More

Afghanistan Civilian Casualties, Injuries Rising Sharply

First Posted: 08/10/10 06:57 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:20 PM ET

Afghanistan Civilian Casualties
A medic helps a boy at a hospital in Kandahar, south of Kabul, Afghanistan. Saturday July 24, 2010. The boy was one of seven children brought to the city's hospital after getting caught in crossfire Friday between NATO and Taliban forces in Sangin, a flash-point town in neighboring Helmand province. The NATO-led command it was aware of reports of civilian casualties in Sangin but said in a statement that it had "no operational reporting that correlates to this alleged incident." (AP Photo/Allaud

(AP) KABUL, Afghanistan - The number of civilians killed in the Afghan conflict in the first six months of the year rose 25 percent compared with the same period a year ago, with insurgents responsible for the spike, the United Nations said in a report Tuesday.

The report showed a reduction in civilian casualties from NATO action, but the overall rise in deaths indicated that the war is getting ever-more violent -- undermining the coalition's aim of improving security in the face of a virulent Taliban insurgency.

"The human cost of this conflict is unfortunately rising," said Staffan De Mistura, the top U.N. envoy in Afghanistan. "We are very concerned about the future because the human cost is being paid too heavily by civilians. This report is a wake-up call."

According to the U.N. report, 1,271 Afghans died and 1,997 were injured -- mostly from bombings -- in the first six months of the year. There were 1,013 civilian deaths in the first six months of 2009.

The U.N. said insurgents were responsible for 72 percent of the deaths -- up from 58 percent last year.

The spike in violence could still undermine NATO's effort in Afghanistan and increase public hostility to the U.S.-led mission, even though the U.N. blames the insurgents for most of the deaths.

In much of the south, people say they are too scared to work with NATO forces or the Afghan government because they will then be targeted by insurgents. And the risk of attack makes travel, running a business or any sort of community organizing or political campaigning dangerous.

The U.N. said insurgents were responsible for 72 percent of the deaths -- up from 58 percent last year.

As the U.N. released its report in Kabul, three civilians were killed when their car struck a roadside bomb just outside the eastern city of Ghazni, according to deputy provincial governor Kazim Allayar.

And an insurgent-planted bomb killed an Afghan civilian near southern Kandahar city on Monday, according to NATO forces.

De Mistura said militants were using larger and more sophisticated explosive devices throughout the nation.

"If they want to be part of a future Afghanistan, they cannot do so over the bodies of so many civilians," de Mistura said.

De Mistura said that does not dissuade the U.N. from seeking a negotiated peace between the government and the Taliban, but he called on insurgent groups to consider whether they are not hurting their own long-term goals.

"One day, when unavoidably there will be a discussion about the future of the country, will you want to come to that table with thousands of Afghans, civilians, killed along the road?"

Deaths from U.S., NATO and other pro-government forces dropped in the first six months of 2010. The report said that 223, or 18 percent, of the Afghan deaths were due to U.S., NATO and other pro-government forces. That was down from 310 deaths, or 31 percent, during the first six months of last year, primarily because of a decrease in air strikes, the report said.

Even so, air attacks were the largest single cause of civilian deaths caused by pro-government forces -- accounting for 31 percent.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the former NATO commander, introduced strict rules on air strikes and called on soldiers to assess the likelihood of civilian casualties before taking any action. His successor, Gen. David Petraeus, has continued the policy.

"Every Afghan death diminishes our cause," Petraeus said in a statement. He also noted that even the increase in insurgent-caused deaths can hurt NATO's effort.

"We know the measure by which our mission will be judged is protecting the population from harm by either side. We will redouble our efforts to prevent insurgents from harming their neighbors," Petraeus said.

Though bombs continued to be the largest killer, there was a large jump in deaths from assassinations, particularly in the last few months.

There were about four assassinations or executions of civilians a week in the first six months of 2009. That jumped to about seven per week in the first six months of this year, spiking in May and June to 18 per week.

"These figures show that the Taliban are resorting to desperate measures, increasingly executing and assassinating civilians, including teachers, doctors, civil servants and tribal elders," said Rachel Reid, Afghanistan researcher for Human Rights Watch. "Targeting civilians violates the laws of war."

The Taliban has called on its fighters to avoid civilian casualties, but the group pointedly excludes anyone allied with the government from this protection. So mayors, community elders taking foreign money for development projects and mullahs seen as supporting the government have all become targets.

Children have also increasingly become casualties of the war. The report says 176 children were killed and 389 others were wounded -- up 55 percent over the same six-month period last year.

