iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WikiLeaks: We Won't Be Threatened By Pentagon

KEITH MOORE   08/14/10 11:40 AM ET   AP

Julian Assange

STOCKHOLM — WikiLeaks will publish its remaining 15,000 Afghan war documents within a month, despite warnings from the U.S. government, the organization's founder said Saturday.

The Pentagon has said that secret information will be even more damaging to security and risk more lives than WikiLeaks' initial release of some 76,000 war documents.

"This organization will not be threatened by the Pentagon or any other group," Julian Assange told reporters in Stockholm. "We proceed cautiously and safely with this material."

In an interview with The Associated Press, he said that if U.S. defense officials want to be seen as promoting democracy then they "must protect what the United States' founders considered to be their central value, which is freedom of the press."

"For the Pentagon to be making threatening demands for censorship of a press organization is a cause for concern, not just for the press but for the Pentagon itself," the Australian added.

He said WikiLeaks was about halfway though a "line-by-line review" of the 15,000 documents and that "innocent parties who are under reasonable threat" would be redacted from the material.

"It should be approximately two weeks before that process is complete," Assange told AP. "There will then be a journalistic review, so you're talking two weeks to a month."

Wikileaks would be working with media partners in releasing the remaining documents, he said, but declined to name them.

The first files in WikiLeaks' "Afghan War Diary" laid bare classified military documents covering the war in Afghanistan from 2004 to 2010. The release angered U.S. officials, energized critics of the NATO-led campaign, and drew the attention of the Taliban, which has promised to use the material to track down people it considers traitors.

That has aroused the concern of several human rights group operating in Afghanistan and the Paris-based media watchdog Reporters Without Borders, which has accused WikiLeaks of recklessness. Jean-Francois Julliard, the group's secretary-general, said Thursday that WikiLeaks showed "incredible irresponsibility" when posting the documents online.

WikiLeaks describes itself as a public service organization for whistleblowers, journalists and activists.

"There are no easy choices for our organization," Assange said. "We have a duty to the people most directly affected by this material, the people of Afghanistan and the course of this war which is killing hundreds every week. We have a duty to the broader historical record and its accuracy and its integrity. And we have a duty to our sources to try and protect them where we can."

Assange told the AP that while no country has taken steps to shut down WikiLeaks, some have been gathering intelligence on the organization.

"There has been extensive surveillance in Australia, there has been surveillance in the United Kingdom, there has been the detainment of one of our volunteers who entered the United States a week and a half ago. But he was released after four hours," Assange said. He didn't give details of that incident.

In addition to speaking at a seminar, Assange was in Sweden to investigate claims that the website was not covered by laws protecting anonymous sources in the Scandinavian country.

Assange confirmed that WikiLeaks passes information through Belgium and Sweden to take advantage of press freedom laws there. But some experts say the site doesn't have the publishing certificate needed for full protection in Sweden.

Assange said two Swedish publications had offered their publication certificates to WikiLeaks, "but we will soon be registering our own this week."

He declined to disclose what other countries house WikiLeaks' technical infrastructure.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
STOCKHOLM — WikiLeaks will publish its remaining 15,000 Afghan war documents within a month, despite warnings from the U.S. government, the organization's founder said Saturday. The Pentagon ha...
STOCKHOLM — WikiLeaks will publish its remaining 15,000 Afghan war documents within a month, despite warnings from the U.S. government, the organization's founder said Saturday. The Pentagon ha...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,050
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
photo
TheBestLackAllConviction
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
05:41 AM on 08/21/2010
It would (will?) be interesting to see what the government redacts vs. the complete document
01:46 PM on 08/18/2010
It is clear that WikiLeaks is not a news organization and is engaging in a criminal act. I would support the government going after WikiLeaks and seizing all their property and funds within our reach. I would support Congress passing a law to exclude this criminal activity from any computer access within the United States. They have their viewpoint, so that permits us to have ours. They don't seem to want to let a court decide who is right and who has access to our military secrets. Let's go get them.
11:47 PM on 08/20/2010
It's not just the computers in the U.S. that are the problem here. It's the people who might access a ready-made WikiKillList.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradley K Evans
02:04 AM on 08/18/2010
what happened to the old addage: if you dont' want it printed, don't let it happen?

