iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mia Farrow Contradicts Naomi Campbell's Testimony About Diamond

TOBY STERLING   08/ 9/10 05:58 PM ET   AP

Mia Farrow

LEIDSCHENDAM, Netherlands — Naomi Campbell flirted with Liberia's former president across the dinner table at Nelson Mandela's presidential mansion in 1997 and boasted the following morning that Charles Taylor had given her a huge diamond during the night, Mia Farrow and another witness testified at Taylor's war crimes trial Monday.

Prosecutors hope testimony from the actress-turned-human rights activist and from Campbell's estranged former modeling agent will help tie Taylor to the illicit "blood diamond" trade that fueled Sierra Leone's civil war. Both contradicted Campbell's account from the witness stand last week that she did not know the nature or value of what she had received.

However, even if judges accept the women's testimony, it seems unlikely to change the course of the trial. Neither claimed to know for certain it was Taylor that gave Campbell the diamonds, meaning the episode will almost certainly be a surreal interlude of glamour in a grim case focused on murder and mutilation in the jungles of West Africa.

Taylor says he is innocent of 11 war-crimes charges linked to allegations he supported rebels during Sierra Leone's vicious 11-year civil war, which ended in 2002 with an estimated 100,000 dead.

He has dismissed suggestions he was involved in the diamond trade as "complete, complete nonsense."

Farrow, however, recounted what she called the "unforgettable" memory of an excited Campbell coming down for breakfast the morning after Mandela's dinner party, so excited she could hardly sit.

"She said 'Oh my God, last night I was awakened by men knocking at the door and it was men sent by Charles Taylor and he sent me a huge diamond'," Farrow said.

Campbell, who resisted appearing before the war-crimes court for months, testified under subpoena Thursday that she was given several small "dirty-looking" stones by men she didn't know after the function in Pretoria.

The British model said she hadn't known they were diamonds, nor who had sent them, and said Farrow was the one who suggested the gift was from Taylor.

Defense lawyers accused the prosecution of calling the unlikely witnesses as a publicity stunt to raise the profile of the trial, which has gone on for more than two years. Taylor himself was on the stand for seven months, portraying himself as an African liberator and statesman who sought to bring stability and peace to his turbulent corner of the continent.

Taylor's chief counsel, Courtenay Griffiths, said Farrow was unlikely to accurately remember what happened at a breakfast 13 years ago. He noted that Campbell received three uncut diamonds – not the single diamond Farrow insisted she heard Campbell talk about.

The defense also suggested Farrow's credibility was tainted by her activism, particularly her campaigns for the victims of Africa's wars.

Farrow, 65, conceded she had never seen the diamond or diamonds herself, and that Campbell might not have used the word "huge." But she insisted remembering Campbell only mentioned a single diamond.

South African businessman Jeremy Ractliffe, the former head of the Nelson Mandela Children's Fund, confirmed last week he had three stones he had received from Campbell to donate to charity after the 1997 dinner. He said he hadn't done anything with them because he feared that a blood diamond scandal might attach to Mandela or Campbell as a result. He has now handed them over to South African authorities and they have been identified as uncut diamonds, but their origins are unknown.

In court, Judge Julia Sebutinde asked Farrow whether it was possible she might have seen the 2006 movie "Blood Diamond" and been influenced by its plot, which centers on a single large diamond.

But Farrow denied any suggestion that she was confusing reality with Hollywood.

Agent Carole White, who fell out with Campbell several years ago, told the court that Taylor and her then-client enjoyed each other's company at the dinner table.

"I think she was flirting with him and he was flirting back," she said.

At one point during the meal, White said, Campbell leaned back to speak to her. She "was very excited and she told me he was going to give her some diamonds," White told the court.

She said Campbell later appeared disappointed when she saw the uncut diamonds and they were "not very impressive and not enormously big."

But under cross examination, Griffiths strongly challenged White's testimony.

"You have a very powerful motive for lying," he said, noting that White is suing Campbell for millions of dollars over an alleged breach of contract.

Campbell has served community service twice after pleading guilty in minor assault cases. A few of her former aides and maids have sued her, accusing her of violent outbursts and usually settling on undisclosed terms.

In all, 91 witnesses testified against Taylor before this week.

The court has heard evidence of radio dispatches between him and rebels, how weapons were allegedly smuggled in bags of rice in exchange for diamonds carried in a mayonnaise jar. The court has also heard from numerous victims and witnesses of atrocities. One of Taylor's former aides testified to witnessing Taylor eat a human liver.

