More

Rob Sherman, Chicago-Area Atheist, Sues Illinois Over Grant For Cross

Bald Knob

JIM SUHR   08/12/10 04:52 PM ET   AP

ST. LOUIS — An atheist is suing to force the administrators of a towering cross in southern Illinois to return a $20,000 state grant toward its restoration, saying Thursday it was "blatantly unconstitutional" to spend taxpayer money on a Christian symbol.

Caretakers of the 11-story Bald Knob Cross of Peace near Alto Pass, Ill., some 130 miles southeast of St. Louis, insist the grant was legally awarded to the 50-year-old landmark in mid-2008 by classifying it as a tourist attraction, not a religious symbol.

Rob Sherman disagrees, pressing in his federal lawsuit in Springfield, Ill., that the grant violates the U.S. Constitution's establishment clause used to argue a separation of church and state.

"There has never been any question, outside of southern Illinois, that this state grant is blatantly unconstitutional," said Sherman, who successfully sued to have an Illinois law requiring a daily "moment of silence" in Illinois public schools overturned.

"The job of atheists is to take clergy to court to challenge the epidemic of civil wrongs that they have perpetrated, on the sneak, against the people of Illinois," Sherman said on his website. "It's a big job, but somebody's gotta do it."

In his lawsuit filed Thursday, Chicago-based Sherman asks a judge to compel the caretakers of the cash-strapped cross to return the money or face what he pledged would be a drawn-out, expensive legal tangle.

Steve McKeown, a pastor and administrator of the cross, said he was confident Sherman would not win. He said Bald Knob drew roughly 1,000 visitors last weekend, underscoring its sway as a tourist draw.

"What Mr. Sherman fails to recognize is there's a long-standing precedent for the fact the just because an organization may have a sectarian purpose, it does not exempt them automatically from receiving tax dollars," McKeown said.

"What Mr. Sherman wants is a United States that's free from religion," McKeown said. "Our founding fathers never meant that to be the case."

The lawsuit's defendants include Gov. Pat Quinn and his predecessor, Rod Blagojevich, who is awaiting the verdict ini his trial on federal corruption charges. Also cited are the current and previous heads of Illinois' Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, which awarded the grant to Friends of the Cross, the landmark's fundraising arm.

The cross – built in large measure with area farmers' profits from selling pigs – has been a fixture on the 1,025-foot-high Bald Knob Mountain for a half century, standing sentry over forests and much of the region's orchards and burgeoning wine country. Easter services have been held on the mountain since 1937.

Over the decades, the cross and its porcelain tiles fell into disrepair, prompting its caretakers' feverish bid to raise funds for the half-million-dollar restoration expected to be completed within months.

Sherman's lawsuit claims that under the state's 2008 contract with the cross' fundraising group, the portion of the restoration work to be covered by the grant was to be finished by last April. Sherman says that work continues.

According to the lawsuit, the rehabbing effort "has the primary effect of advancing a particular religious sect, namely Christianity," with taxpayer funding causing "an excessive entanglement between (the state) and the Christian religion."

Friends of the Cross has maintained the grant has been spent long ago, though Sherman counters that the $20,000 remains in a certificate of deposit readily returnable to the state.

"Nobody's hiding any money anywhere," McKeown said.

No hearing date was immediately set.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

ST. LOUIS — An atheist is suing to force the administrators of a towering cross in southern Illinois to return a $20,000 state grant toward its restoration, saying Thursday it was "blatantly unc...
ST. LOUIS — An atheist is suing to force the administrators of a towering cross in southern Illinois to return a $20,000 state grant toward its restoration, saying Thursday it was "blatantly unc...
Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Cori527
Gay democrat agnostic vegetarian!
12:55 PM on 09/15/2010
Just the Christian Taliban at work, taking the taxpayer dollars for their own religious agendas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombywulf
Pirate Captain Church of Saint Jerry
03:24 PM on 08/17/2010
Hey I want money for a giant star of David and a giant Islaminc Cresant oh ya and a giant Hindu Scared Cow. And a giant Buddah.
01:26 PM on 08/16/2010
I might start a campaign to attach a giant set of blades onto that cross and turn it into a wind turbine.