Unfortunately, the corporate media has fallen asleep at the wheel and lulled a population that is taught to be sheep rather than to come to their own independent decision. The more we hide, the more we need the likes of wikileaks that are willing to expose the truth. The real danger is we have an out of control secrecy addiction, and a refusal by this world's population to stop these types of atrocities for the sake of national security.

War is not pretty. That's the reality. Hiding from the toll it takes on us is the REAL threat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:10 AM on 08/17/2010
Why do those pesky drones keep blowing up wedding parties: the story
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/08/07/bradley-manning-an-american-hero
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ
07:25 AM on 08/17/2010
The odds are 2 to 1 that your comment gets deleted--comments like that just don't fly past the crack team of political censors operating at HP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:43 AM on 08/17/2010
jc. you have been posting here for 9 months, basically the same as I. Up until now I have only had two posts withheld....All of my postings are truthful and can stand scrutiny. Most of my articles are from foreign journalist in foreign countries.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gypsysailor
Things that might have been never were.
03:35 AM on 08/17/2010
I think you people in Wiki Leaks ought to reconsider what you are doing. When all of this settles down and pretty much goes away do you really think you are going to be safe?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:28 AM on 08/17/2010
U.S. soldier's eyewitness account of 'Collateral Murder'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kelmEZe8whI

soldier Ethan McCord was THERE when it happened,
and recounts in graphic detail the carnage that took place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
10:03 PM on 08/16/2010
Hundreds of villagers chanting anti-US slogans have protested in eastern Afghanistan over the killing of three villagers. Locals say US forces shot-dead the innocent men, but NATO insists they were "suspected insurgents" killed in self-defense.

Early Thursday morning, villagers started to gather in the main market of Sayed Abad to protest against the alleged civilian killings.

The men blocked the main highway going through the area and burned two trucks belonging to Afghan private security contractors.

A protester said, "They martyred three students and detained five others. All of them were civilians. Local people are devastated by this incident. Everyone says we do not want Americans in Afghanistan."

So who are you going to trust to tell the truth an organization which is a tool of right wing republicans and MIC or the people that actually live there?

I would go with the villagers. They really have no incentive to lie.
11:51 PM on 08/20/2010
Do you know the villagers personally? Have you been to the unnamed village yourself recently? You can't really provide any concrete evidence that there is no incentive to lie. Rather, that is your own desired state of affairs spoken as though it actually were a fact.
07:19 PM on 08/16/2010
In a perfect world, civilians would never die in wars. In a perfect world that is......even our WWII vets weren't perfect, but they got the job done.
08:37 PM on 08/16/2010
In WWII civilians were targeted. London and Dresden are two examples. Tokyo, Nagasaki, and Hiroshima three more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Derange
05:16 PM on 08/16/2010
good luck with the twins Doogie!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NavyMom44
03:59 PM on 08/16/2010
Too many people call him a hero, for what? Endangering my son along with other military personnel not to mention their informants which is setting these people up to be executed.

I think the reason he left Australia is because he KNEW the government would give him up to the US, trying to say he is providing a service is complete BS and he knows it. When he said the US threatened him so he had to go into hiding he has failed to realize the government may not be his problem but the ones that had loved ones killed/murdered/executed because of his actions. These are military individuals/mercenaries information he put out for any/all to peruse, if I was him I would not worry about the US government but others that answer to no one or very few. When something happens to him, based on his arrogance it will, the US government will be blamed with none taking into account this is more than an "embarrassment" to our government so some he essentially put a target on himself
04:40 PM on 08/16/2010
Wikileaks exposes 20,000 heretofore hidden civilian deaths and suddenly you're all concerned about a few Afghans who may or may not be identifiable? l suspect you're the same ones who use the euphamism 'collateral damage' at your strategic convenience.

