iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Ground Zero Mosque' Becomes Another Election-Year Hurdle For Democrats

LIZ SIDOTI   08/16/10 05:54 PM ET   AP

Ground Zero Mosque Democrats

WASHINGTON — Add another election-year hurdle for Democrats: President Barack Obama's forceful defense of the right of Muslims to build a mosque near the World Trade Center site.

His comments are giving Republicans a campaign-year cudgel and forcing Democrats to address a divisive issue within weeks of midterm contests that will decide the balance of power in Washington. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in a competitive re-election fight, was the highest profile Democrat to move away from Obama on the matter.

"The First Amendment protects freedom of religion," Reid's spokesman Jim Manley said in a statement Monday. "Senator Reid respects that but thinks that the mosque should be built some place else."

Democrats privately called the issue a distraction when the party should be laser-focused on keeping comfortable majorities in Congress. The political climate already favors Republicans as economically struggling voters look to unleash their fury on the party in power.

White House aides have spent four days trying to explain exactly where the normally eloquent president stands on the mosque. Obama's ringing statement in support of religious equality Friday, followed a day later by a caveat, stoked anew false Internet rumors about his citizenship and religion.

Some Democratic candidates fear the political fallout that Republicans suggest is coming against those who support building a mosque two blocks from the lower Manhattan site of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. And some Republicans are trying to walk a careful line in their criticism, lest they be tagged religiously intolerant or be accused of stoking fear.

Former Sen. Dan Coats, who is challenging Rep. Brad Ellsworth for an Indiana Senate seat, said: "It's an insult I think to the people who lost lives there."

Former state Rep. Kevin Calvey, a Republican running for Congress in Oklahoma who served in Iraq, said ground zero is a "grossly inappropriate" place for a mosque. "I think it sends a message to terrorists that they've won, and I think that's a mistake," he said.

One of the few to praise the president was Republican-turned-independent Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York.

"If we shut down – shout down – a mosque and community center because it is two blocks away from the site where freedom was attacked, I think it would be a sad day for America," Bloomberg told reporters Monday.

For weeks, the White House had refused to interject itself into what it called a local zoning issue even though the mosque debate had taken on national significance with Republicans such as Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich forcefully opposing it. Obama publicly commented on the issue only after Bloomberg delivered an impassioned supportive speech and after the plan cleared a final city regulatory hurdle.

It's a tricky issue and not just because of the emotional nature of the attacks executed by terrorists from Muslim countries. Americans view Muslims far less favorably than other religious groups. Obama has set a welcoming tone even as the Christian president has been falsely accused by conservative critics of secretly being Muslim or foreign-born.

Obama waded into the debate Friday at the annual White House dinner celebrating the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, saying: "Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances."

By Saturday, the president was in Florida – and elaborating.

"I will not comment on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there," he said. "I was commenting very specifically on the right that people have that dates back to our founding."

That doesn't mean Obama was backing off his initial remarks, aides said. "The president didn't do this because of the politics," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said Monday. "He spoke about it because he feels he has an obligation as the president to address this."

Regardless, politics was at full tilt.

Republicans, led by several considering challenging Obama in 2012, assailed the president.

"We all know that they have the right to do it, but should they?" Palin asked on Twitter. "This is not above your pay grade."

More bluntly, Gingrich accused Obama of "pandering to radical Islam" and said: "Nazis don't have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust Museum in Washington. We would never accept the Japanese putting up a sight next to Pearl Harbor. There's no reason for us to accept a mosque next to the World Trade Center."

Most Democrats stayed silent, probably because they'd rather discuss voters' No. 1 issue – jobs. They're already answering questions about a 9.5 percent unemployment rate, ethics charges against two veteran House lawmakers and Obama's opposition to Arizona's tough immigration law.

Including Reid, at least three Democrats broke from the White House – and party insiders expected more to follow suit, primarily moderates in conservative places. Several House Republican candidates issued statements demanding that their Democratic opponents say where they stand on the issue.