His lawyers have dismissed such allegations as lies.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LEIDSCHENDAM, Netherlands — Naomi Campbell flirted with Liberia's former president across the dinner table at Nelson Mandela's presidential mansion in 1997 and boasted the following morning that...
LEIDSCHENDAM, Netherlands — Naomi Campbell flirted with Liberia's former president across the dinner table at Nelson Mandela's presidential mansion in 1997 and boasted the following morning that...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 344
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
03:17 PM on 08/10/2010
The easiest way to end this fiasco would be to ban the sale of diamonds period. Of course, lots of corporations benefit from diamonds - just look at apartheid South Africa - so I'm probably whistling Dixie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
01:10 PM on 08/10/2010
Ms Farrow:

You are a marked woman. Please beware of flying phones.

A concerned fan
photo
ladydragon
Never attribute to Malice that which can easily be
08:10 AM on 08/10/2010
Naomi Campbell is a liar. she wants us to believe that 2 armed coureriers hand delivered something to her door that was from Charles Taylor, the president of the country where diamonds are from and she didn't bother to see what was in the bag!! the article already said that he was smitten with her, she knew damn well that those little brown dirty rocks were raw diamonds, if she thought she could get away with keeping those illegal diamonds she would have. My question is, if this happened in 1997, why are we talking about this now; and where are the diamonds now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
disgusted.
09:23 AM on 08/10/2010
Because people were unaware of the scourge of blood diamonds in 1997, they weren't illegal in that sense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_diamond
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bandooluLiberal
04:50 PM on 08/10/2010
wow dont you read the article....the diamonds were handed over years ago and are in south africa..."South African businessman Jeremy Ractliffe, the former head of the Nelson Mandela Children's Fund, confirmed last week he had three stones he had received from Campbell to donate to charity after the 1997 dinner. He said he hadn't done anything with them because he feared that a blood diamond scandal might attach to Mandela or Campbell as a result. He has now handed them over to South African authorities and they have been identified as uncut diamonds, but their origins are unknown."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Welcome to Nepal - the birthplace of Buddha
06:41 AM on 08/10/2010
Case of big diamond. The case, therefore, could be complicated.
04:32 AM on 08/10/2010
Griffiths is a superb lawyer.


Farrow and White's testimony was very weak. Farrow appeared to have the memory span of a goldfish and White's answers are vague and the fact she's suing/being sued by Campbell is very suspicious.
photo
Sunflo
Leave a mark, not a stain.
07:00 AM on 08/10/2010
Yep.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alex8649
11:58 AM on 08/10/2010
Says you. Was any of that pointed out or introduced in any way by the defense team? The other suit you allude to, would have been introduced if they thought it wouldn't have been quickly excuded by the judge. Just a fact to consider. Aside from that, the defense team is what was very weak. Unless you think it's wonderful to defend a mass murderer. Meanwhile. Campbell should really speed dial to her own criminal law atty. in NYC and find out if the S.A. authorities can extradite her back to S.A. which seems an option now that her pal she gave the diamonds to is in the slammer. Where they doubtless both belong.
05:13 AM on 08/11/2010
***Says you. Was any of that pointed out or introduced in any way by the defense team? ***

Yes. Griffiths told White straight that he believed she was lying.

***The other suit you allude to, would have been introduced if they thought it wouldn't have been quickly excuded by the judge.***

The defence lawyer also clearly stated he believed White's testimony was intended to discredit Campbell for the lawsuit.

***Just a fact to consider. Aside from that, the defense team is what was very weak. Unless you think it's wonderful to defend a mass murderer***

Even an alleged mass murderer deserves a legal defence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Koulouris
03:59 AM on 08/10/2010
Hopefully, Naomi can soon put all this drama behind her; we’d hate to see girlfriend pitch another fit and end up picking up trash in an orange jumpsuit again. After all her highness has a lot more to worry about than war crimes, mass mutilation, smashed phones, missing royalties and ‘dirty pebbles’ showing up at the dead of night… Hopefully Mia Farrow and them other wenches will understand she has to tend to some real concerns – like sipping sweet nectar champagne in Sardinia amongst billionaire lovers and friends.

http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2010/08/mia-farrow-claims-that-naomi-campbell-had-knowledge-of-dictator-charles-taylors-blood-diamonds/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
disgusted.
09:32 AM on 08/10/2010
So? I'd sip "sweet nectar champagne in Sardinia amongst billionaire lovers and friends" if they invited me. (they don't)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lam56
Sic gloria transit Monday.
01:30 AM on 08/10/2010
It looks like diamonds are not this girl's best friend.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:25 AM on 08/10/2010
And meanwhile...in other news on international crimes...Oliver North has been pardoned and now is a regular guest on Fox...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:52 AM on 08/10/2010
They should investigate Pat Roberson and *His* involvement with the mining operations for bloοd diamonds.

