EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

James Kilpatrick Dead: Conservative Columnist Dies At 89

NAFEESA SYEED   08/16/10 07:21 PM ET   AP

James Kilpatrick

WASHINGTON — James J. Kilpatrick's in-your-face, conservative bickering with liberal commentator Shana Alexander three decades ago was famously parodied – and then copied for years to come on broadcast and cable channels.

Even more lasting: his contributions as the nation's most widely syndicated political columnist and a dozen books on everything from politics and the U.S. Supreme Court to the use and abuse of the English language.

Kilpatrick, who rose from cub reporter to one of the nation's most recognized conservative voices, died Sunday at age 89, said his wife, Marianne Means.

"He was a hell of a fella," said Means, 76, herself a former columnist for Hearst Newspapers. "He cultivated a public image on TV of being a cranky conservative ... but he wasn't a cranky conservative at home."

Kilpatrick punctuated his more staid commentary with moments of whimsy – as a young reporter who tried to get a lawmaker to introduce a bill outlawing the month of February and a writer desperate to get rid of a skunk that had gotten cozy beneath his home in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia. More than 500 readers sent suggestions on how to handle the problem.

TV watchers in the 1970s knew Kilpatrick as the conservative half of the "Point-Counterpoint" segment of CBS' "60 Minutes." Baby boomers, though, would always know the liberal-conservative pairing is what inspired the "Saturday Night Live" parody featuring Dan Aykroyd and Jane Curtin – and Aykroyd's dismissal of Curtin's opinions with a terse, "Jane, you ignorant slut."

The "60 Minutes" segment's popularity was not lost on Kilpatrick: "People love to watch other people go at it. It does make for good entertainment," he commented in a 1981 Washington Post story about a similar program.

The man known as "Kilpo" to colleagues showed a penchant for the written word as a youngster, learning to read by age 4 and deciding early on he wanted to be a newsman. He worked summers as a copyboy for the Oklahoma City Times while working toward his degree at the University of Missouri.

In 1941, he took a job with the Richmond (Va.) News Leader and was the paper's editor in chief 10 years later. However, he spent many years trying to make amends for the columns he penned as a vocal supporter of racial segregation. When the U.S. Supreme Court struck down separate but equal schools in its Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954, he accused the court of repudiating the Constitution.

"If it be said now that the South be flouting the law, let it be said to the high court: you taught us how," he wrote.

"He apologized over and over publicly and in print when he could about being on the wrong side of the segregation issue," Means said. "He was a son of the South."

Kilpatrick received numerous journalism awards and was one of the few columnists ever honored as a fellow of the Society of Professional Journalists. He worked for Universal Press Syndicate for years until retiring a couple of years ago.

His conservative writings made him a newspaper mainstay, leading to syndication in 1964. Two years later, he left the Richmond paper to write columns full time in Washington. He also served as contributing editor to the National Review and had a monthly column in Nation's Business.

Conservatives, Kilpatrick wrote in Nation's Business in 1978, "believe that a civilized society demands orders and classes, that men are not inherently equal, that change and reform are not identical, that in a free society men are children of God and not wards of the state."

Those observations landed him appearances on television's "Agronsky and Company" and on "60 Minutes," teamed first with liberal Nicholas von Hoffman and then, starting in 1975, with Alexander.

Reached Monday at his home in Maine, von Hoffman said despite their political differences, Kilpatrick was a terrific person to work with.

"We used to call what we did a political form of professional wrestling. We didn't take it very seriously," von Hoffman said. "For others he was very controversial ... but I just liked him a lot."

Later, Kilpatrick focused on his efforts as a wordsmith, proselytizing against the abuse of the English language.

"Be clear, be clear, be clear!" he admonished in his book "The Writer's Art," published in 1984. "Your image or idea may be murky but do not write murkily about it. Be murky clearly."

Former first lady Nancy Reagan issued a statement Monday, saying, "Jack was our dear friend for many years, and I have fond memories of our times together. Ronnie and I looked forward to Jack's columns and to watching him on television. Jack brought a common sense wisdom to the discussions of the day, and was always respectful of other points of view, even when he disagreed."

And Lee Salem, Universal Uclick CEO and editor, which syndicated the column, said in a statement that James "will be remembered for his passionate viewpoints, unmatched professionalism and unwavering dedication to good writing."

___

Associated Press writer Bruce Smith in Charleston, S.C., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

Filed by Danny Shea  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:49 PM on 08/18/2010
"When the U.S. Supreme Court struck down separate but equal schools in its Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954, he accused the court of repudiatin­g the Constituti­on."

