iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Boehner's Economic Plan Would Increase Deficit By $3.781 Trillion, Think Tank Finds

First Posted: 08/25/10 05:20 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:30 PM ET

John Boehner

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) was short on specifics during his much-touted economic address in Cleveland this week, promising to offer a more detailed plan as the election approached.

But the Ohio Republican did outline some ideas about how President Obama could restructure both his White House staff and the economy. And in a subsequent report analyzing his suggestions -- which included the firing of top economic advisers -- the progressive think tank NDN estimates that the plans could exacerbate the deficit by roughly $3.7 trillion over the next ten years.

NDN is, obviously, not an un-biased source in the debate. But they base much of their data on non-partisan indicators. Boehner's suggestions stand little chance of becoming law. They were offered, primarily, as a counterpoint to the agenda that the president is pushing. But NDN's President and Founder Simon Rosenberg makes the case that in a year when deficit reduction is a cause celebre, Democrats would be well served, simply, by highlighting the numbers.

Here is the report NDN put together, titled: "The Fiscal Impact of the Boehner Plan"

1. Fully Extend the Bush Tax Cuts.

Increase deficits and debt by $3.8 trillion over ten years.

2. Have the president veto the Employee Free Choice Act, a carbon tax or cap and trade, and "any other tax increases on families and small businesses" if passed during a lame-duck session of Congress.

Unable to assess impact of hypotheticals, but the provision impairs ability to address deficits and debt, including the potential loss of $624 billion in revenue over ten years from a carbon regime.

3. Call on Congress to repeal the provision in healthcare reform mandating that small businesses file IRS 1099 forms on purchases of over $600.

Increase the deficits and debt by $17 billion over ten years per Congressional Budget Office estimate. The provision was included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to close the business tax gap.

4. Reduce non-defense discretionary spending to 2008 levels.

In 2008, non-defense discretionary spending was approximately $494 billion. Under the President's proposed 2011 budget, non-security discretionary spending is $530 billion. In his State of the Union Address, the President announced a three year freeze on non-security discretionary spending, and levels drop to $490 billion in 2012 and $480 billion in 2013. Boehner's remarks did not address a plan beyond that point. This proposal would therefore save $36 billion next year and nothing thereafter.

5. Resignations of the President's economic team, starting with Secretary of the Treasury Geithner and National Economic Council Director Larry Summers.

The position of NEC Director is not Senate confirmed, so it is fair to estimate that it would take the Administration two weeks to fill that position. Estimating for the taxes paid on his $172,000 annual salary, two weeks without an NEC Director would save the Federal government between $5000 and $6000.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner makes an annual salary of $191,300. Because he is Senate confirmed, it is safe to estimate that it will take two months for his confirmation. Therefore, two months without a Treasury Secretary would likely save the Federal government between $25,000 and 26,000. Therefore, these resignations amount to a fiscal impact of $30,000 - $32,000 of deficit reduction over the next two months.