PS: I am sure he has taken harrassment by the US gov't into account, when he decided to p1ss off the US military industrial complex that endangers your son for their profits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skibum49
08:53 PM on 08/16/2010
Either document that figure or stop using it. The UN says that civilian deaths in Afghanistan are up 31 percent in 2010. The increase is primarily attributed to insurgent activity according to them and the Afghanistan human rights group that monitors such things not by random killings by US troops.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:33 AM on 08/17/2010
you've probably seen this already...

U.S. soldier's eyewitness account of 'Collateral Murder'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kelmEZe8whI

20 minute video of a soldier recounting, in graphic detail, the senseless carnage that took place on a DAILY basis.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Derange
05:19 PM on 08/16/2010
people like you endangered your son by mindlessly endorsing a useless, ridiculous war. us 'hippies' would rather your kid was home fishing with you.
11:56 PM on 08/20/2010
I love the "people like you" prefix. It's so antebellum, so WASP, so elite. I'm glad that "people like you" can put Skibum in her proper place. Without any knowledge of her views, those of her son, or apparently anything else on point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fineartgalaxy
Speaking from the heart, always.
03:14 PM on 08/16/2010
First, the WH said the documents were old and not of any relevance. Later, the Pentagon is screaming that innocent lives are at stake because of these papers. And now we are all so fascinated with Private Manning and WikiLeaks that we do not even know what the papers say. Typical Washington-Pentagon behavior: divert attention from the contents.
jrfromdallas
Who you calling a jive turkey?
02:53 PM on 08/16/2010
Private Manning should be hung for treason.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
lthuedk 1
Artist, Political Imagery
05:03 PM on 08/16/2010
Cheney should be hung for treason and Manning should be given the Nobel Peace Prize.
12:04 AM on 08/21/2010
Hanged is the proper word, here. Whether Private Manning is hung is between him and Mrs. Manning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Noble 2
12:07 PM on 08/16/2010
GWB behaved no differently to JFK, Nixon, Reagan, his daddy or Clinton, lying for wars based on profit is considered politics and often rewarded. Obama therefore if allowed to act in secret will be no better.

The world is sick to death of our greedy meddling. We have brought about a world of abject fear from nuclear holocaust caused by our glee in dropping two nukes on Japan to arming the worst of the worst all over the world to destroy the Soviets. Yet we did nothing in Rwanda and elsewhere.

We have assassinated or aided in the termination of democratically elected leaders and dictators since WW2 and before. We talk about freedom but routinely prop up the worst regimes in the Middle East and yet single out Israel for praise and Iran to be attacked.

America is being brought to book and about time. What hope do we have that Obama will be any better when so many Democrats join him in wanting these brave souls threatened or worse.

What is done is done but these leaks are important to keep Obama and future presidents under control. America should be grateful as now we really cannot say we did not know. We also need to limit what future presidents can order without review. Obama has kept nearly all the powers rendered up to GWB by Democrats and Republican Congresses without a fight.

We must use these leaks as an opportunity for change.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Derange
05:20 PM on 08/16/2010
jfk? he was going to pull troops out of vietnam, and was killed accordingly.
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
06:08 PM on 08/17/2010
another thoughtful and well reasoned liberal.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
11:54 AM on 08/16/2010
To stand up to our government means you can't be an American citizen. Is there a single incidence that the ten's of thousands of pages of documents put any US soldiers in danger? If so, don't you think that would be page one news? The people of the US only get to vote every few years. Between those times, anything goes. And because people have very short memories, nothing ever changes. One word, Vietnam.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDog79
11:02 AM on 08/16/2010
when did wikileaks become part of the GOP?
I'm for freedom of information, but this sounds suspiciously like fame seeking.
03:33 AM on 08/17/2010
Ah. Never mind the horrendous crimes and death toll covered up. Focus on the fact that this makes the Democrats look bad.

Nice.