim as "a nation of laws, not men".
Also a politically unsavory position to hold.

Either choice would be a political disaster for either political party.
It just so happens that it's Obamas' headache. Had McCain won, the difficulty would be exatly the same.

If the Bush league had shown respect for the wisdom of the soldiers
who had helped to create the Geneva conventions by abiding by them,
then we wouldn't be tangled in this unholy web.

Thanks george.
01:43 PM on 08/06/2010
Turn them loose then. Release them to thier home country and watch them. If they go into the same activities arrest them and bring them to trial!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:07 PM on 08/06/2010
You're not doing the domestic political calculation.
If either party did what you're suggesting,
they'd get hammered at the polls.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:10 PM on 08/06/2010
You're not doing the domestic political calculation.
If either party did what you're suggesting,
they'd get hammered at the polls.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:18 PM on 08/06/2010
@ TexanPO'd, the scripts would not allow a direct answer, but since you asked;

"Which country would you like to see us emulate?"

My first choice would have been our own ... in theory. The Constitution and the Declaration of Independence ROCKED when they weren't being used as toilet tissue.

My second choice would be Denmark. Yes, high taxes, but adequate representation leading to the world's most contented population. Denmark makes socialism look pretty good.
01:27 PM on 08/06/2010
agreed! 171
01:13 PM on 08/06/2010
I'm simply stunned that the CIA would do something like this. Like Daddy used to say, if you can't trust the CIA, who can you trust.