More

Top Dems Break With Treasury Over Fannie, Freddie Losses

First Posted: 08/21/10 01:50 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:25 PM ET

Barney

Congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, sent a letter to the White House Friday, demanding the Federal Housing Finance Administration [FHFA] use all the powers at its disposal to recover some of the roughly $150 billion taxpayers lost to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through bad loans purchased from private banks.

The missive to President Obama comes just a week after Frank told HuffPost Hill the mortgage giants are all but obsolete: "A year from now, there won't be a Fannie and Freddie. There won't be those hybrids. But you will have the home loan banks. You'll have the FHA [Federal Housing Administration], you'll have Ginnie Mae, you'll have some other types."

As HuffPost Hill first reported, on August 13 Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.) circulated a letter among colleagues in support of Ed DeMarco, the acting director of the FHFA, who has led the charge in subpoening banks for passing bad mortgages off onto Fannie and Freddie, and by extension, taxpayers.

Reps. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.), chairman of the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, and Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) joined Miller in requesting that taxpayer funds be recovered to the greatest extent possible.

Now Frank too is stepping forward.

With the President set to nominate a new FHFA director, Frank and his colleagues are emphatic that the next FHFA pick follow in DeMarco's footsteps, pursuing all legal paths to limit taxpayer losses.

Frank writes in his letter to Obama:

The losses suffered by Fannie and Freddie have created great cost for the taxpayers--almost $150 billion to date. These losses largely result from business decisions during the bubble years that were honest but flawed. Taxpayers have continued to suffer anew for poor underwriting by these companies during the bubble years.

However, some of these losses result from deception. Private companies sold Fannie and Freddie loans or securities based on fraudulent documents. These transactions created private profits at public expense, and they should be fought with every tool at the companies' and the agency's disposal. These deals must not be allowed to get lost in the shuffle.

I have been pleased at the steps both the FHFA and the companies have taken so far, but it must continue. The extraordinary measures taken to stabilize the financial system over the last two years were done for the benefit of ordinary Americans. We owe it to them to make every effort to make sure that the money is not diverted instead into the pockets of others. I hope you will continue to keep this in mind as you chart the future of FHFA and these companies.

This message puts Frank and other top Democrats at odds with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

This week Geithner told attendees of a housing finance conference that it is no use crying over spilled milk; the government should focus on fixing the system to prevent a future financial crisis.

"There is nothing we can do to decrease the significant losses Fannie and Freddie incurred ahead of this crisis," Geithner told his audience Tuesday. "All we can do is to minimize the risk that they get worse."

Based on the current U.S. Census Bureau population estimates, what Geithner describes as unrecoverable "losses" break down to $483 for every man, woman and child in the country.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, sent a letter to the White House Friday, demanding the Federal Housing Finance Administration [FHFA] use all the...
Congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, sent a letter to the White House Friday, demanding the Federal Housing Finance Administration [FHFA] use all the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 127
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:02 PM on 08/23/2010
Wait, there's more, the best is yet to come:

"How did Fannie and Freddie counter such efforts? They flooded Washington with lobbying dollars, doled out tens of thousands in political contributions and put offices in key congressional districts. Not surprisingly, these efforts worked. Leaders in Congress did not just balk at proposals to rein in Fannie and Freddie. They mocked the proposals as unserious and unnecessary.

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said the following on Sept. 11, 2003: "We see entities that are fundamentally sound financially. . . . And even if there were a problem, the federal government doesn't bail them out."

Sen. Thomas Carper (D-Del.), later that year: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Well is is "BROKE". Give back all of the lobbying money you took. Schnooks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:59 PM on 08/23/2010
Frank admitted he was wrong. Nothing on mainstream media. Zip.

http://townhall.com/columnists/LarryKudlow/2010/08/21/barney_frank_comes_home_to_facts

"Here is what we saw firsthand at the White House from late 2002 through 2007: Starting in 2002, White House and Treasury Department economic policy staffers, with support from then-Chief of Staff Andy Card, began to press for meaningful reforms of Fannie, Freddie and other government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)....President Bush was receptive to reform. He withheld nominees for Fannie and Freddie's boards -- a presidential privilege. While it would have been valuable politically to use such positions to reward supporters, the president put good policy above good politics...Note the following passage from the 2005 budget: Fannie, Freddie and other GSEs "are highly leveraged, holding much less capital in relation to their assets than similarly sized financial institutions. . . . A misjudgment or unexpected economic event could quickly deplete this capital, potentially making it difficult for a GSE to meet its debt obligations. Given the very large size of each enterprise, even a small mistake by a GSE could have consequences throughout the economy."

That passage was published in February 2004. Dodd can find it on Page 82 of the budget's Analytical Perspectives.

The administration not only identified the problem, it also recommended a solution. There is more to read in this excellent article.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/11/AR2008091102841.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:58 AM on 08/22/2010
Fannie and Freddie need to re-verify all documentation in every loan file that has gone bad in the last five years. If it's fraudulent then the loan should be required to be repurchased by the originating bank. I have no doubt that most of the $150B lost by FNMA & FHLMC could be recovered with this process. Kudos to Frank on this one. WTF is wrong with Obama and Geithner?
07:40 PM on 08/21/2010
Thank goodness President and Congress passed legislation to alleviate Freddie and Fannie of government student loans and have went back to the old days where individuals apply for their own loans and repayment programs.

