iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

US-Vietnam Nuke Deal Will Likely Allow Enrichment

FOSTER KLUG   08/ 7/10 05:29 PM ET   AP

Nuclear Weps

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has told U.S. lawmakers that a nuclear cooperation deal with Vietnam is unlikely to include a coveted promise by the Hanoi government not to enrich uranium, congressional aides say.

The United States had sought a no-enrichment pledge, which the State Department promotes as the "gold standard" for civilian nuclear cooperation accords.

It would have been modeled on a deal last year in which the United Arab Emirates pledged, in return for U.S. nuclear equipment and reactors, not to enrich uranium or extract plutonium from used reactor fuel – procedures that would provide material that could be used in a nuclear weapon.

The Obama administration has been eager to send a strong nonproliferation message, especially to Iran, which the United States and others accuse of covertly seeking nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes, but it has resisted international pressure to stop enriching uranium.

A UAE-style deal with Vietnam could have been used by the United States to push other countries for similar commitments not to enrich uranium or reprocess spent fuel. Many countries, however, balk at what they consider an infringement on sovereignty. Countries that have signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty have the right to enrich uranium for civilian use on their own soil under safeguards.

Two congressional aides familiar with the discussions said the Obama administration has concluded that it is unlikely to persuade Vietnam to agree to a UAE-style no-enrichment pledge. The aides spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the negotiations. Another congressional aide, briefed by the administration, said the talks with Vietnam are in their final stages.

The Vietnam development was reported first by The Wall Street Journal.

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley would not talk about specifics of the deal with Vietnam. He called the UAE nuclear accord the "gold standard" and noted that the UAE had decided "that it would forgo the right of enrichment that every country in the world has."

"We certainly want to see other countries make that same kind of decision," Crowley said.

Asked if the United States would agree to a deal that would allow Hanoi to keep its right to enrich, Crowley said: "If a country decides to pursue nuclear energy, and a country decides that it chooses to enrich on its own soil, then we would prospectively work with that country" to make sure its program would meet all international safeguards and work with the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Vuong Huu Tan, director of Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute, said that "Vietnam does not plan to enrich uranium, which is a very sensitive issue."

The United States and Vietnam signed an agreement in March meant to pave the way for U.S. companies to help build nuclear power plants. The countries are now negotiating a broader deal that would allow U.S. companies to enter Vietnam's nuclear power sector.

Vietnamese officials say they also have signed nuclear energy cooperation agreements with Russia, China, France, South Korea, India and Argentina.

Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center think tank and a former Pentagon official, urged the White House to "step back and ask, `Does it make sense to be peddling nuclear cooperation as a way to make and influence friends there?'"

"This deal gives double standards a bad name. They need to slow down," he said. "If you're going to do it, then don't lower your standards. What does that buy you? Nothing but trouble."

___

Associated Press writers Desmond Butler in Washington and Tran Van Minh in Hanoi contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has told U.S. lawmakers that a nuclear cooperation deal with Vietnam is unlikely to include a coveted promise by the Hanoi government not to enrich uranium,...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has told U.S. lawmakers that a nuclear cooperation deal with Vietnam is unlikely to include a coveted promise by the Hanoi government not to enrich uranium,...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:43 PM on 08/08/2010
58,000 dead Americans and now Vietnam is our best friend? Why can Vietnam enrich uranium and Iran cannot? Israel and Pakistan have nukes.

I'm a big Obama supporter and liberal Democrat. But things like this really annoy me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
02:37 AM on 08/14/2010
6,000,000 dead Vietnamese and they still talk to you. Who do you think is annoyed more?

Vuong Huu Tan, director of Vietnam Atomic Energy Institute, said that "Vietnam does not plan to enrich uranium, which is a very sensitive issue."

You left a few countries off of your '... have nukes' list, the complete list looks like this US, Russia, UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel. Countries with nuclear weapons sharing include: Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Turkey, Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mortgagechief
04:40 PM on 08/08/2010
If the US and other named countries are willing to make nuclear deals (with or without enrichment) with Vietnam, why aren't they willing to talk to the Taliban? After all Vietnam cost us more than Afghanistan ever will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
12:38 PM on 08/08/2010
its a slow day.......here is Lorrie Morgan......a Picture of me without you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26PX4y6Qy9Q&feature=related
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjconkster
Occupy the Voting Booth 2014
10:10 PM on 08/08/2010
Lorrie Morgan...one of my favorites...here's another one...and she's looking good in this one...

Lorrie Morgan-Something In Red

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pa8-r5xqY5s&feature=related
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:36 AM on 08/09/2010
mornin tj....yep, something in Red is my favorite as well, and yes she is very hot!
12:18 PM on 08/08/2010
Whatever it takes to agitate China to keep it from breaking free from the US sphere of domination.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
10:00 AM on 08/08/2010
...................................HERE IS THE DOUBLE STANDARD.................................
excerpt: Silence is often more eloquent than loud clamor, so let us attend to what is unspoken.

Amid the furor over Iranian duplicity, the IAEA passed a resolution calling on Israel to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and open its nuclear facilities to inspection.

The United States and Europe tried to block the IAEA resolution, but it passed anyway. The media virtually ignored the event.

The United States assured Israel that it would support Israel's rejection of the resolution -- reaffirming a secret understanding that has allowed Israel to maintain a nuclear arsenal closed to international inspections, according to officials familiar with the arrangements. Again, the media were silent.

