More

GM Files IPO Paperwork: Automaker Will Be Listed On U.S. And Canadian Exchanges

TOM KRISHER and KEN THOMAS   08/18/10 10:01 PM ET   AP

Gm Ipo

DETROIT — General Motors Co. on Wednesday filed the first batch of paperwork required to sell stock to the public, a significant step toward shedding government ownership.

The 700-page filing with regulators begins a process that will lead to an initial public offering of GM's stock. The paperwork laid out reasons why GM would be attractive to investors, as well as the risks the company faces.

GM didn't say how many shares would be sold or when, although experts say the IPO could come as early as October. It also didn't say how many shares GM's majority owner, the U.S. government, plans to sell. Those sales would eventually lead to the government shrinking its big stake in the automaker, something GM is eager to see. The company's outgoing CEO, Ed Whitacre, has said government ownership has hurt GM's public image and sales.

Under the plan filed Thursday, GM said its stakeholders initially will sell common stock, while GM will sell preferred shares, which are like bonds and include dividend payments. GM said it will use proceeds from the preferred stock sale for general corporate purposes. It offered few other details.

GM would have to bring in $70 billion just to pay back all of the automaker's stakeholders. That could come in several sales over months.

The U.S. government now owns about 61 percent of GM, which it got in exchange for giving the company $50 billion in survival aid last year. GM has repaid $6.7 billion, and the remaining $43.3 billion was converted to the ownership stake. Other stakeholders include a United Auto Workers health-care trust and the Canadian government.

Demand for GM's new shares isn't known. In the coming weeks, the company will pitch itself to big investors such as pension, mutual and hedge funds. Many of the shares will go to those larger investors, but small players will also get a chance to buy in. With so much taxpayer money at stake, there's interest in seeing GM's stock price rise.

There are risks. The IPO market is weak. And GM, which lost about $100 billion in the five years leading up to last year's bankruptcy, is hardly a sure bet.

Still, a quick run through bankruptcy court cleansed GM of burdensome debt. It closed 12 factories and its labor costs were cut dramatically through deals with the United Auto Workers union.

Helped by those cost cuts, GM earned a healthy $2.2 billion in the first half of this year despite depressed U.S. auto sales. It's set up to do better if sales rebound, especially in fast-growing countries like Brazil and China, where GM plans to launch nearly 20 vehicles in the next two years.

The company gave investors a lengthy list of risks on Wednesday, including restructuring costs and concerns about the competitiveness of its vehicles.

For example, the Chevrolet Volt, its highly anticipated electric car due for release this year, requires battery technology "that has not yet proven to be commercially viable. There can be no assurances that these advances will occur in a timely or feasible way."

Even new executives were listed as risk factors. GM acknowledged that incoming CEO Daniel Akerson and Chief Financial Officer Chris Liddell have "no outside automotive industry experience" and said it was important for the management team to "quickly adapt and excel" in their new roles.

Both, however, have extensive experience with successful companies. Akerson held top posts for telecommunications firms and Liddell served as CFO of Microsoft Corp.

GM said the company was dependent upon global car and truck sales and said "there is no assurance that the global automobile market will recover in the near future or that it will not suffer a significant further downturn."

The company said it had no plans to pay dividends on its common stock and future dividends would be determined by its board of directors.

The company said it will trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker "GM," the symbol under which it traded before it entered bankruptcy. Shares will also trade in Canada on the Toronto Stock Exchange, but the ticker symbol hasn't been determined.

Francis Gaskins, president of IPOdesktop.com, said GM's decision to sell preferred shares rather than common stock is a sign that it is having trouble attracting interest from investors and felt the need to sweeten the offering with the preferred dividends.

"Only a company that's not strong would do that," he said. "It's a tip-off that the investment community needs something special."

The new preferred shares will be converted to an unknown number of common stock sometime in 2013, the filing said.

GM also said in the filing that outgoing CEO Ed Whitacre, who leaves Sept. 1, will get a compensation package worth around $9 million. He gets a $1.7 million annual salary and the rest in stock.