Total Fiscal Impact of the Boehner Plan: Increase Deficits and Debt by roughly $3.781 trillion over ten years.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) was short on specifics during his much-touted economic address in Cleveland this week, promising to offer a more detailed plan as the election approached. ...
House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) was short on specifics during his much-touted economic address in Cleveland this week, promising to offer a more detailed plan as the election approached. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 906
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
10:00 AM on 09/05/2010
Maybe he and Palin can have a slap and tickle fight.
09:53 AM on 09/05/2010
It seems to me that Boehner is now using the ' Palin Plan '....
Whine..... whine... whine. No credible ideas... but If you're a GOPer... you feel right at home.
At least Boehner is keeping all the Tanning Salons in business. Way to go, John. That's something. They should just sit in the corner with their dunce caps, and let the adults run things. I have never seen someone cry and whine to the extent this man does. But the things they are currently proposing are policies that have already failed.
These are Senators from the same Senate Rebublicans who 2 summers ago were imploring all of us to be patient until President Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy took effect and money would come pouring down on the middle class, like manna from heaven. Short Memorys.
Don't worry about the jobs, you voted against them. I think Boehner just wants to know where the jobs are because he knows he'll have to look for one soon. Maybe he can volunteer for Panama Jack to test out their latest sunscreen.
Some of the Republicans seem to be able to do is cause fear and critisize when they know it will cause the most damage.
They're hoping to enlist the low information voter who don't know any better.
To stop confusing the angry republicans with facts! If you prove them wrong, they'll have to watch Fox or Limbaugh to find out how to spin it!
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
04:03 AM on 08/29/2010
we keep hearing about the rich and tax cuts...the top 1 percent earn $410k the top 5 percent earn 160k the top 10 percent 113k. how long before we are all the rich? the top 50 percent is 33k...so if the bottom 50 decide they want more freebies...who do you think they will come for? the top 1 percent isnt enough dollars to make a dent in our deficit....it is political class warfare that most folks buy into...they already pay a higher percentage and more dollars...how much more will we penalize them...400k isnt rich in new york city....
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
04:18 PM on 08/26/2010
Here is a great way to judge how to vote if you think the party you vote for will be better for big corporate special interests and don't have your interest at heart then vote for them, own the other hand if you think you have a better chance at the party that is trying to help you then please vote for them, it isn't rocket science!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
04:14 PM on 08/26/2010
Beginning to wonder if the plan is to bankrupt the country so we can start over without all that debt to China and Japan, if a total collapse of the United States would bring jobs back because we could no longer accept imports from the cheap labor countries. So wipe the books clean and start over who needs a stimulus just let the nation go under!
photo
CommodoreP
Darn the torpedos, full speed ahead!
03:58 PM on 08/26/2010
Still mad about proposed tax hike on tanning beds
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
prodemlib
Nanny, nanny, boo, boo! :-P
03:49 PM on 08/26/2010
He is the representative for the top 2% earners. He has NO NEW IDEAS, but instead wants to fall back to the FAILED policies of the GOP
03:22 PM on 08/26/2010
More republican deja vu. You would think after the Bush years they would have learned, but nooooo. Let's keep trying those failed ideas and expecting different results. Brilliant! Fiscally conservative? They gave that up long ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lefty83
03:18 PM on 08/26/2010
Of course! It's how the GOP rolls
03:03 PM on 08/26/2010
Of course liberals see spending less and taxing less as the wrong thing to do, porkulus and its iterations has done so much good.
03:36 PM on 08/26/2010
It has if you would crack a history book. Nobody wants to go back to the bad old days except a few republicans. Even many of republicans wouldn't vote for it when they figured out what it actually meant.

Who has higher taxes than us? The rest of the 1st world. Who has lower or none. The third world. The countries with higher standards of living have higher tax rates and vice versa. Isn't your standard of living more important than your tax rate? Not saying taxes don't matter at all but where you want to go won't give you a higher standard of living unless your in the 1% club. Is that you? But since your a conservative you won't get it. How about your party be honest about what you want to do and let the public vote on it? Just saying your going to cut peoples taxes sounds great until you explain how your going to do it. The people will not vote for it. That's why republicans rely on lies, deception, fear mongering to get what they want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
02:58 PM on 08/26/2010
But it's a great plan. Don't you get it? The more people that get screwed down in the "lowlands", the bigger the money-grab, by those in the "highlands". Who (up there) could ask for more?
02:33 PM on 08/26/2010
Thanks for turning in your work John but next time please listen to the lesson assignment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Friction57
full grown and still a microbio
02:03 PM on 08/26/2010
The Republican plan is a tax on people bad at math
01:56 PM on 08/26/2010
the GOP is the party of fiscal responsibility ... fiscally responsible for increasing debt!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glenda Sitnek
Just sayin....
01:44 PM on 08/26/2010
This article should have been on the front page of every newspaper, not in my town! The MSM should give as much attention to this as they do the recession stories, but don't hold your breath.