iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WikiLeaks Interview: 'We Will Keep Publishing Documents'

08/ 7/10 10:44 PM ET   AP

Julian Assange

BERLIN — The online whistle-blower WikiLeaks said it will continue to publish more secret files from governments around the world despite U.S. demands to cancel plans to release classified military documents.

"I can assure you that we will keep publishing documents – that's what we do," a WikiLeaks spokesman, who says he goes by the name Daniel Schmitt in order to protect his identity, told The Associated Press in an interview Saturday.

Schmitt said he could not comment on any specific documents but asserted that the publication of classified documents about the Afghanistan war directly contributed to the public's understanding of the conflict.

"Knowledge about ongoing issues like the war in Afghanistan is the only way to help create something like safety," Schmitt said. "Hopefully with this understanding, public scrutiny will then influence governments to develop better politics."

He rejected allegations that the group's publication of leaked U.S. government documents was a threat to America's national security or put lives at risk.

"For this reason, we conveyed a request to the White House prior to the publication, asking that the International Security Assistance Force provide us with reviewers," Schmitt said. "That request remains open. However, the Pentagon has stated that it is not interested in 'harm minimization' and has not contacted us, directly, or indirectly to discuss this offer."

The NATO-led ISAF security force is mostly deployed in Afghanistan's less volatile north.

The Pentagon has maintained that the Defense Department had no direct contact with WikiLeaks about possible efforts to redact those documents to make them less of a security threat.

White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said late last month that it was "absolutely, unequivocally not true" that WikiLeaks had offered to let U.S. government officials go through the documents to make sure no innocent people were identified.

The Pentagon demanded on Thursday that WikiLeaks cancel any plan to publish more classified military documents and pull back tens of thousands of secret Afghan war logs already posted on the Internet.

The demand to stop publishing more classified documents, which the Pentagon has no independent power to enforce, is primarily aimed at preventing release of approximately 15,000 secret documents that the website WikiLeaks has said it is holding and possibly classified U.S. State Department cables.

The Pentagon also hopes to stop WikiLeaks from making public the contents of a mammoth encrypted file recently added to the site. Contents of that file remain a mystery and Schmitt did not want to comment specifically on the content of a file the group posted online with the label "Insurance" in recent days.

He only said that "we regularly distribute backups of documents that have not been published ... This one has just been placed on a very popular site right now to make sure that it has been distributed as widely as possible."

Schmitt said that the group is committed to the security concerns of the world's entire population – which may in some cases be opposed to the United States' national interests.

"WikiLeaks is a globally acting organization," he said. "In that respect we are responsible toward the people of the world and not the people or the specific interests of one particular nation."

WikiLeaks posted more than 76,900 classified military and other documents, mostly raw intelligence reports from Afghanistan, on its website July 25. The 15,000 additional documents are apparently related to that material.

The documents leaked so far illustrate the frustration of U.S. forces in fighting the protracted Afghan conflict and revived debate over the war's uncertain progress. The White House angrily denounced the leaks, saying they put the lives of Afghan informants and U.S. troops at risk.

An Army private, Bradley Manning, is jailed on suspicion of leaking classified material to WikiLeaks in a previous case. He is a "person of interest" in the latest release, the Pentagon has said.

Schmitt said that he, editor-in-chief Julian Assange and three more people work full-time for WikiLeaks, and between 800 and 1,000 volunteerwith tasks like verifying documents, programming software or legal defense.

The group publishes their material out of "three to four dozen countries" and has had numerous attacks on its website, he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
BERLIN — The online whistle-blower WikiLeaks said it will continue to publish more secret files from governments around the world despite U.S. demands to cancel plans to release classified milit...
BERLIN — The online whistle-blower WikiLeaks said it will continue to publish more secret files from governments around the world despite U.S. demands to cancel plans to release classified milit...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,583
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (109 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
treasure hunter.
09:21 PM on 08/11/2010
We may as well bring everyone home, we have no intention of Removing taliban from villages, or anything else, We are just standing targets, A nation who cant deal with it own traitors has no place on a battle feild.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
treasure hunter.
09:19 PM on 08/11/2010
Where is our justice system, where is our national pride, This guy needs to go to prison, NOW!!, But Instead is running around playing smart a## with the government. Lock this fool up, and forget about him, then go after his network.
09:36 AM on 08/10/2010
If this guy is as good as he appears to be, he has way too much power. A person who knows govt secrets is a guy who can blackmail governments. Despite the self-serving reasons for some info being classified, there are *some* data that need to be kept secret (names and locations of local informants, locations, numbers and vulnerabilities of specific military personnel, YOUR social security number).

His comments indicate he wants to influence world affairs according to his self-righteous standpoint from his unelected perch. (he has said he is not interested in US interests) His views may *seem* standardly 'liberal' at the moment, but what if he has some weird ax to grind? - like a city in the US needs to have its subways bombed to make us less arrogant, or the Tutsis in Rwanda are still over-represented and need to be taken down to stabilize that part of Africa.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
freelancerighter
writer
07:05 PM on 08/09/2010
This entire thread must be enormously encouraging to the terrorists. Yes, in some parts of the middle east, English is taught at the same time as the native language.

It's good to think that a copy of it could be available after the next terrorist strike. That way when we ask ourselves why this keeps happening, we can be happy in knowing how much we contributed by not even knowing who the bad guys are - and in accusing our own soldiers of being war criminals for attempting to help Afghanistan deal with the terrorist overrun.

