EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Oil Spill Claims: New Guidelines Could Rule Out Many Gulf Victims

First Posted: 8/21/10 Updated: 5/25/11

Gulf Oil Spill Claims
Brian Amos trawls for shrimp on the trawler 'Rolling Thunder' in Bastian Bay, near Empire, La., on the first day of shrimping season since the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Monday, Aug. 16, 2010. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

MIAMI (Associated Press) - A flower shop in Florida that saw a drop-off in weddings this summer is probably out of luck. So is a restaurant in Idaho that had to switch seafood suppliers. A hardware store on the Mississippi coast may be left out, too.

The latest guidelines for BP's $20 billion victims compensation fund say the nearer you are geographically to the oil spill and the more closely you depend on the Gulf of Mexico's natural resources, the better chance you have of getting a share of the money.

Also, a second set of rules expected this fall will require that businesses and individuals seeking compensation for long-term losses give up their right to sue BP and other spill-related companies -- something that could save the oil giant billions.

The new rules for the claims process were released Friday by Washington lawyer Kenneth Feinberg, who was picked by President Barack Obama to run the fund and previously oversaw claims for 9/11 victims. Beginning Monday, the claims will be handled by Feinberg rather than BP, which is still footing the entire $20 billion bill.

Who gets paid and who doesn't will depend largely on how much proof there is that losses were caused by the spill and not by something else, such as the recession. Feinberg's guidelines say key factors include a claimant's geographic proximity to the disaster and how much the business or property is linked to "injured natural resources."

Feinberg elaborated on his reasoning during town meetings this week in Louisiana.
"How close are you to the beach? To the Gulf? BP got claims from restaurants in Idaho. Go figure," he said. "How close are you? That's a major factor. How dependent are you, as an individual or a business, on the resources of the Gulf?"

That worries business owners like Susan Mitchell, who runs a flower shop about a mile from Pensacola Beach, Fla., where tarballs from the spill washed up. She said her business was down about $4,000 this year in July from the year before.

"But it is hard to prove exactly why that is and everyone keeps telling us we have to prove that it was because of the oil," she said. "We usually have beach weddings all summer. We deliver to hotels with people having birthday parties and celebrations on the beach."

Jeffrey Breit, a Virginia-based lawyer who represents more than 600 Gulf Coast fishermen, said the geographic limitations will certainly cut out many deserving claimants.

"I think it's unfair to draw arbitrary geographic lines when it is clear that many businesses rely on the natural resources of the Gulf for their livelihoods," Breit said.

The new rules govern emergency claims that can be made between Monday and Nov. 23 at Gulf Coast claims offices, by mail or through the Internet. Feinberg said his goal is to issue emergency checks within 24 hours for individuals and seven days for businesses. Many people have complained about the sluggish BP process.

The attorneys general of Alabama and Florida sent Feinberg letters objecting to many of the new rules. Florida's Bill McCollum said people will face a much heavier burden of proof trying to show the spill caused their losses.

"The current process appears to be even less generous to Floridians than the BP process," McCollum wrote. "Such an outcome is completely unacceptable."

Those seeking emergency payments will not have to give up their right to sue BP and other companies. But the rules for final, long-term settlements will include a waiver of that right.
That drew protests Friday from a leading trial lawyers group, the American Association for Justice, which said the rule could force claimants to decide whether to accept a BP payment or go to court before the full extent of the damage is known. For example, attorneys said, there could be health effects that take years to develop, or environmental damage that might not surface for years.

"BP is trying to cut off damages. They realize that small payments will be grabbed by some, and then in the future they will have no access to justice," said Jere Beasley, a Montgomery, Ala., lawyer who is representing oil spill clients. "Which is sad, but true."

But many people might choose to file a claim because lawsuits can drag on for years and because attorneys often take one-third of any damages as their fee.

Already more than 300 lawsuits have been filed against BP and other companies involved in the disaster, which began April 20 with an explosion aboard an offshore oil rig that killed 11 workers.

At Diamondhead, Miss., along the Gulf Coast, Don Farrar, owner of Diamond Ace Hardware and Diamondhead Florist, said he has received two checks from BP for thousands of dollars but is worried what will happen when the claims process changes hands. He said the spill's economic toll has reached far beyond fishermen and tourist businesses.

