More

New Jobless Claims Fall For First Time In 4 Weeks

ALAN ZIBEL and CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER   08/26/10 10:10 PM ET   AP

Jobless Claims

WASHINGTON — The jobs crisis is putting more Americans at risk of losing their homes.

One in 10 households has missed at least one mortgage payment, and more than 2 million homes have been repossessed since the recession began. Few expect the outlook to improve until companies start to hire steadily again and layoffs ease.

And while there was some good news Thursday – a modest decrease in the number of Americans filing for jobless benefits for the first time in a month – the figure is still too high to bring down the unemployment rate.

So the housing crisis goes on, even though the average rate on a 30-year mortgage fell again this week to an all-time low of 4.36 percent.

"Ultimately, the housing story, whether it is delinquencies, homes sales or housing starts, is an employment story," said Jay Brinkmann, the top economist for the Mortgage Bankers Association.

It's just one of the problems confronting Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke as he speaks Friday at a closely watched conference in Jackson Hole, Wyo. The Fed has mostly exhausted its ammo to give the economy a jolt.

Just under 10 percent of homeowners are delinquent on at least one mortgage payment as of June 30, according to a quarterly report on delinquencies released by Brinkmann's trade group. That's more than double the level before the recession.

The percentage of mortgage borrowers receiving foreclosure notices did fall slightly from the previous quarter, the first drop in four years. And the percentage of loans receiving their first notice of foreclosure also dipped.

But many experts say the situation is getting worse. July was the worst month on record for new home sales and the worst in 15 years for sales of previously occupied homes.

The supply of unsold homes on the market keeps getting bigger. At the same time, the growing number of foreclosures keeps pushing down home prices and scaring potential buyers and sellers from the market.

More than 2.3 million homes have been repossessed by lenders since the recession began in December 2007, according to foreclosure listing service RealtyTrac Inc. And 6 million more will be lost to foreclosure over the next three years, by some estimates.

If that happens, home prices will probably sink further, and the economy will suffer. Builders will keep construction to a minimum, and Americans will be less willing to spend because of their lost home values.

"Housing is certainly not going to help the recovery," said Michelle Meyer, a Bank of America economist. "It threatens to hinder it."

A major problem is that many people have homes that are now worth less than they owe on their mortgages. Approximately 11 million homeowners, or 23 percent of those with a mortgage, were "underwater" as of the end of June, real estate data provider CoreLogic reported Thursday. Nevada had the highest number of any state, with 68 percent.

The number of "underwater" mortgages was down from the previous quarter – but only because homes are being repossessed by lenders.

The number of Americans missing payments and falling into foreclosure has gone up along with unemployment. The jobless rate has remained near double digits all year.

First-time requests for unemployment benefits fell last week to a seasonally adjusted 473,000. It was the first decline in a month and came one week after the number hit the half-million mark – the highest level in nine months.

Even with last week's decline, though, the four-week average in unemployment claims, which evens out the week-to-week volatility, rose to 486,750, the most since November 2009. In a healthy economy that number is more like 400,000.

Losing a job or having health problems that lead to high medical bills are among the reasons many people fall behind in their mortgage payments.

Toni Cloyd experienced both and fell behind twice on her monthly mortgage payment of $2,200 – first in 2006 after undergoing surgery and again in 2008 after she lost a job and was out of work for six months.

The Denver woman says she tried to catch up. She enrolled in the Obama administration's main program to help homeowners at risk of foreclosure by lowering their monthly payments. She says she made payments that were never applied, and the bank is still demanding $98,000 in missed payments, lawyer's bills and late fees.

Bank of America says she never provided proper documents and was not approved for the mortgage modification.

The end result came earlier this month. She pulled into the driveway and was embarrassed to find a foreclosure notice tacked to her door.

"It makes us appear to be deadbeats," she said. "We've done everything that we possibly could to resolve this."

Like Cloyd, nearly half of the 1.3 million homeowners who have enrolled in Obama administration program have been cut loose through July, the Treasury Department said last week. The program is intended to help those at risk of foreclosure by lowering their monthly mortgage payments.