With the president visiting the state, Florida Democratic gubernatorial candidate Alex Sink said families and friends of 9/11 victims are opposed to the project "and I share their view." A GOP opponent, Rick Scott, started running a TV ad that said: "Mr. President, ground zero is the wrong place for a mosque."

In the Senate race, Democrat Jeff Greene said: "President Obama has this all wrong." Conversely, Senate Democratic candidate Kendrick Meek backed the president. But he did so only after independent Senate candidate, Gov. Charlie Crist, said of Obama, "I think he's right," as marquee races in Florida quickly turned from local jobs to a New York mosque in the time it took Obama to explain where he stood.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE – Liz Sidoti has covered national politics for The Associated Press since 2003.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Add another election-year hurdle for Democrats: President Barack Obama's forceful defense of the right of Muslims to build a mosque near the World Trade Center site. His comments a...
WASHINGTON — Add another election-year hurdle for Democrats: President Barack Obama's forceful defense of the right of Muslims to build a mosque near the World Trade Center site. His comments a...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,358
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
10:08 PM on 08/17/2010
Isn't it ironic that, in the "Land of the Free", the leader of that land has been constantly obstructed and handcuffed and ridiculed for his every choice? What could conceiveably be more hypocritical?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregstevens
I'm just some guy.
08:57 PM on 08/17/2010
I'm sure the rage, and hurt, and indignation of these people is genuine. Does that mean we should respect it? Does that mean we should "take it into consideration". Absolutely not.

About a month ago, I was listening to a radio show in which a man was being interviewed who had just found out that his college-aged daughter was gay. He was sobbing. He was heart-broken, and didn't know what to do: wracked with conflicting feelings, you could hear the true and sincere anguish in his voice.

If I didn't know what he was upset about, and just listened to his sobs and the tone in his voice, my heart would have broken for him.

But as is turns out, I did know what he was upset about. He just found out that his daughter was gay, and to him it was worse than if his daughter had died.

Should I "respect" his feelings? ABSOLUTELY NOT! I pity him for having to experience the deep suffering born out of his own prejudice. But the fact that his anguish is strong and sincere does not change the fact that if he wasn't a bigot, he wouldn't be feeling them.

It is the same with the people who are "offended" by the Islamic Community Center. If they didn't on some level equate "Islam" with "terrorism", then they wouldn't be offended. The very fact that they ARE offended shows that they are prejudiced.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
08:10 PM on 08/17/2010
Moderator
I was referred to as "your Kind" by alwayspissedoffatsome

and MY post was scrubbed???
got homobigotry?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lisette53
I am the 99%
03:07 PM on 08/17/2010
I should think this could be seen as a peaceful gesture and a slap in the face to the radical extremists, not to the victims of 911. Americans and Muslim America UNITED is exactly the opposite of what the terrorists wanted. They wanted us to be a nation divided. If we stand together we stand against what they did here.
04:54 PM on 08/17/2010
You have it right!
photo
lemealone
It will take more than condiments to foil my brill
04:57 PM on 08/17/2010
really, Once the Americans' saw the would-be bombers playing ping-pong at the rec center their worries would be over!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lisette53
I am the 99%
05:04 PM on 08/17/2010
What are you saying then? All Muslims are would be bombers? Prejudice much?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
bubbuh
03:03 PM on 08/17/2010
I'm going to vote right now. It's early voting season down here in SOFLA. As it happens, I'll be voting at a YMCA. It has an Xian Chapel in it. I wonder. Should be militantly aghast of fended?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lisette53
I am the 99%
01:38 PM on 08/17/2010
Our hate is showing. Yes lets let rigid intolerance, hate and fear rule our thoughts and decisions and policy making. Lets change our values and ideals and now discriminate against an entire group because of a few radical extremists. Let's not move past 911 peaceably, lets perpetuate the hatred and prove to the world that the terrorists did in fact succeed in terrorizing us to the point where we become as judgemental and hateful and intolerant as they are. How can we even be having a conversation. The GOP wants to take us backwards/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
bubbuh
02:49 PM on 08/17/2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBHONx9vTtI
Let's Do The Time Warp Again
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lisette53
I am the 99%
04:28 PM on 08/17/2010
Hahahahahaha!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:19 PM on 08/17/2010
It's a hot, dry, dusty day in a small town in the Wild West.