Elsewhere in Afghanistan, seven Afghan policemen were killed Monday in attacks in southern Helmand province, police officials said.

In Laghman province in the east, seven Afghan soldiers have died and 14 have been wounded in ongoing fighting with insurgents on the outskirts of the provincial capital of Mehtar, said Gen. Mohammad Zahir Azimi, a spokesman for the Defense Ministry. He confirmed reports that up to 20 Afghan soldiers have gone missing in the province and are in the hands of the Taliban. Thirteen militants have been killed and seven Afghan army vehicles have been burned in the clashes aimed at clearing an area between Kabul and Jalalabad, he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

(AP) KABUL, Afghanistan - The number of civilians killed in the Afghan conflict in the first six months of the year rose 25 percent compared with the same period a year ago, with insurgents responsibl...
(AP) KABUL, Afghanistan - The number of civilians killed in the Afghan conflict in the first six months of the year rose 25 percent compared with the same period a year ago, with insurgents responsibl...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,187
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
captcct
05:45 PM on 08/15/2010
OOps, i made that sill mistake myself.... lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
captcct
05:44 PM on 08/15/2010
Before commeting.. learn how to use a keyboard.
05:30 AM on 08/11/2010
The smae thing is happening in Iraq with Jihadis killing civilians day in and day out.

Before we were there, Saddam murder about a million Iraqis, usually in gruesome ways.
10:55 PM on 08/10/2010
B@rrrrryyyyy, You got some splain'in to dooooo!!!!
05:31 AM on 08/11/2010
Can B@rrrrryyyyy explain what he means by "mdoerate Taliban" an why he wants them int he Afghan government?
08:42 PM on 08/10/2010
Well, what did we expect: the Taliban murder civilians as a matter of policy, NATO forces usually only by accident.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
NOTE: I advocate for anti-BSL...
08:20 PM on 08/10/2010
Blame it on the Tallyban...

We had nuttin to do with it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
07:45 PM on 08/10/2010
Right... the rise in the number of insurgents were responsible for the deaths, and the US military's killing of civilians was responsible for the rise in the number of insurgents.

Rethink Afghanistan. Stop funding supplemental war appropriations requests. Thank you, Congressman Doggett for voting NO on the last roll-call: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll474.xml
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
07:46 PM on 08/10/2010
oops... "...the number of insurgents WAS responsible..."
07:09 PM on 08/10/2010
There are too many people profiting from this war. like the company formerly known as blackwater that are giving money to the taliban as bribes for safe passage. If they do a good job they put themselves out of work. and the riches gasoline to throw in these war flames is innocent hats on the ground.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DougDeWitt
progressive social-capitalist
07:55 PM on 08/10/2010
"Meanwhile, the government pays private firms between $500 and $1,500 a day for the experienced military personnel they supply in Iraq."

Huck Gutman, (a Professor at the University of Vermont."

Well, I'm guessing those guys work 24/7 when they're on the job. And while I don't think anyone could do that every day for a year, the upper end of that range, projected over 365 days in a year, comes to... $547,500 annual income.

Wow. Times how many guys? No wonder it costs us $30 Billion a month...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ipanemagirl
progressive
11:47 AM on 08/11/2010
Doug, You just hit the nail on the head! That's why the GOP does not want to end the wars...the profiteers are gouging the military and making so much money off it....they dont want it to end, so they lobby our faithful slutty politicians to keep pretending its necessary and its "working" even though we see no progress!, In the meantime, the debt to our nation goes through the roof! Funny how the "conservatives" are only conservative when its something to reject that would help our people, the average american, the middle class and the poor...; .but wars are always welcome because they fill their pockets with lobbyists money! Keep bringing it on, they say! under the guise that they are "keeping us safe" bullcrap!
Another good reason we should get out of those countries and let them help themselves now....they dont want us there! And its not making us safer. we should not want to be there,wasting our money, and our lives either! Thanks for your comment!!!
05:00 PM on 08/10/2010
To anyone who thinks the understand what is happening in Afghanistan i suggest you read this:

http://www.durangoherald.com/sections/Opinion/2010/08/08/The_WikiLeak_papers_Much_ado_about_nothing_or_not_enough/

Rob Schultheis has been traveling to Afghan since before the Soviet invasion. He was one reporter who DID NOT ignore Afghanistan after the Soviets left.

I believe he even interviewed Massoud shortly before his assassination.