___

AP Real Estate Writers J.W. Elphinstone in New York and Alex Veiga in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The jobs crisis is putting more Americans at risk of losing their homes. One in 10 households has missed at least one mortgage payment, and more than 2 million homes have been reposs...
WASHINGTON — The jobs crisis is putting more Americans at risk of losing their homes. One in 10 households has missed at least one mortgage payment, and more than 2 million homes have been reposs...
Filed by Nate C. Hindman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mondayboy
Rebel with a cause
07:26 AM on 08/28/2010
What is Chris Rock doing at an IT job fair?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:46 PM on 08/27/2010
How come it is only Breaking News and on the Main when claims go UP ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
12:03 PM on 08/27/2010
The Great Depression ended when the U.S. mobilized to fight the Second World War. Unemployment fell to 2%.

This Second Great Depression can end by mobilizing to supersede fossil fuels in time to avoid what may be life threatening Global Warming.

See the analysis pro and con concerning the threat of a possible climate Tipping Point at http://www.aesopinstitute.org

If, as I suspect, the problem proves to be real, we need a worldwide effort to leave fossil fuels behind much faster than conventional wisdom would believe is possible.

It can be done! Revolutionary breakthrough technologies are being born. They can supplement those truly effective carbon free systems already available.

Although presently difficult for those with scientific or engineering background to take seriously, remarkable out-of-the-box technologies will be validated by independent laboratories.

A few months after Pearl Harbor was attacked, Ford completed a bomber every 59 minutes at the Willow Run factory

That same kind of enthusiastic 24/7 effort can produce surprising results and dramatically reduce unemployment.

It will inherently necessitate and produce the missing additional economic stimulus.

Ironically, this approach will have found a way to regain real economic health that, once the threat is widely understood, can enjoy bold White House and Congressional support.

Insuring reasonable odds for the survival of our children and grandchildren has the potential to provide an emotional force that will surely drive widespread latent leadership.

There is a huge job waiting. We might want to get busy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DebtNavigation
Attorney and Author
10:06 AM on 08/27/2010
These numbers are being cooked by massively dumping claims at the unemployment offices. As one of my correspondents put it in a text message: "Remind me to tell you I witnessed @ Unemployment "dropping folks like flies"! Result? Watch this report #s rise for more political spin about recovering economy."

I'm crossing into Godwin's law territory here, but I have to say Goebbels would be admiring this stuff.
07:20 PM on 08/26/2010
America's just a market now.

An easy target, fertile ground for multinational corporations.
09:09 PM on 08/26/2010
A casino you mean
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Breslin
This is not rocket science.
05:36 PM on 09/16/2010
The big difference being, casinos make money.
06:37 PM on 08/26/2010
It seems to me that alot of people have given up trying! I personally see no new jobs anywhere.
05:11 PM on 08/26/2010
And are jobs still being outsourced? Goodbye America. It was fun.
02:47 PM on 08/26/2010
You know President Obama is in deep trouble when Silicon Valley turns against him. Intel’s chief, Paul Otellini, made some brutal observations about what the misguided economic policies of this administration have done to our economy. Speaking in Aspen, Colo. this week, here’s the crux of what he said about the President’s economic advisors:

Otellini: “I think this group does not understand what it takes to create jobs. And I think they’re flummoxed by their experiment in Keynesian economics not working.”

What’s really shocking about Mr. Otellini publicly bashing the President’s policies is that for 20 years Silicon Valley has been leaning solidly Democratic. Presidents Clinton and Obama relied a lot on their West Coast friends for money and electoral support. But that’s changing now that Silicon Valley sees its market share shrinking and is dealing with thousands of new regulations and taxes that are killing the entrepreneurial spirit.
06:06 PM on 08/26/2010
"leaning solidly Democratic" Do you mean...
How they vote for Presidents? What the CEOs and leadership of the businesses say? How they vote for their Governor? Could you clarify?