I'm sure Jesus wouldn't mind.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalLee
Yes I am a witch. Deal with it.
10:34 PM on 08/15/2010
I never quite understood the whole, " Use an instrument of torture as a holy icon" thing.
Seems a bit creepy...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frant52
04:48 PM on 08/14/2010
I find it difficult to believe that a cash strapped state such as Illinois cannot find a place to put 20k!
Why is a religious icon the responsibility of the state? What am I not understanding?
01:53 PM on 08/14/2010
Once anything is over 50 years old it is eligable for the NRHP, and in turn fed and state money. Simple as that.
photo
BlindChance
Have another cherry...
10:16 PM on 08/13/2010
This is a repeat story, no?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
azatrox
One of those "fake" Americans
06:53 PM on 08/13/2010
Can't get much more blatantly unconstitutional than this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
03:26 PM on 08/14/2010
Yeah you can... This is an historic site, not a megachurch!
photo
Cori527
Gay democrat agnostic vegetarian!
12:54 PM on 09/15/2010
A historic example of squandering of taxpayer dollars, but little else.
09:33 PM on 09/18/2010
It is hardly a historic site. Please.
photo
Jericho the Red
moderate before it was called liberal.
05:16 PM on 08/13/2010
Fight the good fight!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Retrofuturistic
see things as they really are
03:47 PM on 08/13/2010
Bravo, Mr. Sherman. We should not be spending taxpayer money on religious symbols and we should be taxing churches. Allowing them to become fabulously wealthy does nothing but contribute to the growth of far-right-wing causes, to the detriment of all.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalLee
Yes I am a witch. Deal with it.
03:00 PM on 08/13/2010
Why is Freedom from Religion such a bad thing?
Am I required to have one? I don't recall ever reading that in the Constitution.
Well if I must, then so be it.
I'm going to join the church of the One-eyed Goat in Ascendence.
Now can I have my grant money?
His Horniness wants His statue up NOW!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:20 PM on 08/15/2010
this one eyed goat - is he all seeing? i am looking for a new god to worship - but i only go in for a male and omnipotent god.. this goat, he is male, yes?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalLee
Yes I am a witch. Deal with it.
10:33 PM on 08/15/2010
Uh... Which part of "His Horniness" sounds at all female?
And with only the ONE eye... Well, they just don't make deities like they used to.
But His acolytes get every other third leap year February 29th off and a free hair shirt and flail for self-flagellation with sign up. Temple members get a good pot luck dinner on the 2nd Tuesday of every other month.
He draws random prayers out of the Holy Watering Trough and answers one every week though.
Me? I'm not an adherent. I'm just doing some promo work on the side for Him.
photo
saami
Cranky old lady
01:03 PM on 08/13/2010
You can have your cross, just pay for it yourself and own the land it is on. No tax payer dollars to promote any religion. This is not a christian country. Read your history; I mean read the real history not the christian version.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josephking
12:42 PM on 08/13/2010
Hmmmm...atheiest only believe in themselves...so can I sue them for their pressence, and the fact that their basis of belief uses tax funded roads, etc...work with me, it's Friday.
01:42 PM on 08/13/2010
Lets blame it all on Dailey!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:45 PM on 08/13/2010
No, blame it on Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalLee
Yes I am a witch. Deal with it.
03:08 PM on 08/13/2010
That's not true, you know.
Atheists believe in lots of things.
Gravity. The power of human orneriness. Fritos. Murphy's Law.
If you don't believe in yourself. why should anyone else?
It may be Friday, but this is your hole to climb out of. Your basic premise makes less sense than the Big Guy in the Sky thing so many other deluded folks whine at, to, and about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjb5406
10:35 AM on 08/13/2010
Wonder if "Friends of the Cross" is a tax-exempt organization... if so, it is because they claim to be a religious organization?

If you look on the "Friends of the Cross" website, there is a clear tie to religion... on the "Mission" page it clearly states "Faith, Hope, Charity":

http://www.friendsofbaldknobcross.com/mission.htm

Further, the site states "Future Easter sunrise services would have thousands of people come and be part of the tradition which continues today. The beautiful lighted Cross can be seen for 7,500 square miles." I didn't know Easter Sunrise Services were not religious.

They are registered as a 501(c)(3) Charitable Organization.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjb5406
10:24 AM on 08/13/2010
I am normally not a supporter of Rob Sherman since he, more often than not, seems to go after religious symbolism (i.e. the city of Zion's logo) simply for media attention, but this time he's right on the money. I am getting tired of the money flowing between government (at any level) and religious organizations in BOTH directions... with our state being in such a financial bind, $20K may not sound like much, but how many more grants were given to organizations with religious ties (this one was obvious since the project was so visible). Likewise, the religious zealots pump so much money into politics that it's time to revisit their tax-exempt status. After all, doesn't that exemption in itself constitute a government-sponsored endorsement of religion?

Note to Mr. Sherman: Next, go after the state of Indiana over its "In God We Trust" license plates... it may be OK for the federal government to use that on money, etc., but a state using taxpayer funding to promote it on license plates crosses that like again.
photo
TheRevV
My micro-bio is microbial.
10:35 AM on 08/13/2010
It shouldn't be on coinage either. "In God We Trust" was added as the official national motto in the 50s as part of the slow creep towards theocracy.

Mentioning God on money is the worst sort of sacrilege for the concept of "God" in the first place if you think about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjb5406
10:39 AM on 08/13/2010
I don't disagree, but I seem to remember the courts already ruled that "In God We Trust" in the context of the federal government has more historical rather than religious significance (don't have a citation handy)... I consider myself a Christian, but the whole idea of government-funded religion of any sort is repugnant. I hated what Bush tried to do during his tenure, with his "faith-based" initiatives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombywulf
Pirate Captain Church of Saint Jerry
03:48 PM on 08/16/2010
In God we trust, simply means we don't trust the government to back the money, so we are hoping he will.