___

AP Auto Writer Dan Strumpf contributed to this story from New York.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
DETROIT — General Motors Co. on Wednesday filed the first batch of paperwork required to sell stock to the public, a significant step toward shedding government ownership. The 700-page filing w...
DETROIT — General Motors Co. on Wednesday filed the first batch of paperwork required to sell stock to the public, a significant step toward shedding government ownership. The 700-page filing w...
Filed by Nate C. Hindman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 964
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:26 AM on 08/27/2010
Maybe a stupid question:
A company lets its' CEO step down within two weeks of an IPO? That's going to help? Why not wait a month?
jokerdanny
my other bio is a macro
10:02 AM on 08/19/2010
Hey, wait a minute...where the heck are all the "OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST" posters that are usually hanging around HP??? Oh, I guess this story doesn't fit their narrative.
09:27 AM on 08/19/2010
sure people will invest and then get the shaft like they just got with the unions winning and everyone else on the losing end......people can probably make more money buying lottery tickets
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jJohnson1
11:28 AM on 08/19/2010
and the unions won how exactly ? one thing that i havent really seen on here yet is the fact that you arent forced to buy and actually its an IPO for the most part we wont have the option to, adding to that its a choice a risk like any investment you might win you might lose but crying about losing money on a stock you havent bought is the same as complaining about rain when its sunny out. im going to guess that beyond a 401k or mutual fun most of you have very little real experience in the stock market show of hands who truly buys and owns directly ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
08:47 AM on 08/19/2010
Bottom line, this is still a very risky company, They STILL have 96.2 billion in pension promises that they have to payout. They have the 3rd most underfunded pension plan in the US. They have the potential to pull this out but only with changes in management and getting more competitive in the world market.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jJohnson1
08:13 AM on 08/19/2010
Man say GM and the foreign snobs come out of the woodwork. first off how many of you have owned an american car in the last 5 years? Second why are yougiving the unions a group of people that actually havent had a raise in almost 20 years and have taken pay cut aftee pay cut a terrible wrap? how many of you buy imports only because its the popular thing to do. the fact is everyone on here complains about quality that they have only heard from some one else or read about years ago, I dont see a single one saying that well Buick is the best car on the road currently and was 20 years ago too. "GM only builds gas hogs", GM has more cars over 30 MPG than ANYONE. The uaw took a pay cut to $14 an hour thats actually a hard job for those of you that havent done it. The old mantra of american is bad and import is good needs to go more millionaires Drive fords and caddilacs. Now i know ill hear the same old regurgitated arguements based on old BS "i had a gm,ford,chrysler product and it died in this way or this broke" really save it go buy a recalled toyota and tell the world how your so happy and its perfect. or for once you can do this country some good other than sitting on the couch and hating what you dont know!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jJohnson1
08:26 AM on 08/19/2010
oh and 50 billion, thats chump change we throw out 650 billion a each year to support military bases in foriegn lands, helping people keep jobs here with an American company to me makes more sense. oh not to mention 70% of the legacy costs are white collar. oh but you hate unions well if it werent for the sit down strike and the formation of the UAW your wages would be low. you wouldnt have a regulated lunch break, you wouldnt have a choice when it came to overtime and you wouldnt be paid for it, you wouldnt have health care offered at your own companies for those of you that have it offered, you wouldnt have a job if you had to take sick leave actually there wouldnt be a sick leave at all. the fact is we all owe these people if it were not for them all of our companies would take advantage of us in terrible ways. they stood up and all you can do is complain. Tell me whe was the last time you took a pay cut to save your company these people took a big one. and you complain that they made too much actually they made a sustainable wage everyone else below them does not, the inflation of goods vs. the minimum wage is very out of balance and those that dissagree are out of touch with reality.
10:19 AM on 08/19/2010
I buy imports because I get tired of getting my American cars fixed and having them breakdown at inopportune times. I've owned 2 Pontiac, a buick, anda GM Sierra 1500 in the last 5 years, all new.

The one pontiac had new head gaskets, radiator, water pump, and alternator all replaced before it hit 100,000 miles.

The other pontiac and buick are either breaking down or in the shop twice a year. The GM truck is decent but the heating and AC have both went out before it was 5 years old. Also had to replace a number of recalled parts/modules.

The toyotas I've owned don't give me that grief. The mitsubishi's i've owned didn't give me that grief.

I'll still own American cars but you attempt to paint them as a beacon of greatness is laughable at best, ignorant to reality at the worst.