"Did Robertson know about the diversion of the relief planes? According to pilots' records, he actually flew on one plane ferrying equipment to his mines."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/1999/may/23/columnists.observerbusiness1
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:20 AM on 08/10/2010
Agreed. Pat Robertson is up to his neck is corruption related to Liberia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godivademaus
05:39 AM on 08/10/2010
When you see the worm sign, run.
11:47 PM on 08/09/2010
The credibility of Anyone sleeping with woody Allen is questionable
12:36 AM on 08/10/2010
And how many old men has Naomi bedded in exchange for "gifts"? But that's not what at issue here... Mia has devoted most of her life to helping children, she left Woody after she discovered he was sleeping with his own adopted daughter. Mia has morals... Naomi? she has none.
photo
Sunflo
Leave a mark, not a stain.
07:00 AM on 08/10/2010
Oh come now. It's fine if you don't like Campbell but you've clearly and deliberately decided to overlook all the charity she's done over the years in your comparing her to Saint Mia.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:23 AM on 08/10/2010
Oh, Rudolph, Rudolph, Rudolph ... for someone whose shiny red nose lights up the sky, you sure don't see things clearly. Mia Farrow has not been with Woody Allen for over a decade. She has spent her life helping children all over the world. Naomi Campbell, on the other hand, has spent her life assaulting people all over the world.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:39 PM on 08/09/2010
What are the prosecutors thinking, getting Hollywood celebrities involved? These pampered creatures have only a passing connection with reality! They're just going to scatter pixie dust around until any connection with the real world floats away.
11:17 PM on 08/09/2010
oh mia vs naomi - who do you think they will choose to believe - anyway - Taylor's on trial ain't he -
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Frustrated in PA
I am not frustrated, I am NOW disgusted
11:05 PM on 08/09/2010
And the ironic twist in this truly ev il case....Campbell parties on a yacht with Leo DiCaprio.

DiCaprio who made THE movie on this atrocious subject and what men like Charles Taylor did to people while turning out child soldiers and raping both land resources and women.....BLOOD DIAMOND.

Is he that clueless??
04:29 AM on 08/10/2010
Of course not, he just doesn't care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
godivademaus
05:46 AM on 08/10/2010
Who "he?" I find it hard to believe the yacht was Taylor's... doubtful it was Naomi's. My money is it was someone's who is not mentioned, or it was Mr. Dicaprio's. When there's a party, a lot of people could be invited. Famous people. If Ms. Campbell was invited, I doubt her involvement or lack of it was a) the reason for the invite or b) any topic while she was there.

Lastly, one of the reasons blood diamonds are so insidious (aside from raping, murder, etc.) is that once cut, they are impossible to distinguish from other blood diamonds. So many of us could be wearing a blood diamond as jewelry without any idea.

So, again, what has this to do with anything?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Frustrated in PA
I am not frustrated, I am NOW disgusted
10:53 PM on 08/09/2010
I love that they are trying to portray Mia Farrow as some overzealous activist who would PERJURE herself for this case. Bottom line.....Mia Farrow has done more for Africa than Campbell and Taylor combined.

Naomi "I am inconvenienced by this case" Campbell has the credibility of a s l u g.

She parties with her billionaire boyfriend after getting on the stand to protect Taylor and her culpability.
12:13 AM on 08/10/2010
I saw part of her testimony and just thought she was a snooty, pathetic, bad liar.
"I've never even heard of Liberia". >.>
Supermodel that's been all of the world.
I'm just hoping that pics of her modeling in Liberia would turn up.
Well this is what happens when you put people on a pedestal.
10:39 PM on 08/09/2010
naomi campbell would never accept small, dirty stones, even if they were a gift
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amd02148
09:35 PM on 08/10/2010
so so right goody fanned