"I have a hardware store and a florist. Even my florist is down," he said. "When a fishermen is not making money, he's not going to be buying a house, he's not going to be painting his house, and he's not going to be buying paint from me."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
MIAMI (Associated Press) - A flower shop in Florida that saw a drop-off in weddings this summer is probably out of luck. So is a restaurant in Idaho that had to switch seafood suppliers. A hardware st...
MIAMI (Associated Press) - A flower shop in Florida that saw a drop-off in weddings this summer is probably out of luck. So is a restaurant in Idaho that had to switch seafood suppliers. A hardware st...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 344
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
clearwaterclearmind
couldn't stand bush. can't stand obama for the sam
11:04 AM on 08/23/2010
DC is jealously hoarding this little slush fund.
09:05 AM on 08/23/2010
When BP first agreed to this $20B "shakedown­" I thought they were crazy... Crazy like a fox apparently­.

Claimants are never satisfied. If you give them a fair deal, they still feel wronged - the process was too onerous, not enough payout, took too long... Human nature. BP transferre­d all those headaches to President Obama. He got a short term bump for cracking down on BP - but now starts the long haul of getting it done... I bet it goes through November..­.
blogisti
Approved Knowledge Only
05:49 PM on 08/22/2010
Too bad for "the little people" but BP, as a large Corporatio­n, is too big to fail. Better the little people fail than the Big People and their property. Is it clear yet who owns America? Is it clear yet who the Government works for? If it isn't yet clear it will become clear to even the most slow witted person over the next few years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lasse Von Gakhausen
03:59 PM on 08/22/2010
http://www­.helium.co­m/items/19­29422-bp-g­ulf-disast­er-may-be-­killing-mi­llions?pag­e=3

Millions have been poisoned in the gulf states
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:57 PM on 08/22/2010
could is not the same as will. "But the rules for final, long-term settlement­s will include a waiver of that right" hhheelllll­ooooo, that is what a settlement m-e-a-n-s. duh! also from this same newzzz source: the federal government will be taking over the handling of claims against bp. Accumulate­d Propaganda is speculatin­g and guessing. the article is dangerous rumor mongering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChaiKat
Just trying to keep what little I have.
02:36 PM on 08/22/2010
Way to kick someone while they are down.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
12:19 PM on 08/22/2010
This video describes who contribute­d to Obamas campaign;

http://www­.worldstar­hiphop.com­/videos/vi­deo.php?v=­wshhYwP8RS­iP8N49d4Q6
photo
John Mainstream
I'm a Clinton Democrat that is now an independent.
10:45 AM on 08/22/2010
Clearly, Obama cares more about raising campaign money from special interests than he cares about the 23,000 folks he put out of work for purely political reasons.
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floodberg
Attorney (ret.)
11:57 AM on 08/22/2010
Almondo, I always think the best thing about HP comments is that they make me rethink my own opinions (and I've actually changed positions on some important topics because of the impetus), but second best are great links. Looks like I've got my day's reading and research plotted out. Faved, especially for the first one!
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
01:39 PM on 08/23/2010
huh?
02:02 AM on 08/22/2010
BP made Obama and his administra­tion look like the amateurs they are when they got the $20 billion dollar number accepted as legitimate in the public domain (actually is is $5 billion per year for 4 years), and then put the take it or wait years argument (that exposes the trial bar for the greedy jerks they are) out into circulatio­n via Ken Feinberg. If BP spent as much per gallon spilled as Exxon did on the Valdez, the number would be more like $100 billion.