The townspeople stand outside the saloon as Obama rides away.

"Who was that mosqued man?" asks one.

"Why, that's the Lone Haranguer!" replied another.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OKSunny
12:06 PM on 08/17/2010
Does no one think that there weren't American Muslims killed in the trade centers? Aren't their families allowed the same right to grieve at a place of worship that represents their religion? So EVERY singe person killed on 9-11 was a Christian? I have no problem with ANY religion being represented at ground zero; in fact, I can't think of a better way to show the rest of the World (and the terrorists) that America is based on FREEDOM and TOLERANCE of any/all religions than to build a church/mosque/temple etc..representing ALL the World religions...what an awesome sight that would be!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lisette53
I am the 99%
02:04 PM on 08/17/2010
Fan'd and Fav'd. I couldn't have said it better Sunny. This could be seen as a very caring act...not at all inconsiderate! Why can't we see this as a united stand against what happened and a part of the healing? Why perpetrate hate?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
02:21 PM on 08/17/2010
Unfortunately, I don't think the mosque will be there to represent ALL world religions. If it were so, with Christians, Jews, homosexuals, etc., all welcome, I wouldn't have any objection. As it is, the initial choice of the name for the mosque, the "Cordoba," gave the game away. It was planned as a symbol of Muslim victory. Therefore, it's not something I would approve.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Roguewolf
30-Year Military Veteran
11:31 AM on 08/17/2010
While it may be legally correct to build whereever they want it is not respectful to the families of those killed on 9/11. We were attacked for religious reasons on 9/11, so putting up a place of worship there is not the right thing to do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
troberts1943
12:30 PM on 08/17/2010
If we change our way of life to get even than the terrorist have won. We could ban
all Mosque from anywhere in the US, and repeal parts of the 1st amendment.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:22 PM on 08/17/2010
Correct. So don't change our way of life. The Muslims should be as respectful of us as we are of them. Since when is it our "way of life" to let Muslims commemorate an attack on American soil?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lisette53
I am the 99%
01:41 PM on 08/17/2010
Fan'd and Fav'd nice to meet you troberts
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ApolloniaCreed
02:18 PM on 08/17/2010
By your logic there should be no Christian church in all of western Europe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ApolloniaCreed
02:25 PM on 08/17/2010
I meant eastern, but you get my point...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
11:29 AM on 08/17/2010
So it's not a mosque, and it's not at Ground Zero.

