More

Jane Spahr, Presbyterian Minister Who Performed Gay Weddings, Faces Church Trial

First Posted: 08/25/10 11:22 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:30 PM ET

Jane Spahr

By Daniel Burke
Religion News Service

(RNS) For the second time in two years, the Rev. Jane Spahr is on trial in the Presbyterian Church (USA) for performing same-sex weddings.

A retired pastor and self-described "lesbian evangelist," Spahr, 68, was acquitted of similar charges by the denomination's high court in 2008. The same-sex ceremony she had presided over in 2006 was not really a "marriage" since neither church nor state recognized it as such, the court ruled.

Months after that ruling, Spahr again wed a same-sex couple. This time, however, same-sex marriage was legal in California. In fact, Spahr wed more than 16 gay and lesbian couples before California voters passed Proposition 8 and outlawed same-sex marriages in November 2008.

"These are marriages," Spahr said in an interview. "They were legal marriages that were done. There is no question about that."

Now, less than three weeks after a federal judge overturned Prop 8, a seven-judge church court in Napa, Calif., must decide whether Spahr broke church rules while following state law.

Liberal and conservative Presbyterians alike have little doubt about the outcome of the three-day trial that began Tuesday (Aug. 24). They expect the liberal Presbytery of the Redwoods to acquit Spahr.

More important, they say, is what the higher courts decide when the ruling is inevitably appealed, and how Spahr's case plays out in the court of public opinion. A decision from the Redwoods Presbytery court is expected to be issued early next week.

With about 2 million members, the PCUSA is the largest Presbyterian denomination in the U.S., though it has been losing members for decades, with dozens of congregations leaving amid a 40-year fight over homosexuality. On Sunday (Aug. 22), the 1,700-member Colonial Presbyterian Church in Kansas City, Mo., voted to leave the PCUSA to join a more conservative denomination.

Spahr's case also highlights a new dilemma for progressive Presbyterian pastors who live and work in the five states and the District of Columbia where same-sex marriage is legal.

At least a dozen Presbyterian pastors are marrying same-sex couples under the radar, said Pam Byers, executive director of the liberal Covenant Network of Presbyterians.

Under PCUSA law, pastors are allowed to bless same-gender unions, but are not permitted to call them marriages or represent them as such. Many progressive pastors say the rule creates a separate-but-unequal arrangement that alienates their gay and lesbian parishioners.

In Massachusetts, where same-sex marriage has been legal since 2004, a mid-level church court convicted the Rev. Jean Southard in June of violating the PCUSA's constitution and her ordination vows by officiating at the marriage of a lesbian couple.

Southard has appealed the conviction, which will now be considered by the PCUSA's highest court, the Permanent Judicial Council of the General Assembly. That decision will likely come before Spahr's case reaches the high court.

In July, delegates to the PCUSA's General Assembly voted to lift a ban on sexually active gay and lesbian clergy. But the ban must be ratified by a majority of the church's 173 regional presbyteries, where similar moves have been defeated four times in the last dozen years.

In the absence of a firm consensus on same-sex marriage and gay clergy, PCUSA courts have been reluctant to deliver rulings on the merits of cases like Spahr's, often tailoring narrow judgments around technical issues instead.

Some Presbyterians predict Spahr's trial will produce a similar result.

"A lot of time and energy and money will be spent on what in the end will probably not be a clarifying moment for the church," said the Rev. Jerry Andrews, a San Diego pastor and moderator of the conservative Presbyterian Coalition.

"It's doubtful it will stop at the lower level, and its interpretation (of church law) will be ambiguous, maybe intentionally so."

But Byers said the Spahr case provides progressives with another venue to make the case--both inside and outside the courthouse--for gay marriage.

