More

Obama Administration Stem Cell Regulations Temporarily Blocked

PETE YOST   08/23/10 09:00 PM ET   AP

Stem Cell Blocked
A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked Obama administration regulations expanding stem cell research.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked government rules expanding stem cell research, a blow to the Obama administration that could stall potentially lifesaving research.

The nonprofit group Nightlight Christian Adoptions contends that the government's new guidelines will decrease the number of human embryos available for adoption and implantation. Nightlight helps individuals adopt human embryos that are being stored in fertilization clinics. The group provides domestic, international and embryo adoption services to families in all 50 states.

A federal appeals court had ruled that two fellow plaintiffs – doctors who do research with adult stem cells, James Sherley of the Boston Biomedical Research Institute and Theresa Deisher of AVM Biotechnology – were entitled to sue over the new guidelines, prompting U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth on Monday to reverse a decision he made in October when he dismissed the lawsuit.

Sherley and Deisher allege that the guidelines will result in increased competition for limited federal funding and will injure their ability to compete successfully for National Institutes of Health stem cell research money.

Federal law explicitly forbids use of taxpayer dollars to destroy a human embryo – and culling stem cells from an embryo does destroy the embryo. However, once created, these batches of stem cells, or lines, can reproduce indefinitely in lab dishes.

The Obama administration expanded the number of stem cell lines created with private money that federally funded scientists could research, up from the 21 that President George W. Bush had allowed to 75 so far. To qualify, the NIH insisted on evidence that the woman or couple who donated the original embryo did so voluntarily and were told of other options, such as donating to another infertile woman.

Lamberth concluded that those filing the lawsuit have demonstrated a strong likelihood of success in arguing that the new government guidelines violate the intent of the law about federal funding of embryo destruction.

"As demonstrated by the plain language of the statute, the unambiguous intent of Congress is to prohibit the expenditure of federal funds on 'research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed,'" the judge wrote.

Having concluded that the law is unambiguous, "the question before the court is whether ESC research is research in which a human embryo is destroyed. The court concludes that it is," Lamberth added.

The judge's ruling drew praise from the Alliance Defense Fund, a group of Christian attorneys and co-counsel in the suit.

"The American people should not be forced to pay for experiments – prohibited by federal law – that destroy human life. The court is simply enforcing an existing law passed by Congress that prevents Americans from paying another penny for needless research on human embryos," Steven H. Aden, ADF's senior legal counsel, said.

Stem cell research has the potential to produce breakthroughs in treating life-threatening conditions – from spinal cord injury to diabetes to Parkinson's – that have resisted traditional treatment. Scientists say they need to do research with embryonic stem cells as well as so-called adult ones because the former are more flexible, and the NIH is funding both types.

"This injunction blocks important research on how to unlock the enormous potential of human embryonic stem cells," said Sean Tipton of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, a group that treats infertility and does research with a variety of stem cell types. "It will be incredibly disruptive and once again drive the best scientific minds into work less likely to yield treatments for conditions from diabetes to spinal cord injury."

Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a conservative public policy foundation, called the decision "a stinging rebuke to the Obama administration and its attempt to circumvent sound science and federal law."

The NIH declined to comment, referring calls to the Justice Department, where department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said the ruling was under review.

In his ruling, Lamberth said the injury of increased competition that Sherley and Deisher would face because of the guidelines "is not speculative. It is actual and imminent. Indeed, the guidelines threaten the very livelihood of plaintiffs Sherley and Deisher."

Nightlight helps individuals adopt human embryos that are being stored in fertilization clinics. It began the program in 1997, using some of more than 400,000 frozen embryos.

The group's executive director, Ron Stoddart, said the organization was "pleased" with Lambert's ruling, although he said "we're not sure what the Justice Department will do."

___

AP Medical Writer Lauran Neergaard contributed to this report.

Online:

http://www.nightlight.org/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,405
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (131 total)
  1 of 22  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Luna C666 02:44 AM on 08/24/2010
To anyone arguing against this on religious grounds..

The early church was also against the first-known artificial cure for a human disease, using Guaiacum in the early 1500s to treat syphilis, because those who had contracted syphilis had obviously done so because they had done something to encourage God to punish them, and anyone curing syphilis was giving someone a reprieve from an Ultimate  Read More...
04:51 PM on 08/25/2010
"The American people should not be forced to pay for experiments...that destroy human life...needless research...".

This |d|ot should be made aware of any life that's lost from now on due to this ruling. Send obituary notices to his office.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
UpstateNY
03:51 PM on 08/25/2010
We are a nation being held hostage by science-haters.

They want to have people adopt abandoned embryos? How do you adopt an embryo? Is it implanted into a womb? It's beyond understanding to me. If these are Christians - why don't they trust God enough to decide what to do. Scientists who fear God's retribution will not go into this type of work and the rest of us stay out of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Engwall
10:21 AM on 08/25/2010
When I had a spinal cord injury 8 years ago, I was told all the time, "Don't worry, Sam in 10 years they will be able to fix it." I find it discouraging that I am hearing the exact same phrase today. These road blocks affect real people from getting the medical treatment they need. I am just one of many all over the US that will wait a little longer because of actions like these.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
UpstateNY
03:56 PM on 08/25/2010
Christopher Reeve died waiting for advances that could come with stem cell research. The actions of these 'Christians' are hurting (and killing) human beings. How is that right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LukeTunyich
Biomechanics and Health
08:59 PM on 08/25/2010
I believe that one day the spinal cord injury will be cured.