Liberals, my eye. Pacifists that believe in letting evil take over is what I see.
12:51 PM on 08/09/2010
The news corporations within the USA all but totallly ignore all of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maxwelldog
even if i don't go anywhere, I'll still be late.
10:45 AM on 08/09/2010
Well, hiding in a mountain region is one thing. My instincts say something else is afoot, because "hiding" in the open is a sure way to get a close up view of a strike force.
photo
woodshoe
MAYDAY! BastaYA!
08:41 AM on 08/09/2010
the JUICE!
..seconded..(and fyi viewer.. check out his rap battle news (w/ lord mockton vs. al gore (neither 'wins'))
photo
woodshoe
MAYDAY! BastaYA!
08:45 AM on 08/09/2010
lol.. and the inclusion of 'terrence moonseed' is a nice detail.. i think i have seen a few posts from terrence here and there.
01:28 PM on 08/09/2010
I think I've seen a few posts from him on this site, actually ;)
The al gore vid is a classic, well worth checking if anyone hasn't seen it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hassan shoja
05:32 AM on 08/09/2010
He should have won the Nobel Peace Prize, not Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hassan shoja
05:20 AM on 08/09/2010
He should win Nobel Peace Prize instead of Obama.
01:23 PM on 08/09/2010
They gave it to him in the hope he would find the courage to reign in
the military and end the wars.
In his horrific acceptance speech, he stunned the world saying
he has no intention to do that. It is our goal to bring peace through murder
of any percieved threat no matter how remote.
His presented a vision of endless war with the US as the dominant power.
With God on our side we can do no wrong no matter who we kill.
OH to say he didn't deserve it ?
They should be demanding it back !!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mervr1
People have the power over politicians!
08:14 PM on 08/08/2010
Schmitt said he could not comment on any specific documents but asserted that the publication of classified documents about the Afghanistan war directly contributed to the public's understanding of the conflict.

"Knowledge about ongoing issues like the war in Afghanistan is the only way to help create something like safety," Schmitt said. "Hopefully with this understanding, public scrutiny will then influence governments to develop better politics."

This is a video about the Wikileaks and IEDs against our troops in Afghanistan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4JV2Rf3L1Y
04:00 PM on 08/08/2010
Every time someone on this thread makes another garbage filled post on this wikileaks topic I'm going to donate another 10€ to Wikileaks. I've got a long way to go before I blow through my charitable contributions for the year, so make the choice easy for me and keep it up. http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Special:Support
04:45 PM on 08/08/2010
keep donating no one really cares about you or wikileaks.
photo
Rosewren
The power of kindness is infinite
06:40 PM on 08/08/2010
Speak for yourself, a$$w1pe
03:06 AM on 08/09/2010
Some elements of the US government obviously do care.
04:46 PM on 08/08/2010
Funny how libs think they are more important then anyone else
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
InspiredByTruth
03:31 PM on 08/08/2010
Did you guys here? The government is "frustrated" some keeps exposing their coverups of civilian massacres in a clearly failed and reckless war with no purpose. Why are these guys (the perpetrators of these war crimes and coverups) not in prison right now?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
freelancerighter
writer
09:19 PM on 08/09/2010
You know that Al Queda and the Taliban wear no uniforms, right? That makes them civilians. As were the people that took out the trade towers.
mgpayne
Trying to make sense of it all
02:40 PM on 08/08/2010
Has this question been asked? Who does WikiLeaks work for? Is it another government or large company?

The guy in the picture looks sneaky to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ascoli
02:53 PM on 08/08/2010
Gee if he looks 'sneaky'............maybe he works for Cheney.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
InspiredByTruth
03:24 PM on 08/08/2010
Your post looks suspicious to me. Do you work for the pakistani ISI? Something kinda fishy....like the fish might have corexit in it so you don't know if you wanna take a bite...yeah..fishy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fishingriver
Citizen
01:18 PM on 08/08/2010
Q- Do you believe the government who have lied continuously to the American people about the Afghan war-or- do you believe wikileaks who has released documents that prove the US government is lying?

A- If the US government is telling the truth they can prove it by supplying reviewers for the next round. I assume from wikileaks contending that they requested the reviewers that this is an open invitation for US classified military document leaks.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
freelancerighter
writer
09:21 PM on 08/09/2010
How did the US government lie about the war in Afghanistan? Be specific.
11:47 AM on 08/08/2010
Imagine a Wikileaks equivalent for individuals, for instance, each individual posting here. One might wonder if all this praise for Wikileaks would be quite so dominant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fishingriver
Citizen
02:02 PM on 08/08/2010
If we were on the governments payroll and if we were created for the sole purpose of serving government and this included an expected transparency from us...I wouldn't have a problem with it. But we weren't created to serve government...they were created to serve us.
08:38 PM on 08/08/2010
great post!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
InspiredByTruth
03:28 PM on 08/08/2010
Your post doesn't make sense. How is an independent investigative journalism site exposing government lies and coverups in any way compare to random posters on a political site...unless you're suggesting people here are all part of some vast conspiracy involving mass murder, opium trafficking and the plunder of tax payer wealth for independent contractors. . .
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
freelancerighter
writer
09:23 PM on 08/09/2010
I think Huff-Po needs to figure out some way of keeping people from admiring their own work.