"Jane's ministry is in two parts," Byers said. "It is primarily pastoral, but it's also a ministry of witness. So she has the three days of the trial to present lots and lots of witnesses. The actual import of this case and this ruling is educational."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Daniel Burke Religion News Service (RNS) For the second time in two years, the Rev. Jane Spahr is on trial in the Presbyterian Church (USA) for performing same-sex weddings. A retired pastor and ...
By Daniel Burke Religion News Service (RNS) For the second time in two years, the Rev. Jane Spahr is on trial in the Presbyterian Church (USA) for performing same-sex weddings. A retired pastor and ...
Filed by Clay Chiles  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 59
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JamesSin
02:24 PM on 08/27/2010
That's not a minister, that's Sue Sylvester from Glee
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NYC123
08:56 AM on 08/27/2010
“God Bless you Christians, brothers and sisters in Christ, for speaking out! Speaking out at a time when "what is right by Gods nature," in today's blind world, one (you) is persecuted! Hold firm for scripture speaks of these times -- so in a big way it is good they are here; for it is a sign of the approaching end of this wicket system of things! And more importantly, the sweeping-in of the promised hope of a new heavens and a new earth, and God Almighty's rule will be eternal!! Hallelujah!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
unitarianuniversalist
I LOVE Bernie Sanders & Elizabeth Warren!
03:45 PM on 08/27/2010
I just want to puke right now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NYC123
10:30 PM on 08/27/2010
Don't heart yourself by trying to chew gum and breath!:))
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NYC123
10:32 PM on 08/27/2010
Error I'm sorry! Try again!

Don't hurt yourself (got it this time) by chewing gum and breathing!:))
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Bouchard
I worship His Divine Shadow.
02:20 PM on 08/30/2010
I'm not sure what any of this trip means, but it looks like it's got something to do with cricket.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Dombrowsky
11:37 PM on 08/26/2010
As a member of the PC USA I think the most important thing for us to do is keep up the dialogue. Some day we will have clarity on this issue, but I doubt if it will come in my lifetime. Meanwhile the important thing is to maintain a big theological tent with room for people of many points of view.
06:16 AM on 08/27/2010
Keep violating the bible
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
unitarianuniversalist
I LOVE Bernie Sanders & Elizabeth Warren!
06:53 PM on 08/27/2010
I read your response which was deleted by a Huffington Post moderator. You are the reason I left the church. Intolerance is what it is. No amount of using the Bible to support your views changes that. I thank all that is good and holy that I no longer have to rub shoulders with folks like yourself.
09:13 PM on 08/27/2010
But you have done the same, my brother/sister in Christ, and probably haven't given it a second thought in most cases.

I've used the story of Sodom & Gomorrah to make this point in the past: Today, the focus is almost always on the men wanting to have sex with the angels, but these same protesting, pious souls who value the sanctity of one man/one woman marriage and the right to life hardly ever protest against Lot offering his daughters in the angels' place, or with what happened between Lot and his daughters after the destruction of Sodom & Gomorrah.

Do your modern sensibilities flinch at the idea of offering up your own children, or children in general, to a lusty mob of men? If you don't think it's an issue, then you aren't violating that precept in the Bible, so you're good with God, right? If you recoil at the very thought, then your modern sensibilities probably reject that precept because those particular norms of Lot's day are foreign to our norms and laws here in America, by and large. Ergo, violation without realization.