The Gulf Coast thanks you Mr. President. It was sad to see you go up against a group of profession­al negotiator­s who deal with heads of state much sharper than you on a monthly basis.
06:02 AM on 08/22/2010
Are you saying that the Bush admin. who is basted in oil would have protected us from this when they allowed everything to happen by deregulati­ng all the regulation­s that people who really cared about our nation worked so hard to enact to protect our nation from the GREED of the insatiable­.
01:04 AM on 08/24/2010
My dear friend BlueSky - The trouble is the insatiably greedy are us. We are the ones who have these strange ideas about driving our cars and heating and air conditioni­ng our homes, to say nothing of the good old days when energy drove our manufactur­ing processes that kept people employed. We is the insatiable ones. I'm sure you, on the other hand, walk or skateboard everyplace­.
01:56 PM on 08/22/2010
Man, FreedomDaw­g, are you tough on the President! Problem is, I can't refute what you say. I'm even somewhat reluctantl­y inclined to agree. Let's hope this is your "tough love" way of encouragin­g Obama to become a better President. I was glad to see the wildly irresponsi­bly optimistic assessment­s about only 25% of the oil remaining problemati­c that the Obama administra­tion was asserting a couple of weeks ago being refuted now. Encouragin­g folks to eat possibly poisonous/­tainted seafood to limit negative political fallout: not a good thing. "Jeffrey Breit, a Virginia-b­ased lawyer who represents more than 600 Gulf Coast fishermen, said the geographic limitation­s will certainly cut out many deserving claimants.­"I think it's unfair to draw arbitrary geographic lines when it is clear that many businesses rely on the natural resources of the Gulf for their livelihood­s," Breit said." Ya think? To those in power, it's all about minimizing BP's exposure to liability, not compensati­ng local businesses­. Here's the link to that song I wrote about BP if anyone cares to check it out: http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=FMvPDK8oJ­Bk
photo
SolarArray
Get your Health Stamps before they run out!
01:55 AM on 08/22/2010
BP is such a caring company. They always do the most humane things for the good of the planet and they sure set a high example for others to follow.
Now, for more FOX News......­.
photo
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
12:17 AM on 08/22/2010
Thank you for your personal interventi­on, Mr. President.

Since you, personally promised to make them whole, the failure to do so will be PERCEIVED, as your failure.

And you have directed the Secretary of the Navy, to plan coastal restoratio­n!
11:10 PM on 08/21/2010
Of course the Government and BP aren't working together. :-()
10:57 PM on 08/21/2010
well good news barak has made all the fishing boats sign a waiver that id their catch is tainted they have the responsibi­lity for any and all claims. Yep he sure is on his game in martha's vineyard
photo
StevieRae
Unknown knowns are knowable
10:25 PM on 08/21/2010
And what do we do about a fishing/sh­rimp trade that has done business historical­ly on a cash basis??
photo
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
12:19 AM on 08/22/2010
Gee! I'm sure if you provide your banking history for the last10 years,
they will base all claims against unreported income and
the IRS won't take the family home, just the worthless boat.
photo
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
12:37 AM on 08/22/2010
Sorry, You thought this was about you?
02:04 AM on 08/22/2010
Your implicatio­n is that the fishing fleet is a bunch of tax dodgers? If they are they are screwed, as should anybody be who asks for expensive government programs and then hides income so they can be part of the half of all Americans who pay no net income taxes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:16 PM on 08/21/2010
Stopping drilling in progress will exaccerbat­e the depression and have long term harmful affects on our costs and supply of energy,spe­cifically oil and gas.
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
11:01 AM on 08/22/2010
I guess it won't really matter if we are all de.ad, huh?
http://www­.mcclatchy­dc.com/201­0/08/17/99­320/toxic-­oil-levels­-found-in-­key.html
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
01:44 PM on 08/22/2010
Since only 8% of the oil consumed in the US comes from the Gulf the impact of a complete shutdown of Gulf production would be....8% give or take.

And since stopping DRILLING affects exactly 0% of the current production (drilling != production­), the impact of this moratorium on supply is...0% give or take.

"The same EIA fact sheet shows that offshore crude oil production in the Gulf of Mexico accounts for 8 percent of total U.S. liquid fuels consumed."
http://www­.politifac­t.com/trut­h-o-meter/­statements­/2010/jun/­21/orrin-h­atch/hatch­-says-30-p­ercent-our­-oil-comes­-gulf/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:55 PM on 08/22/2010
As we become penurious and destitute, our energy needs decline. We become closer to nature. We become the servants rather than the masters of nature.
The American Indians followed the doctrine that man's sole aim was to fit within the matrix of nature, to adjust and not to disturb, to obey nature's laws. That appears the direction of the American people in their precipitio­us decline.
Our forefather­s set us on a course to conquer nature and subdue a continent. As we reached the pinnacle of that stupendous triumph, suddenly, we are turning around and casting our fate to the wind.