De-regulation...the gift that just keeps on giving.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:12 PM on 08/21/2010
""There is nothing we can do to decrease the significant losses Fannie and Freddie incurred ahead of this crisis," Geithner told his audience Tuesday."

should we have said the same thing about 9/11?

we are at war with the financial terrorists who have rape_d our country into a second Depression.

geithner, summers, rubin, bernanke, greenspam, fuld, blankfein, dimon, and all their ilk belong in pri$on next to their buddy bernie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
12:24 PM on 08/21/2010
When does it become relevant to start thinking about ending one or both programs?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald Fannin
11:59 AM on 08/21/2010
Let's see how this works. First you give banks money to cover bad mortgage loans, now we sue the banks for the bad loans they passed on to Freddie and Fannie, then tomorrow we give the banks more money so they can pay their judgments???
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
11:57 AM on 08/21/2010
"There is nothing we can do to decrease the significant losses Fannie and Freddie incurred ahead of this crisis," Geithner told his audience Tuesday.

No, but we can make sure the writers of "no look" loans take those losses, not the taxpayers.
Which is what Frank is saying.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:33 AM on 08/21/2010
Even if he did misjudge the situation in the past, I admire Barney Frank for standing up for the people now. We all make mistakes, and many did about Freddie and Fannie.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:13 PM on 08/23/2010
So, is he hoping that people will forgive and vote for him? Reverse psychology sort of thing? I hope not. Throw all of the bums out.
10:32 AM on 08/21/2010
I love how it's ALL Franks fault according to some posts. Yes -he said before the crisis that Fanny and Freddie were gonna be OK. Just like I thought I was OK financially in '08. Both of us had the same problem- we didn't know how badly Wall St. had screwed up. The number of mortgages that failed was high and would have caused problems on their own-but it was the backroom deals and heads I win-tales you lose dealings on Wall St. that made a problem a disaster! Follow the money-who benefitted from this unnatural disaster?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:13 PM on 08/23/2010
"Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said the following on Sept. 11, 2003: "We see entities that are fundamentally sound financially. . . . And even if there were a problem, the federal government doesn't bail them out."
10:15 AM on 08/21/2010
I seriously LOVE how Barney Frank has done a complete 180 on his stances on Fannie and Freddie . . .

Of course he'll never admit it but he used to use them as his little pet, now they are a problem and he'd probably have voted with the Rs when they tried to reign in F & F years ago . . . which at that time he said no way.
photo
TremoluxMan
Politics: BS on Steroids.
10:10 AM on 08/21/2010
So, which banks off-loaded craptacular mortgages to Fannie & Freddie? Wouldn't be some buddies of L'il Timmy now, would it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 AM on 08/21/2010
How immature and meaningless.
photo
TremoluxMan
Politics: BS on Steroids.
11:50 AM on 08/21/2010
You mean Geithner? I agree.
09:57 AM on 08/21/2010
Why is anyone still listening to Barney Frank? This guy is so deep in lobbyist pockets and made so many terrible decisions leading to the current financial crisis. Why isn't anyone leading the charge to hold HIM accountable? Get this political hack out before he does more damage. He has a lot of financial blood on his hands (not that it bothers him in the least). He's easily done as much damage to our country and my kids future as Bush and Cheney.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:18 PM on 08/23/2010
He's not as high up on the list as others.....http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html

#1 Dodd, #2 Barack Obama, #3 John Kerry. Frank is a piker compared to them.
09:55 AM on 08/21/2010
On thing is abundantly clear, we can not trust our government. Government says oil gone from Gulf; scientist find twenty mile long plume deep in Gulf. Time is coming for citizen uprising! Enough is enough! Get your torches and pitchforks at the ready.
10:23 AM on 08/21/2010
"Government says oil gone from Gulf"

Heck if we trusted Jimmy Carter, there wouldn't be oil in the Gulf because he went on national TV and told us that there would be no more oil and we'd run out by the early 1980s
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:15 AM on 08/21/2010
Correction; If we trusted Jimmy Carter, the White House would still have solar roof panels, we would have solar panels on all government buildings and our cars would be electric.
He was right about the energy crisis and our way out, but wrong about 'peak oil'.
Still, on the energy issue we have not had a President since who understood the problem as well as Carter did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim1478
08:49 PM on 08/21/2010
President Jimmy Carter understood the dangers of onshore and offshore drilling and at the time respected intentions not to go where the damage could be catastrophic. That changed under Bush Senior when he authorized offshore drilling and hence, the gulf is a miserable death trap.
09:44 AM on 08/21/2010
If we go after all these banks who passed on bad loans, which used to be considered good loans that they were encouraged to make to help spread the joys of homeonwership, we will need to take money back from the banks. This will make them insolvent. When they are insolvent, either one branch of the government will bail them out, or another branch will take them over and cover their loses. Either way, it is us taxpayers who are paying for it.