The point is that there is room for latitude, given our use of free will, and the Bible has countless stories of change and progress, albeit crude at times. That's why "do unto others," in part. Stop. Think. Wonder about the other as fellow humans, not some abstract object to be penalized because they don't act/worship/believe as you do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
unitarianuniversalist
I LOVE Bernie Sanders & Elizabeth Warren!
03:55 PM on 08/27/2010
I'm a former United Methodist and those folks talk our of both sides of their mouths. They have a motto: "Open Doors, Open Hearts, Open Minds." However, their practice is anything but. Among other things, I got tired of their hypocrisy and left for a more open religion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NYC123
06:13 PM on 08/26/2010
I want the gay community to have equal rights like heterosexuals. But lets note, the next group to follow are, Creations that want to marry other forms of creation! And that is taking place in other parts of the world! If the gay commuity deserve marriage -- so does multi-creation marriages! .Why? Becuase the argument is the same, civil rights! And lets be real, the multi-creation community will come up with creation professional whispers will testify and be belived, "These 2 creation have told me they are in love!" We cannot deny them their civil rights.
06:07 PM on 08/26/2010
Hmmmm Marriage is a religious institution not a government so I guess that what it has to do with a church
photo
Dots
The shadow of God is beauty.
02:38 PM on 08/26/2010
Anyway, what does who you have sex with—have to do with the church?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PJ M
02:07 PM on 08/26/2010
Rev. Jane Spahr is far closer to the teachings of Jesus than those trying her.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gun1934
75 years old fisherman
10:04 AM on 08/27/2010
if thats true what yoy said---P J M --then why is she going against the bible and teaching of jesus through the holy spirit to paul--1st-timothy--chap--3--vrs--1--2---this is a true saying-- if a man desire the office of a bishop--he desireth a good work--a bishop then must be blameless--((_ THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE -)) vigilant--sober--of good behaviour--given to hospitality--((APT TO TEACH ))--chap--2--vrs--12 --13----but i suffer not a woman to teach or usurp authority over the man--but to be in silence--for adam was first formed --then eve--and what is an abomination befor jesus christ--is being gay and no repenting
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PJ M
09:23 PM on 08/27/2010
Jesus would not recognize you as a Christian ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Bouchard
I worship His Divine Shadow.
02:32 PM on 08/30/2010
I can't understand what you're saying if you use words but don't put them into sentences.
06:41 PM on 08/27/2010
More in league with teaching Satan not Christ
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PJ M
09:25 PM on 08/27/2010
If Jesus appeared before you today, your mindset is more likely to crucify him again then accept him..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ernie Lijoi
02:07 PM on 08/26/2010
Burn the witch!
01:50 PM on 08/26/2010
That this issue is an issue says so much. No wonder gays still drift towards centres of tolerance.
01:09 PM on 08/26/2010
the inquisitions begin...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbera
Citizen of Planet Earth
12:26 PM on 08/26/2010
When people within the church are being hated by the church, that identifies their visionaries. Just like Israel of old, the church is still stoning the prophets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgieMark
Cogito Ergo Sum
11:48 AM on 08/26/2010
Good on her. While I don't see much point in consecrating marriages (same sex, or different) I have to congratulate the pastor for her ....ahem.... secularism.

Religion comes a poor second to secular legislation and if secular legislation allows same sex marriages then religious officials should bow down their heads and learn how to eat sleep and bathe with it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kathryn Maver
10:50 AM on 08/26/2010
Good Lord, doesn't the Presbyterian Church have some poor to feed or some orphans to clothe?
DrSnuggles
You label me and I'll label you
09:39 AM on 08/26/2010
Maybe it's time churches look to their own ministers and parishes for their worship as opposed to some governing body. I applaud Rev. Spahr for her actions and I hope she laughs in the face of her church trial (religious trial in Massachusetts you say?).

The biggest problem with organized religion is the "organized" part.
08:12 PM on 08/27/2010
Some churches may and do make that decision, especially in a congregationalist-type system where each church essentially governs itself while remaining loosely affiliated with a national body. In my own congregationalist denomination, there are a wide variety of beliefs on gay marriage. My church has performed both gay marriages (when legal in CA) and commitment ceremonies, but in my view the couple is married, period. The law says differently, of course. And my more conservative brothers and sisters from different areas of the country have had been opposed to gay marriage. And there's all views in-between.

Kudos to Rev. Spahr. It's hard going against a presbytery, I suspect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
09:31 AM on 08/26/2010
Jane Spahr, like the people who challenged Prop 8 in California, and the couple in Wyoming who are suing to overturn that state's homophobic marriage laws, knows that forcing change on the gay marriage issue is probably the only way to keep the issue being discussed. And as long as it is still on the table, the better the opportunities for winning over hearts and minds to the cause of love. Forcing the homophobes to out themselves as bigots shows the world the ugly insanity of hate and the beauty of love, no matter what its sexual orientation.