Which would have put him in the mainstream of today's conservati­ve movement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jelperman
08:42 AM on 08/18/2010
Shana, Shana, Shana...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira Meyers
Blogger,Proud Liberal
08:20 PM on 08/17/2010
By todays standards, not one of these right wing "genius" would even understand what he was talking about. Palin would need a translator­, as would Kilpatrick­. I never agreed with him, however he was intelligen­t, and was articulate­, maybe Hannity, O'Rielly and the rest of the talking heads could learn from him.
01:51 PM on 08/18/2010
Hannity and Beck are what I now call "predator pundits," spewing poison into the culture to kill off every decent impulse members of society may have in the name of corporate America's interests.
07:29 PM on 08/17/2010
Shana, you ignorant sl*t.
06:19 PM on 08/17/2010
It's a noticeable phenomenon here that when one provides chapter and verse regarding one's segregatio­nist past, the likelihood of that comment appearing on the website is hugely, hugely diminished­. Kilpatrick is a case in point. Apparently the gatekeeper­s wish to remember him as a benign old presence. Specific history would indicate otherwise.
05:01 PM on 08/17/2010
There was a humorless man if ever I saw one.
photo
Toddynho
Slartibartfast made me do it.
01:35 PM on 08/17/2010
Kinda difficult to see him as a conservati­ve writer today, or better yet, harder to see today's tea baggers and consider them conservati­ve. I may not have agreed with many things Kilpatrick wrote, but at least he was clear in expressing his ideas unlike the snot blowing conservati­ve hacks of today.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
trishinpitt
No, your micro-bio is empty!
11:24 AM on 08/17/2010
It's weird when you read about someone who was an ardent segregatio­nist (or whatever the negative position they have) and see that they spent the rest of their lives apologizin­g or repenting and in this man's case saying, "I was a son of the south" as did Robert Byrd and others. And yet, you see someone like Jimmy Carter who has never had to regret his position because he somehow rose above the nasty "son of the south" racist position and saw his black neighbors as people first... It's like this mosque in NYC. I find it so hard to believe that people can take the side of not allowing a place of worship to be built simply because these people are Muslim. It's not even a valid choice. I don't even feel like it's a decision. It's either you agree with the first amendment or you don't. The same goes for prejudice against race...eit­her you agree that the other person is an equal or you don't. There shouldn't have to be a deliberati­ve discussion or blaming your heritage. Your conscience and your heart should tell you what is right, even if it's not the popular or populist decision.
07:57 PM on 08/18/2010
I totally agree, Trish. What is it that makes 2 "sons of the South" who had similar background­s have a completely different view of how they should relate to people of another race? I think it's a cop-out to blame your racism on heritage and then say it was something you grew out of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bloggerrogr
Thou shalt not whine
11:21 AM on 08/17/2010
Before I acquired some political sophistica­tion, I read Kilpatrick almost religiousl­y and bought heavily into the conservati­ve meme.
It was only after I was disabused of conservati­sm (via Nixon and Watergate and 'Reaganomi­cs') that I could look at Kilpatrick with different 'eyes'.
His love of the language was undeniable and his style and prose will not be equalled for a long time.
For THAT. I must salute the man.
FWIW
03:45 PM on 08/18/2010
You could say the same about Buckley. Eloquence doesn't deserve salute for anything more than "he shore talk purty". And, no, the Kilpatrick that *I* saw never was especially poetic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:08 AM on 08/17/2010
He did his damage.
11:03 AM on 08/17/2010
Kilpatrick repented of some of his worst ravings. A long life allows the chance for some redemption­.

But his biggest karmic balancer may have been his contributi­ons to clarity in written communicat­ion. My husband and I read his column "The Writer's Art" for years and we learned something every week. He was much better than Safire and a lot more fun to read. The man loved the language, he helped people use it better and that's all good.
06:05 PM on 08/17/2010
I submit that no wordsmithi­ng will ever balance out racial enmity. No matter if you're Shakespear­e himself!
09:17 AM on 08/17/2010
My condolence­s to his family, but ... I could have sworn he had died years ago.

Maybe it was just his relevance that had long ago crossed the great divide.
photo
magnetplanner
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
12:16 AM on 08/18/2010
Talent is never irrelevant­. What's your talent besides making snide comments about 89 year old deceased people?
08:26 AM on 08/17/2010
Good riddance.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
03:21 AM on 08/17/2010
The guy couldn't get a job on Faux today. He was a conservati­ve in the old style - far too liberal for today's repubs. Although I rarely agreed with him, I read his articles for years and admired that he could express his opinion without hate and bile.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wforvendetta
Entitled to my opinion, not my facts
01:06 AM on 08/17/2010
Kilpatrick also was parodied in the motion picture "Airplane!­," in which the faux Kilpatrick argues in favor of the plane crashing.

"I say - LET 'em crash!" One of my favorite scenes.