Indian officials greeted U.N. Resolution 1887 by announcing that India "can now build nuclear weapons with the same destructive power as those in the arsenals of the world's major nuclear powers," the Financial Times reported.

India and Pakistan are expanding nuclear weapons programs. They have twice come dangerously close to nuclear war, and the problems that almost ignited this catastrophe are very much alive.

. before he was awarded the Nobel Prize for peace, the Pentagon announced it was accelerating delivery of non-nuclear weapons in the arsenal: 13-ton bombs for B-2 bombers,
http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20091105.htm
12:21 PM on 08/08/2010
Twice come close to nuclear war? India and Pakistan? You've mistaken saber rattling for war talk. Just because CNN says so, does not make it so.
photo
CigarGod
What is your process?
06:45 AM on 08/08/2010
I get it.....
If Iran lets USA companies build their power plants, then we won't demand they not enrich their uranium.
01:38 AM on 08/08/2010
obama is always willing to grovel in the face of our enemies. he is making a farce of our efforts to deny iran nuclear weapons.
photo
esseff44
mini-macro-bio
07:46 PM on 08/07/2010
There was a nuclear research facility in Dalat, Viet Nam. I toured in back in the early '70's while it was still in the hands of the Saigon Government. It was built by US as a gift to Ngo Dinh Diem before the CIA decided he had outlived his usefulness. Then, as Saigon fell, it took a heroic effort to try to make it not useful to the new Government of reunified Viet Nam that had just driven out the world's best armed and largest fighting force.

We really should be careful about who we sell nuclear power plants to. Is that all we have left t export besides weapons?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:38 PM on 08/07/2010
As we know, much of our CIA government takedowns come back to bite us later and the more weapons we put out there the more likely it becomes that some of those will comeback at us too. Of course you allready know that weapons are all we have to offer the world now. Good point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
06:31 PM on 08/07/2010
When you have no commercially viable deposits of raw uranium, or would face large costs imposed for political reasons if you were to develop a uranium refining industry, and can see that one will have sources for fuel even if one finds oneself on the wrong side, politically speaking, later on, it makes sense to agree not to develop the capability to refine oneself.

But if one has the raw material, and can see that one will be facing politically imposed costs either way, then standing by your rights to develop the ability to refine does make sense, and indeed is likely the best option.

Turning to nuclear energy without a domestic source for fuel puts one in the same position as those who are presently having to import oil, basically one is vulnerable to embargoes and price fluctuations that have nothing to do with the costs of production.

And that is why the UAE can agree to give up its right to enrich (if it finds itself out of favour with the US in the future, it will be able to turn to Russia or Iran for fuel, and maybe the Jordanians or Saudis) while Iran cannot (it would basically be forced to turn to Russia, and, as in the case of the nuclear generating station, Russia might use that as a bargaining chip with the US and Iran would be able to do nothing about it)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gingershot
One man, one vote, from the river to the sea
10:21 AM on 08/09/2010
I'm getting sick of the UAE - little pipsqueaks - nothing but mouthpieces for Israeli-US hegemony

They're traitors to their own people and hopefully their fatcat monarchs are overthrown soon -
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
akrishn3
05:14 PM on 08/07/2010
ooooooooooo, Barack and nukes....I love it.
Thanks Nobel prize committe!!!!
photo
cjohnathan
I speak only in hyperbolic statements...
05:12 PM on 08/07/2010
this is an effort to screw with China- the Chinese have purposely allowed the Pyongyang problem to fester because it weakens the US....I think this is a good move -Bejing won't like this at all....
08:33 PM on 08/07/2010
Yes, let's expand nuclear enrichment and proliferation to increase tensions between global powers.. god knows, they'll always be our pawns, everything will play out predictably, and there is no chance that a bigger pool of uranium enrichers will make it more likely for terrorists or unstable states to acquire atomic weapons...

all you need to blow up a major city, is a tennis ball-sized chunk of plutonium, and an artillery gun -- the U.S. sells them decommissioned for $10k... I wonder if you can find those for any cheaper, and not disabled, in say.. any former war torn country is South Asia. There probably aren't any apathetic underpaid or ex-military folks there, willing to trade old arms for a used car.
04:56 PM on 08/07/2010
In case someone hasn't post it yet, VIETNAM IS A COMMUNIST COUNTRY.
photo
cjohnathan
I speak only in hyperbolic statements...
05:08 PM on 08/07/2010
please....
04:22 AM on 08/09/2010
So?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidwayneosedach
03:57 PM on 08/07/2010
I can't imagine Vietnam having nuclear weapons.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
1088
03:47 PM on 08/07/2010
The President is going to ravish Michelle when she comes home! I love my President!!
03:44 PM on 08/07/2010
Iran should have nuke to counterbalance the Zios who have them but for some reason won't allow inspections and are NOT in the NPPT./
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce
Atheistic-agnostic Canadian polymath
06:34 PM on 08/07/2010
But, despite the prohibitions the NPT places on such, able to access dual-use and even exclusive-use technologies and devices from certain NPT members.
08:37 PM on 08/07/2010
No thanks. The Middle East doesn't need an arms race.

The whole world needs to speed up the decline of nuclear weapons proliferation, and Israel and the Middle East need to grow up and stop basking in their shared misery.