I believe in the progress of science but I don’t believe that will happen because of stem cell research.
I believe that “stem cells research” is a waste of time and money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Engwall
10:32 PM on 08/25/2010
Well, most of the global scientific community disagrees with you Luke. In fact, stem cells are already being used to treat certain types of cancer, and there has been limited success in newly injured people with SCI already.

One of the biggest misconceptions in the general public is that fetal stem cells will be harvested and implanted into people with injuries. This is a lie, I believe, propagated by those who are against the research. The fact is that in order for stem cell therapy to work, it has to be cells that are cultured from the recipient. Just like human organs, stem cells from donors get rejected and destroyed by the recipient's immune system... So in order for them to become the working, living cells we want them to be, they must genetically match the recipient.

The research is just research, to get us to the point where we can understand, grow and manipulate these cells and put their potential therapy into action.

Stem cells, I believe, will fundamentally change medicine (just like vaccines did throughout the 20th century), and hold significant promise.

Throughout history there will always be naysayers such as yourself, Luke, and there is nothing wrong with that. I just hope, for my own sake, you turn out to be wrong.
10:50 PM on 08/25/2010
Well, it has worked in mice and human trials were coming until this ruling. On what scientific basis do you think it is a waste of time and money? How will spinal cord injuries be cured in your estimation?
photo
scorpioman
The Naked Truth
07:48 PM on 08/24/2010
BREAKING NEWS: Activist judges blocking all progress!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maattwo
07:20 PM on 08/24/2010
I have a challenge for the journalists on this list. Who appointed this judge? Does he have a pro-life affiliation, which would be the case for virtually any judge appointed by George W. Bush. Are the plaintiffs and the judge pursuing a pro-life agenda? The consistent extremism of Bush judicial appointees have skewed the legal system substantially in other areas, especially in favoring corporations over individuals. Is the extremism of this decision a continuing legacy of Bush v Gore? I hope someone is paying attention.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
UpstateNY
03:55 PM on 08/25/2010
It doesn't matter if this judge is pro-life (just like it didn't matter whether the Prop 8 judge was gay). Judges are supposed to judge according to the law. I don't think the law was with this judge - I may be wrong and need lawyers to explain that one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maattwo
11:26 PM on 08/25/2010
Actually, that's a great fantasy. In real life, Judges often rule in ways that can be predicted based on their prior lives. For example,I strongly suspect that the reason we have so many Catholics on the Supreme court is that, with the exception of Sotomayor I hope, they represent people who are firmly anti-abortion but who also have the proper legal training and writing credentials. GWB's staff vetted his judicial appointments through the anti-abortion, pro-corporate criteria of the contemporary Republican party. It shows in district court decisions. The fear that Obama would play the same game (he's not, at least not as rigidly) fuels Republican obstruction of his judicial appointments.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nancy Lloyd
07:20 PM on 08/24/2010
Someone partake of too much Bush last Decade, and now we're suffering from the hangover.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
station agent
06:13 PM on 08/25/2010
Fanned and faved....
06:49 PM on 08/24/2010
i am afraid for my country, afraid that we might turn into an evangelical theocracy
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
UpstateNY
03:53 PM on 08/25/2010
That's exactly what it sounds like. The Taliban couldn't have done a better job.
photo
mariusvinchi
Saint Lucia is looking better and better every day
05:43 PM on 08/24/2010
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM!!!! Where are the right wing-nuts with their battle cry? You know, like when Judge Walker reversed Prop 8? What's good for the Goose is apparently poison for the Gander.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kallou22
05:42 PM on 08/24/2010
This is really about the two adult stem cell researchers that didn't want to have to compete with embryonic for fed dollars. Here's your free market.
05:33 PM on 08/24/2010
Did anyone inform this judge that they are removed from the body before they are stimulated to grow. Making them not that much different than what comes out of a women once a month.

I wonder if they run around collecting tampons to save them too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heardingcats
05:04 PM on 08/24/2010
I have Osteoarthritis in both knees; almost to the bone on bone stage. I was told that in 2001they were roughly eight years away from perfecting cartilage replacement via stem cells. If the Bush administration had not pulled the plug, treatment would most likely be available today...I guess tossing the unused eggs from fertility clinics makes SO much more sense
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
murmur55
05:00 PM on 08/24/2010
I just heard one of the stem cell experts on the radio. This is a terrible setback for stem cell research right now. People are going to lose their jobs because the money is being tied up by some religious freaks who have no sense of morality; the same religious freaks who thought nothing of abusing my sister and leaving abandoned on the streets of Boston psychotic and suicidal. Religion is the dark night of the soul.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okieborn
Equal Rights For All !
04:27 PM on 08/24/2010
This is life saving research. how very sad.
photo
realitycitizen
Proud American, Proud Gentile
04:01 PM on 08/24/2010
Im so sick of a bunch of brainless activists and big government bureaucrats getting in the way of scientific progress.

Government should be there to protect science, and take the fight to the opposition.
Henri101
There is nothing more dangerous than sincere ignor
03:43 PM on 08/24/2010
A federal judge who seems to not fully comprehend the law he is attempting to interpret has sided with 2 selfish women who do not want additional competition for federal funds. A group of conservative extreme groups are expressing joyous satisfaction because they detest research on human embryos. Shame on these two women who think they should be provided federal money without competition and the conservative groups for not understanding that the medications their members take on a daily basis were only approved for sale after being tested on living beings; some who died during the testing because they were given only placebo. Selfisness and ignorance are consummating a marriage and the rest of us are going to suffer.
03:51 PM on 08/24/2010
Henri what did the judge do wrong?