Another point. Are the Silicon Valley still outsourcing jobs?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Social Construct
Go left, young man.
06:46 PM on 08/26/2010
That statement shows what is a very big part of the problem with contemporary corporate capitalist thinking: Short-sighted, poor understanding and greed-based thinking. It is analogous to being involved in a thirty year war, pointing to the private soldier shooting at you and blaming that sole individual as the cause of the entire conflict. What a sad state of affairs we are in when our business leaders use such reasoning. Corporate capitalists, such as the one used in the above example, see an unsustainable ideal as no corporate taxes and everyone working for minimum wage.
02:35 PM on 08/26/2010
AND????

This just means those folks were dumped off the roster of the unemployed… not that they got jobs… just no longer getting unemployment checks!

Thanks to the lack of a TIER~5 extension!

Also; Don't feed into this bull~pucky about the adjustment to unemployment via the agricultural "seasonal" employment!
Any one that has traded in commodities, or worked on a farm, knows we are a month, to two months out from harvest time... and that most of the work is done by illegals that are not on the unemployment rosters!
More lies to try and get you to invest... in a market that is dead and dying daily!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anna Lopez2774
02:18 PM on 08/26/2010
i hope this is good sign and sustains, i desperately need some positive economic and political news for the greater good.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
don52
01:14 PM on 08/26/2010
For one week it fell 1.5%, that is real encouraging. I see stock market has rebounded on such encouraging news. Over the month employers are not only hiring, but are laying people off. The extension just added 2.2 million people to the rolls. The extension last through the end of November, but that is a false. They don't pay by weeks but by allotted dollars. Many people will be back off the rolls starting in September. Then our 10 million receiving unemployment checks will begin to drop. We then have reason to be optimistic. I'm sure the markets will go up. On the other hand if the 10 million receiving unemployment checks does not drop then we will know for sure that more people are losing jobs. The government definitely needs to be tracking those that are unemployed and have run out of benefits. Maybe its better not to know for sure how bad it is. Lets hang on that 1.5%
10:21 AM on 08/26/2010
Easy to do if you don't fund unemployment benefits. There are no jobs. The only reason why this maybe good is if people were getting jobs. They are not. More people are losing them and the economy is getting worse. If the things were reversed and the Dems screwed up the economy and Repubs were in office, the Repubs would spend more money without hesitation.
11:07 AM on 08/26/2010
Eight years of Republican control yielded zero job growth. Factor in those entering the labor force those eight years, and your claim splats on the concrete with the force of vomit. Members of the Party of Corporate Welfare, like yourself, are truly disgusting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mbo2
12:40 PM on 08/26/2010
Uh, the Dems took control of Congress in 2007. And the economy tanked right afterwards.
02:51 PM on 08/26/2010
Plus when did the DEMS start attacking the economy verbally - 2006 to get elected. They started in word and completed it in deed.....
10:13 PM on 08/26/2010
Exactly right which is why no matter what I will never vote GOP never...they stood by and watched the country fail in order improve their political situation...they are the s cum of the earth.
10:05 AM on 08/26/2010
New claims would mean those people would need to be actively looking for work, and that they have not exhausted their benefits, and that they believe the active looking is not in vain.

What always does happen with these numbers is that each week the ones reported previously get changed to show the real numbers. The government always reports numbers that are too optimistic and hope nobody notices the revisions.

We should be reporting the true jobs picture that includes many that have hobbled together a couple jobs to make one full-time job. So what constitutes somebody working? So if you had a 50,000 yr job and replaced it with a 20,000 year job, because that is all there was, it is disingenuous to say this person is working again in the sense this person is living the same life prior to the recession.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DD2005
10:02 AM on 08/26/2010
I find it creepy when media outlets applaud these jobless claims that effectively confirm that the equivalent of another small city is now out of work. Perhaps we should save the party hats and noise makers until we finally get job creation.
09:40 AM on 08/26/2010
So what is the reason for this change. Was it that a lot of people found jobs, or that the people drawing unemployment ran out of their allotment.