I don't really care about their workers. They are overpaid for what they do. Any job that only requires a high school diploma to do and a week of safety training shouldn't be paid that much money. I'm sorry but that's the classification of those types of jobs and the pay they deserve. One day they won't even be needed because we will have robotized the rest of their jobs away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foundryman
Reality trumps ideology
02:13 PM on 08/19/2010
fanned and faved x 10 if i could..
photo
Ed C Atlanta
Justice for all,,It's an Entitlement
08:05 AM on 08/19/2010
to most of those on the right who didn't think it was good business to save GM, well just Chrysler was saved in the 70's, now another American company has been saved and you guys are still upset. why?, beacuse it wasn't done by a repub president?
08:01 AM on 08/19/2010
Saw photo GM symbol. Thought, Cartman's relaunched Faith+1 as metal band.

'And GM, which lost about $100 billion in the five years leading up to last year's bankruptcy, is hardly a sure bet.' Wow! I mean, wow!
08:01 AM on 08/19/2010
and not a word about the 1.5 million cars recalled for possible fire from windshield washer heaters or 250k for faulty seat belts
yet the drums were banging about gm's largest competitor, toyota
a cynic would think this has to do with the govt ownership
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Mazzoni
07:06 AM on 08/19/2010
Then after how many years will the UAW run GM need more loans to stay afloat when they go public? They have a negative stigma about them that will last for decades. The volt will not save them, they need to control their labor cost, limit their health care spending, and make a product consumers want to buy.

How come no one is out there questioning GM's decision to buy Americredit?
07:00 AM on 08/19/2010
What about that commercial with Ed Whitacre saying that GM had paid back the government loan in full ahead of schedule. Says here that GM still owes 43.3 billion. No thank you got burned with this before not going happen again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mtracy9
05:25 AM on 08/19/2010
It's interesting how many right-wingers, who were enthused about Chrysler's bailout back in the 1980s under their hero Lee Iaccoca, throw cold water on this bailout.
04:44 AM on 08/19/2010
What happened to the promise of more reasonable, more fuel-efficient and greener cars? GM is still about huge gas-guzzling urban assault vehicles.
05:04 AM on 08/19/2010
They just introduced the "Volt". It gets an incredible 40 miles per charge and costs 41k. I'm sure they'll sell hundreds of them.
http://m.chevrolet.com/Volt_Overview?id=1901&md2psid=-1
photo
earto44
Defender of planet Erf.
08:39 AM on 08/19/2010
The Volt was introduced in 2001. Then 2002, Then 2003 for a 2005 delivery date. Then in 2005 they said it would be delivered in 2008 then in 2008 they said it would be delivered in 2010 in December. I am guessing there will not be any Volts being sold in Dec of this year. California is not going to give the Volt the $3000 rebate. That is due to the Volt giving a 8 year warrantee on it's battery. EPA/ CA wants to see a 10 year warrantee on the battery. Who was the President that ordered all of those electric cars to be crushed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
darr
08:40 AM on 08/19/2010
One word, VOLT.
10:21 AM on 08/19/2010
Three Words:

Over Priced Sedan.
02:16 PM on 08/19/2010
Volt is like the single token black at a Republican convention: a chimera. It'll never become a viable product.
02:54 AM on 08/19/2010
I guess us former shareholders just get the shaft.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mtracy9
05:21 AM on 08/19/2010
Why should we care about them? They put up their money and took their chances. That's capitalism.
07:20 AM on 08/19/2010
not really....
the govt stepped in and went around the normal bankruptcy procedures
they gave the uaw 20%
they negated the original stock which, wouldn't normally happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:37 AM on 08/19/2010
The first thing they should do is give back, one for one, stock to all the shareholders they screwed when then went bust
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:44 AM on 08/19/2010
You could argue that the bondholders were treated badly in the bankruptcy proceedings of GM and Chrysler, but I can't see how stockholders have any legitimate complaint. If the government had not intervened at all, both companies would have gone into Chapter 7 bankruptcy and would have been liquidated. The stockholders would have taken a bath. That's the way stock investments work. Sometimes the investment turns out to be a bad decision and the investor loses all of his money.
03:27 AM on 08/19/2010
Yeah well that will never happen. It's been a year and I still have worthless shares of US Shipping in my brokerage account. They just sit their mocking me, telling me I got screwed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheCarCzarsPage
02:13 AM on 08/19/2010
Don't buy cars from Commies!