I will go with Rob on this.
04:34 PM on 08/10/2010
This is expected of the bad guys. They get a pass. The good guys have to fight with one hand behind the back and are brow beaten by world opinion for any misstep no matter the intent. This is the world people really want? Bad guys on top, good guys tangled in red tape? When the bad guys come for you you think their will be good guys left to save you? Not the way things are going..
photo
Halsey
"There is a price to pay for speaking the truth. T
01:02 PM on 08/11/2010
um..has the Taliban (which we funded and trained against the Soviets) landed here? Are they under my bed (like communists were under my parents' bed?). I'll borrow a line from the 60's,

Fighting for U.S. safety in Afghanistan is like f**king for virginity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michal Appleton
03:52 PM on 08/10/2010
And the world doesn't care. No one is inquiering, setting up UN meetings etc.
Everyone is appauled by Israel here, Israel there, the only country who realy fights terror!

And we would have never been so disrispectfull to our fead by building a mosque at ground zero.
04:43 PM on 08/10/2010
The mosque issue is a red herring. It's not "at" ground zero. It's blocks away. Built by the most moderate Muslims you could find and wish others would emulate. This country still has freedom of religion and property rights. What they are doing is legal. There are 911 survivors that are against it and those who are for it. All you hear about are those opposed to it. Why? This issue is being used by those who want to stir things up for their own gain. It's a distraction from the real issues and that is the point.
05:38 AM on 08/11/2010
Rauf is the most moderate Muslims you can find?

Unlike Rauf, my Lebanese Muslim doctor doesn't like Hamas, Hizbullah and the PLO.

As for "who is building the mosque" we don;t know. $100 million? Where does it come from?

We should build a synagoge on one side, a church on the other, each 1 story higher than the Mosque. After all, what better way could there be to show Rauf's tolerance?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia Clark Taylor
03:37 PM on 08/10/2010
Viet Nam ended and the Mid East heated up. Follow the guns, follow the money, follow the military construction dollars...into Riyadh and throughout the Mid East. Before one war slowed down, there were plans on the drawing board for another war. At the same time, the dumbing of America included lack of geography, geopolitics, foreign language and international studies taught to affluent Americans who would benefit financially from the information. Combine that with the heating up of "absurd Christianity, Islam, and other forms of strange religious attitudes from the same root" and you have the 21st century with Americans scratching their heads about the insanity of Iraq and Afghanistan.
05:43 AM on 08/11/2010
Vietnam ended in the 1970's. There was a war in the midaeast in 1967 followed by the war of Attrition along the Suez canal into 1970 (when Israel shot down russian pilot flying under Egyptian colors).

As for education, we ahve new coursed that didn't exist when I was in college (58-62). We didn't have Woman's Studies, Ecology, and a lot of strage curses that get defined as education today.
photo
Halsey
"There is a price to pay for speaking the truth. T
01:03 PM on 08/11/2010
faved! it IS always, to quote deepthroat, follow the money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AKL1985
Fueled by biscuits..
03:19 PM on 08/10/2010
Afghanistan is where empires go to die, so hopefully the US learns this lesson and leaves
04:45 PM on 08/10/2010
Like Vietnam? The military industrial complex makes sure those lessons don't get learned. It's bad business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AKL1985
Fueled by biscuits..
03:03 PM on 08/10/2010
It makes me sick when 1,271 civilians are killed due to this war in the first 6 months of the year, yet when around 10 western medics/missionaries die their is a huge outpouring of attention. The civilians have no media to showcase their daily horrors, no soap and clean water to polish themselves and kids up for the TV camera to seek your sympathy. No, I am not condoning their death, but the double standards are ridiculous. When Afghans die, it's just a number.
05:47 AM on 08/11/2010
AKL1985:

It bothers me, too. I don;t understand why the world isn't the least bit upset when Jihadis murder all those civilians, especiallywhen they are murdered by people who think they will get eternal rewards for the murders.

The Taliban murder epople for listening to music or growing flowers but the main stream media seems not to care enough about it to tell their audience. Nor do they talk about attempts to bring the Tlaiban into the governemnt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHarold
02:59 PM on 08/10/2010
I wonder how Obama would feel if that were his kids lying in the hospital bed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Suntio
Amat victoria curam.
03:13 PM on 08/10/2010
Did you even READ the article? It clearly states that the spike in civilian casualties is due to the Talban.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AKL1985
Fueled by biscuits..
03:18 PM on 08/10/2010
If the coalition wasn't in Afghanistan, then Taliban wouldn't have to engage in firefights! The US also carpet bombs whole villages and uses drones, yet it's all "the Taliban fault"
photo
Halsey
"There is a price to pay for speaking the truth. T
01:05 PM on 08/11/2010
And you believe it part and parcel?