In other words, it's a perfect fact-free Gooper talking point!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:22 PM on 08/17/2010
You can't kid me! It's a mosque disguised as a "community organizer!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Albert Amato
08:35 PM on 08/17/2010
It will be a mosque on that site as well as an expansion of the community center there at this point.
It is near Ground Zero not at GZ.
11:24 AM on 08/17/2010
The Left’s OVERDUE NEEDED POLITICAL STRATEGY:
As the right has successfully dismissed Obama’s remarks that contribute the economic woes to the Bush’s policy and what Obama inherited by saying “there he goes again blaming Bush,” the left must DO the same with the constant daily Obama bashing, which is relentless. This strategy will work. All left activist should and must begin to constantly repeat like a persistent drumbeat, “oh there they go again, blaming everything on Obama,” or “oh, there they go again, constantly criticizing Obama.”
The right has been too successful with their lock-step message. By saying the above quotes over and over again will eventually, over time, dismiss the nonsense, malicious, and untruthful agenda from the right. I urge you to pass this message to everyone, so that we can somewhat balance out the political arena.
Thank you,
DBR
11:09 AM on 08/17/2010
Obama said the right, brave, and unpopular thing. That's what PResidents should do. I'm very PROUD of him. Abe Lincoln did not do the popular thing and KEEP slavery, which I can not believe that American actually wanted to keep slavery. F**K them Mr. President!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Roguewolf
30-Year Military Veteran
11:28 AM on 08/17/2010
No, he said one thing to appease the Muslims and the next day said something different to appease Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
11:31 AM on 08/17/2010
Americans don't oppose the mosque. Only conservatives do, and as everyone knows, they aren't Americans.
Sundiszno
Facts are facts carnival barkers!
12:26 PM on 08/17/2010
Would you agree that Mr. Obama is a politician? If so, would you also agree that everything else being equal he would say things that would gain him political points versus lose them? So when he says something that is obviously not popular, what does that say about him? In this particular instance, one must conclude, as you have, that he is simply beholden to the Muslims and he was following his natural instincts. Or, and I'm going way out on a limb, he may have taken his oath to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution too literally, even at the cost of his own and his party's political life. So, who's crazier, you or I?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OKSunny
12:07 PM on 08/17/2010
Does no one think that there weren't American Muslims killed in the trade centers? Aren't their families allowed the same right to grieve at a place of worship that represents their religion? So EVERY singe person killed on 9-11 was a Christian? I have no problem with ANY religion being represented at ground zero; in fact, I can't think of a better way to show the rest of the World (and the terrorists) that America is based on FREEDOM and TOLERANCE of any/all religions than to build a church/mosque/temple etc..representing ALL the World religions...what an awesome sight that would be!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Roguewolf
30-Year Military Veteran
12:23 PM on 08/17/2010
Multi-religion center, that would be great!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R U Sirius
Retired educator, trainer; writer/editor
10:39 AM on 08/17/2010
What? I'm a Democrat, and you may consider me NOT DISTRACTED.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krummlaw
10:21 AM on 08/17/2010
The First Amendment is a "hurdle" to Dems?

It's either the most important pillar of our democracy or just another piece of paper.

More than a million Americans have died fighting for its precepts.

Truth is, it's the Dems who lament the First Amendment "hurdle" to Dems who are the hurdle.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
11:34 AM on 08/17/2010
Dems aren't the ones trying to repeal the First, Tenth, Fourteenth, and Seventeenth Amendments.

Conservatards are.

I know reality is difficult, and it requires a lot of work keeping up with what's actually going on... but do try to keep up.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AyeChart
Retired Army, half-retired physician
01:25 PM on 08/17/2010
That's just ignorance or bluster. No conservative wants to repeal the 1st or 10th Amendments. The 17th, I am all in favor of repealing and going back to the original, proper, correct idea of the Founders. The 14th has produced some unexpected and unintended problems, much like Prohibition did, and we repealed that, didn't we?

Get serious.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
anotherwomanfromva
Got social security, thank a democrat
10:21 AM on 08/17/2010
The "Ground Zero Mosque" didn't have to be a distraction for the democrats. If the dems would just lead on an issue. If they for once could actually work together and come up with a singular message. Instead, the dems have a every man for himself mentality and that makes them look weak and disjointed.

Repubs have offered this country nothing in the 8 years of the Bush administration and less than nothing since Obama's election and yet they might pick up a few seats. That should be a wake up call for the dems to let them know it's time they Dems grew a spine.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lisette53
I am the 99%
02:45 PM on 08/17/2010
They are spineless because they don't vote or think as a block? Although I do agree, it would be nice if they could get themselves together on a few things.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
anotherwomanfromva
Got social security, thank a democrat
03:00 PM on 08/17/2010
Yes. It doesn't have to be on every issue. But just on some of them. This being one of them.